iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Linda Evangelista Child Support Court Battle Underway With Francois-Henri Pinault

Linda Evangelista Child Support Trial

JENNIFER PELTZ   05/03/12 08:34 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK — She has one of the world's most famous faces. He's a billionaire fashion CEO. And their 5-year-old son is at the center of a bitter, big-money child support fight.

Supermodel Linda Evangelista and ex-boyfriend Francois-Henri Pinault, a French business tycoon now married to actress Salma Hayek, faced off Thursday in the utilitarian environs of a Manhattan family court.

She wants a court to make him pitch in for child-rearing expenses she has tallied at nearly $50,000 a month – for armed bodyguards and a round-the-clock nanny, among other costs.

The trial is offering a public glimpse into the lives of the boldface and beautiful, from the vagaries of a modeling career to the peripatetic lifestyle of a movie star's child. The first day of testimony included a detailed description of a $12 million mansion and Pinault discussing his brief breakup with Hayek before their 2009 marriage.

Evangelista, the 1980s and 1990s magazine-cover fixture who famously quipped that supermodels "don't wake up for less than $10,000 a day," looked on with somewhat anguished poise in a demure black knee-length skirt, flower-patterned blouse and tan stiletto pumps.

At one point, she let out a faint, frustrated "ohhhhh!" and raked her hair with her hands when Pinault's lawyer, David Aaronson, said she was looking for $46,000 a month. While that's what she said she's spending on the child, Evangelista's lawyer said Thursday she isn't asking for any particular amount.

Although she willingly paid all the boy's expenses for most of his life, her roughly $1.8 million-a-year income took a major hit last year as a contract with L'Oreal ended, said her lawyer, William Beslow.

"It became necessary for her to go to the bullpen and ask the father for help," he told the court. "Ms. Evangelista is not looking to piggyback the lifestyle of Mr. Pinault."

But Pinault's camp says the supermodel is doing just that. A potential $46,000-a-month tab is "just ridiculous," Aaronson said.

Evangelista, now 46, and Pinault, 49, dated in late 2005 to early 2006, though he testified Thursday that the trans-Atlantic couple spent only about seven days together over that time.

Pinault is the chief executive of PPR, which owns Gucci, Yves St. Laurent and other luxury brands. He makes about $4 million annually from a complex of his family's companies; Forbes recently estimated the family's net worth at $13 billion.

Evangelista didn't publicly identify Pinault as the father of the boy, Augustin, known as Augie, until last year, when she went to court against the businessman. In the meantime, he and Hayek had a daughter, Valentina, and later married.

When Evangelista told Pinault she was pregnant in early 2006, it wasn't welcome news to the businessman, who had two children from a previous marriage. When asked Thursday if he thought Evangelista had tried to get pregnant, Pinault replied, "I guess so."

Beslow said Pinault indicated he'd prefer her to abort the child. Pinault testified Thursday that he told her he wasn't in a position to parent a baby but respected her decision to have the child.

"She told me that if I didn't want to be involved in raising the kid or stay together and be parents together, she would understand, and she will take care of the kid," the soft-spoken Pinault told the court, testifying in English. "I told her that I would recognize the baby ... and I will take my responsibility."

But he found her initial child-support proposal unreasonable, so he presented a counteroffer in 2007 but got no response until she sued last summer, he said. He has since paid an undisclosed amount, but he acknowledged that he had contributed virtually nothing until then.

"I'm not going to pay money I'm not asked for," Pinault said.

His and Hayek's 4-year-old daughter, Valentina, meanwhile, has been taken on a $52,000-plus 12-day vacation to Bora Bora and has a $12 million Los Angeles home in a trust for her – a step Pinault said he took to reassure Hayek she and the girl would have a home if the couple parted. A brief premarital split in 2008 "created a high level of anxiety to my wife," he explained.

Evangelista was expected to testify later in the trial. At the end, the judge will make a ruling that the couple could accept or ask to be reconsidered.

___

Follow Jennifer Peltz at . http://twitter.com/jennpeltz

See more model-moms:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Alessandra Ambrosio

    Daughter Anja Mazur (WireImage photo)

  • Veronica Webb

    Daughter Leila Rose (Getty photo)

  • Jill Goodacre

    Daughters Sara Kate and Gerogia Tatom (Getty photo)

  • Josie Maran

    Daughter Rumi (Getty photo)

  • Christie Brinkley

    Son Jack and daughters Alexa Ray and Sailor (FilmMagic photo)

  • Linda Evangelista

    Son Augie (Getty photo)

  • Elle MacPherson

    Son Flynn

  • Kathy Ireland

    Daughter Lily (Getty photo)

  • Stephanie Seymour

    Son Peter

  • Christy Turlington

    Daughter Grace (Getty photo)

  • Milla Jovovich

    Daughter Ever Gabo (Getty photo)

  • Iman

    Daughter Zulekha (Getty photo)

  • Camila Alves

    Daughter Vida (FilmMagic photo)

  • Heidi Klum

    Son Henry and daughter Leni (Getty photo)

  • Rebecca Romijn

    Daughters Charlie and Dolly (FilmMagic photo)

  • Karolina Kurkova

    Archie Dury and son Tobin Jack (Getty photo)

  • Cindy Crawford

    Son Presley Walker and daugther Kaya Jordan Gerber (FilmMagic photo)

  • Kate Moss

    Daughter Lila (WireImage photo)

  • Claudia Schiffer

    Daughter Clementine and son Caspar (FilmMagic photo)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

NEW YORK — She has one of the world's most famous faces. He's a billionaire fashion CEO. And their 5-year-old son is at the center of a bitter, big-money child support fight. Supermodel Linda E...
NEW YORK — She has one of the world's most famous faces. He's a billionaire fashion CEO. And their 5-year-old son is at the center of a bitter, big-money child support fight. Supermodel Linda E...
Filed by Ellie Krupnick  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 252
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cincity Cin
03:33 AM on 05/26/2012
I wonder if he cares what his son will say, when his son is all grown up. If it where me it would not be postive.
01:43 PM on 05/08/2012
If child support is mandatory, DNA testing should be mandatory.
09:24 PM on 05/07/2012
sad excuse for a man..... sad excuse for a woman...... and selma, Im embarrassed for you that you would hook up that kind of man, and have him produce another child..... perhaps she'll be suing for support in a couple of years, when he fathers some additional children
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Goldie Treasure
Biracial.25.Sarcastic.Mod>Rep=Dem
07:26 PM on 05/07/2012
I never understand why judges allow for such large amounts of child support. Regular folks do just fine raising their kids for a lot less than $50,000.00 a month so why can't people like her? Save that money for college or starting a business when it is an adult,not so mommy can buy some shoes.
10:48 AM on 05/07/2012
For me, situations like these expose the hypocrisy of modern-day sexuality. In the pre-coitus stage, it's all about the right to satisfy carnal desire and proclaiming one's sexual liberation. But sexual intercourse is not cut and dried and always carries the potential of procreation. Women don't like to factor in the concept that they may just be a piece of a..., and that a man has zero interest in anything more, much less co-parenting and all that goes with it. And men don't seem to recognize that very few women are just interested in sex and nothing more. What bothers me is, why can't this be put on the table so everyone knows where the other is coming from? A man seriously committed to no-strings sex might pass on a night of passion and if he didn't then, he cannot claim he was not aware. And why do women who want to be more than meat, put themselves in these situations? It really does come off as calculating. I find it impossibe to believe that Evangelista didn't get pregnant on purpose because this man is rich. But since he is, he can afford to pay child support, put money in trust and keeping the child safe from kidnapping. But Evangelista should not be rewarded with an oppulent lifestyle.
12:23 AM on 05/08/2012
Kudos to you Waldimore, VERY well thought out and you expressed yourself well!!
10:42 AM on 05/07/2012
I am aging and my supermodel days are over. Hmm, lets see, let me get knocked up by a billionare-that will give me enough tax free income-er , child support-to last me another 18.
10:29 AM on 05/07/2012
"A supermodel doesn't wake up for less than $10,000". Guess I don't live right. A cup of coffee and a dog that needs to go pee will get me out of that bed in a heartbeat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scar1
09:51 AM on 05/07/2012
This is ridiculous. Be glad I am not the judge. I would take all the kids. This is pure greeed on all sides and has no consideration of the children. They are self asorbed and just ridiculous. That poor child has to put up with two jackasses like these two parents.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Versh
09:14 AM on 05/07/2012
7 days together. dang.
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
06:13 AM on 05/07/2012
Looks sort of like Sophia Loren in the lead shot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Versh
09:15 AM on 05/07/2012
A lot of her photos do.
03:43 AM on 05/07/2012
My question to her, is why she waited so long to name the father and ask for child support? I'm sorry but she had no business getting pregnant on a 7 day fling, and in my book she did this on purpose to gouge this man out of his money. If she doesn't get out of bed for less than $10,000 a day, then she can support her ownself and her kid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GirlInNYC
A girl in NYC
09:31 AM on 05/07/2012
It takes two.
03:50 PM on 06/07/2012
it takes two to make the baby but only one of them gets any say in whether or not to have it. amazing how that works. the beauty of "feminism".

out of curiosity - if he had intentionally impregnated her (during consensual sex) would your response be the same? or are you just a typical chick who's wholly unaware of this daily double standard?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tendril
imperfect at best and proud of it
02:36 AM on 05/07/2012
The legal obligation doesn't care what the numbers are (for the most part). It is a matter of applying the law. With the money he is going to spend on trial (and with the possibility he might have to pay HER fees), providing the child support might be the cheaper way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmchafin
01:27 AM on 05/07/2012
I swung to supporting the mother when the faher said "I'm not going to pay money I wasn't ask for"..

Seems like a way to avoid suppor...Damned if she doesn't ask for money and damned when she does and he refuses to pay now. This twit needs be be responsible for this child in the same manner he treats his other children. Period.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ok3apples
It's all interesting
11:15 PM on 05/06/2012
Why does the boy need armed bodyguards? That's a sad way to grow up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GirlInNYC
A girl in NYC
09:33 AM on 05/07/2012
Kidnapping. It's not uncommon for wealthy kids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissBrnSug
10:21 PM on 05/06/2012
you go girl, get your money, I'm not mad