iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Joshua Hersh
GET UPDATES FROM Joshua:

Atta Muhammad Noor, Afghan Governor, Criticizes U.S. Exit Plan

Posted: 04/30/2012 10:50 am Updated: 04/30/2012 11:02 am

Atta Muhammad Noor
Atta Muhammad Noor, who many consider to be the strongest governor in Afghanistan, has been critical of a U.S.-supported plan to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table.

MAZAR-E-SHARIF, Afghanistan -- Atta Muhammad Noor, a former Northern Alliance warlord who many consider to be the strongest governor in Afghanistan, is the kind of longstanding ally American officials would love to comfortably count on as they plan their withdrawal from the decade-old war here.

So it may sting a little to hear Noor lash out about the American exit strategy, and especially the U.S.-supported plan to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table, before a room full of American military officers.

"The current peace process as conducted by our government and by the U.S., with their meetings in Qatar, I don't think it can lead to a good outcome," Noor said last week in a conversation with a small gathering of reporters at his estate in Mazar. The gathering was organized and attended by a half-dozen coalition military officials. "It will be very difficult to sit at the same table with the leaders of the Taliban."

Noor's complaint may not be unexpected -- the idea that ex-Northern Alliance leaders would resist reconciliation talks with their ideological and military arch-enemies, the Taliban, is hardly surprising.

But it also clashes with recent American policy, which has focused on working behind-the-scenes to bring the Taliban back to peace talks. The hope, analysts and officials say, is that if a political balance can be struck between the insurgents and the government of President Hamid Karzai, the U.S. may be able to draw down its military presence by the end of 2014 without precipitating a new round of civil conflict.

If so, the political rebellion of the governors and warlords of the North, many of whom fought side-by-side with American special forces in the 2001 overthrow of the Taliban, could be a deeply complicating circumstance for the U.S. exit plan.

"I share the belief with my father that America’s Afghan strategy is shortsighted and probably based on domestic rather than strategic considerations," wrote Abdul Matin Bek, the son of a recently slain Northern tribal leader, who had fought with the Americans against the Taliban, in a January New York Times op-ed that captured the sentiment. "As Afghans, we rarely understand U.S. policy. One day the U.S. military declares the Taliban the enemy, the next day they’re willing to make peace. Does this policy reflect the realities on the ground? Is it a winning strategy?"

Last week, that disaffection emerged in the form of one of the odder sideshows of Afghan politics, when U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), who had recently met in Germany with several anti-Karzai ex-Northern Alliance officials, was blocked by the government from entering the country.

American officials in Kabul say that while they are not surprised by the anxieties of the Northern Alliance leaders, they still sense broad agreement with their old allies over the long-term benefit of political negotiations.

"We do agree with leaders like Atta that the dialogue has to include all of the stakeholders," said one official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

"Our view is that there is not a purely military solution to the insurgency here; part of the solution has to be political. The reconciliation process is much more serious and active now than it was eight months ago, so we are not surprised to be seeing a lot more Northern Alliance leaders being a lot more vocal about it."

Noor, who has a long history of antagonizing Karzai -- although he recently made a dramatic public appearance at the Presidential Palace -- was not among those at the meeting in Germany. But he said he still shares his fellow Northerners' disenchantment about the American-proposed national reconciliation talks.

"I have the same complaints as they do," he said. "What we want is to preserve the achievements of the past ten years -- to keep the rights of women, the freedom of speech, all of these things we've earned. It will very difficult to sit at the same table with the leaders of the Taliban, because from their form of Islam they only know the way of killing and suicide bombing."

He went on, "I want to include the leaders of the Taliban if they can accept all of our achievements over the past ten years. Then we will welcome them. But the current negotiations just seem to be an opportunity for them to empower themselves, and then afterward they can move on to weapons and fighting."

Analysts say that Noor may have other constituencies in mind as well. Fabrizio Foschini, a researcher with the Kabul-based Afghan Analysts Network, says that Noor has recently been toying with the idea of running for president, and can at least be expected to seek the leadership of his local political party.

"As of now he has more to gain by retaining his northern feud and his business there," said Foschini, who added that for practical reasons Noor is unlikely to take his criticisms of the Americans beyond simply rhetoric.

"U.S. support gives him a strong card to play in the run-up to a presidential election: he could decide to play with his candidacy to raise his stakes in a future power-sharing with the new president," Foschini said.

"He's got some divided loyalties, that's for sure," added Lt. Col. David Olson, a spokesman for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) who helped organize the trip to Mazar. "He's looking out for his regional and ethnic interests. But on balance he's someone we feel we can count on. He's a very influential fellow, and he's very vital to the efforts of the government of Afghanistan up here."

A few days after the interview in Mazar, Noor took another populist stance, telling a gathering of northern governors that while he generally supported the preliminary strategic agreement formed between Karzai's government and the U.S., he would reject any permanent American military bases in the country.

"I have a message to the West and the world community," Noor concluded last week. "The Western countries should not think that through Afghanistan they can threaten China, or Central Asia -- they should not have such an idea. If this is the goal of the West, the Afghans will not accept it, they will not tolerate it. Afghans will stand against anyone who seeks to use us in this way."

FOLLOW WORLD

MAZAR-E-SHARIF, Afghanistan -- Atta Muhammad Noor, a former Northern Alliance warlord who many consider to be the strongest governor in Afghanistan, is the kind of longstanding ally American officials...
MAZAR-E-SHARIF, Afghanistan -- Atta Muhammad Noor, a former Northern Alliance warlord who many consider to be the strongest governor in Afghanistan, is the kind of longstanding ally American officials...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 97
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:37 AM on 05/12/2012
Bye-bye gravy traın.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KJohns
08:19 PM on 05/11/2012
"domestic rather than strategic considerations"...yeah, guy...because, at least in theory, the United States government ought to consider the desires and needs of the people it is supposed to represent, as opposed to winning a futile game of Risk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttsgw
Atheist and secular humanist
11:39 AM on 05/02/2012
But the Americans will have no problems sitting at the same table as the Talibans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
10:23 PM on 05/01/2012
The Taliban aren't just terrorist. They fund their terror group through drug trafficking, kidnap and ransom, etc. Yet their main goal is to implement Islamic law in Afghanistan? They don't sound like devout Muslims to me. They sound like war lords who are appropriating religion to collect power and influence.

I can see the Northern Alliance's point.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:37 AM on 05/01/2012
What the heck - we threw the Sunnis under the bus when we left (sort of left) Iraq, so why should anyone be surprised when we do the same to some of the Afghans? Remember when the US government praised those in Iraq who helped our troops? And they were promised places in the military, in the government and now they are marginalized. If I remember right, they were part of the "Awakening" or some such name.
05:21 AM on 05/01/2012
Remember VietNam? Get ready for that last helicopter...
11:49 PM on 04/30/2012
You can't leave yet, I have got my 500 million and my US visa yet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:18 PM on 04/30/2012
Afghanistan and Iraq are the latest of countries that end up getting addicted to US money. All politicians in these countries know the US will continue to spend by talking about potential disaster if we leave. Don't invade foreign countries without an exit plan. When are we ever going to learn?
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
08:01 AM on 05/01/2012
and don't invade counties that never attacked America
photo
manfrommars
space blogger from afar
05:22 PM on 04/30/2012
Get America out now
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:22 PM on 04/30/2012
What was his position about all the money going into the pockets and bank accounts of Afghan criminals and officials?

We've been bled dry. Our projects have mostly ended up incomplete or unsustained because the Afghan government will not stand up against the bad guys -- and because the government is often the bad guy!

So he may be right about the Taliban.

But what does he want done instead? What can be done? I don't mean tried and failed -- I mean what can we accomplish?
05:20 PM on 04/30/2012
We are committed financially for the next ten years to Afghanistan so all the noise coming from there is just that. Noise.
05:08 PM on 04/30/2012
We have committed ourselves to be in Afghanistan for the next ten years so all this noise is just that 'Noise'. That country will bleed us financially until whenever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
04:57 PM on 04/30/2012
The American people are being "worked" here, sophistry that justifies the irrational continuance of perpetual war, no matter the "humanitarian cause" is the continuance of the financial/economic offensive conducted against the United States. Perpetual War is war conducted against the United States, leaving us weaker and bankrupt, making economic recovery impossible.

I don't believe nation building was ever the intention; US deployments serve the Imperial system, the Opium War, that provides the invisible cash flow to the various financier interests, that sustains the Ancients, for the enslavement of millions, and the ultimate undermining of government everywhere is the International policy working in Afghanistan.

As long as the Imperial monetary power exists their is no peace, no nation, and the population is constantly assailed.
04:36 PM on 04/30/2012
Get over it. We've been milked enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krenzny
WTF?? Get up, stand up!
04:25 PM on 04/30/2012
Of course he wants to keep us there! He wants the taliban in on the gravy train as well. How long are we going to be their fools?