iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Marines Leave Okinawa: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island (VIDEO)

By ROBERT BURNS 04/26/12 11:25 PM ET AP

WASHINGTON — About 9,000 U.S. Marines stationed on the Japanese island of Okinawa will be moved to the U.S. territory of Guam and other locations in the Asia-Pacific, including Hawaii, under a U.S.-Japan agreement announced Thursday.

The move is part of a broader arrangement designed to tamp down tensions in the U.S.-Japan defense alliance stemming in part from opposition in Okinawa to what many view as a burdensome U.S. military presence.

It also reflects a desire by the Obama administration to spread U.S. forces more widely in the Asia-Pacific region as part of a rebalancing of U.S. defense priorities in the aftermath of a decade of war in the greater Middle East.

The agreement was outlined in a joint statement issued Thursday night by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and their Japanese counterparts.

Citing an "increasingly uncertain security environment" in the Asia-Pacific region, they said their agreement was intended to maintain a robust U.S. military presence to ensure the defense of Japan.

"Japan is not just a close ally, but also a close friend," Panetta said in a separate comment. "And I look forward to deepening that friendship and strengthening our partnership as, together, we address security challenges in the region."

The joint statement made no mention of a timetable for moving the approximately 9,000 Marines off of Okinawa. It said it would happen "when appropriate facilities are available to receive them" on Guam and elsewhere.

Under the new agreement, about 10,000 Marines will remain on Okinawa, which has been a key element of the U.S. military presence in Asia for decades. The U.S. also has a substantial Air Force presence on Okinawa.

"I think we have made some progress and this plan offers specific and forward-looking action," said Japan's Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba, who added that Japan wanted to "reduce the burden on Okinawa."

Japan, including Okinawa, is a linchpin of U.S. strategy for deterring aggression in the region and for reinforcing the Korean peninsula in the event North Korea attacked South Korea.

The Obama administration believes the new agreement with Japan will make the alliance more sustainable, while also giving the Marines more regional flexibility.

Between 4,700 and 5,000 Marines will relocate from Okinawa to Guam, according to a U.S. defense official who briefed reporters on some of the details before the agreement was official announced in Tokyo and Washington.

The remainder of the 9,000 who are to relocate from Okinawa will move to Hawaii or be part of a rotational presence in Australia and elsewhere in the region, the official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was previewing the official announcement.

The official would not say how many would be moved to Hawaii. Earlier this week, Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he expects around 2,700 Marines will be shifted there.

Of the $8.6 billion estimated cost of relocating Marines to Guam, Japan agreed to pay $3.1 billion, the official said. The total cost includes an unspecified amount for possible construction of new training ranges in the Northern Mariana Islands that could be used jointly by U.S. and Japanese forces, he said.

The agreement also calls for a phased return to Japanese control of certain parcels of land on Okinawa now used by the American military.

The shift of Marines from Okinawa to Guam has been in limbo for years because it was linked to the closure and replacement of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma. Okinawans fiercely oppose Futenma and believe the base should simply be closed and moved overseas or elsewhere in Japan. The U.S., however, has insisted that Japan find a Futenma replacement on Okinawa.

That issue remains unresolved.

Although many Okinawans welcome the reduction of troops, they believe their main island still has too many bases on it, and say the military presence causes congestion, leads to military-related crime and increases the possibility of civilians who live near the facilities being injured in accidents such as helicopter or aircraft crashes.

The whole dispute over the U.S. military presence on Okinawa has its roots in the 1995 kidnapping and rape of a schoolgirl by three American servicemen. Top U.S. government officials publicly apologized for the crime, but tensions continued to grow despite a strong desire by Tokyo and Washington to maintain their historically close military and political alliance.

The accord was timed for completion and public announcement before Japanese Prime Minster Yoshihiko Noda's scheduled visit to Washington on Monday for talks with President Barack Obama.

___

Associated Press writer Eric Talmadge contributed to this report from Tokyo.

Loading Slideshow...
  • South Korea And U.S. Marines Conduct Landing Exercise

    U.S. Marine soldiers from 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Battalion landing team deployed from Okinawa, Japan, participate in the U.S. and South Korean Marines joint landing operation at Pohang seashore on March 29, 2012, in Pohang, South Korea. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

  • South Korea And U.S. Marines Conduct Landing Exercise

    U.S. Marine soldiers from 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Battalion landing team deployed from Okinawa, Japan, participate in the U.S. and South Korean Marines joint landing operation at Pohang seashore on March 29, 2012, in Pohang, South Korea. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

  • South Korea And U.S. Marines Conduct Landing Exercise

    U.S. Marine soldiers from 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Battalion landing team deployed from Okinawa, Japan, participate in the U.S. and South Korean Marines joint landing operation at Pohang seashore on March 29, 2012, in Pohang, South Korea. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

  • South Korea And U.S. Marines Conduct Landing Exercise

    U.S. Marine soldiers from 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Battalion landing team deployed from Okinawa, Japan, participate in the U.S. and South Korean Marines joint landing operation at Pohang seashore on March 29, 2012, in Pohang, South Korea. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

  • South Korea And U.S. Marines Conduct Landing Exercise

    U.S. Marine soldiers from 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Battalion landing team deployed from Okinawa, Japan, exit an Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAV) during the U.S. and South Korean Marines joint landing operation at Pohang seashore on March 29, 2012, in Pohang, South Korea. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

  • Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda

    Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda is greeted by US military staffs upon his arrival at the Futenma US air base at Ginowan city in Japan's southern island of Okinawa on February 27, 2012. (STR/AFP/Getty Images)

FOLLOW WORLD

WASHINGTON — About 9,000 U.S. Marines stationed on the Japanese island of Okinawa will be moved to the U.S. territory of Guam and other locations in the Asia-Pacific, including Hawaii, under a U...
WASHINGTON — About 9,000 U.S. Marines stationed on the Japanese island of Okinawa will be moved to the U.S. territory of Guam and other locations in the Asia-Pacific, including Hawaii, under a U...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,084
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Montana
04:51 PM on 04/30/2012
When the US military is sent to any foreign nation, we absolutely refuse to leave. WWII ended in 1945 yet the US still maintains large bases in Germany and Japan with no intention of drawing them down, hacking the bloated and enormously disproportionate US military spending, and allowing sovereignty for these countries. Okinawan people certainly don't want the bases there, it's long been a point of loud protest for decades and it defies common sense.

The excuse I hear is "strategic advantage" but occupying anywhere with a military base would count as an advantage. With that logic, having a military base in virtually every nation on Earth in every key region in existence would be a "strategic advantage". It doesn't mean we should maintain them. Compare our military spending to any other nation on the planet - none exists in the same galaxy of comparison. The numbers are absurd and this country has been bankrupting itself, pulling the rug from under the working-class and middle-class, to pour our GDP in maintaining a global military presence that's unnecessary and makes no sense.
REDSTATEREFUGEE
Texan by birth ; Californian by choice
07:19 PM on 04/30/2012
X 161 , Nick......You said everything I wanted to state, but better.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
King7David
Hoo Yah!!!!!!!
02:00 AM on 05/03/2012
A voice of reason, thanks Nick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timbeaux
Novelist, anti-professional politicians, liberal l
12:14 AM on 04/30/2012
The Japanese don't want us there. We should leave. Oh, and how would we react if China, for example built a military base in, say North Korea? Or one of the contested Spratley Islands? What are we doing on Okinawa in the first place other than pissing off the Okinawans?
10:51 AM on 04/29/2012
And it is about time!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 AM on 04/29/2012
I was in Okinawa in the 50s, before it was Japan. Actually I was stationed in several places in the Far East. It was a beautiful little island. But the Okinawan people were the most friendly and gracious people I've ever met. I'm sure our presence helped change that over the years
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
res ad triarios venit
09:41 AM on 04/29/2012
What doesn't get talked about is the horrible hate crime that proved the catalyst, three men whose idea of chillin with the locals was to abduct and sexually assault a 12 year old Okinawa girl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Montana
04:54 PM on 04/30/2012
That's talked about and very well-known in Japan because it was the incident that directly pushed to establish the policy of US military personnel being under the jurisdiction of Japanese law and prosecution if they commit crimes off-base. It wasn't a "hate crime" either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
King7David
Hoo Yah!!!!!!!
02:02 AM on 05/03/2012
That's only one incident, believe me there were plenty more not mentioned here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pines15
09:31 AM on 04/29/2012
that's good now EVERYBODY,EVERYBODY,EVERYBODY out of Iraq,and Afghan.
02:07 AM on 04/29/2012
Indigenous Chamorro's really don't want them in Guam either.
photo
hot lava
soft rocks
02:45 PM on 04/29/2012
The battles in Guam during WWII plus the military presence there has irreparably and negatively impacted the culture there. The US Military, of course, has appropriated the most beautiful parts of the island, During the Japanese occupation and ensuing liberation, tens of thousands of Chamorros lost their lives and cities were completely destroyed. Now, after 60 years of trying to reconstruct their cities and culture, they are to be invaded again.
06:57 PM on 04/29/2012
Hafa Adai.

I made that comment because I once lived there.

Am completely aware, but it is good you provided further info for those that may not know the story or the fact that Guam was attacked 4 hours after Pearl Harbor and was occupied by Japan until 1944.

I am haole, so never Chamorro, but Guamanian yes.

Proud to fan you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alan Duncan
12:52 AM on 04/29/2012
I loved Okinawa. I was in a small village in 1964 and went into a bar where there was only one guy at the plank. 6000 miles from home and the guy was another sailor from S.F. We were 5th grade classmates. SMALL WORLD.
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
12:17 AM on 04/29/2012
Beautiful island but small. WWII has been over for half a century and Japan is one of our staunchest allies. Pull our service members back to Guam (a US territory) so our base fees stay in America, let the Okinawans own their island save for an air force base.
10:55 PM on 04/28/2012
Bring them home and give Okinawa back to the Okinawans. No patriotic US resident would tolerate a foreign military presence in this country. Why should we expect the Okinawans to tolerate us occupying their island?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sergeant2
Proud Marine, Proud Papa, Proud Grandpapa, Proud D
10:26 PM on 04/28/2012
I don't know about anybody else, but I'm not going to be critical of the United States long presence on Okinawa. Perhaps if Japan had never sent out the order Tora! Tora! Tora! We wouldn't be there in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IMac
08:24 AM on 04/29/2012
It's a beautiful island with people who are sick and tired of the US military raping their children and getting off scott-free. Japan has wanted us gone for decades - and the Japanese people will continue to press for the US to stop their occupation - while the military continues to be polite but make fun of and joke about the Japanese - all the time! As an American, I was ashamed of our military and their "better than thou" attitude in Okinawa!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shipfixr
I feel very strongly on BOTH sides of the issue..
06:06 PM on 04/29/2012
You really don't know what you're talking about. First, the biggest mistake we ever made was turning those islands back over to Japan along with the Ryukyu Islands.....the Okinawans resented that very much.... Many people, and obviously you're one of them, think that the Okinawa Islands are traditional Japanese territory.....actually, Japan annexed the islands in the mid-19th century and treated the people as serfs....just as they did with the Koreans and Taiwanese. Prior to our giving Japan sway over them, I never recall the natives of Okinawa raising any sand to get the Americans out.....that started when the Japanese took over. I'm sorry you are so ashamed of our military.....there's a few others here on this thread you should meet.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sergeant2
Proud Marine, Proud Papa, Proud Grandpapa, Proud D
10:04 PM on 04/28/2012
Spent the entire year of 1971 in Okinawa while in the Marines, quite an experience for a 19 year old. It was common to see ox pulled carts along the roads. I loved Okinawa and I loved the people. Like any country, if you respect their culture and customs, they will show their appreciation by treating you with respect and kindness. I can see why many Military personnel would want to live there after retiring from the Military. In 1971 talks of returning Okinawa back to Japan were all ready in the air. Back then many Okinawans were concerned of how they would be treated by the Japanese. I was told the Japanese looked down on Okinawans like they were 2nd or 3rd class citizens. I don't know if those fears were unfounded or not. I know back then a lot of the locals worked at the Bases, I don't know what the job situation is now, but I hope their not cutting off their nose to spite their face.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shipfixr
I feel very strongly on BOTH sides of the issue..
06:14 PM on 04/29/2012
It's Japanese noses that are being cut off....the actual people of Okinawa who many people think ARE Japanese, would have been happy if we'd never left. Why we turned those folks back to the people who enslaved them for so many years is far beyond my ability to understand.
shylove2
warfare state is pathological
08:42 PM on 04/28/2012
I think Okinawa and Japan will still be overflowing with numerous bases. Now our colonial territory of Guam will just be a bit more crowded but our big sticks won't show quite as much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
osofar
America once was exceptional, and could be again,
08:14 PM on 04/28/2012
How many Japanese soldiers are stationed in Hawaii, and the US Virgin Islands? Like all countries we "help", the US has long overstayed its conquest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiebag
Big, Bold, Brassy
08:56 AM on 04/29/2012
The US had to be there because Japan can not be trusted, same for Germany. USA love it or leave it.
photo
fredrdr
Let us dare to read, think, speak and write.
02:48 PM on 04/29/2012
Review history, current events, then comment.
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
11:15 AM on 04/30/2012
Yeah, who knows when the Fuhrer and Tojo will rise from the grave and resume WW II.

The far right: always has to have an enemy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shipfixr
I feel very strongly on BOTH sides of the issue..
06:22 PM on 04/29/2012
Well, had they won WWII, I'm sure there would be a lot of Japanese soldiers stationed in Hawaii. Okinawa was taken away from Japan during the war but, many people are not aware that Okinawa and it's island group were only annexed by Japan in the mid 19th century and the people were treated very poorly....same for Korea and Taiwan. When I was in Okinawa, the last thing the people there wanted was the return of the Japanese and, for many years, we promised them autonomy......we turned the Islands back to Japan in '72 along with the Ryukyu Islands (which WERE Japan's). My Stepfather was stationed at Kadena AFB from '70 to '73......he and my mother both told us how the people resented that and that the Japanese came back like long lost landlords.