iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Air Pollution, Asthma Burden Unevenly Shared Among U.S. Children

Posted: 05/07/2012 7:44 pm Updated: 05/07/2012 7:55 pm

Kellen Bolden was only 10 years old when an asthma attack took his life, but his mom still remembers him as a "little man" with big aspirations.

Kellen Bolden, 1990-2001.

"He often said to himself, 'Good morning, Mr. Millionaire,'" recalled Rhonda Mitchell. Kellen's dreams, she said, weren't confined to the limits of his hometown, Jonesboro, Ga., a predominantly minority, low-income community about 20 miles south of Atlanta.

Much like its bigger neighbor to the north, and a number of other cities across the country, Jonesboro has long faced air pollution problems.

"We know that air quality is unacceptable in many places," said Christopher Paul, a graduate student in environmental policy at Duke University. "This is just one of a number of assaults on children's well-being that makes it harder to lead healthy, successful lives."

Paul is a researcher on a study published last year that describes disparities in air quality around the U.S. By pairing census data with air pollution levels from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's monitoring network, his team found that low-income and minority groups -- in particular, poor children of color -- tend to be most exposed to air pollution.

Disadvantaged kids not only breathe disproportionate amounts bad air, but they also can be more vulnerable to the ill effects of that bad air. As The Huffington Post reported in March, asthma is likely the most notorious of these ailments. Nearly one in four Hispanic and Puerto Rican kids living in poverty in the U.S. has been diagnosed with the condition that can cause wheezing, coughing, breathlessness and chest tightness, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That compares with about one in 13 middle-class or wealthy white children. (The agency also reports similar disparities in exposures to air pollution.)

Air pollution, Mitchell said, was a major trigger for Kellen's asthma. "On smoggy days, it seemed like he couldn't ever get enough air," she said, noting that the avid football player stayed indoors when these dangerous conditions hit Jonesboro.

Just why lower income families more commonly reside in places with dirty air is not clear, said Janice Nolen, assistant vice president of national policy and advocacy at the American Lung Association, which released its annual State of the Air report last month. Power plants and industrial boilers might be constructed in poor neighborhoods. Or it may be that areas housing such facilities, or that are bordered by heavily trafficked roads, simply offer cheaper housing. Researchers recently traced back the historical influx of African Americans into western Louisville, Ky., and found that this occurred after the arrival of polluting industries that gave the area its nickname of "Rubbertown".

"Richer neighborhoods are not necessarily built near major highways or downwind from factories," noted Nolen.

Regardless, the differences in how much toxic air children breathe may not be the only explanation for the disparities in air pollution-related children's health problems, experts said. Take, for example, the city blocks that extend north and south of East 96th Street in Manhattan, New York, the rough dividing line between the neighborhoods of East Harlem and the Upper East Side.

Nearly one of every three kids in East Harlem suffers from asthma. In the more affluent Upper East Side, the rate is less than 10 percent. Yet both neighborhoods have been found to have poor air quality due in large part to diesel truck and bus traffic and old buildings that still burn dirty heating oil.

How could kids living within walking distance of one another face such disparate risks?

"You have to layer the air pollution on top of other existing social disparities," explained Cecil Corbin-Mark, deputy director for the Harlem-based nonprofit WE ACT for Environmental justice. "What happens when a child has an asthma attack? How does that impact families income? These are domino-like effects that can flow from these bad air quality situations in our neighborhoods."

Disadvantaged populations may lack access to health care, grocery stores and good jobs. Add to that the underlying chronic stress that comes with living in poverty, which researchers are finding might further increase susceptibility to conditions that include asthma, heart disease and cancer.

Poorer communities may also be more likely to encounter other environmental exposures, including contaminated water and toxic wastes. Indoor pollutants, such as cigarette smoke and cockroach droppings, are associated with both poverty and asthma as well.

“There might be multiple steps in the development of asthma. Diesel particles can encourage someone’s immune system to have an allergic response,” said Matt Perzanowski, an environmental health scientist at Columbia University and researcher on a recent study that found higher rates of childhood asthma in New York City neighborhoods that had more black carbon pollution in the air as well as a greater presence of cockroach and mouse allergens. Once a kid has asthma, Perzanowski added, such allergens may be triggers of asthma attacks.

Of course, a child living in a pest-free home on the Upper East Side, who may not have to think about where his or her next meal will come from, is not immune to air pollution's threats.

Brennan Passons, 2000-2011.

The Passons live in an affluent suburb about 20 miles north of Atlanta. The family spoke out alongside Kellen's mom at an asthma awareness event last week in Atlanta. Brennan Passons, 11, died of asthma in October.

"Brennan and Kellen are on two opposite ends of the spectrum. But it's not just one income group or demographic. Asthma affects everyone," Tim Passons, Brennan's dad, told The Huffington Post. "It naturally makes you wonder. Why is it that 10 percent of the kids in Georgia have asthma? Certainly the environment has something to do with it."

While most attention, including the American Lung Association report, focuses on ozone (smog) and particle pollution (soot), scientists are finding that specific air pollutants such as PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and mercury pose a number of dangers to babies in the womb and young children -- from future obesity to cognitive problems. The pollutants tend to stem from the same sources, namely power plants, said Nolen.

The EPA has recently targeted sources of unhealthy air with new rules that restrict cross-state air pollution, strengthen mercury and air toxics standards and limit carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants. Should they withstand opposition from some members of congress and industry, 540,000 asthma attacks will be prevented each year. The proposed carbon restrictions could further decrease asthma's death toll. The biggest beneficiaries: disadvantaged groups.

The EPA and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is increasing its focus on environmental justice issues in urban areas, as well as rural communities and Indian tribes that often fall off the radar.

"We need to target these worse-off neighborhoods," said Duke’s Paul. "By acting on pollution in places that have the highest burden, we will both be reducing the worst polluted areas and reducing disparities."

Locally, cities that include New York and Atlanta are pushing to reduce the number of idling trucks and the use of hazardous heating oils. "But the date for that to take effect is still well ahead of us," noted Corbin-Mark, referring to pending legislation that would phase-out the dirtiest heating oils from New York City buildings.

"While people are working on green answers to air pollution, which can take a long time, we don't want to wait," said Sarah Passons, who along with her husband and Rhonda Mitchell are helping to educate parents on how to protect their asthmatic children today. Sarah's recommendation: "Always have an EpiPen on you at all times, know how to use it and teach your children how to use it." An EpiPen is an injector filled with epinephrine, which relaxes airways in an allergic or asthma attack.

Kellen always knew his name would some day be "up in lights," added Rhonda Mitchell. She suggested that his dream is coming true, albeit not in a way he might have anticipated. His story is helping other kids have a better chance at a healthy life.

FOLLOW GREEN

 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:25 AM on 06/07/2012
Their are great products out there that can greatly reduce the discomfort and severity of asthma attacks and other breathing problems. They are through extensive testing proven to work extremely well. Check it out http://atmospure.com
04:48 AM on 05/09/2012
How sad that all those creating the pollution all over the world are so damn stupid and don't realize that they too are inhaling that which we have to. Lock 'em away in a room and make them inhale the stuff for a year or so and see what they have to say when out again. Their brains are already affected now!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
05:56 PM on 05/08/2012
childhood asthma news and articles - Natural News
9/19/2006 - The prevalence of childhood asthma and wheeze rises around 2 to 3 per cent for every indoor swimming pool per 100000 of the population across ...
www.naturalnews.com/childhood_asthma.html

Combat childhood asthma naturally with the Buteyko breathing ...
Oct 25, 2005 ... Childhood asthma is fast becoming an epidemic in the United States. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, close to one in 13 ...
www.naturalnews.com/012829.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lesscancer
Bill Couzens is the Founder of Less Cancer
12:03 PM on 05/08/2012
Good Post. Everyone should have the right to clean air. And sorry to read of the tragic deaths of these children. And grateful to the parents bringing attention to this issue.

In the Asthma journey in my family ways I worked to reduced risk in our home was to insure that no smoking is allowed in our home- other things included removing things that catch dust or dampness like wall to wall carpet and even curtains and anything that would collect or generate dampness. For the bathrooms we kept them clean and used cleaners with little scent and often kept fans running after a shower to insure there was no dampness.

The things that take on the natural landscape of every household with kids was to do things like eliminated excessive stuffed animals -the ones that were carried by kids were washed in hot water regularly.

Other practices included reducing exposure to pets by not allowing pets into the bedrooms etc.or on the furniture. Washing bedding in hot water-using mite proof pillow cases.Eliminated fragrances like perfumes, dryer sheets and room fresheners and scented candles etc. Often there are scents in things you would not suspect like an air furnace filter. And aside from being triggers for asthma we do not fully understand all the healthy risks associated with products that we bring into our homes.

This of course did not replace medical attention but did seem to help in my situation.
04:49 AM on 05/09/2012
Yes, everyone should be entitled to clean air EXCEPT those polluting it.
12:36 PM on 06/30/2012
if you drive your contributing to the pollution just as much as the energy companies
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
97034Leftofcenter
10:21 AM on 05/08/2012
Now I know why there are so many asthma docs in Houston TX
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
10:07 AM on 05/08/2012
Air quality is certainly a factor in asthma. Equally deletorious is the over-consumption of dairy products which is toxic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:57 AM on 05/08/2012
We've come a long way since 2005. Death's attributable to power plants has gone way down

"Particle pollution from power plants has been recently estimated to kill approximately 13,000 people a year."
http://www.lung.org/press-room/press-releases/power-plants-epa.html

For perspective, deaths due to suicide are way higher.

Suicide: 36,909
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
06:54 PM on 05/08/2012
Those numbers are way underestimated. Ten percent of the people in Los Angeles die from complications arising from the air they breathe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:44 PM on 05/08/2012
Could much of the smog be from transportation?  The ALA study only relates to power plants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
3rdgenfeminist
09:13 AM on 05/08/2012
Asthma kills. More infants and elderly are being diagnosed each year.
Asthma costs. That means it costs our economy, diverting both workers and spending dollars to the health system, whether covered by insurance or not.
This makes it OUR problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Num1Christy
Progressive Ohioan
10:42 AM on 05/08/2012
Couldn't agree more.
08:52 AM on 05/08/2012
Disparities in air quality in the U.S.?!! So I suppose air quality should be equal, well THAT'S just more liberal socialism!
06:57 PM on 05/08/2012
Where I live, those disparities are caused by the people themselves. In los Angeles hundreds of thousands of people cook with wood every day. Those people are usually poorer immigrants living in immigrant neighborhoods.
04:39 AM on 05/09/2012
I think what the article is alluding to is the fact the wealthy deliberately isolate themselves from the very industries that create the problem, from which they profit.
It's much like where I live, cigarette smokers will ALWAYS sit nearest to the doors and windows of bars and restaurants, simply because they don't want to wallow in the filth their drug addiction creates.
But I agree about many people causing their OWN health problems as far being irresponsible. I used to live in the state of WA and there was ALWAYS some lazy hillbilly or land rapist burning stumps and garbage because it was cheaper than disposing of the problem legally and responsibly.
If it was ONLY those people that suffered health problems and died of lung cancer then I would applaud them for ridding the earth of themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h23154
08:48 AM on 05/08/2012
What a silly headline. Just can't stay away from that equality mantra. LOL.
02:21 PM on 05/08/2012
The left is incredible, or should I just say, not credible.
photo
Hoodoo X
tanstaafl
08:46 AM on 05/08/2012
"disparities in air quality around the U.S"
Gosh.  You mean there is a difference in air quality between a farmhouse in western Kansas, and an apartment in downtown LA?  Hopefully there will more government funded research into this alarming fact.
09:00 AM on 05/08/2012
Yes. That's the important issue here. It's not that industry profits at the expense of our children's health.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
10:39 AM on 05/08/2012
Why don't you bother reading the whole article. A main point is that these disparities are what drive future economic divides - when 1/4 of kids living in poverty have asthma, then don't be surprised when they grow up to be poor as well, and don't be surprised when poor parents need government help to pay for medicine or make up for lost hours of work spent caring for asthmatic kids - all because of pollution that the rest of us refuse to take responsibility for.

Yet, like a good Conservative, you'll probably blame the parents and the child for being poor. "Get a job" and "I made it all by myself, why don't you?", all while we contribute to the conditions that keep them poor.

Take some responsibility, for god's sake.
CrustyCSM
the liberals nightmare
08:41 AM on 05/08/2012
Tough to justify these assumptions. I grew up in the 60s when the environment was in a much worse condition as far as air quality went. Many factories converted to cleaner energy systems and most houses converted from coal to natural gas, electricity, or home heating oil. Asthma rates were much lower back then. Some medical reviews have backed the notion that our kids are inside too much. Many toxins are found in our building materials, furniture, and everyday cleaning materials. And our kids spend much more time inside. Im not sold on a childs economic status as having much impact. Detroit should be a pretty healthy place to live now eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
10:05 AM on 05/08/2012
True. People need to list all of the chemicals in their homes and look up their MSDSs online. We use the same hazardous chemicals in our home as industry uses. And most we pour down the drain with copious quantities of dispersant. Our sunscreen use killed all of the coral reef in the Gulf of Mexico according an article I read in Science News Magazine.
We eat Benzene compounds and put them on our face. We use frack fluid when fracking the hole in the bedroom. The main ingredient of most of the products we buy for our children causes cirrhosis of the liver, obesity and is a trigger for Diabetes. I could go on for pages, but there is a limit on words per comment. Do your own research. You will be shocked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
02:52 PM on 05/08/2012
My friend who grew up in Pittsburgh remembers that children were kept inside when the pollution levels were high. They were not told to breathe deep and suck it up.

When those horrible 'fogs' made it impossible to see in London from burning coal the health of the lower classes was abysmal. A huge percentage failed to pass the physical for military service. That's why after WW2 there was so much support for a national health service and for phasing out the worst pollutants for heating.

The article said that the levels vary with distance from major highways and from power plants. Even a few miles makes a very large difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:38 AM on 05/08/2012
I simply cannot help but wonder if paediatricians and early 'detection' don't somehow play a role in this. When my daughter was around two it started with her paediatrician... every time she got a cold and he would tell me or her father that she had asthma and needed an inhaler. If she was with her father (we're divorced) he would buy into it and get the inhaler. When he would bring her back to my house I would put it away. She had chest congestion, a common symptom of a cold. Her father was terrified she was going to be asthmatic and my assertion was that if he wanted her to be so he should continue to listen to her doctor and give her the inhaler. When he learned that she recovered completely from the colds she had over the next few years, after I had ceased giving her the inhaler, he finally stopped fretting. She is NOT asthmatic. Though there are no doubt children born with the trigger for asthma I suspect the growing, and alarming, numbers may also be related to early misdiagnosis to some degree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
10:41 AM on 05/08/2012
Then how could kids living in poverty who have LESS access to a doctor (or to prescription inhalers) be diagnosed with asthma MORE than kids that have a higher likelihood of access to a doctor?

It doesn't quite add up...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:23 PM on 05/08/2012
I was speaking to the increasing incidences of asthma overall.  I would suspect, where poor kids are concerned (though they do have access to doctors), living conditions play a larger role... mold, mildew, waste from rodents/etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
10:41 AM on 05/08/2012
Plus, kids don't die from "not asthma" attacks...so deaths from asthma would be a pretty reliable metric.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:24 PM on 05/08/2012
They cited some deaths.  This article isn't strictly about deaths from asthma, but childhood asthma overall.  
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sonoflars
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional
08:17 AM on 05/08/2012
Unfortunately, this is America. The Koch brothers and their allies in the Congress (the entire republican caucus) and the numerous conservative think tanks and PAC will prevent regulations to reduce air pollution. If you want a cleaner environment, vote them out in November. There's no other way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
10:26 AM on 05/08/2012
There are other ways. Get rid of that internal-combustion vehicle (gasoline, diesel, biofuel, hybrid, flex fuel are all equally bad). Get rid of that flush toilet, bathtub and swimming pool. Do not use aquifer water; only rainwater. Stop using disposable products. Stop using toxic chemicals in our homes. Reduce the amount of dispersant we pour down the drains.
One can't be Green if they use or do any of the things above. Let's make an example to others
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sonoflars
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional
11:32 AM on 05/08/2012
I agree with you in principle. What you believe is necessary would destroy our economy and I'm not necessarily saying that we shouldn't do that. In our economy, wealth is created when materials are transformed. Oil into gas. Sand into glass. Earth into clay pots. So on and so on. Food that's transformed into unhealthy happy meals to make our children crave salty, fatty foods. That's why I'm not saying it's a bad thing to bring it down but in so doing, lots and lots of us will feel a great deal of pain.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
08:16 AM on 05/08/2012
Nothing worse than the lose of your child, so glad these parents talk abt the dangers to others. So often in this country we direct the fixes to problems on individuals, if we the people used less gass, used less electricity etc, but fact is, its our government and industry that uses the bulk of these resources and produce the most pollution. For 35 yrs my family has worked to be energy self-sufficient and even after all this time, we cannot have all the electrical gadgets a "normal" house uses, most restricted by costs. Greensville, (I think name of town) Missouri was destroyed by a tornado a while back and they are rebuilding "green"...not sure I like the once tree lined streets now lined in windmills but if the alternative is pollution, then lets put up more windmills.