iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Darrell Issa Seeks Contempt Vote On Fast And Furious, But Boycotted When Democrats Sought One

Posted: 05/04/2012 5:02 am Updated: 05/04/2012 5:18 am

Fast And Furious

WASHINGTON -- House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is threatening a vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, but when Democrats tried a similar move in the Bush administration, he called it politics and boycotted.

Issa feels he has not gotten all the documents and information he has demanded in subpoenas to the Justice Department seeking information on the ill-fated Fast and Furious gun-running sting. In the operation, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents allowed suspects to "walk" with numerous guns in hopes of grabbing the higer-ups in criminal syndicates.

But the weapons wound up in the possession of Mexican drug cartels, and some were linked to the killing of border agent Brian Terry. Issa is trying to find out how high the blame lies in the Obama administration, and whether crimes were committed. Holder has testified seven times on Capitol Hill and the Justice Department has handed over thousands of pages of documents. But in a long memo released Thursday that lays out the case for contempt, Issa argues federal officials have stonewalled key requests that they have no right to block.

The Department of Justice has argued that it is releasing material as quickly as it can, so as not to endanger criminal investigations.

Apparently Issa has had enough, and his spokesman, Frederick Hill, argued that the DOJ's position was untenable after officials, including Holder, have had to retract and revise various denials involving Fast and Furious.

"To allow an agency that has already been caught making false statement to assert carte blanche authority to decide which documents they release is allowing them to be their own judge and jury," Hill said.

But is was a different matter in 2008, when Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee were trying to find out if the administration of President George W. Bush fired seven U.S. Attorneys for political reasons. (An inspector general later determined that they had.)

In the course of the investigation, Congress subpoenaed former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and then-chief of staff Joshua Bolten. They refused to comply, asserting executive privilege, and the House voted to hold them in contempt. Although there was strong evidence the U.S. Attorneys' dismissals were bogus, Republicans cried foul, accused Democrats of playing politics and stormed out of the House in a boycott of the vote.

Issa was the first one off the floor after then-Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio). (Watch the video above.)

Hill said the comparison of the cases was "poor," and argued that they are different because the Bush administration was asserting executive privilege, while the Justice Department under President Obama is only saying it is trying to safeguard investigations.

"They are not willing to let Congress look at their management and operations, and that is preventing what congressional oversight is supposed to do," Hill said.

He also noted that Democrats could be equally accused of hypocrisy if they thought administration obstruction warranted a contempt vote in 2008 but not in the current case, where at least one official has pleaded his right to not incriminate himself.

Although Hill argued that the cases are entirely different, Issa's memo does cite the Miers and Bolten contempt vote as a precedent for his.

The top Democrat on the Oversight Committee was not buying Issa's argument.

"Holding someone in contempt is one of the most serious actions Congress can take, but it is being used in this case as part of a partisan election year witch-hunt," Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said in a statement. "Unsurprisingly, these draft contempt documents were leaked to the press and Republican House leaders before Committee Members ever saw them, and are based on an investigation characterized by repeated claims that turned out to be false. Rather than straining to generate press for political purposes, our Committee should engage in legitimate reform efforts to help law enforcement agents combat drug cartels and gun traffickers on both sides of the border."

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is threatening a vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, but when Democrats tried a similar move in ...
WASHINGTON -- House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is threatening a vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, but when Democrats tried a similar move in ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,361
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (79 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
larmarch5 11:58 AM on 05/04/2012
Every investigation Issa has going has led right back to GWB's administration. Thousands of heckuvajobbers were hired and promoted based on their religious beliefs and loyalty vows. They were hired, not appointed, and cannot automatically be fired. They are civil servants and must be allowed to continue in their jobs until they are weeded out through poor performance or conduct failures. 

That  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RepsSuck
01:57 PM on 06/25/2012
Republicans use whatever they can to to turn it into a hostage situation! They used the 9/11 heroes to get outsourced companies tax exempt status, unemployment benefits during the holidays to keep the Bush tax cuts. Now they are trumping up charges against Holder to appear to be taking the moral high ground, and media attention while going after "the crooks!" So, Republicans pick someone of dubious moral character (and several arrests, and investigations against him) to lead the charge! The Republicans are so crooked (yes, and stupid); they can't even see the absurdity of their actions! They trump up charges against Holder for devious reason; yet want the public to think they are going after crime! If that were the case; too many Republicans to count would be under investigation; with Issa at the top of the list!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
12:13 AM on 05/06/2012
Has Eric Holder accomplished a SINGLE THING as the nation's "Top Cop"?

Well Holder did "protect" the NBPP from ever answeing for voter intimidation!

Has failed to prosecute any of the Wall Street Banksters from the "housing bubble" crimes of 2008!

And has "politicized" the administration of justice in this country!
photo
pcw5150
Un-learn.
01:29 PM on 05/06/2012
Well said. Holder as a political hack long passed the exploits of even Ashcroft and Gonzales. Incompetence implies a certain degree of not having the skills to do the job. As your examples and the joint BP/Halliburton atrocity in the Gulf show, Holder is committing willfull neglect consistent with BO's pro-corporatist tea party collaborating agenda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
12:04 AM on 05/06/2012
let's see here now, ok?

US Attorneys are appointed by the President and serve at his/hers "good pleasure", right?

How many ICE/Border Agents died or how many arms reach drug cartels in Mexico because
a president lost his "good pleasure" with some US Attorneys?

Liberals, ALWAYS, ALWAYS SELF SERVING!
11:16 PM on 05/05/2012
Has Darrell Issa accomplished a SINGLE THING as the nation's "Top Cop" or is he just smoke and mirrors... performing for his partisan puppetmasters at the cost of American Citizens who seek good decisions from his chair? For a man with Darrell Issa's record, it is no less than a JOKE that he'd be judging anyone at all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ex-eye-in-the-sky
South Jersey Progressive Piney
04:52 PM on 05/05/2012
A real honest & impartial committee this is, isn't it. I wouldn't ask these guys to investigate my lawn for weeds. They're pathetic. They only act when it suits their fancy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HisXLNC
No.
02:11 PM on 05/05/2012
Wide Receiver is not equal to Fast and Furious. Wide Receiver:

1. Was COORDINATED with the Mexicans
2. Was AUTHORIZED by the Mexicans
3. Was LEGAL under Mexican law
4. Killed ZERO Mexican citizens
5. Killed ZERO Border Patrol agents
6. was NOT used as an excuse to implement back door registration of multiple long gun purchases in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas and, finally...
7. Was STOPPED as soon as guns went missing.

Fast and Furious was not.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
01:24 PM on 05/05/2012
Apparently "executive privilege" is something that only privileged white presidents can invoke.
10:17 AM on 05/05/2012
I find it astounding that supporters of Holderbama resort to "Bush was bad" as their argument for denying justice in Fast and Furious. 2,000 guns approved for distribution to drug cartels and no mention of it to the Mexican government, or the FBI or ICE for that matter, and the best you got is "Bush did it, too" and "Issa is a criminal?" Seriously? At least Bush told the Mexicans when guns were coming. 40,000 Mexicans have been slaughtered by these cartels, and you can rationalize the AG lying about helping the cartels murder people because someone else did bad things. I get the political support thing, but this seems a little twisted.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
01:29 PM on 05/05/2012
The point is that F&F was CREATED by the Bush Admin. It was an ongoing program that was set into motion before the financial crisis. Excuse Obama for focusing on the economy and the 800,000 jobs lost to Bush policies every stinking month. It sure is nice having 100K in the positive. People call it a "bad" jobs report but its much better than anything under a republican. So it may be true that Obama didn't put out this particular fire before the program backfired resulting in the death of an agent. Put the blame where it is due. F&F is a Bush policy, not an Obama policy. Obama was too busy trying to put out all the other fires started by Bush/Cheney and frankly this is a back-burner thing. It was also a secret program. Why did Bush approve this ridiculous program in the first place? Was it purposefully a timebomb for the next president?
07:04 PM on 05/05/2012
Just like the decision not to investigate Bush and cronies of war crimes, the decision to maintain F&F happened under Obama.
photo
shootr687
Liberty, not false security
02:04 PM on 05/06/2012
When someone takes the personal credit for the good that occurs under their watch, they must also take the discredit for the bad. NO CHERRY PICKING ALLOWED. And no more excuses, no more blames. Do some research on gun-walking. You will find the pre-Obama operation to be a law enforcement strategy that didn't work and the operation STARTED under Obama to have not only a different but an illegal agenda. Guns cannot be allowed to leave our borders without consent from the State Department. When asked about the operation. Hillary Clinton said she had no comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suvariboy
No agenda...except for, well, you know...
07:17 AM on 05/05/2012
House oversight run by a former criminal. Interesting.
photo
pmag88
water and carbon and a bunch of other stuff
03:30 AM on 06/09/2012
It's all bs because the NRA and their client manufacturers created have twisted the existing laws in such a way that virtually anyone can purchase 10 or more heavy weapons per week in AZ and other southwest states, without being flagged. The Cartels only do business with these middle men for a short period of time and no one really knows who they are dealing with so other than something like fast and furious, the gun merchants, buyers, and resellers cannot be prosecuted. Imagine thousands of people buying multiple guns per week and then re-selling them and we have no way to prove anything, thus no way to prosecute. Issa and the rest of these merchants of death really are 'vipers', who are probably angry about fast and furious because it might have eventually worked well enough to prove that we need to change the existing laws. Issa and the rest don’t care a bit about civilians or agents or the police on either side of the border. They just want the profits to keep rolling in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Stark
Solving problems with the resources at hand
01:28 AM on 05/05/2012
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered (incited?) by fear." (William Gladstone, 19th Century British Prime Minister)

Darrell Issa has his criminal past, and is a dyed in the wool CONSERVATIVE who cannot ever get out of his fearful Conservatism, or be exposed for the creeping slime-mold he is.
Dragonstalon
America is Lost!!
04:46 AM on 05/05/2012
Conservatism - Society is composed of individuals to be judged on their individual merit. Values individualism, self-reliance, and independence.
Liberalism - Sees society as composed of groups: black vs. white, old vs. young, rich vs. poor, male vs. female. These groups are pitted against each other. Stirs up racial and class envy and division.

Conservatism - Less government is better. Wants only necessary regulation of business, economy, and individual lives, resulting in more freedom.
Liberalism - More government is better. Many regulations are necessary to achieve a more fair & just society which is government’s primary role, resulting in less freedom.

http://www.conservatismvsliberalism.net/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suvariboy
No agenda...except for, well, you know...
07:19 AM on 05/05/2012
It's the Libs who pit whites against blacks? Rich against poor? Who wrote that piece, a conservative?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Stark
Solving problems with the resources at hand
10:30 AM on 05/05/2012
Conservatives are self-sufficient in the face of the needs of others. "If they are likely do die, they had better do so and decrease the surplus population, Success is "US VERSUS THEM" even if it creates a situation that harms themselves. Justice is personal . Merit is by trial and "hazing" to be accepted. If it gets in the way, kill it. If it benefits me, it is great, even if it harms hundreds of others. The group means nothing, even if the group benefit benefits me. Never spend on others because all are a drain on ME! Survivalist and "Doomsday Preppers".

Liberals are looking toward the success of the whole community. If one person is sick, or in distress, the community supports them. Individual success is welcome when it contributes to the success of the whole. If your action will take away from the survival of the community, don't do it. Don't chop the mountain down if it will kill the stream where you get your fish, Justice is for each must be justice for all, not based on individual concept of justice. Defense is for the group. Dissent is for the good if it helps the group. Any thing that benefits the group, even if one benefits more, is a benefit to the group. That which harms the group especially if only one benefits, must be addressed. Pay it forward, so it may be paid back. Communes and "Kibbutzim"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jared Jentzsch
Let the nonsense commence.
01:26 AM on 05/05/2012
As opposed to the lesser known and not as deadly sister mission known as 'Slow and Melancholy.'
Dragonstalon
America is Lost!!
01:08 AM on 05/05/2012
For those of you that Think President Bush was the person that set "Operation Fast and Furious" into motion...meaning Liberals/Progressives...you might want to watch this Clip of the Mar 24, 2009 White House Press briefing where the speaker mentions President Obama is authorizing Eric Holder and the ATF to use 2009 Stimulus Package money to fund "Project GunRunner", which was the forerunner to "Operation Fast and Furious". President Bush's Administration was in charge of "Operation Wide Receiver" and stopped the "Gun Walking" practice after that. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFrApLNmjtk

oh, and the Video is only 1:21 minutes long, so all the Liberals/Progressives attention span won't wander too much, unlike Videos of over 2 minutes or longer.
acorus
don't be naive
12:32 AM on 05/05/2012
would you buy a used car from this man? would you elect him to represent you? why is he in oiffice? because he's too slippery...if you lock the door he'll crawl through the crack
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kuewa
12:42 AM on 05/05/2012
agreed but I think you mean slither rather than crawl...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Kamala Farang
Bad to the Bone
12:29 AM on 05/05/2012
No one's favorite tool, Issa. Imagine putting this guy in charge of anything? Ye Gods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApprxAm
Oh, dam_…the dam is broke!
11:41 PM on 05/04/2012
They're angry that Obama flip-flopped by tracking & killing Bin Laden simply because he did the job they were supposed to do better than they ever could.