iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Thomas Kemp Execution sparks Debate Over Single-Drug Lethal Injection

Reuters  |  By Posted: 04/27/2012 9:44 am Updated: 04/27/2012 10:11 am

Thomas Kemp
Thomas Kemp, who was executed in Arizona on Wednesday, may have suffered cruel and unusual pain before he died because executioners used a single-drug lethal injection, rather than a three-drug injection, Kemp's lawyer said. Kemp's execution happened the same day a Kentucky judge ordered officials to consider using the single-drug injection for future executions.

(Reuters) - A Kentucky judge ordered state officials to consider using a single drug to carry out executions instead of a series of three drugs used by many states where the death penalty is legal.

The judge's ruling on Wednesday was handed down on the same day that a controversy erupted over the execution of a man in Arizona using a single drug.

Thomas Kemp was put to death in Arizona on Wednesday using the single drug pentobarbital. His lawyer Tim Gabrielsen, who witnessed the execution, said after Kemp had been put to death that the inmate began to "shake violently" after the drug was injected.

In an interview with Reuters on Thursday, Gabrielsen said he was concerned that his client might have suffered cruel and unusual pain before he died. A corrections official who also witnessed the execution disputed Gabrielsen's account.

A handful of the 33 states where capital punishment is legal use a single drug. In addition to Arizona, they are South Dakota, Idaho, Ohio and Washington.

In a ruling issued on Wednesday in Frankfort, Kentucky, Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd gave state officials 90 days to decide whether to adopt rules for carrying out executions with a single drug. Without such action, Shepherd said he would move toward a trial on a lawsuit against the state of Kentucky brought by six inmates on death row.

The judge also gave the state the same period to adopt regulations to guard against executing mentally ill or insane prisoners. The inmates argued that the three-drug execution method violates their Eighth Amendment constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment.

In the three-drug series, pentobarbital or another sedative is administered to put the inmate to sleep before two other drugs are given to paralyze the person and stop the heart.

Death row inmates in several states have challenged this procedure in courts, arguing that if the sedative is not administered properly, the inmate could be subject to cruel and unusual pain before death when the other drugs are injected.

Inmates have argued it would be more humane to inject a massive dose of the sedative to kill the inmate and eliminate the other drugs.

Judge Shepherd said a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing the three-drug method was partly based on the fact that no states were then using a single-drug method and there were no studies that showed it would be an equally effective method.

"Thus, the Supreme Court's affirmation of the three-drug protocol was contingent on the absence of any proven alternative method of lethal injection," Shepherd wrote in his ruling.

But the judge said since then, the five states have approved using a single barbiturate-only procedure and that at least 18 people have been executed in that manner.

The Kentucky ruling, along with actions by a handful of states to switch to single-drug executions, is "giving momentum to the argument that this is a more humane, safer protocol," said Richard Dieter, director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington.

Dieter said a consensus could be building toward a one-drug method as opposed to the three-drug protocol.

A spokeswoman for Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway said on Thursday he would not comment on the ruling until it is reviewed by state officials including the Department of Corrections. Governor Steve Beshear also noted the ruling was under review but declined further comment.

Kentucky last carried out an execution in 2008. The state has executed only three people since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States in 1976.

(Editing By Andrew Stern and Greg McCune)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CRIME

(Reuters) - A Kentucky judge ordered state officials to consider using a single drug to carry out executions instead of a series of three drugs used by many states where the death penalty is legal. ...
(Reuters) - A Kentucky judge ordered state officials to consider using a single drug to carry out executions instead of a series of three drugs used by many states where the death penalty is legal. ...
Filed by Kyle McGovern  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 155
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
01:26 PM on 07/05/2012
so what.i hope he hurt bad he deserved it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Dunn
Can't we all just get along?
08:09 PM on 06/25/2012
Well, I don't know. Did his victims suffer cruel and/or unusual pain ? I am being Sarcastic!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolmance
01:30 AM on 06/13/2012
The only witness who stated he "shook violently" was the executed guy's lawyer. Everyone else who was there said his "hand trembled" for a moment.

Just sayin'.
05:38 PM on 06/05/2012
Who cares if he suffered or not. He wasn't concerned about his victims.Executions take to long.Do like Iraq does 30 days.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:29 PM on 06/01/2012
I'm sure who ever he killed suffered too. So he got what was coming to him.
08:10 AM on 05/22/2012
Kemp, who acted with an accomplice, was sentenced to death in 1993 for snatching Hector Soto Juarez from outside his Tucson apartment, taking him to a mine northwest of the city and forcing him to disrobe. Juarez was shot fatally in the head.

Aw, poor baby Tommy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolmance
01:31 AM on 06/13/2012
The killer also sexually abused the man before he was murdered.
12:00 AM on 05/17/2012
so he suffered cruel and unusual pain...........good......so did his victims......dont give them any mind altering drugs........they deserve the feelings their victims endued............quit mottle cotting these animals..........
04:15 PM on 05/15/2012
I completely agree with the ban against using only a single drug during an execution proceeding. We should ban drugs during these proceedings altogether to ensure the murderer is wide awake, maybe given an extra couple of shots of Red Bull to start with.
12:02 AM on 05/17/2012
i agree.......
photo
William Diaz
Passive-Aggressive word salad tossed here!
08:17 PM on 05/14/2012
I am not a fan of the death penalty by any stretch, but as a scientist that works with rodent models of metabolism, I have sacrificed a fair share of animals using pentobarbitol. Quite often the animals will have muscle motion or shaking as they succumb to the drug, but they are not in pain, it is an involuntary neuro-muscular response to the drug.

Have a great day!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:04 PM on 05/14/2012
There have been various forms of the "Death Penalty" over the years and across the globe. I personally believe an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. How can one say that a person can only be put to death as long as it's not cruel and he/she does not have pain and/or suffering and only if he understands why he is being put to death. Did all of this apply to the people or person that they decided to put to death?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamabn
I Doubt , Therefore I might be
12:08 PM on 05/07/2012
Did this man suffer cruel and unusual punishment ? Two words . " Don't care " .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolmance
01:34 AM on 06/13/2012
You and I and just about everyone commenting here will experience more discomfort when it's our time to eat that dirt sandwich waiting at the end of the road for us all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Dunn
Can't we all just get along?
08:12 PM on 06/25/2012
willimabn...Oh, you said it best...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
evolvedtg
A lie's a lie, even if everyone believes it.
12:22 AM on 05/04/2012
I plan on 'shaking violently' when I kick.
12:03 AM on 05/17/2012
u go.....get it on
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brianna Cole
Which one wins? The one you feed.
07:47 AM on 05/02/2012
If we feel we have the right to kill someone, we should do it in a painless way (or as close to as possible). I completely agree with the death penalty. However, I believe that the less pain the better. Regardless of what the person did. They are already going to die.
09:47 AM on 05/03/2012
How about the victims of this person. Did they suffer or did he offer them an instant and painless death? If one of those victims had been a person you loved would you feel the same? I think not..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brianna Cole
Which one wins? The one you feed.
10:11 AM on 05/03/2012
I would feel the same. I know I would. I would be angry as HECK, but I know in my heart that wishing that the person who hurt my loved ones would suffer is wrong. Please don't try to assume you know me, how I feel, or what I would do. Just because this person may have been an evil, sadistic, child-raping (etc. etc. etc.) murderer, does not mean we are extended the right to torture him as well. I fully support the death penalty, and I believe it is in place for a reason. Someone should be punished for their actions, but who are we to torture them when we have ways to kill them properly? We don't.
photo
William Diaz
Passive-Aggressive word salad tossed here!
08:22 PM on 05/14/2012
That is why we have rules and laws, to prevent our baser instincts and behaviors from coming to the forefront. Being a victim or survivor of a crime doesnt grant you any special dispensation from the law or humane behavior.

Have a great day!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glitterik
Mexico Daydreams ....
04:06 AM on 05/02/2012
Did he suffer? Hope so. Who cares.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SylvreWolfe
08:29 PM on 05/05/2012
I care. I hope he suffered.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lademambro
12:31 AM on 05/02/2012
Well I think he should be killed the same way his victim was killed. How come we have to consider their feelings and not the victims? Wasn't the way he killed cruel and unusual? To bad for him if he felt any pain.