iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Japan Nuclear Disaster: Crisis-Hit Country Mulls Shift To Renewable Energy

By ELAINE KURTENBACH and MARI YAMAGUCHI 05/ 3/12 04:07 AM ET AP

Japan
In this photo taken Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012, reactor buildings of Unit 6, left in center, and Unit 5, right in center, at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant is seen through a bus window in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan. (AP Photo/Kimimasa Mayama, Pool)

TOKYO -- Another long, stupefyingly hot summer is looming for Japan just as it shuts down its last operating nuclear power reactor, worsening a squeeze on electricity and adding urgency to calls for a green energy revolution.

On Saturday, the last of the country's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of Japan's electricity. At a time when temptation to set the aircon to deep freeze is at its greatest, companies and ordinary Japanese will be obliged to economize amid temperatures that can climb above 40 degrees Celsius (104 Fahrenheit).

Nuclear energy seemed a steady mainstay of Japan's power supply until the March 11, 2011, tsunami crippled the Fukushima Dai-Ichi plant in the worst atomic accident since the 1986 Chernobyl explosion. Authorities have since tightened safety standards and refrained from restarting reactors that were shut down, mostly for routine checks.

To offset the shortfall, utilities have ramped up oil- and gas-based generation, giving resource-poor Japan, the world's third-largest economy, its biggest annual trade deficit ever last fiscal year. That $100 million-plus a day extra cost, worries over the risks of nuclear power and concern over carbon emissions are leading many decisionmakers to view renewable energy such as solar, hydro and wind more positively.

Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda has pledged to reduce Japan's reliance on nuclear power over time. And Japan is debating renewable energy targets of between 25 percent to 35 percent of total power generation by 2030, looking to Germany, which raised the proportion of renewables from 5 percent in 1990 to 20 percent by 2010.

"If Japan has the motivation, it can do this, too," said Sei Kato, deputy director of the Environment Ministry's Low Carbon Society Promotion Office. "We have the technological know-how. Japan can do anything that Germany can."

Real change has been slow. Giant solar arrays and wind farms can't be built overnight and powerful utilities that spent billions on nuclear are lobbying to protect their interests. The government is muddling along, seemingly unable to take a decisive stand either way as opinion becomes increasingly polarized between mavericks calling for massive investment in alternative energy sources and big business interests that favor keeping Japan Inc. nuclear powered.

Many believe Japan has little choice but to restart nuclear reactors even in the face of spirited public opposition. Utilities predict power supplies could fall 16 percent below demand in western Japan during the summer peak.

The government is eager to restart some reactors in coming months if it can persuade skeptical local leaders and residents that they are safe.

"The bottom line is that without nuclear power Japan will have a very hard time meeting demand," said Paul Scalise, a fellow at the University of Tokyo who specializes in Japan's energy sector.

Oil, coal and gas now generate about nearly 90 percent of Japan's electricity, with hydropower accounting for about 8 percent and other renewables – solar, wind, geothermal and biomass – making up the balance.

The International Energy Agency estimates shutting all nuclear plants increases oil demand by 465,000 barrels a day to 4.5 million barrels a day, raising Japan's daily costs by about $100 million.

Hiroshi Hamasaki, an energy expert at Fujitsu Research Institute, estimates that with stable "feed-in" tariffs, which guarantee renewable energy producers a fixed price for their power, renewable energy generation could surge by 200 times over the next three years.

"There will be a boom close to a bubble, with many companies rushing to enter the market over the next three to five years," Hamasaki said.

Although experts are enthusiastic, green energy in Japan still faces numerous obstacles and headwinds. Besides the nuclear industry's vested interests, those barriers include stifling regulations, a power grid ill-suited to accommodating volatile solar and wind energy, and the huge upfront costs of building solar or geothermal plants. Both are technologies in which Japan is a world leader, although it has lost out to China in solar cost competitiveness.

To help move things along, the government is easing restrictions on land use for solar and wind power. It also is relaxing regulations on small hydropower projects and regulations on drilling for geothermal energy in national parks.

More crucially, last week it approved feed-in tariffs that are expected to spur investment by guaranteeing higher returns for renewable than for conventional energy.

From July, utilities will be required to buy electricity from renewable energy from providers at a rate of 42 yen ($0.52) per kilowatt hour (kwh) for solar energy, 23 yen/kwh for wind power and 30-35 yen/kwh for small-scale hydropower. These preferential rates will apply for 10 to 20 years depending on the energy source.

Most of those higher rates will be passed on directly to consumers.

That business incentive is essential, said Masayoshi Son, a telecoms tycoon and leading proponent of renewable energy. He said the rates were a "good start," adding that if prices were any lower, "Japan would likely never see a new energy era."

Son, founder of telephone company Softbank Corp., set up SB Energy Corp. in October, 2011, to promote, generate and sell renewable energy.

The company has begun building five mega-solar plants across the country, with output capacity of 2.1 megawatts to 2.8 megawatts. The first will begin operations as soon as July 1. That is still just a fraction of Japan's 3.5 gigawatts of installed solar capacity.

The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan says member companies are building 20 mega-solar facilities capable of providing 103 megawatts by March 2015.

A vocal critic of Japan's business establishment for years, Son has publicly blasted Japan's regulators and utilities for working together to block new entrants and keep the power rates consumers pay high.

But the heavy political influence once exerted by the country's "nuclear village" of power companies and regulators is waning, experts say.

"Before, many companies were reluctant to move toward renewable energy because they were afraid of displeasing the utilities, but that has changed," said Koichi Kitazawa, head of an independent commission investigating the Fukushima crisis and former president of the Science and Technology Agency.

Many of Japan's biggest corporations, from steel mills and automakers to ceramics and electronics makers also are developing renewable technologies, often incorporating solar and wind power features into their own offices and factories.

Most renewable initiatives remain piecemeal, such as a "smart community" plan for Kamaishi, a tsunami-hit city planning to rebuild as an eco-town powered by solar, wind and other renewable energy.

Unlike a European country such as Denmark, which has pledged to shift entirely to renewable energy by 2050, Japan is an island isolated from neighboring countries. An Asian "super grid" proposed by Son that would link Japan to mainland Asia, and massive wind power capacity in the Gobi desert, will take years and could prove prohibitively expensive.

Even Son concedes that renewable energy is going to serve only a small percentage of electricity demand over the next few years.

"The point is to change components of the energy mix 10, 20 or 50 years from now," he said.

___

Associated Press Writer Malcolm Foster contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

TOKYO -- Another long, stupefyingly hot summer is looming for Japan just as it shuts down its last operating nuclear power reactor, worsening a squeeze on electricity and adding urgency to calls for a...
TOKYO -- Another long, stupefyingly hot summer is looming for Japan just as it shuts down its last operating nuclear power reactor, worsening a squeeze on electricity and adding urgency to calls for a...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
01:38 AM on 05/23/2012
Nuke is a complete and utter joke, a terrible joke on humanity.

Info here

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:47 PM on 05/12/2012
Just cover every rooftop with solar, and you will never miss those nuclear reactors, and can reduce the output from all your fossil plants tot. The invest in offshore wind, electric commuter cars, and waste bio fuels, and you will have a complete energy solution. cheaper, clean, safe, forever.
01:01 PM on 05/06/2012
Nuclear is an old, dangerous technology. There's no way around it. It had it's time in human history, and now it's time to move forward and create power in a way we can be proud to hand off to future generations. In terms of baseload production, keep your eyes out for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC). It creates emission free power from the temperature difference in shallow and deep ocean water. No fuels required, and the only byproduct is clean drinking water. Japan is in a position to show the rest of the world how a first world nation can thrive on renewable energy, hopefully OTEC is part of their future energy solutions. 
 
Lots more on how OTEC works, and the countries currently getting ready to put it to work at The On Project.

http://www.theonproject.org/otec/?utm_source=huffpost&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=mscomment
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
09:36 AM on 05/04/2012
For those who oppose nuclear power over toxic nuclear waste concerns - the only way you will successfully convince industry/government or any other involved greed heads that fission based energy is not viable is by showing the real financial costs which continue to mount day by day, year by year. The greed heads will never alter course based on environmental concerns or concerns about the health and well being of future generations. They're too busy living in the present and for them, as long as a gated community exists somewhere on planet earth with safe water to drink and air to breathe, they're fine with whatever power source nets the biggest cash load for their Swiss bank account. So to convince them, you have to talk dollars and cents (not sense - they don't respond to that).

http://www.greens.org/s-r/11/11-08.html
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
08:59 AM on 05/04/2012
As expected, a lot of the energy cost assessments are strongly biased by the sources providing the information. When one examines the true cost of nuclear energy - including long term waste management and disposal - it is not even in the ball park. Interestingly, none of the data sources shown in the link below explicitly acknowledges the open ended cost of nuclear waste containment in their ultimate findings but they do make reference to plant decommissioning:

"does not include externalities such as health damage by coal plants, decommissioning costs of nuclear plant."

The data source below shows a wide discrepancy in estimated costs for wind power - among other energy sources. It is interesting to see how the French estimate for nuclear power cost is about 1/2 that of the other source estimates. So clearly, a lot of the data one finds is more wishful thinking on the part of the data "generator" than actual fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

From my perspective, I place more faith in the data generated by sources that are more closely tied to the end user than the producer of energy. For that reason, I have more faith in the California Energy Commission's results than most of the other "government" based (as we all know, government and industry are getting extremely hard to tell apart these days) sources.
01:57 PM on 05/04/2012
Since nuke plants will always be nuke plants and nuke waste is actually fuel for gen IV reactors you point is mute. The cost of building the plants all over the world is widely published. All the worlds nuke waste would fit on a football field in any case.

What is never published is what to do with the cubic miles of toxic forever end of life toxic solar waste.
07:43 AM on 05/05/2012
"and nuke waste is actually fuel for gen IV reactors you point is mute."

Sounds good until you actually looks at the economic reality of gen IV "recycling" markko?

How much do new gen IV plants cost?

How much profit do these new gen IV plants make if they burn waste instead of running in "breeder" mode?

How expensive is the reprocessing needed to prepare the waste for use?

Has any gen IV plant ever been shown to be economically viable in any way at all?

Will ALL the waste be recycled?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
01:01 AM on 05/21/2012
Another lie of the nukers
03:27 AM on 05/04/2012
Nuclear Contamination As Seen By Japanese Humor

http://www.testosteronepit.com/home/2012/2/26/nuclear-contamination-as-seen-by-japanese-humor.html
10:38 PM on 05/03/2012
when greed is the deciding factor for decision making, the outcome is always a disaster..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
07:38 PM on 05/03/2012
This first story is on huffpost but you need the second to understand what it is about:

TransCanada's Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Project Moves Ahead

Gov. Sean Parnell had wanted all parties on the same page as a way to jumpstart seemingly stalled progress on a line. He said if the market had truly shifted from the Lower 48 he wanted the companies to unite behind a project that would allow for liquefied natural gas exports to the Pacific Rim. ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/03/transcanada-alaska-natural-gas-pipeline_n_1474439.html?ref=green )

Hope for Natural Gas Pipeline Shifts From Juneau to Japan

On Monday night, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) had dinner with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda. During that dinner, held by the State Department in Washington, D.C., Murkowski talked with Noda about a key concern of his: electrical power for Japan.

In the year since the incident, the Japanese have turned against nuclear power, although the country's 53 nuclear plants used to supply a third of Japan's electricity. Fifty-one of the 53 plants have now been shut down, and Japan wants to replace them with relatively clean-burning natural gas. ( http://articles.ktuu.com/2012-05-01/natural-gas_31524116 )

I love they are selling the "renewables" to the home and "environmental" crowd but first like Germany, they are lining up the natural gas.
10:16 AM on 05/04/2012
They Japanese have introduced a FIT program to help finance an expansion renewables. They expect 2.5 GW to be built in the first year (solar, geothermal, wind, biomass, hydropower), and intend for the program to remain in place for 20 years.

http://www.cleanbiz.asia/story/new-fit-japan-expects-13-rise-renewables-within-year
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
07:10 PM on 05/03/2012
Germany electricity energy sector increased greenhouse gases and only has shuttered about about 24 percent of its nuclear power. They also reduced their net power exports by over 85 percent. All during the largest install of renewables in history. Germany also uses HALF the electricity of japan.
10:20 AM on 05/04/2012
Germany met its Koyoto targets in 2009. From 1991 - 2008, they had a 20.23% drop in total carbon emissions. The small increase in electricity related emissions contributed to further overall declines for 2011. Not sure what the story is here, other than Germany has successfully met all of it's climate mitigation benchmarks.

http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=en_atm_co2e_pc&idim=country:DEU&dl=en&hl=en&q=carbon+emissions+german
01:58 PM on 05/04/2012
in 2009 before they shuttered the nukes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
06:51 PM on 05/03/2012
Yeah, I bet there is some serious mulling going on right now, with all those Gigs standing idle, and more Japanese sweat on display than a Shintaro Katsu closeup.
Long hot summer.
04:38 PM on 05/03/2012
This is so sad. For what Japan paid for the 4 nuclear reactors and the damage they have wrought, they could have gone 100% renewable. Now, they will have to pay twice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
07:06 PM on 05/03/2012
If the technology existed - perhaps. I dont think its going to be all that expensive. Or that environmentally damaging by reports.
03:31 AM on 05/04/2012
"I dont think its going to be all that expensive. Or that environmentally damaging by reports"

That's what "reports" told the people of Belarus 26 years ago - if they told them anything at all
10:55 AM on 05/04/2012
What reports are you talking about?

The government has already undertaken the largest bailout of an industry since the banking crisis of 1990, and we are only one year into the accident.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-24/tepco-bailout-largest-in-japan-since-rescue-of-banking-industry.html

And with Japanese debt currently at 208% of GDP, that's money they don't have. Experts and the Government have said the clean-up could take decades (30 years or more).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/31/fukushima-nuclear-plant-30-years-cleanup
02:00 PM on 05/03/2012
TEPCO is being taken over by the government of Japan. The taxpayers of Japan will be paying for this nuclear disaster FOREVER.

Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous.
10:25 AM on 05/04/2012
So far, it's cost the Japanese taxpayer 11 trillion yen ($137 billion) ... the largest bailout since the banking crisis in 1990s. And with debt currently at 208% of GDP, that's money they don't already have.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-24/tepco-bailout-largest-in-japan-since-rescue-of-banking-industry.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt
02:02 PM on 05/04/2012
It's an investment in Tepco not a cost, they still have lotsa of cash flow. The Japanese economy needs some stimulus.
01:59 PM on 05/03/2012
Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.

Japan has shown that is can get by with 53 of 54 nuclear power plants shut down. It is time to transition to safe clean alternative energy sources.

The disaster at Fukishima is not over. The spent fuel rod pools are as much a disaster as the reactors themselves. It has been over a year and the disaster site is still not under control and safe. This disaster will go on for decades to come.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:48 PM on 05/03/2012
Leave it to the US media to ALWAYS ALWAYS ignore the investments in rooftop solar and microwind and efficiency that the real people can make (at no cost to government OR other ratepayers, and the huge boost to the economy that comes from the improved property values, and the generous per-kWh feed in tariffs being paid to US and our neighbors instead of some horrible Big Energy company!

Even though it has been proven that WIDELY DISTRIBUTED solar (eg rooftop) is FAR more reliabile than central station solar (and obviously erratic, inefficient Big Wind is just a dead end), the mediat reliably trots out the old lies about how unpredictable solar is, as though it's all one technology and all one level of reliability.

Energy Democracy is a real possibility - it's past time we fought for it EVERYWHERE. Big Energy will never be the solution and will always be the problem.
05:53 PM on 05/03/2012
Energy democracy doesn't have to mean produced on your rooftop. There could be a situation where 10,000 families invest $10,000 and purchase a small modular reactor and sell the power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
07:00 PM on 05/03/2012
I belong to a not-for-profit energy cooperative here in Ga. I own a piece of Vogtle and Hatch, as does the guy down the street from me, and the folks down the street from him and so on, and so on, about 75% of the state.
If we conserve and use less than the output of those units, somebody buys the rest, the profit from which comes off our bills.
I think it's a pretty sweet deal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
01:02 AM on 05/21/2012
Oh that sounds real safe.....LOL
12:15 PM on 05/03/2012
Japan can not only match Germany, they can surpass Germany.

More power to you.