iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shannon Colonna Sued For Sending Text Message To Kyle Best When He Caused Car Accident

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: 05/08/2012 7:55 pm Updated: 05/09/2012 12:14 pm

Kuberts Text Lawsuit
David and Linda Kubert lost their legs when a driver who was texting behind the wheel hit them. Now they are not only suing the driver but the person who texted them.

Texting while driving is illegal in 38 states, but a pending court case in New Jersey may determine whether there are legal ramifications to texting someone when they're behind the wheel.

In 2009, Kyle Best got into a car accident while replying to a text sent by Shannon Colonna.

Best, who was 19 at the time, was behind the wheel of his pick-up truck and, as he texted, drifted into opposing traffic and slammed into David and Linda Kubert's motorcycle.

The Kuberts both lost their left legs as a result from the collision and have brought a suit against Best for his role in the injury.

Now, in what could be a precedent-setting case, lawyer Stephen "Skippy" Weinstein has expanded the complaint to also include Colonna.

"They were texting back and forth like a verbal conversation," Weinstein told ABC News. "She may not have been physically present, but she was electronically present."

Not surprisingly, Colonna's lawyer, Joseph McGlone, is arguing that his client shouldn't be part of the suit.

On Friday, he asked Morris County Superior Court Judge David Rand to dismiss charges against Colonna, saying she owed no legal "duty of care" under the facts of the case, the Morris County Daily Record reported.

"The sender of the text has the right to assume the recipient will read it at a safe time," McGlone argued in court. He said there is no court ruling anywhere in the country that says a text-sender is liable if the receiver causes injury while reading the message.

"It's not fair. It's not reasonable. Shannon Colonna has no way to control when Kyle Best is going to read that message," McGlone said.

Although Colonna said in a deposition that she didn't know whether Best was driving when she texted him on Sept. 21, 2009, she also said she "may have known."

Weinstein pointed out that Colonna didn't seem to realize the dangers of texting while driving or texting someone who is driving.

"What I found interesting was her testimony at depositions that this is what teenagers do," Weinstein told WABC-TV.

Evidence in the case shows the pair exchanged more than two dozen texts during the day and Weinstein argued that Colonna should have been aware Best was driving when he resumed texting her after staying off the phone about five hours while he worked.

According to a deposition, Best said that at the time of the crash he glanced down at his cell to see who texted him, but a time sequence of the exchanged texts read in court show he was the last to text before the crash.

McGlone told the court that cellphone analysis showed that Best texted Colonna seconds before 5:48 p.m. She responded 31 seconds later. Best texted her back, and seconds later he called 911 to report the collision.

According to the sequence, there was no intervening text from Colonna between Best's last text to her and his 911 call, the Daily Record reported.

Earlier this year, Best pleaded guilty in Montville Municipal Court to three motor vehicle summonses that arose from the crash: using a hand-held cellphone while driving, careless driving and failure to maintain a lane.

Although his driver's license was not suspended, Best's punishment included $775 in fines and he was ordered to speak to 14 high schools about the perils of texting and driving.

Judge Rand is expected to make his ruling on May 25 about Colonna’s potential liability in the accident but, meanwhile, McGlone argues that case law examples do not support the duty of care Weinstein contends Colonna should have shown.

A passenger, for example, can be held liable for a crash if he encourages a young driver to speed or ignore traffic signals, but Colonna had no control over Best's conduct since she wasn’t in the car, he said.

FOLLOW CRIME

Texting while driving is illegal in 38 states, but a pending court case in New Jersey may determine whether there are legal ramifications to texting someone when they're behind the wheel. In 2009, ...
Texting while driving is illegal in 38 states, but a pending court case in New Jersey may determine whether there are legal ramifications to texting someone when they're behind the wheel. In 2009, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,252
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
10:20 AM on 04/17/2013
starting tommorrow their will be a class action lawsuit against all cell phone companies due to the fact that not enough is being done to prevent texting while driving. how many more people need to die?
02:04 PM on 07/03/2012
Should the city be held responsible for not fixing a pothole that causes an accident or worst?
10:16 AM on 04/17/2013
yes!
photo
AZLibDem
If you're speeding, you're an "illegal"
08:09 PM on 05/23/2012
I am as rabid as anyone can get about cellphone use while driving, and I think texting while driving should be the legal equivalent of DUI.

That said, I cannot see how someone sending a text to someone who is driving can be held responsible; they have absolutely no control over how or when the message is read.
05:30 PM on 05/23/2012
The couple on the motorcycle were MORE responsible than the text sender because they chose to drive a vehicle that doesn't protect them at all. If they hadn't made that choice they would each have both of their legs. Holding the text sender responsible is idiotic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EFMGrad
03:58 PM on 05/23/2012
This was a needless tragedy. However, put the responsibility where it belongs - with the driver. There is an off button on cell phones for a reason.
09:17 AM on 05/23/2012
I do believe the driver should be charged, however the girlfriend a different story. She knew he was driving but it was his choice to repond. I think Mr. Weinstein has a good chance of winning this case. What did we do before cell phones? It is a law he should have waited to respond.
10:07 AM on 05/22/2012
Here's a comment that will make any lawyer's heart, if he had one, skip a beat. So why aren't they suing the phone company for allowing texting? It would be very simple for them to disable texting when the phone senses it is moving. By the way, I want 10% of every settlement using this arguement.
06:44 AM on 06/07/2012
MrHoop: Lawyers should do this. Call for a Class Action Suit against each cell phone carrier. Every documented accident caused by texting; the friends, family etc. of the injured and/or dead victum sue the phone carrier of the cell phone the driver was using. Enough suits would force the moblile phone industry to take the action you stated. Why has there been no legal action yet?? I have come upon stories like this one before. Nobody thought what you have: Sue the cell phone carrier. It is not yet culturally accepted to do so. Welll start changing culture now. Everything has a start/beginning, so shouldn't this. It was lawyers that changed the way cigerrettes were viewed. They started to bring law suite against tobacco companies.
12:25 AM on 05/03/2013
Duh - so you can't text while being a passenger in a car, bus, train? Stupid to sue the phone company for a wreck as it is to sue a gun maker for a shooting - the simple and LOGICAL solution is to hold the person who caused the accident responsible! i.e. the person texting while driving or the person pulling the trigger. You really haven't throught this through before you spouted off.
12:55 PM on 05/15/2012
I am a trial lawyer of 27 years. This case will get tossed on motion to dismiss or summary judgement. The homeowner's carrier will bear the small defense costs.

This is the type of case that draws all the attention regarding frivolous lawsuits, but gets no air time when the case is tossed out.

The Chamber of Commerce will love this one. Like the guy who went to the bathroom in R-V while on cruise control. That never happened. This headline is about the suit. So-in-so sued for texting driver, yada yada. But no one will hear the results of the case. This filing o0f the claim occurred because of the tremendous damages involved in the loss of a leg. Sad deal.
07:06 AM on 06/07/2012
To Kingpinto: Have you read JonQ967's comment. I think it is another excellent on. Will you answer it? Mad Mothers Against Drunk Drivers would want what? Concerning drinking and driving? Prevention Action. Therefore suits against bartenders, sometimes even waitressess. Suits against (parents) allowing their teens to serve beer/liquor in their home to friends. Do you think this all to be frivilous? It saves lives on the road. How did the cultural stance change?? Unfortunately, through law suits. Now bartenders take action, customers of bars do to, it wasn't this way at one time. There are too many stories of accidents caused by texting. The current view/stance needs to be changed.
08:49 PM on 06/07/2012
My opinion applies to those facts, and not to bartenders who over serve and drunk drivers.  How in the world did you get there????
10:27 AM on 05/14/2012
Cell phones and texting are really the modern social DRUGs of choice. Except that when you commit a crime such as texting and driving or enabling a driver by texting them continually, endangering their lives and those of others, you are actually sober and are even more liable because you know you are commiting a crime and do it anyway!!
10:15 PM on 05/10/2012
Pure and simple...No one should be on a cell phone when driving! If you need to phone someone or text them, pull off the road and do so, not while you in an automobile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Troutman
My micro bio is still empty
05:11 PM on 05/10/2012
No wonder his nickname is "Skippy".He must have skipped on some of his law classes,thought he could come up with a new one.Even if she knew he was driving,he chose to answer texts,knowing it could be dangerous.Unfortunately for the couple it was.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:08 PM on 05/10/2012
hahahahahahaha! I'm never sending a text again! I don't want to be sued! oh what silly garbage comes out of peoples heads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hypyrwyf
ignorance begets fear begets violence
02:11 PM on 05/10/2012
This:
"The sender of the text has the right to assume the recipient will read it at a safe time," McGlone argued in court
02:10 PM on 05/10/2012
1. You have no way of knowing what someone is doing when you send a text 2. We all have our own free will and it is OUR responsibility for what we do with it. No one forced him to answer the text. He knew he was driving and knew he could be distracted but HE made the choice to respond, not her. He could have waited until he got to his next destination or if it was oh so urgent he could have pulled over.

We all take on the risks of our behaviors. If I choose to drink too much at the bar and get sick the next morning thats my problem, thats the risk I took. I can't turn around and sue the bar for allowing me to drink.
02:34 AM on 05/23/2012
No, but had Best hit the pair after becoming drunk at a bar, the motorcyclists could sue the bar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hypyrwyf
ignorance begets fear begets violence
02:09 PM on 05/10/2012
That's ridiculous. The best thing about texts is that you can time-shift it, get to it when you have time.