iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jonathan Vilma, Scott Fujita, Others Fight Suspensions In Saints Bounty Case

By BRETT MARTEL 05/07/12 06:48 PM ET AP

Jonathan Vilma
Linebacker Jonathan Vilma of the New Orleans Saints in action during the game against the Indianapolis Colts on October 23, 2011 at Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images)

NEW ORLEANS -- Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma and three other players suspended in the NFL's investigation of New Orleans' cash-for-hits bounty system challenged their punishments Monday.

Vilma, named by the NFL as a ringleader of the operation, appealed his season-long suspension while the NFL Players Association notified the league it was reserving the appeal rights of Saints defensive end Will Smith and those of ex-Saints Anthony Hargrove and Scott Fujita.

All four players and the union argue that no appeal should be heard before NFLPA grievances are resolved questioning NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's authority to discipline the players and to hear their appeals.

Vilma's appeal also states the NFL has not presented any evidence linking him to a system in which players were paid to injure opponents. It asks the league to provide a wide range of documentation, including witness statements and the names of those witnesses.

Vilma received the harshest of the suspensions, followed by Hargrove (eight games) Smith (four games) and Fujita (three games). Monday was their deadline to appeal.

Hargrove now is with Green Bay. Fujita, a member of the NFLPA's executive committee who has played for Cleveland since 2010, made his first public statement since all four suspensions were handed down last Wednesday. Like Vilma and Smith before him, Fujita denied involvement in a "bounty pool" and challenged the league's findings.

"I disagree wholeheartedly with the discipline imposed," Fujita said in a statement emailed to The Associated Press. "I've yet to hear the specifics of any allegation against me, nor have I seen any evidence that supports what the NFL alleges.

"I look forward to the opportunity to confront what evidence they claim to have in the appropriate forum," Fujita continued. "I have never contributed money to any so-called `bounty' pool, and any statements to the contrary are false. To say I'm disappointed with the League would be a huge understatement."

The players' maneuvers came on the same day copies of a sworn statement by Hargrove were obtained by media including the AP.

Hargrove's statement describes how he was instructed by ex-defensive coordinator Gregg Williams and current New Orleans assistant head coach Joe Vitt to deny the existence of a bounty program to NFL investigators.

The interpretation of his statement is a matter of debate, however.

The NFL has said that Hargrove's words acknowledge the existence of a bounty program and show that Hargrove initially lied to NFL investigators about it. The union notes that Hargrove's statement does not say that he lied to anyone, nor does it state that he or any other Saints participated in a bounty program.

The argument is one of many that are bound to play out on appeal, once the union's jurisdictional challenges have been resolved.

The union's grievances argue that Goodell is prohibited from punishing players for any aspect of the case occurring before the current collective bargaining agreement was signed last August. It argues that a CBA system arbitrator, and not Goodell, has the authority to decide player punishment under such circumstances, as well as rule on any appeals.

Vilma's latest filing not only reiterates those positions but also states that the NFL still has not provided "a single piece of evidence" to the Saints defensive captain to justify his suspension.

"To be able to share, discuss and analyze the supposed evidence that has been gathered is a fundamental cornerstone of a fair and just process, and a vital prerequisite to uncovering the truth," wrote Vilma's attorney, Peter Ginsburg. "Indeed, the failure of the NFL to conduct itself in a just manner has compromised the process and resulted in erroneous and damaging conclusions."

Vilma's legal team now wants to see if there really is evidence such as account ledgers of improper cash bonuses, payment slips or other documents or emails showing Vilma pledged, made or received bounty payments.

Vilma also asks to review any video or audio evidence that the NFL has, including video from games or any statistical analysis of Vilma's on-field performances.

Last week, former U.S. attorney Mary Jo White, who was hired by the NFL to evaluate its bounty investigation, said there was evidence from "multiple independent sources" that shows players received payments for going after particular opponents.

The NFL has said its investigation included 18,000 documents comprising nearly 50,000 pages.

White said the NFL has shared ample evidence with suspended players and the NFLPA, and she also said that concealing the identity of witnesses is important in terms of not only protecting those who help investigations but encouraging more to step forward in the future.

The Saints already have been punished heavily in connection with the probe.

Head coach Sean Payton has been suspended the entire 2012 season, while suspensions of eight games were handed down to general manager Mickey Loomis and six games to Vitt. The club also was fined $500,000 and docked two second-round draft choices this year and next. Meanwhile, Williams, who admitted to running the bounty program from 2009-11, has been suspended indefinitely. Williams was hired by the St. Louis Rams in the offseason.

FOLLOW SPORTS

NEW ORLEANS -- Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma and three other players suspended in the NFL's investigation of New Orleans' cash-for-hits bounty system challenged their punishments Monday. Vilma, na...
NEW ORLEANS -- Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma and three other players suspended in the NFL's investigation of New Orleans' cash-for-hits bounty system challenged their punishments Monday. Vilma, na...
Filed by Michael Klopman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:50 AM on 05/13/2012
Roger Goodell, the whole leadership of the New Orleans Saints and any other team that countenanced intentional hits and all players who participated in intentional hits should be indicted for assault and battery, conspiracy to intentionally cause bodily harm and prosecuted for their actions. The teams should be sued civilly by all who were injured by such hits. Intentional maimings are still criminal actions, even when an athlete assumes the liability of severe injury in a highly physical sport. Suspending these vermin for one year or less simply countenances such activity and therefore Goodell is part of the conspiracy.

Additionally, Goodell and all players, coached and executives from teams involved in the intentional hits should be barred from the NFL for life. The argument that one year suspension is too long is ridiculous.

And such light treatment of the criminals who initiated and carried out or attempted intentional, crippling hits is in itself proof the NFL would rather have football players suffer concussions then take the steps to fix the problem. They believe the sport is not as appealing if people aren't regularly crippled. The number of former players speaking out on concussions speaks for itself. Only the NFL can get away with this kind of behavior.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nygcruz80
God bless Mark Levine !
12:23 PM on 05/10/2012
Forget it guys, you are TAINTED.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ajp49
I am now doing thing and or making decision based
05:11 PM on 05/08/2012
KEEPING IT THOUGHTFULLY HONEST: Commission Goodell, you did good! Tell it like it really it, "This is player on player and what we want to do is make sure that people understand that there needs to be respect for players that play the game, and that needs to start with players against players.” Are you listen now, NFL P(L)AYERS’ ASSOCIATION? Let’s see, the union is NOT fighting to protect the health and future physical welfare of its players, but to protect players with criminal intent from “accountability to prohibited and dangerous conduct directed to hurt their own members!” Huh? Who is protecting who? This union has direct evidence of a signed and sworn statement from Hargrove admitted to his role in the criminal bounty program as well as how Coaches facilitated its execution! “Hargrove said Williams and Vitt instructed him to "play dumb" if he was asked about bounties.” Yet, this union is doing such a disservice to be more concern with trying to question and under mind the disciplinary process that they so carefully negotiated in the Collective Bargaining less than a year ago." Is it any wonder, why players are leaving this profession with permanent life threatening injuries? And now these dummies continue to follow orders, “"play dumb" if he was asked about bounties.” THE DAY FOR ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SAINTS THAT DID BEHAVE LIKE SAINTS IS HERE! This is absolutely positively incredibly, Ludicrous!
tqcobb
Free your mind and the rest will follow
01:56 PM on 05/08/2012
wonder if Payton and the other front office types threw their own players under the bus in hopes of getting lighter sentences? wouldn't surprise me one bit...in many cases mangement doesn't view their players as men/people, more like commodoties