iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Larry Summers: Efforts To Contain Europe's Crisis 'Have Fallen Short'

Reuters  |  Posted: 04/30/2012 8:48 am Updated: 05/ 1/2012 12:32 am



By Lawrence Summers

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 30 (Reuters) - Once again European efforts to contain crisis have fallen short. It was perhaps reasonable to hope that the European Central Bank's commitment to provide nearly a trillion dollars in cheap three-year funding to banks would, if not resolve the crisis, contain it for a significant interval. Unfortunately, this has proved little more than a palliative. Weak banks, especially in Spain, have bought more of the debt of their weak sovereigns, while foreigners have sold down their holdings. Markets, seeing banks holding the dubious debt of the sovereigns that stand behind them, grow ever nervous. Again, Europe and the global economy approach the brink.

The architects of current policy and their allies argue that there is insufficient determination to carry on with the existing strategy. Others argue that failure suggests the need for a change in course. The latter view seems to be taking hold among the European electorate.

This is appropriate. Much of what is being urged on and in Europe is likely to be not just ineffective but counterproductive to maintaining the monetary union, restoring normal financial conditions and government access to markets, and re-establishing economic growth.

The premise of European policymaking is that countries are overindebted, and so unable to access markets on reasonable terms, and that the high interest rates associated with excessive debt hurt the financial system and inhibit growth. The strategy is to provide financing while insisting on austerity, in hopes that countries can rein in their excessive spending enough to restore credibility, bring down interest rates and restart economic growth. Models include successful International Monetary Fund programs in emerging markets and Germany's adjustment after the expense and trauma of reintegrating East Germany.

Unfortunately, Europe has misdiagnosed its problems in important respects and set the wrong strategic course. Outside of Greece, which represents only 2 percent of the euro zone, profligacy is not the root cause of problems. Spain and Ireland stood out for their low ratios of debt to gross domestic product five years ago, with ratios well below Germany's. Italy had a high debt ratio but a very favorable deficit position. Europe's problem countries are in trouble because the financial crisis under way since 2008 has damaged their financial systems and led to a collapse in growth. High deficits are much more a symptom than a cause of their problems. And treating symptoms rather than underlying causes is usually a good way to make a patient worse.

The cause of Europe's financial problems is lack of growth. In any financial situation where interest rates far exceed growth rates, debt problems spiral out of control. The right focus for Europe is on growth; in this dimension, increased austerity is a step in the wrong direction.

Systematic comparisons suggest that when economies are demand-constrained and safe short-term interest rates are near zero, policy measures that reduce the deficit by 1 percent have a multiplier of 1 to 1.5 - implying that a 1 percent reduction in a country's ratio of spending to GDP or an equivalent tax increase reduces its GDP by 1 to 1.5 percent. Essentially, cutting deficits will have a disproportionately adverse effect on GDP because the multiplier is larger than 1 on the growth-reduction side of the equation. This means that austerity measures at the national level are likely to be counterproductive in terms of creditworthiness. Fiscal contraction reduces incomes, limiting the capacity to repay debts. It achieves only limited reductions in deficits once the adverse effects of economic contraction on tax revenue and benefit payments are accounted for. And it casts a shadow over future growth prospects by reducing capital investment and raising unemployment, which inevitably takes a toll on the capacity and willingness of the unemployed to work.

These considerations are magnified at the continental level. Slowdowns in one country reduce the demand for the exports of other countries. As a matter of arithmetic, increases in saving and exporting in some countries have to be offset by increases in spending and importing in others. Germany's enormous success in recent years has been achieved by becoming a large-scale net exporter - it would not have been possible without large-scale borrowing and importing by Europe's periphery. The periphery cannot possibly succeed in substantially reducing its borrowing unless Germany pursues policies that allow its surplus to contract.

Skeptics will rightly wonder how a prescription for more spending by countries that already have trouble borrowing can be correct. The answer lies in the difference between borrowing by individuals and countries. Normally, an individual helps his creditors by borrowing less; but a person who stops borrowing to finance commuting to his job does his creditors no favor. A country's income is determined by spending, so a country that pursues austerity to the point where its economy is driven into a downward spiral does its creditors no favor. Yes, there will ultimately be a need to raise retirement ages, reform sclerosis-inducing regulations and restructure benefit programs; phased-in commitments in these areas would be constructive. But the prospect for political and economic success in these endeavors depends on growth being restored.

Only if growth is restored can the euro endure and European financial problems be resolved. If there was ever a situation that called for a collective response, this is it. Going forward, the IMF and international community should condition further support not merely on individual countries' actions but on a common European commitment to growth.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

By Lawrence Summers CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 30 (Reuters) - Once again European efforts to contain crisis have fallen short. It was perhaps reasonable to hope that the ...
By Lawrence Summers CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 30 (Reuters) - Once again European efforts to contain crisis have fallen short. It was perhaps reasonable to hope that the ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:30 AM on 05/01/2012
Larry Summers....

"The cause of Europe's financial problems is lack of growth."

"Only if growth is restored can the euro endure and European financial problems be resolved."

That's it in a nut shell.

Socialism is concerned with redistribution of Wealth , while Capitalism is concerned with the creation of wealth. Growth..

Socialism is concerned with protecting jobs through programs called "Domestic job protection laws", while Free market capitalism allows people to work free from government interference and restrictions. Growth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
08:27 PM on 04/30/2012
Of the nearly thirty countries that have tried austerity programs to get out of financial recessions/depressions in the last 100 years, all but a couple were unmitigated failures (and the few questionable cases are just that: questionable one way or the other). People who believe in austerity are so convinced that it SHOULD work, that they refuse to accept the reality that IT DOES NOT WORK! As Forrest Gump would say: Stupid is as stupid does. And people who believe in austerity are not very bright....and that's history talking, not me!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
06:43 PM on 04/30/2012
Do the Europeans believe in TOO Big to Fail?
photo
ConservativeSuperstar
Socialism...So good it must be mandated...
04:56 PM on 04/30/2012
Summers is symbolic of the failures and incompetence of the obama White House. Its surprising that Summers would show his face in public again after as such a dismal failure in his job of advising obama.

Here is a tip: Keynesian Economics was, is, and always will be a massive failure. Its never worked. EVER.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
08:28 PM on 04/30/2012
Says WHO??????? YOU?!?!?!! Give me a frikken break!!!!

Oh, wait. Was that meant to be a joke? That would make a lot more sense than you're being serious about what you said...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:34 AM on 05/01/2012
Keynesian Economics was introduced when Government spending was 2% of GDP. It was argued that increasing government spending during a slow down would benefit economic growth.
That may have been true when Government spending was at 2% but now we have government spending at 30%.
Once the recession ends, government spending was supposed to retreat to a very minor role again in terms of GDP.
It wasn't expected to remain a permanent level of spending.
03:15 PM on 04/30/2012
The big banks made bad loans....... maybe the banks need to be reformed.

Paying bonuses on the size and number of loans creates a incentive to produce more loans no matter the quality of the loan.

Banks need to be required to keep a portion of those loans on their books. If they do they will make sure they are quality loans when they make them and have a reasonable chance of being repaid.
05:47 PM on 04/30/2012
If only they watched 'Married With Children': Al Bundy's neighbor Steve Rose approved loan just to get a free vacation!
Oops.....That is where they learnt to build their business model.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:49 PM on 04/30/2012
Larry, Larry, Larry! Just STOP! The problem in Europe is that not only did people in the US with power to fix the mess actually LISTEN to you, so did the people in Europe - at least some of them did. Your policies are moot. They do not work except for the folks you would love to be vacationing with in the Greek Isles. Hint - don't go ashore! If we had had just tow people running the Wall St. and Bank reform - Warren and whoever SHE picked, we would be well on our way to a booming middle class. But every time your policies were taken seriously, we all (well 99% of us ) suffered more. The foreclosures, bank regs, consumer protections, Credit Card and Bank fees, Taxing trades, getting rid of CDOs and the other fun things, Warren probably would have had about 500 folks awaiting trial by now. Hey- YOU might have been one of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:44 PM on 04/30/2012
"Europe's problem countries are in trouble because the financial crisis under way since 2008 has damaged their financial systems and led to a collapse in growth. High deficits are much more a symptom than a cause of their problems."
===================================================

The above being the case, why should we in the U.S. expect to be exempt from the effects of a no growth policy being enacted by countries which (a) aren't growing, and (b) are kicking the problem economies (Greece, Portugal, Spain, eastern europe) down the road like the proverbial tin can?

Furthermore, why are our politicians and their stooges in the financial media telling us during this campaign year that somehow the U.S. is exempt from this process? If Europe is already in a recession, it's just a matter of time before we are too. Don't be fooled by those who tell you otherwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjohns3
6 P's
02:42 PM on 04/30/2012
I think he means efforts to contain the fallout from the disastrous deregulation policies he pushed for have failed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidc Smith
Montani Sempre Liberi
02:41 PM on 04/30/2012
Mr. Summers is too close to the monster to come up with a solution other than feed it some more cookies. The problem is that the nations of the world have wracked up more debt than there are tax proceeds to pay for. It is wholly unrealistic to expect this mountain of debt to ever be repaid, and to attempt to do so will result into a serf like standard of living that no one is willing to accept. The only solution is for the governments of the world to tell the international banksters no mass and that they will not continue to impoverish themselves so that the Misses gets a new bullet proof Mercedes. A global year of Jubilee with much of the existing debt being written off is the only workable solution--particuarly as the amount of indebtness is too large to every be paid for--otherwise the entire system will just fall in on itself, as its doing now, and the collapse of the Bankster House of Cards will be much worse than having to go on a diet. Its time to do a Knights Templar on the big banking houses, cause its coming one way or the other.
02:39 PM on 04/30/2012
Why does anyone care what this sleaze, whose policies pushed the economy to the brink, while using his position to close out female voices who called foul, advises.

Example of sleaze:

"Normally, an individual helps his creditors by borrowing less; but a person who stops borrowing to finance commuting to his job does his creditors no favor. A country's income is determined by spending, so a country that pursues austerity to the point where its economy is driven into a downward spiral does its creditors no favor. Yes, there will ultimately be a need to raise retirement ages, reform sclerosis-inducing regulations and restructure benefit programs; phased-in commitments in these areas would be constructive. But the prospect for political and economic success in these endeavors depends on growth being restored."

Speaking out of both sides of his sleazy mouth.
06:01 PM on 04/30/2012
He sounds creepy, doesn't he?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 PM on 04/30/2012
Larry Summers and his kin should be hauled to the Hague and tried for crimes against humanity
02:24 PM on 04/30/2012
The too big to fail banks pushed debt like a drug dealer with the same results.

The too big to fail banks need to be broken up into 2 or 3 smaller banks.

There needs to be a financial transaction tax so that the banks that created this mess can help pay for it.
02:22 PM on 04/30/2012
Ok, now that the "Euro" experiment has CLEARLY FAILED, can we desolve the EU and go back to what worked for CENTURIES?

...oh no, we can't do that, say the new world order guys, we must march on.

A WORLD ECONOMY WILL NEVER WORK, people themselves will not allow it, it's human nature to compete, if we all work for the same multienationals corps where is the compitition?
No compitition, no more "growth".

To all you one world economy backers, you're batting ZERO so far and you are facing the worlds greatest pitchers without a bat...
04:34 PM on 05/01/2012
Worked for centuries? The casualties of the almost non-stop wars might disagree with you whether it actually worked or not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p mersault
02:14 PM on 04/30/2012
The full court press from the financial wizards to juice the monster they've created is on.

And yes, let's take advice from the people who got us here.

Touting "growth" strategies is fine, but no one ever says how. The key to this is that soveriegn debt in these European countries is unserviceable, meaning that these countries cannot take on any more debt without making rates for future borrowing unsustainable.

So this is all well and good, but where to get the money? Where?!
02:14 PM on 04/30/2012
They just need to build some more trains is all.