iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ryan Grim
GET UPDATES FROM Ryan:

Nancy Pelosi Defended By House Progressives In Tussle With Russ Feingold

Posted: 05/08/2012 5:57 pm

Pelosi

WASHINGTON -- Leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are coming to the defense of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California after former Sen. Russ Feingold challenged her commitment to protecting Social Security and Medicare.

"Let's remember that we are on the same team," reads a letter being circulated by progressive House Democrats. "We need to focus our efforts on the true targets, which are the 228 House Republicans who voted to end the Medicare guarantee, reduce benefits and increase costs for seniors."

The letter has so far been signed by Reps. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the progressive caucus co-chairmen, as well as Reps. Jan. Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Doris Matsui (D-Calif.), who sit on the progressive caucus committee that deals with aging issues.

The House liberals told Feingold, a Wisconsin progressive, that "we are concerned by the email sent by your organization on May 3, 2012, which raises questions about House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s commitment to Social Security and Medicare. The email states that she indicated 'a disturbing potential willingness to adopt a plan that could slash these benefits.' This statement unfairly characterizes Leader Pelosi's record and position on Social Security and Medicare."

Feingold, who lost his Senate seat in the 2010 election, had been responding to Pelosi's recent comments that she would have been willing to vote for what's known as the Simpson-Bowles plan, which includes a mix of cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, other social programs, with revenue increases. It would also trim the Pentagon budget.


The progressive caucus letter does not address the Simpson-Bowles comments.

"The question remains -- does Leader Pelosi support benefit cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security?" said Cole Leystra, executive director of Progressives United, the political organization Feingold founded last year.

Read the full letter below:

Senator Russ Feingold Progressives United P.O. Box 620533 Middleton, WI, 53562 Dear Senator Feingold:

We write today as your progressive Democratic colleagues – and as the Co-Chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Co-Chairs of Seniors Task Force. Over many years we have worked together and stood for economic and social justice. We have admired your leadership on our shared agenda. Support for Social Security and Medicare have been among our core shared values. In this context we are concerned by the email sent by your organization on May 3, 2012 which raises questions about House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s commitment to Social Security and Medicare. The email states that she indicated “a disturbing potential willingness to adopt a plan that could slash these benefits."

This statement unfairly characterizes Leader Pelosi’s record and position on Social Security and Medicare. Together we have worked with Leader Pelosi for more than two decades. In our experience Leader Pelosi stands out as one of the strongest champions for Social Security and Medicare throughout her time in Congress. Time and again, both as a Member of Congress and as Leader, she has fought to protect these programs.

Leader Pelosi’s record is clear. She has been a tireless advocate in our fight to protect Social Security and Medicare from Republican attempts to dismantle them. Her leadership was crucial in defeating President George W. Bush’s efforts to privatize Social Security. And, no one is working harder to ensure that Democrats regain control of the House of Representatives so we can protect the long term viability of these programs.

Let’s remember that we are on the same team. We need to focus our efforts on the true targets, which are the 228 House Republicans who voted to end the Medicare guarantee, reduce benefits and increase costs for seniors.

Committed progressives should unite to protect these initiatives from Republican attacks. We will be more effective champions of the middle-class, and those who aspire to it, if we collaborate on a strategy to challenge Republicans on their attacks on working families. We hope to work with you and a broad progressive coalition in the months ahead to preserve Social Security and Medicare.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are coming to the defense of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California after former Sen. Russ Feingold challenged her com...
WASHINGTON -- Leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are coming to the defense of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California after former Sen. Russ Feingold challenged her com...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:24 AM on 05/10/2012
Seems the Progressive caucus want to condemn themselves into irrelevance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JimRinX
Ex-Chef with Neuropathy on SSDI
12:05 PM on 05/09/2012
For me, there's one over-riding issue - though, to be honest, I'm not sure this memory from my youth is valid....so I'm hoping someone will set me straight!
IF I remember, the Social Security Trust has been a Cash Cow for the Federal Government and Private Citizen/Corporation Contractors who dump those taxdollars right back into the Economy, by:
A). Borrowing against it, with Interest; which's supposed to 'grow' the Trust Fund faster than the Drain upon it; which would be the case right now, IF they hadn't already lowered the Feds Interest Rates - as it's the Feds T-Bill rate that determinesregulates the Trusts Growth!
B). This Is the 'Iffy" one. Before President Carter ended the practice in the 1970's, the Fed regularly RAIDED the Social Security Trust during 'National Emergencies' - Many of which had been 'legislated into existence' by crooks who wanted to steal it (Sound familiar?).
IF I'm right about the last bit then all of the Corporations - the ones who, if memory serves me right - made so much MONEY off of all of the Neutron Bombs that they were 'paying for' with that Trust Money, should have to PAY IT BACK!
I mean: The Cold War Is Over - The Energy Crisis WOULD BE, If you useed all of those semi-ill gotten gains to 'Be the Change', rather than to 'Buy It, and then Shelve It' (Mr. Vetner, How - No, Where! - Are You, and Your - no, Exxons! - Miracle Algae?)
10:15 AM on 05/09/2012
Remove the cap. Problem solved.
10:12 AM on 05/09/2012
Russ makes a good point. SS and Medicare should be off the table until the Pentagon budget is slashed, subsidies to Oil and Gas eliminated, and the Buffet rule a reality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yossarian22
10:46 AM on 05/09/2012
SS and Medicare should be off the table entirely, unless those programs are getting beefed up, not slashed down.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:08 AM on 05/09/2012
I'm glad Feingold did remind Democrats to defend Social Security & Medicare against Republican destruction. From attending Feingold's listening sessions in Wisconsin, I think I know his positions well enough to understand his concern that senior's issues and those of all citizens are taken care of.
07:38 AM on 05/09/2012
Hyperbole, fearmongering and rhetoric - the Dimocratic Party way!
It is the Dims that will let seniors down by allowing SS and Medicare to run out of money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JimRinX
Ex-Chef with Neuropathy on SSDI
12:15 PM on 05/09/2012
Okay, sure...uh-huh....right......
See the Above Cooment - the part about the Social Security Trusts Growth Rate being tied to the Federal Treasuries T-Bill Rate - which, uuuuuh, Sec. Paulsen, NOT SEC. BERNACKE, lowered to 'historically low levels' during the, uuuuuuh, "Bush Rex II", NOT THE PRESIDENT OBAMA, Administration.....'cause that's, like, the Real Fact Thingy that they're trying to sweep under the RUG, Ma-a-a-a-a-an!
In fact, the Trust wouldn't be 'running out' of money 'faster than expected' if they hadn't done that, cause the original 'run out date' was calculated using 'assumed T-Bill rates' that did not materialize because of Hank Paulsens 'Historic Measures' - In my opnion, Sec. Bernacke has been a rat on a sinking ship whose done a pretty damn good job of plugging all of the holes that Bush and his
'1980's Yuppie Coke Head Junk Bond Dealer-cum-Junk Debt Dealer' Krowd made in the hull........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fourex
10:42 PM on 05/08/2012
Dem Comm. defense, "This statement unfairly characterizes Leader Pelosi’s record and position on Social Security and Medicare."
This is false. Feingold quotes Pelosi's statement on TV where she states support for Simpson/Bowles which cuts Social Security and Medicare. Lies by committee are still lies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
09:56 PM on 05/08/2012
We have to make cuts for SS recipients who are upper middle income and higher, at least triple the cap on income that has payroll deducsions. It is shocking how many people don't know that ONLY the first $106,000 of income has SS taxes deducted. Those 2 things would probably solve the SS problem.

NEWS FLASH: ONLY 2.9% is income is taxed for Medicare, HALF fm emplyee and HALF fm employer. That's the cost of one or two watery cups of Dunkin Donuts of coffee per week. THAT would do wonders.
10:20 PM on 05/08/2012
"It is shocking how many people don't know that ONLY the first $106,000 of income has SS taxes deducted"

And then if you explain to them that there is a pay in cap because SS is not a welfare program and there is also a cap on pay outs . . . it all makes sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
11:18 PM on 05/08/2012
yes, but well to do and more fortunate also get a lot of financial advantages fm tax deductions that lower income just don't get. In other words, all the deductions and tax advantages, investment income advantages allow upper income folks to live much better. I guess I believe in the commonweal a little more.

Like when they tried to address SS in the 1980's under Reagan, I remember Peter Jennings reporting on 2 examples of advantage, trouble is I can only remember the one where the little old lady who saves her SS checks for her annual trip to Paris. The other example is really egregious but can't remember it, damn !
07:44 AM on 05/09/2012
It is a moot point. Dims do not have the political courage to fix the SS and Medicare funding problem. When GOP tries to find refunding options, the gutless Dims claim they are trying to end entitlements.
Fact: SS and Medicare will run out of funding by 2034. Something needs to be done to refund or millions of seniors will be on the streets. Dims point fingers and have head in sand - Party of No Responsibility!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fourex
10:50 PM on 05/08/2012
Only the cap need be lifted to pay-out benefits for the next 8 decades.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
11:19 PM on 05/08/2012
yes, I think I remember that point being made in a discussion, maybe on CSpan.
09:51 PM on 05/08/2012
I miss Russ!
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:11 AM on 05/09/2012
I miss Russ too, and his taking care of our concerns, as I have benefited from his looking in to issues for me. Republican, tea Bagger Ron Johnson is NO HELP whatsoever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Quitcherbichin
If you are posting here, thank a veteran.
09:05 PM on 05/08/2012
"Revenue enhancements". Liberal speak for tax increases. The Demos are obsessed with "taxing the rich" because they know that it plays well with their base who are ignorant of what it will (not) accomplish. They try to spin it so that increasing taxes on the so called rich will reduce the deficit, balance the budget, save Medicare and SS, and give every citizen 40 acres and a mule. The reality is that the revenue that will be generated from the proposed "soak the rich" plan would not run the country for two days. It is simply playing to the ignorance of their base.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Unclebuggies
09:31 PM on 05/08/2012
Revenue enhancements is actually a term the Republicans started using last year because they'd all signed pledges against any tax increases. Remember healthcare mandates? That's a Republican idea too. So were the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't want to step on any toes, so I thought I should clear up this confusion.
09:44 PM on 05/08/2012
Yea, didn't work during the Clinton years.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:52 PM on 05/08/2012
Nancy Pelosi and the Progressive Caucus are weakling losers and are worthless advocates for the poor and middle class. If they weren't we'd have a public option in health care, at the least, and could possibly have single payer. These losers talk a good game but when it's time for action they fold in deference to the DLC/corporate wing of the Democratic Party. I used to be proud to be a Democrat (since 1972), but since they have proven to succumb to political threats from the DLC/Obama/corporate America, I have resigned as a Democrat and urge others to do the same. Then, I'll be an independent and the Democrats might then give a crap about what I think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
10:08 PM on 05/08/2012
I share your view, but for god's sake, don't vote for the Republicans, that's what the big D Democratic Party has become with their "Right Turn" around 1990 after Reagan's landslide 84 re-election. They sold their souls to Wall Street. I still remember a cartoon showing a fat cat fm behind, with Republicans in his "right" hip pocket and Democrats in his "left" hip pocket. I think it was a play on a quote fm Ralph Nder. "Right Turn" also is the name of a little book used in a poli sci course. Right Turn, The Decline of the Democrats and The Future of American Politics by Thomas Ferguson and Joel Rogers, 1987. It has one review with 5 stars on Amazon.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:35 AM on 05/09/2012
I would rather have a hot poker stuck in my eye than vote for a Republican. There are other choices. Our two party system has been ruined by money and corporate media. I don't want to keep doing the same thing over and over again (voting for the lesser of two evils) and expect things to change. Obama is different than Bush only on the margins. I still see pandering to the wealthy and to corporations. I still see endless war and bombing of civilians. There is still a lack of transparency in government and it's gotten worse under Obama. The endless "War on Terror" is still being used as a justification for the erosion of civil liberties and I guarantee that it will get worse if the populace doesn't come out of it's zombie like trance. It can start with one protest vote.
07:46 AM on 05/09/2012
Vote out Pelosi, Reid, BHO and the rest of the obstructionist Dims.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:20 AM on 05/09/2012
So you want to be a "sit on the fence," wondering which side to crap on person? Good luck with the double political junk mail & political calls, because I heard that is what happens to Independents. "Let me see, which way is the wind blowing today? So which person do I support today? Oh! let me see now. Oh, oh? The phone just doesn't stop ringing, and I wonder which party it is this time. Oh, so stupid!
08:48 PM on 05/08/2012
Me thinks thou dost protest too much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fourex
08:37 PM on 05/08/2012
Pelosi was quoted as saying she'd support Simpson/Bowles if put before congress. Alan Simpson has been trying to destroy or steal from Social Security for decades. Pelosi knows this. Simpson/ Bowles, among other items, proposes cutting Social Security benefits to reduce the deficit when Social Security doesn't create any debt. Pelosi knows this. Pelosi in supporting Simpson/Bowles is a threat to all working/retired Americans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dashcat
Sanspoof is my idol
09:05 PM on 05/08/2012
Exactly. That's why I signed Russ Feingold's petition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
12:01 AM on 05/09/2012
where can I find the petition.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
08:23 PM on 05/08/2012
Pelosi is an elected official. Feingold is not. If Feingold was that interested, he would have run for office as he had been urged.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dashcat
Sanspoof is my idol
09:06 PM on 05/08/2012
He thinks he can have more influence as a private citizen with a non profit. I'd say he's making himself heard.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
09:13 PM on 05/08/2012
He is acting the fool, and saying things that are not helpful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
03:26 AM on 05/09/2012
Its very easy to snipe from the side lines when you are a private citizen and don't have to play a part in running the country.nancy Pelosei is treated like dirt because she is an intelligent articulate woman by the Republicans .She is dealing with the fallout left by 30% of Dems not voting in 2010 and personally i think she is doing really well considering the recalcitrance and bone headed arrogance from the other side of the house.
Russ Feingold would do better to try and educate voters and help get Dems elected rather than give the Republicans more ammunition.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:25 AM on 05/09/2012
Feingold was urged to run for an office in Wisconsin for a state position, most likely for governor. NOT a federal position, and would not have made a difference in the Federal Government. Big difference. People who believe Limbaugh & FOX are REALLY dumbed down.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
05:46 AM on 05/09/2012
Feingold had an opportunity to run for the Senate also. Feingold had an opportunity to retain his seat and felt too high and mighty to mount a serious campaign.

You insult yourself with your spurious assumption, and foolish comment about being dumbed down and what news outlets I enjoy. You would best hush rather than tell lies in posts.
08:21 PM on 05/08/2012
all she cares about is giving her brother in law those nice "green" contracts, the ones he's already made millions on
08:14 PM on 05/08/2012
Hopefully Feingold's "I'm watching you, Nancy" will cause her to think twice before joining Obama in gutting the SocSec & Medicare safety nets.

Meanwhile what option did the CPC have but to defend Pelosi's honour. Who else have they got to turn to, Obama? Notice that O is not mentioned in the letter to Feingold.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:29 AM on 05/09/2012
Pres. Obama is NOT planning to gut Social Security or Medicare. That is the Republican plan. The president's suggestion was only to cut payments to the super wealthy, and I know this from listening to his press conferences. Don't you listen to his talks, or are you too busy with the shock jock, Limbaugh lies?
07:50 AM on 05/09/2012
Dims plan is to gutlessly let SS and Medicare run out of funding in 2034. Hey, they won't be around anymore.