iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Edwards Trial: Daughter Cate Leaves Courtroom Crying During Testimony

AP  |  By Posted: 05/ 2/2012 3:43 pm Updated: 05/ 3/2012 7:45 pm

John Edwards Trial Cate Edwards
Former presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. John Edwards, right, leaves a federal court with his daughter Cate, left, in Greensboro, N.C., Monday, April 23, 2012. A former aide to Edwards has taken the witness stand in his criminal trial to testify about his role in allegedly violating campaign finance laws to cover up an extramarital affair. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)

GREENSBORO, N.C. -- John Edwards' daughter left the courtroom crying during testimony on Wednesday about a confrontation between her father and deceased mother over the onetime presidential candidate's extramarital affair.

Former Edwards aide Christina Reynolds was testifying about an argument Elizabeth Edwards had with her husband on the day in October 2007 that a tabloid published a story about his affair. As Reynolds was beginning the account about what happened at the Raleigh airport, Edwards turned to his daughter Cate, who was seated in the front row.

"I don't know what's coming; do you want to leave?" Edwards was heard asking.

She responded inaudibly to him, then walked away wiping tears. Edwards was heard saying, "Cate, Cate" as she walked out. Cate Edwards later returned to court after a recess.

Wednesday's hearing at the campaign finance corruption trial also included an account from another aide who testified that he repeatedly voiced concerns about the mistress, Rielle Hunter, and later left the Edwards staff after an expletive-laced dressing down from the candidate. The mistress would later have Edwards' child.

But the most stirring testimony came from Reynolds, the candidate's onetime communications adviser who was also a confidante of Elizabeth Edwards. Reynolds recently joined the board of the educational foundation named for Elizabeth Edwards, who died in December of 2010 after a years-long fight with cancer.

Reynolds told the court that Elizabeth Edwards asked her over to the family's Chapel Hill home in the summer of 2007 and revealed that her husband had confessed to an affair the previous year. The two women had bonded because they had similar backgrounds in military families.

The following October, Reynolds testified, she observed a very upset Elizabeth Edwards confront her husband at Raleigh-Durham International Airport on the morning that The National Enquirer published a story about the affair. She stormed off and then collapsed in the parking lot, Reynolds said, and the aide and another staff member helped her into the bathroom of a private hangar.

After collecting herself, Elizabeth Edwards came back into the hangar, found her husband and began yelling. She then pulled off her shirt and bra, leaving herself bare-chested, Reynolds said.

"You don't see me any more," Reynolds quoted the wife as saying.

Reynolds said Edwards didn't show emotion, but that he called his wife's doctor and asked for help.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six counts related to campaign-finance violations. He faces up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines if convicted on all counts.

At issue are payments from wealthy donors that were used to keep Hunter and the baby out of public view. Edwards' attorneys have said he didn't know it was being used to hide her.

Earlier Wednesday, jurors heard from another aide whose testimony is a key part of prosecutors' efforts to establish a timeline of the affair and Edwards' efforts to cover it up. Josh Brumberger discussed topics ranging from the night the candidate met his mistress to how he charmed the wealthy donor whose money would be used to cover up the affair.

Brumberger, now 33, was having drinks with Edwards in the bar of an upscale New York hotel in February 2006 when they were first approached by Hunter. Brumberger frequently traveled with Edwards and said it was not unusual for strange women to come up to him. The former aide said he politely helped extricate the candidate from the conversation.

Sometime later, Brumberger saw Edwards returning alone from dinner and surrounded by a group of women that included Hunter. He ran outside to once again politely get his boss out of the conversation.

"My normal bag of tricks included 'Got a big day tomorrow, got to rest'" he recalled.

Weeks later, Brumberger said, the woman began traveling with Edwards to film behind-the-scenes footage. At the time, Edwards had yet to declare his candidacy.

Brumberger couldn't place her at first, but within days he realized that she was the woman from the hotel. Hunter was paid through a political action committee supporting Edwards.

"It was a cause of concern," the former aide testified.

Brumberger said his misgivings grew after Hunter demanded to travel with Edwards on private jets, rather than commercial flights like other staff and consultants.

"Ms. Hunter felt she pretty much had an all-access pass to everything," he said. "I disagreed."

Brumberger said he attempted to bar Hunter from the flights, but the candidate overruled him.

Edwards also ordered Brumberger to make sure the PAC paid for Hunter's health insurance, unheard-of for a consultant not on the full-time staff. Concerns were also raised among senior staff that Hunter didn't appear to know much about shooting video. Tapes filmed by Hunter played for the jury showed shaky camera work where those speaking were sometimes not in focus or not in the frame at all.

"It was shoddy and unprofessional," Brumberger said.

Brumberger also described accompanying Edwards on his first trip to the Virginia estate of donor Rachel "Bunny" Mellon in December 2005. The visit unfolded pleasantly with her recounting her visits to the Kennedy White House, where she helped plant the rose garden.

Soon after, the wealthy heiress made the first in a series of substantial donations to Edwards' political committees and his anti-poverty foundation that would eventually total more than $6 million.

Prosecutors said Edwards used money from Mellon, who's now 101, and another wealthy donor to hide the mistress. Edwards' attorneys have said he didn't know it was being used to hide her and that another former aide, Andrew Young, spent much of it on his dream house.

Brumberger described how Edwards and his associates made efforts to stay in touch with Mellon, including calling on her birthday and sending flowers. Brumberger said that it was typical for Edwards to have "call time" with major donors.

Months after the first meeting with Mellon, Brumberger was traveling with Edwards when he called her on her birthday from North Dakota. Brumberger sent Young -- a key adviser -- an email that it had gone well.

"JRE called. Bunny is still in LOVE," Brumberger wrote in the email, referring to Edwards by his initials.

After the email was displayed in court on Wednesday, prosecutors asked Brumberger what it meant.

"I believe what I meant by that is Ms. Mellon was still supportive of Mr. Edwards's causes," Brumberger testified to laughter in the courtroom.

Prosecutors have said Mellon offered under-the-table cash to cover Edwards' personal expenses after the candidate was embarrassed by media reports that campaign funds were used to pay for $400 haircuts.

Weeks later, Hunter informed the candidate she was pregnant. According to the account in Young's 2010 tell-all book about the affair, Edwards was unable to access his own money to support Hunter without his wife, Elizabeth, finding out. So, Young says, Edwards decided to take Mellon up on her offer.

For most of 2006, Hunter traveled with Edwards for months to meetings across the country, as well as on an overseas trip to Africa.

Concerned about the affair, Brumberger said he twice tried confronting his boss. After Edwards made no effort to send Hunter away, Brumberger said he talked to two senior staff members.

Edwards learned of the meeting and confronted Brumberger in a private lounge at the Chicago airport just before the Africa trip.

Using expletives, Edwards began yelling and his face turned red.

"He said he couldn't trust me anymore," Brumberger recounted. Edwards informed the aide that he might be fired.

Brumberger said he quit, instead.

"I told Mr. Edwards I was no longer interested in working for him," Brumberger said. "I was kind of in shock."

In front of several staff members, the woman who had endured grueling treatments for breast cancer took off her shirt and bra, exposing her chest.

"'You don't see me anymore,'" Reynolds quoted Elizabeth Edwards as screaming. "He didn't have much of a reaction."

As staffers scrambled to cover up Edwards' wife and huddle her into a car, Reynolds heard the Democratic candidate use a cell phone to call his wife's doctor to ask for help.

Edwards then boarded a waiting jet and took off for his scheduled appearance in South Carolina, Reynolds said.

She testified that Elizabeth Edwards had known about her husband's affair with Rielle Hunter before The National Enquirer made it public in October 2007. Hers was the most stirring testimony of the day at Edwards' trial on corruption charges, as prosecutors worked to build a timeline of the affair and efforts to cover it up.

Shortly before Reynolds began her account of what happened that day at the Raleigh airport, Edwards turned to his daughter Cate, who has been seated in the front row for much of her father's trial.

"I don't know what's coming," Edwards was heard saying. "Do you want to leave?"

She responded to him in a whisper, grabbed her purse and walked out, wiping away tears. Edwards was heard saying, "Cate, Cate" as she left. She returned to court about a half hour later, after a brief recess.

Shortly before her testimony about the airport argument, Reynolds recounted that Elizabeth Edwards asked her over to the couple's gated estate near Chapel Hill in the summer of 2007 to tell her that her husband had confessed to an affair the prior year.

"I was very surprised by what she told me and I didn't want it to ever become public so the kids wouldn't have to know about it," the former aide said.

Reynolds, now 37, had worked on John Edwards' successful U.S. senate campaign in 1998 and had quickly bonded with his wife. Both women grew up in military families and had moved around a lot as children. Reynolds worked as the research director and a senior communications adviser to the 2008 presidential campaign and recently joined the board of the educational foundation named for Elizabeth Edwards, who died in December of 2010.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six counts related to campaign-finance violations. He faces up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines if convicted on all counts.

At issue are payments from wealthy donors used to help keep his pregnant mistress out of public view. Edwards' attorneys have said he didn't know about the money.

Earlier Wednesday, jurors heard from another aide who discussed topics ranging from the night the candidate met his mistress to how he charmed the wealthy donor whose money would be used to cover up the affair.

Josh Brumberger, now 33, was having drinks with Edwards in the bar of an upscale New York hotel in February 2006 when they were first approached by Hunter. He frequently traveled with Edwards and said it was not unusual for strange women to come up to him. The former aide said he politely helped extricate the candidate from the conversation.

Sometime later, Brumberger saw Edwards returning alone from dinner and surrounded by a group of women that included Hunter. He ran outside to once again politely get his boss out of the conversation.

"My normal bag of tricks included, `Got a big day tomorrow, got to rest,'" he recalled.

Weeks later, Brumberger said, the woman began traveling with Edwards to film behind-the-scenes footage. At the time, Edwards had yet to declare his candidacy.

Brumberger couldn't place her at first, but within days he realized that she was the woman from the hotel. Hunter was paid through a political action committee supporting Edwards.

"It was a cause of concern," the former aide testified.

Brumberger said his misgivings grew after Hunter demanded to travel with Edwards on private jets, rather than commercial flights like other staff and consultants.

"Ms. Hunter felt she pretty much had an all-access pass to everything," he said. "I disagreed."

Brumberger said he attempted to bar Hunter from the flights, but the candidate overruled him.

Edwards also ordered Brumberger to make sure the PAC paid for Hunter's health insurance, unheard-of for a consultant not on the full-time staff. Concerns were also raised among senior staff that Hunter didn't appear to know much about shooting video. Tapes filmed by Hunter played for the jury showed shaky camera work where those speaking were sometimes not in focus or not in the frame at all.

"It was shoddy and unprofessional," Brumberger said.

Brumberger also described accompanying Edwards on his first trip to the Virginia estate of donor Rachel "Bunny" Mellon in December 2005. The visit unfolded pleasantly with her recounting her visits to the Kennedy White House, where she helped plant the rose garden.

Soon after, the wealthy heiress made the first in a series of substantial donations to Edwards' political committees and his anti-poverty foundation that would eventually total more than $6 million.

Prosecutors said Edwards used money from Mellon, who's now 101, and another wealthy donor to hide the mistress. Edwards' attorneys have said he didn't know it was being used to hide her and that another former aide, Andrew Young, spent much of it on his dream house.

Brumberger described how Edwards and his associates made efforts to stay in touch with Mellon, including calling on her birthday and sending flowers. Brumberger said that it was typical for Edwards to have "call time" with major donors.

Months after the first meeting with Mellon, Brumberger was traveling with Edwards when he called her on her birthday from North Dakota. Brumberger sent Young - a key adviser - an email that it had gone well.

"JRE called. Bunny is still in LOVE," Brumberger wrote in the email, referring to Edwards by his initials.

After the email was displayed in court on Wednesday, prosecutors asked Brumberger what it meant.

"I believe what I meant by that is Ms. Mellon was still supportive of Mr. Edwards's causes," Brumberger testified to laughter in the courtroom.

Prosecutors have said Mellon offered under-the-table cash to cover Edwards' personal expenses after the candidate was embarrassed by media reports that campaign funds were used to pay for $400 haircuts.

Weeks later, Hunter informed the candidate she was pregnant. According to the account in Young's 2010 tell-all book about the affair, Edwards was unable to access his own money to support Hunter without his wife, Elizabeth, finding out. So, Young says, Edwards decided to take Mellon up on her offer.

For most of 2006, Hunter traveled with Edwards for months to meetings across the country, as well as on an overseas trip to Africa.

Concerned about the affair, Brumberger said he twice tried confronting his boss. After Edwards made no effort to send Hunter away, Brumberger said he talked to two senior staff members.

Edwards learned of the meeting and confronted Brumberger in a private lounge at the Chicago airport just before the men were supposed to board a plane to China.

Using expletives, Edwards began yelling and his face turned red.

"He said he couldn't trust me anymore," Brumberger recounted. Edwards informed the aide that he might be fired.

Brumberger said he quit, instead.

"I told Mr. Edwards I was no longer interested in working for him," Brumberger said. "I was kind of in shock."

It was almost exactly a year before news of Edwards' affair began to tumble out in the heat of the Democratic primary campaign.

___

Follow AP writer Michael Biesecker at twitter.com/mbieseck

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
GREENSBORO, N.C. -- John Edwards' daughter left the courtroom crying during testimony on Wednesday about a confrontation between her father and deceased mother over the onetime presidential candidate...
GREENSBORO, N.C. -- John Edwards' daughter left the courtroom crying during testimony on Wednesday about a confrontation between her father and deceased mother over the onetime presidential candidate...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 474
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SpeakupNation
Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the livi
10:55 AM on 05/03/2012
This is so painful for me and for my wife. Not only were we once Edwards supporters (and we adored Elizabeth Edwards), but my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer the same day that Elizabeth's relapse occurred. How could Edwards do this to his family, himself and to his supporters? I have zero sympathy for anything that happens to him in this life or after.
That said, this is a ridiculous case to prosecute. It should not have been pursued, and is a waste of taxpayer money.
photo
VA Jill
I'm not perfect and neither are you
06:14 PM on 05/03/2012
I agree with you. Edwards was stupid and wrong-headed, but this is nothing but a show trial perpetrated by a self-important prosecutor,wanting a scalp on his belt. Malicious prosecution is a fiine old political virtue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dukeruke
10:52 AM on 05/03/2012
"Tapes filmed by Hunter played for the jury showed shaky camera work where those speaking were sometimes not in focus or not in the frame at all." - why would this make them question her ability shooting a camera? Sounds like she'd be perfect working on some lame reality tv show...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Willhoite
10:26 AM on 05/03/2012
I wish this poor young woman didn't feel she has to be in court with her father. It's unnecessary torture. I hope he realizes how much this sordid story is hurting his unfortunate family. He should have to face it alone.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mafdet
10:02 AM on 05/03/2012
Edwards is putting his family through this just because he thinks that by laying his embezzlement off on his aides, he can create reasonable doubt with the jury. What are the chances that a million dollars got diverted by his aides without his knowledge?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MomWithTwoHeads
12:46 AM on 05/07/2012
Edwards isn't putting anybody through anything. It's the Bush era prosecutors who needed to spend taxpayer dollars on nonsense, and now to the Obama era prosecutors can't back off on this thing without there being a worse scandal. The whole prosecution is ridiculous. Everything about this man is pathetic and tragic, and he's been totally ruined. That should be enough. The possible illegality of this situation is so far fetched. I wish there was some kind of dignity in prosecution, where you could just not go there. Some things should be left private, and I don't think justice is served, or decency, by making public such at tragic confrontation between a wife and a cheating husband.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mafdet
01:15 AM on 05/07/2012
I am sick of these politicians using their campaign money or tax dollars to fund their affairs. I want Edwards to answer for it. I would like Ensign to answer for funding 2 salaries and who knows how many hotel rooms and meals on the taxpayer to further his affair or affairs. I want Souder to be prosecuted for creating a position for his mistress as an abstinence spokesperson. But in each of the other cases I mention, the current Administration and Congress don't want to pursue charges. And it would be tedious pinning the use of public funds on Souder and Ensign (apparently, Ensign had his daddy pay for his affair with a married couple). In Edwards' case, it was a million dollars off the books that they know about. I hope he goes to jail.
07:23 PM on 05/13/2012
Finally, a sensible "take." All you have to do is recall Kenneth Starr's pornography (spread over the internet to the please the Clinton-haters). Or the election of a President coming down to a Supreme Court's partisan pick. The Edwards' affair is sad and sordid, but it's not worth the taxpayer's money nor does it warrant all of these righteous judgments about any of the 3 (hypocritical stone-casting). We have a right to be outraged about the course of the nation during the years 2000-2008, more costly and tragic than any triangular personal affair. We can wonder "what if" a Dem administration had presided over our international "affairs." What if instead of a "co-President" we had a man whose responsible behavior led him to the "Vice-Presidency?
08:40 AM on 05/03/2012
Curious how John Edwards is simply referred to as "John Edwards" in all these HuffPost articles. If he had been a former Republican senator or former Republican presidential candidate, you can be sure that he would be identified as such without fail whenever his name appeared in any article. Typical HuffPost...um..."journalism." Typical media bias.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mafdet
09:29 AM on 05/03/2012
Really?  You do understand that the story they cover daily pertains to campaign fraud that Edwards committed while running for president.  You don't think there's all kinds of info about him implicit in the fact of his running for president?
12:11 PM on 05/04/2012
Yes, I know what the article is about and I know how much coverage this is getting. That isn't the point. The point is the media wouldn't miss a chance to explicitly and directly affiliate John Edwards with his party if he weren't a Democrat, especially in this election year. As it is, conveniently omitting his party affiliation better serves Democratic Party interests and the majority of the media's agendas, which are essentially the same.
08:37 AM on 05/03/2012
To the many "Edwards Fans". What a sad flock you were or are. your "Boy's" weakness was lack of breeding. He thought he was the second coming of "JFK". (and I loved ol' Jack)
08:29 AM on 05/03/2012
cregis you are the first clear thought I've read so far, but Feds have been off base before. Edwards was no different than hundreds of other power thieves his staff included and we all know what Ms Hunter is. He and his bunch are guilty of "gross (non-punishable) indecency"
at best and worst. The only "harmed one" is gone and the gov't isn't finished spending your
money. I'm sure tax evasion is next when they lose this one. The man is sullied and many of us knew he was a "creep". I look forward to seeing him host SNL.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Apphouse50
07:54 AM on 05/03/2012
With all due respect, I'd someday like to hear what efforts, if indeed any, Elizabeth Edwards made to persuade him to drop his candidacy when she knew he was having an affair.

Because the lure of the Presidency and all that power can make people overlook things they shouldn't. Had they never heard of Gary Hart? In this day and age, Hart and Edwards should be cautionary tales, but a blind eye is a blind eye.
06:53 AM on 05/03/2012
i guess pigs lie with piglets!!!
06:48 AM on 05/03/2012
I just read that this hush money never got into a campaign bank account but went into an account in Andrew Young's name, so where is the crime here? The donors knew what the money was for and apparently were fine with it. Maybe there's some tax evasion on not paying gift taxes but where is the campaign finance fraud if the money didn't even go into the campaign? It's not illegal to coverup an affair. All these tears and emotion seem scripted to me The crime here is the waste of taxpayer money. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Stockey Swanborn
Consult reality.
06:06 AM on 05/03/2012
Old sins have long shadows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Slander
06:04 AM on 05/03/2012
How does the daughter reconcile the fact the man she's defending did the cruelest things ever perpetrated on her dying mother?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UmaUma
09:59 AM on 05/03/2012
I hope you can have some sympathy for her.
photo
Nute
I am luxurious
03:03 PM on 05/05/2012
My father (a NYC cop) did what John did and none of us supported him. Especially after he told us his mistress was now "his priority". We were still in Middle and HS when he pulled his antics and although we love him, we have 0 respect for him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sistagirl Young
01:22 AM on 05/03/2012
What's he on trial for? His wife is deceased. So it can't be about her. So what's the trial about. Misappropriation of campaign funds? What. As you can see there is a great deal of confusion on my part. Did Mrs. Mellon bring charges? I must needs go back and read it again. But then I didn't get it the first time. I doubt I'll get it the second. But it's all right. As long as those involved understand. I'm just part of the peanut gallery. An extremely confused part...but a part nonetheless. Life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
04:46 AM on 05/03/2012
If the contributions were given for the purpose of keeping the mistress quiet and not for campaign contributions, then everything was perfectly legal. They're claiming he used funds contributed to his campaign to pay off the mistress. Mellon didn't bring charges.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sistagirl Young
12:49 PM on 05/03/2012
Hello time2talk; Thank you. But if Mellon doesn't have a problem. What's the problem? His campaign, his funds. Don't tell me used them for something other than wat they were allocated for. LAWD Today. Well, who blew the whistle and why? It ain't like he would be the first crook, oops, politician who did something a bit unsavory. Chil', that's a headache I don't have and neither would I want it. Thank you for the explanation. Very kind of you. Still confused but I accept this. Have a lovely day. Life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Avice Mendenhall Woodard
05:11 AM on 05/03/2012
I doubt you would get it the third, fourth, fifth, or the hundredth time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sistagirl Young
12:43 PM on 05/03/2012
Hello Avice Mendenhall Woo...: You know, I believe you're right. Frees me to do other things. How cool is that? Thank you for the comment. Life.
mscellanus
U may kiss it!
12:58 AM on 05/03/2012
Just let the man live his life and get out of the Media's assault. He suffered enough seeing his wife getting ill and losing his son. Just leave him alone!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Slander
06:01 AM on 05/03/2012
Yeah, like what's with Elizabeth with a terminal disease getting all up tight about his affair spread across the Enquirer. Couldn't she see he was suffering. What an understanding partner you have to be.
07:04 AM on 05/03/2012
Yes, we just can't comprehend how much HE suffered having to keep his affair a secret and carry on w/ 2 women. Duh. HE's the one who suffered. Not Elizabeth while she was battling for her life and seeing it all collapse around her...

Some people show that the sensitivity gene has been long lost...
12:39 AM on 05/03/2012
Edwards is a selfish sleeze; he doesn't deserve such a wonderful family! Put him in prison where he belongs. The worst is to know that his wife was dying from cancer during his marital
affair!
03:04 AM on 05/03/2012
NO..the worst is reading about how so many women chased fame and money and threw themselves at him.
makemesmile
it makes you wonder
03:07 PM on 05/03/2012
How many of these women were as butt-ugly as Rielle Hunter? The man has no taste in women.