iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Cuyahoga Valley National Park Bomb Plot: FBI Says Suspects Put Fake Explosives On Bridge

By THOMAS J. SHEERAN and ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS 05/ 2/12 09:33 PM ET AP

Cleveland Anarchy
These 5 men are charged in an attempted bomb plot to blow up a bridge near Cleveland, Ohio. Top row, from left, are Douglas Wright, Brandon Baxter and Anthony Hayne. Bottom row, from left, are Joshua Stafford and Connor Stevens.

CLEVELAND — Occupy protesters must ask serious questions about their open-arms policy in light of charges brought against five members accused of trying to blow up an Ohio bridge, a top Cleveland official said Wednesday.

The city declined to renew the group's downtown encampment permit on Wednesday, a denial planned before the bridge plot arrests were announced Monday, said Ken Silliman, chief of staff to Mayor Frank Jackson. The group, which remained by its encampment tent Wednesday night despite a 5 p.m. deadline to leave, can still gather at a spot across the street day or night. Police are monitoring, but no arrests have been made.

The decision was made with the allegations as a backdrop, Silliman added.

"I think a fair question to ask of Occupy Cleveland, is, if you have portrayed your organization up till now as welcome to all-comers – the tent will accommodate anyone and everyone – how does that change when something like the events of yesterday happen?" Silliman said.

"How does that change when some of the people you've welcomed into your decision-making are now accused of such serious felonies?"

That question must be asked even if the city accepts the organization's statements that it is nonviolent and was distancing itself from those charged in the plot, Silliman said.

Occupy members, who received an encampment permit in October, planned to sit in protest of the tent's dismantling by police, but don't plan to be arrested, Occupy Cleveland spokesman Joseph Zitt said. The group has said the men didn't represent Occupy Cleveland and were not acting on its behalf.

Silliman's statements are something the group must discuss, he said.

"When things like this happen, we discover there might be factors that we had not necessarily thought of before," Zitt said. "Questions arise, they get discussed in assembly, we come to consensus on it. We're learning."

The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio questioned the timing of the permit revocation, saying it was concerned Jackson's announcement was an attempt to connect the entire Occupy movement to the bomb plot.

"Individuals are responsible for their own actions, not the groups they affiliate with," ACLU of Ohio Legal Director James Hardiman said in a statement. "City officials should not be in the business of condemning an entire group of people based on the actions of others."

Bill Dobbs, a spokesman for Occupy in New York, also said the arrests have nothing to do with the Occupy movement that began last fall.

"This incident has nothing to do with Occupy Wall Street, which explicitly stands for non-violence," he said. "Before there's a rush to judgment, facts need to come out. Those charged are entitled to a fair trial and due process."

The five were charged Tuesday with plotting to bomb a bridge linking two wealthy Cleveland suburbs by placing what they thought were real explosives at the site and repeatedly trying to detonate them using text messages from cellphones, according to the FBI affidavit.

On Wednesday, an attorney representing one of the defendants questioned the role of an undercover informant, saying the ex-con hired by the FBI appeared to have played an active role in the plot.

Cleveland defense lawyer John Pyle said his client, Brandon Baxter, will plead not guilty in the case, which is set for a preliminary hearing next week.

An attorney for a second defendant, Douglas Wright, said his client also will plead not guilty. The attorney for a third defendant, Anthony Hayne, said his only information came from the 22-page affidavit.

"I have no idea who it is at this point," Michael O'Shea said Wednesday of the informant. "I imagine they will work pretty hard to keep that from us as long as they can."

Federal authorities described the men as anarchists who are angry with corporate America and the government and unknowingly worked with an FBI informant for months as they crafted and carried out their plan.

The FBI said the suspects bought the explosives – actually fake – from an undercover employee and put them at the base of a highway bridge over the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, about 15 miles south of downtown Cleveland, on Monday. After leaving the park, they tried to initiate the explosives using a text-message detonation code, and they called the person who provided the bombs to check the code when it failed, according to the FBI affidavit.

The affidavit also discussed the suspects' desire to destroy signs on banks as a protest against corporate America but said they didn't want to be seen as terrorists.

Christopher Banks, an associate professor at Kent State University who has written on terrorism, said Wednesday that anarchists have targeted research and development centers, car dealerships, timber resources and storefronts over issues including corporate policies and the environment.

"I think the so-called anarchists are getting a lot more notoriety because of economic summits and things like that, which tie into the Occupy Now movement a little bit," he said. "I think that's why it's part of the discussion today."

Court documents detail conversations the FBI secretly recorded in which its informant discussed bomb plans with some of the suspects. In one, Baxter, 20, of Lakewood, allegedly said, "Taking out a bridge in the business district would cost the ... corporate big wigs a lot of money" because it would cause structural damage and prevent people from going to work.

The alleged conversations depict Wright, 26, of Indianapolis, as a sort of group leader who recruited others, scouted out the bridge site and participated in buying the fake explosives.

The other suspects were identified as Joshua S. Stafford, 23, and Hayne, 35, both of Cleveland, and Connor Stevens, 20, of suburban Berea.

All five are charged with conspiracy and trying to bomb property used in interstate commerce. They appeared Tuesday in U.S. District Court and were ordered jailed without bond pending a hearing Monday.

The charges carry possible penalties of more than 20 years in prison.

___

Welsh-Huggins reported from Columbus, Ohio. Associated Press writers Kantele Franko and Barbara Rodriguez in Columbus and Verena Dobnik in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW CRIME

CLEVELAND — Occupy protesters must ask serious questions about their open-arms policy in light of charges brought against five members accused of trying to blow up an Ohio bridge, a top Clevelan...
CLEVELAND — Occupy protesters must ask serious questions about their open-arms policy in light of charges brought against five members accused of trying to blow up an Ohio bridge, a top Clevelan...
Filed by Hilary Hanson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 181
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
cincijuggalette
Everybody dies, but not everybody lives.
02:50 PM on 05/14/2012
I met Doug Wright on my way (trainhopping) through Indianapolis last summer. He showed my two friends and I a place to sleep near the tracks in hopes of hopping out early morning. He made us feel uneasy, so when he left we quickly relocated. Sure enough he came back yelling for us, not too long after we haved moved. We left Indy a couple days later. I found him on Facebook (via telephone number) and decided to add him. He settled down with a girl for a while in Ohio, then headed back towards Indy not too long ago. We found a newspaper last weekend and saw his picture. My friend and I both thought, "Hey, that looks like that guy from Indianapolis!" And reading into it, it sure was. Although my friends mildly feared for their lives that night, i never thought that guy would do something this insane. But i guess they were right. "Maybe he really was going to kill us!" Oh boy.
LOL
08:59 AM on 05/07/2012
"'This incident has nothing to do with Occupy Wall Street, which explicitly stands for non-violence,' he said."

I love how they ALWAYS say this. No matter how much violence happens. Occupy Oakland has been violent since the beginning, but they still keep telling us it's non-violent.

The weird thing is, after someone gets arrested for violence, they always march in support of the violent people.

But don't believe your lying eyes, kids! The Occupy movement is non-violent! Always has been, always will be!
09:34 PM on 05/06/2012
It's shameful how the Liberal MSM has tried to hush up this story. First they said no one in group had more than a vague association with the Occupy movement, then it turns out that one of them is a signee for the lease on the Ohio Occupy headquarters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Act out
Make love not war.
04:38 PM on 05/14/2012
I checked out your statement and I couldn't verify that one of them is a signee for the lease on the Ohio Occupy headquarters. As a matter of fact the FBI have not said how they know that they are part of the occupy movement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sugarpops
05:46 PM on 05/06/2012
"The FBI said the suspects bought the explosives – actually fake – from an undercover employee..."
Definition of PROVOCATEUR. 1: agent provocateur. 2: one who provokes, a political provocateur.
Sounds like some of the same dirty tricks that the FBI has played with other movements.
08:56 AM on 05/07/2012
You're right. The FBI should have either sold them real explosives or let them buy them from somewhere else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Act out
Make love not war.
04:43 PM on 05/14/2012
It was definitely a set up. These guys were a disaster waiting to happen especially if you have highly educated FBI telling you that you can get away with it. Did you here about the police in Minn. handing out pot to Occupy Protesters? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/11/minnesota-police-occupy-drugs_n_1510557.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rowsdower
For extra fun, read my posts in Igniknokt's voice.
04:09 PM on 05/05/2012
Look at them, they look like post-apocalyptic mutants. Been drinking from the Cuyahoga, boys?
08:57 AM on 05/07/2012
Oh, Rowsdower!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boissiere Parker
This isn't a term paper so stop correcting me!
10:55 AM on 05/05/2012
I wish Occupy was more organized. However, this idea...blowing up a bridge, no bueno!
photo
VA Jill
I'm not perfect and neither are you
05:30 PM on 05/04/2012
There's always a few of them. Most generally they are very fringe participants and are shouted down by the leadership. i think they are pretty pervasive in all protest movements, right or left. This bunch of sad sacks looks like an advertisement for bad hair days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Great Intellectual
08:56 PM on 05/06/2012
The Tea Party never tried to blow up a bridge but yet they were accused of Violence.
09:35 PM on 05/06/2012
They are not fringe. One of them is a signee on the lease for the  Occupy  Ohio headquarters.
04:44 AM on 05/04/2012
Yeah, blowing up a bridge in Cleveland - that's really gonna stick it to the 1%.

OWS is done.
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
07:33 PM on 05/03/2012
Wow! What a sting. Undercover looked around a large group to finally find a buyer. Probably no one in the group knew how to do the thing on their own. Then when they arrest this group paint the whole occupy group with the dirty brush. Talk about reaching. Might as well arrest all Baptists for what the Kansas group does in the name of the 1st amendment.First amendment protection applies to buying elections and hate churches, but not occupy groups.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rda1911a1
God Bless John Browning
11:51 AM on 05/04/2012
Sort of like fast and furious huh?
12:49 PM on 05/03/2012
...["How does that change when some of the people you've welcomed into your decision-making are now accused of such serious felonies?"]....

What a silly question. What happens in *any* group when individuals end up on the wrong side of the law?

Answer: law enforcement takes care of the problem, and an organization proceeds as Americans are supposed to - with a presumption of innocence and a focus on the group's mission.

Same as with local, state or federal government (where Felonies happen all the time), the Banking industry (where felonies are punished with petty fines), our Oil Cartels (Gulf of Mexico anyone?) ... or perhaps when a media group like News Corp gets caught hacking into phones and bribing government officials on a massive scale.

Nobody asks these kinds of questions when the people committing crimes work on behalf of the 1% ... shocking!
08:54 AM on 05/03/2012
They continue to further 'occupy' the cesspool that is their movement.
http://benokeefesamericansociety.blogspot.com/2012/05/occupy-terrorism.html
07:23 AM on 05/03/2012
They all kind of remind me of a guy named Manson in the looks department. Looking pretty tough in those mug shots. Wonder how tough they will be that first night in prison?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plepgeat
My micro-bio was empty.
01:23 AM on 05/03/2012
Try occupying a salon - that's some real bad hair.
man hammer
right wing terrorist
12:36 AM on 05/03/2012
The difference between you and us, Paint with A broad brush.
11:32 PM on 05/02/2012
if the main stream media would put more effort into covering this story, if only they could find a Tea Party connection, rather than the obvious obama-endorsed OWS connection. I have an idea! ...if the main stream media were to search deeply enough, they just might find that the parents and grand-parents of the 5 OWS desperados are either members of, and/or supporters of the Tea Party!

There's the connection, now the story will grow legs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dale Ruff
03:39 AM on 05/03/2012
The "connection" to OWS is guilt by association, a standard fascist propaganda maneuver.
The only connection, in reality, is that these guys attended, as anyone can, an open Occupy event. People are to be judged by their own actions, not those of groups they join.
This is a fundamental legal and moral concept of the rule of law. When guilt by association becomes accepted, we descend into barbarism.l

The informant for the FBI escalated the groups desire to topple bank signs to a fake bomb attack on a bridge. This is one more case of the FBI creating a terrorist threat to justify the huge security budget. Left to their own devices, these idiots wouldn't have been able to plan oreven buy the fake bombs the FBI both funded and provided.

The rightwing will use this to attack the non-violent Occupy movement. rfproanoke's post demonstrates how the unAmerican concept of guilt by association will be used to
demonize Occupy, while painting themselves (the Tea Party dupes) as victims in waiting. . Really,this fear of the undefined mainstream media? it 's just old fashioned paranoia, which is the root of the Tea Party movement(which protested tax hikes by protesting the Obama Recovery Act, which had 280 billion in tax cuts). Up is down, and if your worst fears are not true today, they will be tomorrow. Be very afraid.
10:03 AM on 05/03/2012
no fear here. I do appreciate the time you spent in your comment, although you missed my point. essentially, the main stream media and lib politicians have, without any evidence, characterized the Tea Party as full of angry, dangerous, violent people. Angry? yes. People? yes. dangerous and violent? no. The Tea Party people take their message to the ballot box, which I suppose is a violent and dangerous act according to the main stream media and libs. The OWS take their anger out on innocent people. Had the bombs gone off, how many 1%ers' would have been harmed?

My point was simple, but you missed it: According to the main stream media and lib politicians, anything Tea Party is bad, and anything OWS is good.
05:14 PM on 05/03/2012
seems to me that the dems and main stream media asserted their opinion regarding the racist, violent Tea Party, with no proof. the double standard is what the issue is, but you are unable or unwilling to recognize it.