iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fracking Chemical Disclosure Rules Proposed

AP  |  By Posted: 05/04/2012 10:44 am Updated: 05/05/2012 6:46 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration said Friday it will for the first time require companies drilling for oil and natural gas on public and Indian lands to publicly disclose chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing operations.

The proposed "fracking" rules also set standards for proper construction of wells and wastewater disposal.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said the long-awaited rules will allow continued expansion of drilling while protecting public health and safety.

"As we continue to offer millions of acres of America's public lands for oil and gas development, it is critical that the public have full confidence that the right safety and environmental protections are in place," Salazar said.

The proposed rules will "modernize our management of well-stimulation activities, including hydraulic fracturing, to make sure that fracturing operations conducted on public and Indian lands follow common-sense industry best practices," he said.

The new rules, which have been under consideration for a year and a half, were softened after industry groups expressed strong concerns about an initial proposal leaked earlier this year. The proposal would allow companies to file disclosure reports after drilling operations are completed, rather than before they begin, as initially proposed. Industry groups said the earlier proposal could have caused lengthy delays.

Some environmental groups criticized the change as a cave-in to industry, but Salazar said the rules were never intended to cause delays, but to ensure that the public is "fully aware of the chemicals that are being injected into the underground" by companies seeking to produce oil and natural gas.

The Bureau of Land Management, which oversees drilling on public lands, estimates that 90 percent of the approximately 3,400 wells currently drilled on federal and Indian lands using hydraulic fracturing techniques.

The rules would not affect drilling on private land, where the bulk of shale exploration is taking place. A nationwide drilling boom in formations such as the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian region and the Bakken in North Dakota and Montana, as well as in traditional production states such as Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, has led to 10-year lows in natural gas prices.

Still, Salazar said he hopes the new rules could be used as a model for state regulators.

"We hope our leadership is followed," he said at a news conference.

Industry groups and Republican lawmakers say federal rules are unnecessary, arguing that states already regulate hydraulic fracturing, in which water, sand and chemicals are in injected underground to break up dense rock that holds oil and gas.

The industry also has complained that disclosure of chemicals used in fracking could violate trade secrets, although Salazar said the rule would include exemptions for specific formulas. Some of the chemicals used in fracking include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene, all of which can cause health problems in significant doses.

Critics say fracking chemicals have polluted water supplies, but supporters say there is no proof.

Tom Amontree, executive vice president for America's Natural Gas Alliance, an industry group, said the Obama administration "may not fully appreciate" significant regulatory steps taken by states such as Colorado, Texas and Wyoming to oversee hydraulic fracturing.

"State regulatory bodies have repeatedly proven that they have the understanding of their state's own unique geologic conditions, the on-the-ground expertise needed to oversee this important work, and most importantly, the ability to respond to rapid change," Amontree said. As drafted, the federal proposal would create reporting requirements and "regulatory impediments" that could substantially affect the ability of companies to drill on public lands, he said.

The proposed rules will be subject to public comment for 60 days, with a final order expected by the end of the year, said Bob Abbey, director of the land management bureau.

____

Follow Matthew Daly on Twitter: (at)MatthewDalyWDC

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration said Friday it will for the first time require companies drilling for oil and natural gas on public and Indian lands to publicly disclose chemicals used in...
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration said Friday it will for the first time require companies drilling for oil and natural gas on public and Indian lands to publicly disclose chemicals used in...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 154
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
11:21 PM on 05/06/2012
"State regulatory bodies have repeatedly proven that they have the understanding of their state's own unique geologic conditions..."

Aaaahahahaha. Bull. Go to your local state geologist's office and ask for their data. They'll pull out USGS maps. States have around 2 geologists on staff, and usually they're ex-oilmen.

Yet another fantasy put out there by corporate mouthpieces.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
11:18 PM on 05/06/2012
Obama administration: "Here's our new plan for reasonable regulation. We simply ask that you drill your wells right and disclose what you're leaving in the ground"

Industry: "Waaaaaaaaaahhhhh...we want to be able to cut as many corners as possible and hide toxic chemicals in public lands...."

This is why Ron Paul's America can never happen - his fantasy that somehow corporations will be "responsible" if left to regulate themselves is clearly not rooted in reality. If you're a drilling rig operator and it's just too much effort for you to submit a list of chemicals and pour concrete correctly, then why on earth would we trust you to self-regulate? Any Paulites want to help out here? How does this self-regulation work?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Howes
Video Online Training
05:18 PM on 05/06/2012
I think this is good news all people will be able to view what are the Mix of chemicals that are pumped down to force gas up. We will beable to read the chemical names and then look what the hazards are from MSDS sheet even. Yes if more people take training to understand what information they are given more people will be able to say how they understand what this means to them in there life. Yes I have MSDS class I can help you understand what chemicals are www.isoclasses.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
11:19 PM on 05/06/2012
Read closer - they are still allowed to withhold "trade secrets", just like ALEC proposed in their corporate "model legislation".

Other than that, though, it looks like a good set of regulations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
09:07 AM on 05/06/2012
I say we take the vile and polluted water created from the poisonous chemicals used in the fracking process to baptize all new born repukeblican babies. Perhaps then they'll consider backing a ban on the horrible fracking process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
05:01 AM on 05/06/2012
Republican lawmakers, what a joke. They've destroyed the economy and the country now they're intent on destroying the planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
04:50 AM on 05/06/2012
Supporters say there's no proof fracking is harming underground water supplies! Just like BP said there's no oil leaking into the GOM.
08:53 AM on 05/06/2012
And what some supporters are saying, it is not the fracking process which is causing problem. It is the handling of surface water (fracking fluids) and the failure of the well casings.

Here in NY which has banned fracking at this time, there are discussion of regulating the casing themselves ie: triple the thickness as it pass thru the water table and tighter regulations for the retention ponds.

Instead of banning fracking, just do it right...

We need natural gas to replace coal for electric production...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
09:08 AM on 05/06/2012
Concur. I'm all for finding and harvesting alternate fuels but not for the current process of getting them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
04:39 AM on 05/06/2012
I certainly hope we can all agree that disclosure of chemicals used in fracking is just a starting point? We know they're using very harmful agents in fracking but what do we do after we learn what they are? We should ban the use of them! Use environmentally friendly compounds to frack for shale gas and oil.
08:40 PM on 05/05/2012
Green lemmings claim that fracture completions at 10K feet below the surface cause contamination at 100 ft--it does not happen and by claiming it does over and over again does not make it real.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
04:40 AM on 05/06/2012
Denying it over and over doesn't make it true either. The liquids used for fracking seep up to the surface. It is very true.
09:01 AM on 05/06/2012
The fracking process does not create cracks in the rocks all the way to the surface, that just silly..

If what you say is true, the fracking fluids are seeping to the surface then why didn't the methane and/or natural gas seep to the surface millions of years ago?
oil patch
if you voted obama, you are to blame
04:21 PM on 05/05/2012
Once again the socialists seek to destroy private business! Why would I want to put up billions in operations, research and manpower to develop the best frac fluid to have to publicly display my recipe???
If the frac job contaminates your water or I harm your property, sue me in court.
You will have to wait forever for your day in court because it does not damage the environment, so until that day comes GET A REAL JOB!
02:54 AM on 05/06/2012
fku!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
11:14 PM on 05/06/2012
Why should I have to go to court to stop you from doing something that risks my water?

And if you don't want to disclose the chemicals you're using, then don't put them into the ground. The particular mix and timing aren't required - just a listing of the chemicals you're using.

This is perfectly reasonable regulation, and it's idjits like you that cause hysteria and paranoia and cry about regulation. It'll cost drillers very little to meet these requirements, and it will save a good deal of money in ruined water supplies.

By the way - much of the technology used in fracking was developed by the DoE. Who's the socialist now?
photo
ConservativeSuperstar
Socialism...So good it must be mandated...
08:24 AM on 05/05/2012
This is total proof that the Left should rename themselves "Regressives".

Are they against any and every kind of energy?

YES.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
12:11 PM on 05/05/2012
Or NIMBY!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
12:16 PM on 05/05/2012
You don't know what you're talking about.
08:19 AM on 05/05/2012
Let see I am an refinery owner, and have all this toxic bull crap that is costly to get rid of.. I use to be able to just burn it up the stacks at night but the people around the refinery didn't like the residue all over their cars, it would eat the paint. Now we have gas drillers, that are forcing a secret ingredient into the ground to break rock. Hummmm, lets use the toxic waste from the refinery and chemical plants, its a win win, we charge them to get rid of their waste and we get the ingredient to force into the ground to break up the rock.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
01:14 PM on 05/05/2012
that's it, you got it.
07:55 AM on 05/05/2012
And by knowing which chemicals are being used, which chemicals are poisoning my drinking water...all this 'knowledge' will make fracking safer? Are we into the sign of 'Stupid-arious'???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrEMT
Evolution is your friend
01:15 PM on 05/05/2012
If we know what is injected, we know how to better regulate.
01:56 PM on 05/05/2012
And if we don't inject anything, don't allow fracking...period! our environment will be the better for it. Enough! of profits before people, before our planet.
05:54 AM on 05/05/2012
We have a second home we only frequent a couple of times a year to get away in Virginia. We were shocked to find Virginia Dept of Mines minerals and Energy had give permits to drill a gas well. waste well and open a slope coal mine all located within 700 feet from our front door. They said they didn't know the home was their. Lies !!! How do you miss a 72' split level home with no leaves on the trees. What about tax maps and google earth all showing our home. We now listen to a mine fan blowing filth out and have filth water in our well. Virginia.."Nothing we can do"!!!
01:34 PM on 05/05/2012
You want to stop development of a natural resource which does produce jobs so you can have a vacation home which is only used a couple time per year?

Concerning environmental impact, building a house which is only used a couple times per year is not very green...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy333
Save Our Planet!
04:46 AM on 05/06/2012
Contact your repukeblican representative with yoru concerns. See how much they empathize.
02:13 AM on 05/05/2012
The Obama administration is so in bed with Mid-Eastern Oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
01:15 PM on 05/05/2012
if that's the case, why are they funding Romney for the win?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrEMT
Evolution is your friend
01:16 PM on 05/05/2012
Oh God... where you guys get this stuff.
02:11 AM on 05/05/2012
There is never "enough" proof for things corporations do not want proven. How much will be "enough"? No water left that is non-flammable?