iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dark Matter Particles Collide Frequently With Atoms In Human Bodies, Study Suggests

Posted: 04/29/2012 11:39 am Updated: 04/29/2012 11:39 am

By: Charles Q. Choi
Published: 04/27/2012 03:59 PM EDT on SPACE.com

Invisible dark matter particles may regularly pass through our bodies, and dozens to thousands of these particles may be colliding with atoms inside us every year, according to a new calculation.

However, radiation from these impacts is unlikely to cause cancer, investigators added.

Dark matter is one of the greatest scientific mysteries of our time — an invisible substance thought to make up five-sixths of all matter in the universe. Scientists think it might be composed of things called weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs, that interact normally with gravity but very weakly with all the other known forces of the universe.

Its ghostly nature makes it exceedingly difficult to directly prove whether dark matter really exists or what its properties really are. Dark matter is largely thought to be intangible, its presence detectable only via the gravitational pull it exerts.

Still, although dark matter particles are thought to interact only very rarely with normal matter, Earth and everything on it should be hurtling through a dense sea of dark matter, with billions of these particles rushing through us every second. Though the large majority of these particles would pass straight through us without hitting any of the atoms that make up our bodies, a few collisions would be likely. And the aftermath of such impacts could shed light on dark matter's nature. [Gallery: Dark Matter Throughout the Universe]

Scientists calculated how many times dark matter particles ought to collide with atomic nuclei in adult-size bodies — lumps of flesh about 154 pounds (70 kilograms) in mass largely composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen.

Dark matter should most often collide with the hydrogen and oxygen nuclei in the body — the former makes up 60 percent of the atoms in the body, while the latter makes up about 60 percent of the mass of the body. Given the most common assumptions regarding what dark matter is, roughly 35 impacts between dark matter particles and atoms in your body should happen annually.

However, if the latest models are correct and dark matter interactions are more common than previously thought, there might be about 100,000 collisions annually for each human on the planet.

"Before we did these calculations, I had been under the impression that on the average, one WIMP would hit one of the nuclei in a human body in about 100 years. In fact I used to joke about the 'WIMP death theory,'" said researcher Katherine Freese, a theoretical physicist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. "Instead, it turns out that the number of WIMP interactions would be so much more frequent — as many as one per minute."

Though recent research has suggested that our corner of the universe is actually not bathed in dark matter, Freese did not find this work compelling. "The stars they looked at are 1.5 to 4 kiloparsecs (4,892 to 13,046 light years) below the galactic plane — nowhere near the sun," Freese said. "I wouldn't trust their extrapolation to the solar neighborhood, which relies on a lot of assumptions."

The researchers also calculated whether the energy released from dark matter-human body impacts might cause cancer.

"We discovered that WIMPs are harmless to the human body," Freese said.

"WIMPs are clearly a source of radiation, and their collisions could in principle be dangerous to humans," Freese said. However, "we discovered that the answer is no. Other naturally occurring sources of radiation, from radon and cosmic rays, are a much larger problem for us. This is not unexpected, since WIMPs only interact via weak interactions, whereas cosmic rays are charged particles and thus have electromagnetic interactions, which are much more common and exchange more energy."

Freese and her colleague Christopher Savage plan to submit their findings to the journal Physical Review Letters.

Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

Filed by Melissa Cronin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 95
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geldsmaggen
DOWN WITH DUOPOLY!
02:18 PM on 12/30/2012
Since dark matter is supposed to be related to gravity could it be that without getting hit by dark matter we'd float off into space? Maybe dark matter=gravitons?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geldsmaggen
DOWN WITH DUOPOLY!
02:15 PM on 12/30/2012
Could dark matter be part of the structure of a human being in any way rather than just passing through?
12:48 PM on 05/02/2012
why do we believe this crap I hate physics its useless (accept those who are in the chem related industry) too much energy used in physics and too much time dealing with maths that are probable to the obscenely missing reality that is NATURE! learn from it physicists
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mynamesyow
Scientist, Gonzo, Champion of the Poor
02:12 PM on 05/01/2012
Contrast this small scale article with this large scale experimental results released last week that seriously call Dark Matter into question.

Quote: The most accurate study so far of the motions of stars in the Milky Way has found no evidence for dark matter in a large volume around the Sun. According to widely accepted theories, the solar neighbourhood was expected to be filled with dark matter, a mysterious invisible substance that can only be detected indirectly by the gravitational force it exerts. But a new study by a team of astronomers in Chile has found that these theories just do not fit the observational facts. This may mean that attempts to directly detect dark matter particles on Earth are unlikely to be successful

LINK: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120418111923.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Rochon
Trying to fly under the radar
10:34 PM on 04/30/2012
If dark matter exists, where does it fir in the standard model?
photo
TakeSake
The United States for All Americans
12:49 PM on 04/30/2012
It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together.
04:30 PM on 05/01/2012
Yep... being fed on by midi-chlorians wearing tiny Jedi robes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
11:14 AM on 04/30/2012
Move on. Nothing to see here. This "stuff," if it actually exists, passes through everything and has been doing so from time immemorial.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:02 AM on 04/30/2012
considering the basic foundations of the research process have been brought into question,
(relativity and particle acceleration), wouldn't it make sense to confirm the observation process in order to more clearly understand the reactions to what we can't see.
we see what we understand to exist, not always what exists.
for instance some see my questioning of the process as disbelief in the process, and some can't see the forest through the trees.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogstomper2
Secular conservative
01:41 AM on 04/30/2012
"WIMPs are clearly a source of radiation, and their collisions could in principle be dangerous to humans,"

Oh, great. Here come the anti-dark-matter hats and skin creams and diet books and crystals. I'd get in on that market myself, but I still need to use the mirror sometimes...
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:02 AM on 04/30/2012
That's not necessarily the case.

The decay/interaction/annihilation rate of WIMPs are all unknown, just limited from above.

The rate is certainly lower than for cosmic ray muons, although they don't deposit energy uniformly through the body.

Whatever the rate is, there's absolutely nothing that can be done about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:47 PM on 04/30/2012
He's talking about public perception and hucksters making a buck.
10:33 PM on 04/29/2012
Given how very difficult it has been to detect dark matter with extremely sensitive detectors, I think they're being rather silly. Maybe they actually believe that Italian result that no one can reproduce ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
11:02 PM on 04/29/2012
Yeah, it is a mystery. I don't know if there is broad consensus on this but I've been quoting NASA as suggesting that our own galaxy is 90% dark matter. If that is true, I wonder how it is distributed throughout the galaxy. I wonder if it is all around us (my general assumption) or distributed in some uneven way that makes it more absent here. If we could figure out how the 90% is approximately distributed, that might help us with the search. Very interesting stuff.
11:17 PM on 04/29/2012
The dark matter should be distributed smoothly -- concentrated toward the center fo the Galaxy, perhaps, but not all lumpy. There's no direct evidence for this, but in clusters of galaxies it's possible to infer the outlines of the dark matter distribution from gravitational lensing, and the dark matter is distributed very symmetrically. That implies that it's not collisional or dissipative, which would in turn suggest that it should be distributed smoothly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
11:07 PM on 04/29/2012
BTW -- I responded to you because I think I saw that you are an experienced physicist. I'm certainly not.
11:18 PM on 04/29/2012
Thanks -- yes, I have a background in astronomy and astrophysics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:12 PM on 04/29/2012
.. too much coffee . . .trigger posting! LOl
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:11 PM on 04/29/2012
Rats! 2nd time today. . . sorry for the typos! =/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 PM on 04/29/2012
OK . .who's laughing at the folks in tinfoil hats NOW? LOL ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Killermolls44
The night is dark and full of terrors.
02:35 AM on 04/30/2012
Scientists believe that, not all. Not conspiracy nuts. I don't think they could comprehend such information.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 PM on 04/30/2012
Yes, their hats prevent thought from escaping as well as preventing facts coming in! It was justv some gentle teasing, not serious! LOL Nice to meet you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rkilburn81
Advocating Logic AND Belief for a new Renaissance.
10:07 PM on 04/29/2012
In order for the outer arms of the whirlpool galaxies to spin as fast as they do we need about 85% more mass than we can percieve to exist in the universe.
So, in order to explain why the equation does't work out, we need an invisible, intangible, and immaterial particle of matter with a lot of mass to exist, and we need a lot of it.

So... to prove a materialistic reality you have to invent an immaterial particle?

Don't let your head explode yet, I havent even gotten to Dark Energy...
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:05 AM on 04/30/2012
Not just `whirlpool galaxies', but all galaxies. In fact, the ratio of dark matter increases into elliptical galaxies, and increases further to clusters of galaxies.

Or you go for a modified gravity, weaker at low accelerations, which is perhaps less philosophically attractive.

When coconuts washed ashore in northern europe in 1400, it was perhaps sensible to posit the existence of a tropical new world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rkilburn81
Advocating Logic AND Belief for a new Renaissance.
03:58 AM on 04/30/2012
We recently found out that matter drags the space/time around it.

As the mass of a galaxy spins, would it not drag the space around it, all the while pulling the matter in that space which itself pulls more space... that coupled with the void and vacuum of space is there any need for dark matter?

What is this fabric of space/time?
As a fish cant see the water through which it swims, and people cant see the air which we breath, perhaps space/time is a lattice constructed of some-thing that is well beyond our perception?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mynamesyow
Scientist, Gonzo, Champion of the Poor
02:15 PM on 05/01/2012
This study released last week actually backs you up

LINK: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120418111923.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:51 PM on 04/29/2012
"Dark matter is one of the greatest scientific mysteries of our time — an invisible substance thought to make up five-sixths of all matter in the universe."

NASA estimates that over 90% of our galaxy is dark matter. Might we be in a sea of dark matter?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:10 PM on 04/29/2012
JUts tp be devil's advocate here. . how is beleiving in this "mystery" make scinetist any differenet in this regard that those who believe in another mysterious invisible substance. . . the soulo? Just asking. . .;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
10:43 PM on 04/29/2012
Since I'm a Jesus enthusiast, I'm probably the wrong person to ask. :)

Empirical evidence for multiverses, dark energy, and the substance of dark matter is elusive. I enjoy pondering these mysteries though. Dark matter does help explain the apparent gravity acting on our galaxy and other entities in the universe (e.g., light curvature).

But that doesn't skake my faith in Jesus.
11:57 AM on 04/30/2012
Notwithstanding the somewhat poetic context attempted by the article, there is no issue of "belief" and there is nothing mystical here. Observations of luminous matter are inconsistent with rotation curves. WIMPs are one hypothesis to explain the inconsistency, which will either become stronger or be abandoned as better experimental tests of the hypothesis are developed.

If there are specific testable hypotheses to demonstrate the existence of a soul, I'm all ears.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:07 AM on 04/30/2012
We are in a sea of dark matter, but the density of normal matter is hugely higher than typical here. Rather than a few atoms per cubic centimeter like the average for the universe, we have about 10 to the 23. The density of dark matter is thus very low around here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
10:42 AM on 04/30/2012
This is something I found over the weekend. At our distance from the center of the galaxy, I think many scientists believe that the ratio of matter to dark matter is about 1 to 1.

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/04/has-dark-matter-gone-missing.html
"According to standard cosmology, we should be swimming in dark matter."
"In fact, the speed with which the sun goes around the center of our galaxy suggests that dark matter ought to be about as abundant as ordinary matter at our distance from the galactic center, about 27,000 light-years."

Of course, the link shows that there is disagreement on that.