iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Trial: Guantanamo 9/11 Case Could Last Years

By BEN FOX 05/06/12 09:10 PM ET AP

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Trial
In this photo of a sketch by courtroom artist Janet Hamlin and reviewed by the U.S. Department of Defense, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, Ammar al Baluchi, Ramzi Binalshibh, Walid bin Attash and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed pray during their arraignment at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base in Cuba, Saturday, May 5, 2012. (AP Photo/Janet Hamlin, Pool)

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The U.S. has finally started the prosecution of five Guantanamo Bay prisoners charged in the Sept. 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, but the trial won't be starting anytime soon, and both sides said Sunday that the case could continue for years.

Defense lawyer James Connell said a tentative trial date of May 2013 is a "placeholder" until a true date can be set for the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-described mastermind of the attacks, and his co-defendants.

"It's going to take time," said the chief prosecutor, Army Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, who said he expects to battle a barrage of defense motions before the case goes to trial.

"I am getting ready for hundreds of motions because we want them to shoot everything they can shoot at us," he said.

Saturday's arraignment lasted 13 hours, including meal and prayer breaks, as the accused appeared to make a concerted effort to stall the initial hearing, which didn't end until almost 11 p.m.

"Everyone is frustrated by the delay," Martins said on Sunday. He noted that the civilian trial of convicted Sept. 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui took four years, and he pleaded guilty in 2006 before being sentenced to life in prison.

On Saturday, Mohammed and his co-defendants refused to respond to the judge or use the court's translation system and one of the men demanded a lengthy reading of the charges. Connell called the tactics "peaceful resistance to an unjust system."

The arraignment, Connell said, "demonstrates that this will be a long, hard-fought but peaceful struggle against secrecy, torture and the misguided institution of the military commissions."

The defendants' actions outraged relatives of the victims.

"They're engaging in jihad in a courtroom," said Debra Burlingame, whose brother, Charles, was the pilot of the plane that flew into the Pentagon. She watched the proceeding from Brooklyn on one of the closed-circuit video feeds around the United States.

A handful of those who lost family members in the attacks were selected by a lottery and flown to watch the proceedings at the U.S. naval base in Cuba, where Mohammed and his co-defendants put off their pleas until a later date.

They face 2,976 counts of murder and terrorism in the 2001 attacks that sent hijacked jetliners into New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The charges carry the death penalty.

The detainees' lawyers spent hours questioning the judge, Army Col. James Pohl, about his qualifications to hear the case and suggested their clients were being mistreated at the hearing, in a strategy that could pave the way for future appeals. Mohammed was subjected to a strip search and "inflammatory and unnecessary" treatment before court, said his attorney, David Nevin.

It was the defendants' first appearance in more than three years after stalled efforts to try them for the terror attacks.

The Obama administration renewed plans to try the men at Guantanamo Bay after a bid to try the men in New York City blocks from the trade center site hit political opposition. Officials adopted new rules with Congress that forbade testimony obtained through torture or cruel treatment, and they now say that defendants could be tried as fairly here as in a civilian court.

Nevin said it would be impossible to present testimony against his client that wasn't corrupted by treatment that he says amounted torture. "It's not possible to untaint the evidence any more than it is to unring a bell."

Eddie Bracken of Staten Island, New York, was one of the victims' relatives allowed to attend the hearing, and said it was important to him to see the people accused of killing his sister, Lucy Fishman, a Brooklyn mother of two who worked in the World Trade Center.

He said he came away impressed by the military justice system, with defense lawyers putting up an aggressive defense.

"If they had done this in another country it would have been a different story," Bracken said Sunday. "But this is America."

Human rights groups and defense lawyers say the secrecy of Guantanamo and the military tribunals will make it impossible for the defense. They argued the U.S. kept the case out of civilian court to prevent disclosure of the treatment of prisoners like Mohammed, who was waterboarded 183 times.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced in 2009 that Mohammed and his co-defendants would be tried blocks from the site of the destroyed trade center in downtown Manhattan, but the plan was shelved after New York officials cited huge costs to secure the neighborhood and family opposition to trying the suspects in the U.S.

Congress then blocked the transfer of any prisoners from Guantanamo to the U.S., forcing the Obama administration to refile the charges under a reformed military commission system.

Mohammed, a Pakistani citizen who grew up in Kuwait and attended college in Greensboro, North Carolina, has admitted to military authorities that he was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks "from A to Z," as well as about 30 other plots, and that he personally killed Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Mohammed was captured in 2003 in Pakistan.

Ramzi Binalshibh was allegedly chosen to be a hijacker but couldn't get a U.S. visa and ended up providing assistance such as finding flight schools. Walid bin Attash, also from Yemen, allegedly ran an al-Qaida training camp in Afghanistan and researched flight simulators and timetables. Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi is a Saudi accused of helping the hijackers with money, Western clothing, traveler's checks and credit cards. Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, a Pakistani national and nephew of Mohammed, allegedly provided money to the hijackers.

During the failed first effort to prosecute the men at the base in Cuba, Mohammed mocked the tribunal and said he and his co-defendants would plead guilty and welcome execution. The lawyers' statements indicate that plan has changed.

___

Associated Press writer Verena Dobnik in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW WORLD

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The U.S. has finally started the prosecution of five Guantanamo Bay prisoners charged in the Sept. 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, but the trial won...
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The U.S. has finally started the prosecution of five Guantanamo Bay prisoners charged in the Sept. 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, but the trial won...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 460
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
Norge
Rolf K. Artist, worker of metal, writer of poems
02:13 AM on 05/08/2012
They should have a trial in a international arena, under international laws with all of their human rights respected. If their human rights are not respected, the west loses total credibility. People can be emotionally angry, hurt, grieving over9/11 though for America to lower itself down to standards of inhumanity does a disservice to the American people who for the most part want justice and not retrebution and revenge. If America has tortured these persons, then they have already lost the first round of the trial.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EliotRosewater
01:26 AM on 05/08/2012
The circus that occurred on Saturday does not bode well for the trial. This farce could have been avoided had the attorney general been allowed to try the defendants under Article III of the United States Constitution. http://doug-elliott.blogspot.com/2012/05/circus-comes-to-guantanamo.html
photo
Sansculotte
I never did like Tea
01:53 PM on 05/07/2012
The moment we stooped to torturing these guys was the moment this - procedure - became a farce. I don't blame them for completely ignoring the judge.
Yes - they're guilty. Unfortunately - so is the USA. Torture is a war crime. Or so we said at Nuremberg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawa
row, row your boat
01:16 PM on 05/07/2012
bloomberg and the right screamed when obama wanted to try these killers in NYC. now the killers claim the military and/or the cia tortured them, this could of been over done, and given the needle. but no politics had to take priority
11:26 AM on 05/07/2012
How is it that we Americans think we can continuously slaughter civilians and soldiers in their Muslim Mideast homeland and not suffer retaliation in our homeland? To us, 9/11 was terrorism. Our victims, unable to retaliate conventionally against a superpower, did so unconventionally. To them, 9/11 was masterful, but only symbolic in magnitude. Our killing of Osama was similarly unconventional. Arguably, the five accused should be treated as soldiers and repatriated. Israel, our inseparable ally, would flip. That too would serve the interests of America and world peace.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:24 AM on 05/07/2012
Do not let them play silly games. If they can't behave during court, let them sit in a room and watch proceedings on television.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:21 AM on 05/07/2012
Guess, what are they praying for on their "breaks"? Death to America.
photo
jason thomson
ATWA'r with lies
12:33 PM on 05/07/2012
Death to America..... & the world would be a safer place!
photo
smcguire
Work is the curse of the drinking classes.
09:15 AM on 05/07/2012
These men cannot be tried in American civilian court; what legal precedent would be set by allowing evidence obtained through enhanced interrogation techniques? Were evidence gained by waterboarding, forced stress positions, sensory deprivation or bombardment etc given the patina of legality, would there remain any protections for the rest of us? We as citizens must weigh the value of what has been gained against what has been lost in the post 9/11 world. Are we the better for having kept alleged "dirty bomber" Jose Padilla in isolation to the point where his mind has been broken? He was neither a boy scout nor a Mensa member to begin with, but the US government denied this US citizen due process, and broke him mentally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:50 AM on 05/07/2012
Your Arguments can certainly be made by their defense counsel. These men should have been tried by a military tribunal years ago. They are not entitled to be considered ordinary criminal defendants and they are not entitled to turn the proceedings into a circus. Perhaps they should be treated to the full deference that they would receive in a Saudi Arabian court. Would that be preferable? Your comments seem to imply that theses monsters should not be tried at all. What is YOUR solution? They are enemy combatants and they deserve to be put to death for their crimes. Ye, they are entitled to a presumption of innocence in the eyes of the law; no such fiction applies to those not involved in the process…
photo
smcguire
Work is the curse of the drinking classes.
10:27 AM on 05/07/2012
What's done is done. Whether they should have been tried as criminals in civilian court is moot; I don't see how they can be now. KSM takes credit for everything; at this point, he has nothing to lose. It's unlikely he ever takes a free breath again, so why not claim to be the brains behind 9/11 et al? I don't fully understand the military tribunal protocols, but have faith they will follow their mandate to the letter. At this point we have to see these as acts of war and not criminal, and hope that a military tribunal finds the truth and applies justice
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:53 AM on 05/07/2012
Perhaps you can give us your Constitutional Law opinion on the president of the United States ordering the summary execution of an American citizen who had not been charged with any crime, let alone convicted of one, by firing a Hellfire missile into a nation that we are not at war with. There's a nice straightforward case for you to make into a cause célèbre...
photo
smcguire
Work is the curse of the drinking classes.
10:41 AM on 05/07/2012
your condescension aside,

The execution of Anwar al-Awlaki shows how The War on Terror has undermined our traditional understanding of our constitutional rights. The interests of the National Security State now trump all other concerns
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charleshbuchannan
My microbio does not meet guidelines?
12:36 PM on 05/07/2012
That is easy. Al Awaki confessed his crimes (treason) freely in his own videos.

It was al Awaki who put himself beyond the reach of any legal proceedings. He was hiding behind enemy lines, not walking the streets of London or Madrid.

If the British had had the opportunity to kill Lord Haw Haw (in Berlin) and taken it, would you be tearing your hair out about it?
07:56 AM on 05/07/2012
Didn't most of these prilcks confess to what they did? They're proud of their murderous handiwork. Why does this trial need to take so long, especially since the defendants seem inclined not to cooperate? If they become disruptive remove them and let them watch the proceedings on TV, like we do with other defendants. No prayer breaks either. Breaks only for meals and bathroom. If they need to pray let them do it over lunch or in the bathroom.

Their lawyers? They should probably be disbarred for coming out publicly and questioning the integrity of the system of which they are a part as officers of the court unless their specious claims can be verified.
10:32 AM on 05/07/2012
"Didn't most of these prilcks confess to what they did?"

Yeah... after the number of times they've been water boarded, I'm sure they'd even confess to wiping out the native |ndians....
12:25 PM on 05/07/2012
How about this confession by Mohamed:

"I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me holding his head on the internet." - KSM - 3/10/2007

They didn't waterboard him enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
simon Bar
You Have To Let That Raga Drop...!
12:38 PM on 05/07/2012
So, with the US Govt. excellent track record on everything 911, we should be careful who we kill.

At Least 7 of the 9/11
Hijackers are Still Alive

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

The muscle hijackers 'picked by bin Ladin':

Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).

How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
01:20 PM on 05/07/2012
Are you conversant in English?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
07:31 AM on 05/07/2012
They should have been tried years ago. They should have been allowed to enter guilty pleas and receive the death penalty. What we have to wonder about is the timing. Eric Holder managed to mount two federal trials against a former baseball player who allegedly lied to Congress about allegedly taking performance enhancing drugs but is just now getting around to trying these accused mass murderers? It’s been over a decade and one would think that the justice Department has had enough prep time to be ready for anything that the Defense team is going to throw at the Prosecution in an attempt to muddy the waters. The first thing they need to do is make it absolutely clear that there is a single unified standard for court room behavior. No prayer breaks, no paper airplanes, no snickering. Criminal Defendants are routinely restrained and/or gagged when their behavior is disruptive. If their counsel wants to dress up in a burka for her own obscure reasons, fine she doesn’t get to dictate pandering dress codes to anyone else. Let’s get this trial started and make the Defendants play by our rules. If they are uncomfortable with that, give them a one-time offer of a trial under the terms they could expect in Saudi Arabia...
07:31 AM on 05/07/2012
OBL or KSM? -
Who is the real alleged mastermind of 9-11? At has been alleged that both OBL and KSM were the masterminds?

- http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30720
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
simon Bar
You Have To Let That Raga Drop...!
11:50 AM on 05/07/2012
Do more research , it was neither of these two terrorists, it was other terrorists.
12:36 PM on 05/07/2012
I am aware it was neither of the two. My point was to expose the contradictions in the official story, which are too many to even count. Those accused are the convenient scapegoats or fall guys. Neither OBL or KSM could have had the means or opportunity to pull off such an operation.
07:25 AM on 05/07/2012
Just who is in charge of our countries court system? Who is in charge of impeding our rights to a speedy trial? Who is in charge of allowing our country's biggest enemy to run amok and wreak havoc in OUR court ? WHO?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pending
05:49 AM on 05/07/2012
Giving these people a fair trial is exactly what makes us different from them. We should not give up our moral and ethics, ones that we have fought so hard for, just for the sake of revenge.

Showing ourselves and the world that we are a civilized society is the best revenge possible.

In saying this however, if they themselves are not adhering to the rules of the court, we have the right to deal with them as we would with any other disruptive defendant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Michael Norris
06:41 AM on 05/07/2012
This isn't a fair trial.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terroristmd
10:36 AM on 05/07/2012
Whats unfair about it besides trying to get 12 jihadis together so they can have a jury of their peers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffreygeez
05:01 AM on 05/07/2012
The Navu Seals that iced Osama should get the medal of honor just for saving the world the dog and pony show that his trial would have been.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
05:00 AM on 05/07/2012
Fees for lawyers - process instead of justice...Jared Loughner; Ft. Hood shooter.