iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Matt Sledge
GET UPDATES FROM Matt:

Sotheby's 'The Scream' Sale Intensifies Criticism Of Art Handlers' Lockout

Posted:

Sothebys The Scream

NEW YORK -- On Wednesday, Sotheby's set a record: a pastel version of Edvard Munch's famous painting "The Scream" sold for a record $119.9 million, the most ever for a work of art at auction.

But on the street outside, Occupy Wall Street protesters and Teamsters Local 814 members were protesting. For nine months, Sotheby's has locked out the art handlers who move paintings in and out of the its auction house because it wants to negotiate a contract that reduces union members' work hours and increases the use of temporary workers.

Now, in the wake of the record Munch sale, both art world figures and the union that represents the art handlers are sharpening their rhetoric against the profitable auctioneer.

"What's the one percent up to this week?" asked Julian Tysh, a 31-year-old handler who had worked for the company for about six years before he got locked out. "What are they up to? They're gathering in an auction room to exchange millions and millions of dollars in investments through art."

"And what's the 99 percent doing?" he continued. "They're gathering in the streets to say that the same kind of corporate greed you're seeing at Sotheby's is what's destroying the economy and turning us into a third world country."

The final sale price for the Munch painting included $12.9 million in commission fees for the art house. Teamsters Local 814, which represents the handlers, says the yearly contract for all 42 union members would cost the company $3.3 million. The union also represents handlers at competing auction house Christie's.

"With the tremendous success that Sotheby's had last night, there's just no reason to keep us out on the street, keep us suffering," Tysh said.

The art handlers are not standing alone in their contract dispute. On Monday, Paddy Johnson, the critic who blogs for Art Fag City, launched a petition on Change.org in support of the workers that has already garnered more than 1,700 signatures.

Johnson said despite the impression some people might have that art handlers get paid cushy union wages for a straightforward job, it's not easy work.

"It involves working with a lot of rich people," she said, "who are often not very nice. So you have to be able to manage relationships."

"Those connections can't be made over a six-month period of time," by temporary workers, she added. "As someone who has done a fair amount of art handling -- and actually stopped because I got fired -- it's not an easy job."

Tysh, who has been relying on unemployment benefits since the lockout began, said union handlers must learn how to do specialized handling for tricky media like terra cotta or bronze statues. He's a fan of Munch, he added.

"It's a famous portrayal of human anguish and suffering. So you know, there's a little irony there -- 42 of us have been made to suffer for nine months. But yeah, you know, I think it's a good painting."

Signers of Johnson's petition include street artist Shepard Fairey, art collector Andy Stillpass and photographer James Welling. On Wednesday, New York magazine art critic Jerry Saltz lambasted Sotheby's for the lockout on CBS "This Morning."

Lauren Gioia, a spokeswoman for Sotheby's, declined to immediately respond to the union's criticisms. In December, Bloomberg noted that the company had already spent an additional $2.4 million on the temporary workers.

In that article, Sotheby's was quoted as saying the lockout was "the last thing we wanted.”

FOLLOW BUSINESS

NEW YORK -- On Wednesday, Sotheby's set a record: a pastel version of Edvard Munch's famous painting "The Scream" sold for a record $119.9 million, the most ever for a work of art at auction. But o...
NEW YORK -- On Wednesday, Sotheby's set a record: a pastel version of Edvard Munch's famous painting "The Scream" sold for a record $119.9 million, the most ever for a work of art at auction. But o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:57 AM on 05/08/2012
Handling art is not that complicated. Be careful! is 90% of it. You can learn the other dos and don'ts in a few days. Anyone who claims otherwise is ignorant or has an agenda.
06:43 PM on 05/11/2012
If you can learn the "dos and don'ts" of art handling "in a few days", why do so many job postings for art handlers want years of experience? How would these art handlers ever have managed to unionize in the first place, if they're so replaceable?

What experience do you have in the art world that gives you the right to call others ignorant? How many shows have you installed or curated? I don't think you have the slightest idea what you're talking about, except insofar as there is a union involved and unions must be wrong.
08:54 AM on 05/14/2012
20 years. Hundreds. You "think" poorly and infer nonsensically.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pedestrian101
10:43 PM on 05/04/2012
I WOULD NEVER TRUST A SCAB TO HANDLE MY ART WORK..... TEAMSTER UNION BEST IN THE BUSINESS.
09:00 PM on 05/05/2012
I was thinking the same thing! Is Sotheby's crazzzzazzzzy!? They're not like longshoremen dumping boxes on a dock, or TSA baggage handlers chucking you luggage onto an airplane. These pieces are worth millions and some are extremely fragile. If I were one of their patrons, I would be the first to sign the workers' petition, and more.
06:09 PM on 05/04/2012
I actually signed up just to answer the comments here, I work in the art field and I've been around all sorts of movers, the cheap unqualified ones broke my stuff all the time, you don't want dilettante fly by night temps handling your stuff...
-unskilled: those guys handle millions of dollars worth of items, unskilled people break stuff...
-perception that 72k a year is a lot: not in NYC it isn't...
-rich people are mean: not in my experience and I'm not rich, I work for the rich. The guy quoted is right though, you can't improvise when you deal in that realm, you got to know how to behave.
-there are 4 of this painting, all different, if I had the money I would have paid it. It's amazing
04:38 PM on 05/04/2012
The Teamsters Art Handlers Union? Was this article a satire piece? There is actually a union that represents a group of completely unskilled people who perform a completely unskilled job?

I'm afraid to ask what the Picture-Picker-Uppers-and-Placer-Downers make.
01:54 PM on 05/05/2012
You haven’t the faintest idea what it takes to handle art as you would not call these people unskilled! Art is part of history and should be respected, maintained, taken care of and the Art Handlers do it best. They are extremely skilled and I would NOT want some temporary unexperienced person handling my centuries old Pagoda or a Munch Pastel for that matter. The art handlers are trained to handle various types of art work and their mediums without destroying them. They are smart intelligent people and sometimes artists in their own wright. They work extremely hard, take orders from people who look down on their work as you obviously do. They work very long hours, week ends away from their families and all just so the rich can live out their very expensive collection hobbies, while the rest of this country do their best to find a jobs?
09:07 PM on 05/05/2012
If you just paid $12 million for a painting are you really going to scrimp and save a few extra thousand and call Schleppers or Two Guys with a Van? There is definitely a skill to handling this delicate work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ppossom
His life is full
11:25 AM on 05/04/2012
The art is upstaged by the price.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealPolotik
Steal Yo Face.
11:03 AM on 05/04/2012
119.9 Million for a painting, with a commission of 12.9 million for the auction house.

People have nothing better to do with their money? Or they are THAT conceited.

Let's go with the latter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media1
10:56 AM on 05/04/2012
"Union" art handlers.
Give me a break.
NY unions, mob, what's the difference?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shupper
10:13 AM on 05/04/2012
Big money acting badly—what a surprise!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 PM on 05/04/2012
I know, 3.3 million for 42 union workers to move art around and "people manage".
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
No More Hurting People
12:53 PM on 05/04/2012
That comes to 78,500 per person, and since it is talking about all contract costs it includes benefits and other payroll costs. That means actual pay is likely less than $50K. That is modest for a job that takes specialized training, especially one that involves handling items worth millions (and even 10s of millions) of dollars.

You are also talking about New York City, where a waiter can earn $50k, and needs to do so in order to afford an apartment.
06:12 PM on 05/04/2012
Kernalan: do you know anyone in the 1% personally?
06:34 PM on 05/05/2012
Actually I do, and I have to say they are nicer to me than most of the 99%. Really. But they do expect something back but then they also deliver. A faceless corporation doesnt. I couldn't even count the number of the 99% who blew smoke in my face and never delivered. So even in the 1% you can find reliable people to do business with and no they aren't perfect and they will have extra requests but they come thru pretty much on their end. The trick is to always take their phone calls because a job to do is usually in them.
photo
kernalsan
Fresh Air. Exercise. Fun.
08:58 AM on 05/04/2012
"It involves working with a lot of rich people," she said, "who are often not very nice. So you have to be able to manage relationships."

Amen. This statement is verifiable by anybody who works with wealthy people. Ms. Johnson understated the case. The 1% are the nastiest, most loathsome employers that any suffering employee can have.

The wealthy flatter themselves that everyone envies them and so they surround themselves with elaborate security. But then they abuse these workers as well.

The Roman emperors also had reason to be concerned about their household guards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealPolotik
Steal Yo Face.
11:00 AM on 05/04/2012
I believe many a Roman Emperor met their fate at the hands of their "bodyguards"...
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
12:15 AM on 05/04/2012
Is this satire? D: