iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Postal Service Will Keep Rural Post Offices Open

Postal Service Cuts Senate

HOPE YEN   05/09/12 06:11 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Bending to strong public opposition, the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday backed off a plan to close thousands of rural post offices after May 15 and proposed keeping them open, but with shorter operating hours.

The move to halt the shuttering of 3,700 low-revenue post offices followed months of dissent from rural states and their lawmakers, who said the cost-cutting would hurt their communities the most. In recent weeks, rising opposition had led Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe to visit some rural areas in a bid to ease fears about cuts that could slow delivery of prescription drugs, newspapers and other services.

In an election year, the angst over postal closings also extended to nearly half the senators, who in letters last week urged Donahoe to postpone closing any mail facility until Congress approves final postal overhaul legislation. The Senate last month passed a bill that would halt many of the closings; the House remains stalled over a separate bill allowing for aggressive cuts.

"I could live with this plan, and I think the majority of people could," said June Nygren, who runs the Jersey Lilly Saloon & Eatery in the tiny Montana town of Ingomar. Donahoe visited the rural town of about 80 people last month, which welcomed him with a spread of home-made baked goods and a packed school gymnasium as people pleaded for their post office to stay open.

"I felt he really paid attention, and apparently he did," Nygren said.

At a news briefing, Donahoe said he hoped the latest plan will help allay much of rural America's concern about postal cutbacks. He prodded Congress to act quickly on legislation that will allow the agency to move ahead with its broader multi-billion dollar cost-cutting effort and return to profitability by 2015.

"We've listened to our customers in rural America, and we've heard them loud and clear – they want to keep their post office open," he said. "We believe today's announcement will serve our customers' needs and allow us to achieve real savings to help the Postal Service return to long-term financial stability."

While no post office would be closed, more than 13,000 rural mail facilities could see reduced operations of between two hours and six hours a day, but only after a review process that is expected to take several months. An additional 4,000 rural post offices would keep their full-time hours.

The agency also will announce new changes next week involving its proposal to close up to 252 mail processing centers.

After the Postal Service gets regulatory approval and hears public input sometime this fall, the new strategy would go into place over two years and be completed in September 2014, saving $500 million a year by reducing full-time staff.

Under the plan, communities would get the option of keeping their area post offices open, but with reduced hours. Another option would be to close a post office in one area while keeping a nearby one open full time. Communities could opt to create a Village Post Office, one set up in a library, government office or store such as Walmart, Walgreens or Office Depot.

"At the end of the day, we will not close rural post offices until we receive community input," said Megan Brennan, the Postal Service's chief operating officer.

The latest move comes as the Postal Service is pushing Congress to pass cost-saving postal legislation that includes an end to Saturday mail delivery.

The Senate-passed bill would give the Postal Service an $11 billion cash infusion but also impose a one-year freeze on shuttering rural post offices. It would reduce by half the planned closings of mail processing centers, give affected communities new avenues to appeal closing decisions and bar cuts to Saturday delivery for at least two years.

At the time it was passed, the Postal Service denounced the Senate bill as "totally inappropriate" because it would keep unneeded facilities open.

In the House, hesitancy among rural lawmakers is helping to stall a separate bill that would allow for far more aggressive cuts, including a more immediate end to Saturday delivery.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., a co-sponsor of the House bill, said the plan announced Wednesday doesn't cut costs enough. He noted, for instance, that additional cuts can be made in more densely populated urban communities, which should also be prodded to consider Village Post Offices or other alternatives that save money.

"The smallest 10,000 post offices collectively cost USPS less than $600 million to operate each year," he said. "To achieve real savings creating long-term solvency, the Postal Service needs to focus on consolidation in more-populated areas where the greatest opportunities for cost reduction exist."

Most of the 3,700 post offices that had been under review for possible closing had been in rural areas with low volumes of business, with most having only two hours of business a day even though they are open longer. Currently the post office operates more than 31,000 retail outlets.

The agency said its new plan will save more, mostly by weeding out full-time postmasters who don't have labor contract protections and replacing them with part-time workers. It plans to discuss possible buyouts with 13,000 postmasters who are now eligible for retirement. More than 80 percent of postal costs in rural areas are labor-related.

The Postal Service has been grappling with losses as first-class mail volume declines and more people switch to the Internet to communicate and pay bills. The agency has forecast a record $14.1 billion loss by the end of this year; without changes, it said, annual losses will exceed $21 billion by 2016.

If the House fails to act soon, postal officials say, they will face a cash crunch in August and September, when the agency must pay more than $11 billion to the Treasury for future retiree health benefits. Already $13 billion in debt, the health payment obligation will force the agency to run up against its $15 billion debt ceiling, causing it to default on the payments.

The agency plans to release its latest quarterly financial results on Thursday.

___

Associated Press writer Matt Gouras in Helena, Mont., contributed to this report.

___

Online:

Link to post offices facing reduced operating hours: http://tinyurl.com/cnygdne

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Bending to strong public opposition, the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday backed off a plan to close thousands of rural post offices after May 15 and proposed keepin...
WASHINGTON — Bending to strong public opposition, the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday backed off a plan to close thousands of rural post offices after May 15 and proposed keepin...
Filed by Katy Hall  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:25 AM on 05/10/2012
PART 2/2

I share an office with a mail box shop and was asked the owner this morning that if I wanted to deliver a letter to someone in Miami using the cheapest method possible, what would it cost me - if I didn't use the USPS. $10 he said. You're telling me that every time you want to send someone a check or a birthday card you're going to pay Fedex $10 to do that?

And speaking of FedEx, their top 5 executives made $25m in 2010. The top 5 executives of the post office made $2.4m. That delta alone could pay for 452 additional US workers making $50k / yr. We must define efficiency differently.

Even if it weren't mandated by the Constitution and we disbanded it, what about the 570,000 people they employ? That's over $200m per week in unemployment. Just a single full year of that is two years of operating losses and we're out a valuable service.

If $5.5bn sounds like a lot to you, know that more than that will be spent on elections this year (which is an entirely different soapbox). If amortized among all tax payers who receive value from the service (companies and individuals), guessing that number is at least 200m entities (but probably more), is around $25.50 / year - or about $2/month. I would gladly give up a cup a coffee per month to continue receiving birthday wishes other than facebook posts.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
05:33 PM on 05/10/2012
First, why would you want to send a letter when you can send an email? Why, for that matter spend the money to write the check when you can pay via the internet, know when you send it, know when they got it and not having to worry about the USPS losing it? And electronic cards are really cool as they come with music and action. Second, the USPS is not "mandated" but is an option just as post roads are. The USPS is nothing more than a freebe for rual voters who tend to vote Conservative and those to lazy to learn to use a computer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maatpublish
writer, publisher, producer, & social commentator
05:44 PM on 05/10/2012
Please don't generalize. I am a rural voter and I use USPS to send out packages because companies like FedEx and UPS are inconveniently located 40 miles away and cost more to boot.

Emails are cool and all, and I make use of them constantly. However, there is something to be said for getting a hand written letter or a postcard from a friend who is traveling in a foreign country, for example. In some places, things like internet access is not all that common.
03:25 AM on 05/10/2012
PART 1/2

The postal service was founded in 1775, by Benjamin Franklin, who was arguably the most influential founder of the United States, and the ONLY founding father who signed all four of the major documents of the founding of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

There is a section of the Constitution dedicated specifically to the postal service - therefore I think it is reasonable to assume that the founding fathers, as well as today's supreme court, would have to agree that not only is it a necessary role for the government to play, it is a mandatory one.

I keep hearing "efficiency" come up in the post office conversation, as well as big government. So let's talk about that. The post office's revenue is $65bn, so losing $5bn in a year in less than 8% of their gross revenue. They deliver 177 billion pieces of mail per year. So there is a loss of less than $0.03 / piece. Furthermore, profit isn't the gov'ts motive; it is to break even - which is essentially what a 8% loss is. Plus, this loss is also a pretty recent phenomenon. It has only been in the past few years there have been a shortfall at all.
10:25 PM on 05/09/2012
The writer neglected to address the true cause of the USPS's woes, as usual. The internet did not cause the losses. The mandate to prefund retirement healthcare to the tune of $5.5 billion annually did. Also, Darrell Issa is an idiot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:20 PM on 05/09/2012
The Postmaster General is in collusion with the Rethlugliconns to privatize the postal service in this country. This splash headline is misleading. The plan is still to "reduce hours" at non-profitable sites. Why is the postal service, a service for PUBLIC GOOD paid for SOLEY BY STAMP SALES, forced to "make a profit." I live in a small town of 1200. We have NO POSTAL DELIVERY. We have to go pick up our mail at the Post Office. The Saturday hours are already only 9 to 11 a.m. That's inconvenient enough!

The Democratic Party had better start standing up for the American people. The Post Office must NOT be forced to fund its retirement fund for 75 years in advance. That doesn't even make sense and sounds like a joke when you say it out loud. The Conservative Corporatists want to make postal service so poor that people will be driven to the companies of their corporate paymasters. This is undemocratic and unjust! Please, people, go to the internet and raise a firestorm over this antidemocratic plan.
photo
Portland R
A vote for a Republi-con is a vote against Myself
02:44 PM on 05/09/2012
Why not folks? DHL really wants to run the post office! They took over the German post office and their profits are way up. Why not America too? All they have to do is spread money around Washington DC, and sometime in the future they will have the plum of all plums.

My God - look at all the money the Koch brothers are pouring into Wisconsin to keep Walker in office - just so they can 'nearly' bankrupt the state and take over all of their electricity production. Electricity is one of the top 3 "future businesses to own, and the Koch brothers want their unfair share!
....so does DHL. Who would believe this stuff????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:44 PM on 05/09/2012
Shocking. Ten years ago if I'd heard this kind of stuff I would have scoffed. "Surely our government could never be THAT corrupt." Lord, the last ten years have been a lesson I wish our country had never had to learn.
photo
Portland R
A vote for a Republi-con is a vote against Myself
04:37 PM on 05/09/2012
I was thinking the same thing. What about the young people of today? They are being brought up with this type of "stuff" being the norm!!

For God's sake! The Post Office is as American as apple pie.

You know, in Europe, two families controlled the post and trade routes for centuries. If you didn't need a stamp, but needed to use the trade routes for commerce, they imposed a tax on you! Today they are still extremely rich and powerful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:44 PM on 05/09/2012
Oh, F and F, btw.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:52 PM on 05/09/2012
Time to cut the post office loose. Breaking this up is our best option. If it's too big to fail, it's just too big. FedEx, UPS, and others will fill the void while few notice any difference.
02:22 PM on 05/09/2012
You really think FedEx, UPS, and others will deliver a letter for anywhere near 44 cents? How about bulk mail that pays even less? More than a few would notice. Let the USPS set it's rates instead of the politicians who set it up for failure and then say see I told you so!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:26 PM on 05/09/2012
Of course not. And have you noticed that UPS and FedEx are healthy businesses that make a profit and the USPS is failing and closing offices?

The USPS is proof the government regulations don't work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:45 PM on 05/09/2012
Right. FedEx letter rates would be over $10.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:27 PM on 05/09/2012
yea, so?  Pocket change isn't enough to fund a dying business like the USPS.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lightningbolt
01:48 PM on 05/09/2012
There is nothing wrong with the post office.  What's wrong is that the republicans forced it to fund it's pension system for 75 years into the future!  No other government agency is required to do this.  This was done deliberately with the intent of destroying the post office for the benefit of the republican party's corporate bribers, UPS, FEDEX, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:47 PM on 05/09/2012
Already a fan. Faved.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lightningbolt
01:45 PM on 05/09/2012
The republican party m u r d e r e d the post office for the benefit of its corporate masters.  They forced the post office to fund it's pension for the next 75 YEARS!  That is TOTALLY RIDICULOUS!  The republicans are T R A I T O R S!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:48 PM on 05/09/2012
You feel like I do. Get on the internet and raise holy "heck." Already a fan, faved.
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
01:10 PM on 05/09/2012
That's what happens when you try cutting the budget. The populace that wants cuts the most does not want their service cut. Still, a good compromise by the postal service; something that our Congress and statehouses around the land should emulate. Compromise and get on with it. If it's not enough, there's another election 2 to 4 years down the road.
12:31 PM on 05/09/2012
Try this: eliminate the position of postmaster from the 3,700 low-revenue post offices. IMO every post office does not need fully compensated postmasters to complete its postal mission. This is top-heavy management at its best.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
11:40 AM on 05/09/2012
The disease killing the post office is simply the republicans. it is the republicans long term plan to slowly kill the post office, just like they are doing for the govt. how are they doing this? by making the post office bleed billions of dollars, yet blocking them from doing any form of reform. yes there has to be some kind of reform, however the two things killing the post office is the republican law that forces them to funds retirement in a short period of time, and their refusal to allow the post office to raise rate, deliver wine and beer and look for other avenues of revenue. you used to be able make copies and print out document at post office. now you can. what the congress and dems need to do, is to extend the funding of this retirment, or reduce the amount or suspend it for a while. at the start of recession, most private companies were able to reduce, suspend or even end their contribution to 401k. why can't congress allow the post office to do that. simply solution exist, yet republicans in their long term plan to destroy every govt agencies or to privatize it would not allow it. where are the dems on this? we need the post office, congress let them operate to make money.
11:27 AM on 05/09/2012
The Post Office needs to reduce their payrolls. I have a neighbor who works for the Post Office and he tells me that he finishes his work in 2-3 hours. Then, he is able to go out to the parking lot and drink for the rest of his shift. Oh, and by the way, he also "works" overtime to accomplish all this.

What a waste!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
11:41 AM on 05/09/2012
one in thousands. your neighbor needs to be fired. i know couple of congress people that just drink and take vacation, recess and don't do anything. yet they can still keep their job.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:51 AM on 05/09/2012
I know a few Postal Workers as well and they are not like this.

So you want to attack a fly with a sledge hammer? Got it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WomenOnGuard
11:09 AM on 05/09/2012
Considering that our own government was dipping into the Post Offices funds for years, this just proves how strong and sturdy this organization is. Good for them and congrats to all postal workers that will keep their jobs!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
10:57 AM on 05/09/2012
Nice to see the Republican in Congress are giving $11 billion in taxpayer to their rual base. Is this not an entitlement? Eleven billion down the tube.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
11:43 AM on 05/09/2012
God that is so ignorant of you. you clearly have no clue about the issue. 11 billion is part of the over payment the post office made to the treasury. it is money that the post office earned from services and product. there is not a single dime of tax payer money. low information is a disease that leads to self destruction.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
01:06 PM on 05/09/2012
It is money the USPS lost due to two things, the Republican mandate that retirement be funded and a poor business model. The PO returned no money to the treasuray.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:52 AM on 05/09/2012
Down the tube?

No, we can still send a letter coast to coast for under 50 cents, cheap at twice the price!

Try that with FedEX or UPS.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
01:04 PM on 05/09/2012
Sorry but I'm willing to pay the cost of it rather than bilk the taxpayer of who I am one.
10:47 AM on 05/09/2012
Why don't they put solar panels on every location it would at least cut the power costs and it's easier to get a one-time funding than to pay your bills in a federal organization. Next would be to rent out space to military recruiters.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
10:58 AM on 05/09/2012
Add to that making PO vehicles run on natural gas and hold internet lessons at a break even cost in those buildings and we might be off to a strt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
11:45 AM on 05/09/2012
this would cut their cost in half. post office vehicles are the best for electric and natural gas. they have a base they can go back to get charged or refuel. common sense smart approach like this are not what congress is made off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
11:11 AM on 05/09/2012
Because Ronald Reagan and his gang changed the direction of American Government, you will not see smart actions in the Peoples interests until we purge the Corporatists form every corner of government, elected and appointed.