iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Illinois Basin Coal Mines Making A Comeback Over Appalachia

Reuters  |  Posted: 05/11/2012 8:56 am Updated: 05/11/2012 11:36 am


* Illinois Basin coal production on rise

* Region has lower costs, easier mining than Appalachia

* Mining companies see growth potential

By Steve James

NEW YORK, May 11 (Reuters) - Two years ago, Peabody Energy Corp opened a new coal mine in Sullivan County, Indiana. The mine, called Bear Run, is now the largest surface mine in the eastern United States and a symbol of the revival of one of America's historical coal fields.

As coal mining slows in Appalachia, Midwestern fields are drawing new coal investors as more efficient anti-pollution technology at coal-fired power plants has made Illinois Basin coal competitive again.

"It's probably the fastest growing region because now utilities have scrubbers, they can burn that nasty coal," said William Burns, a coal industry analyst with Johnson Rice in New Orleans.

Coal entrepreneur Chris Cline is betting on an Illinois Basin boom with a planned $300 million initial public offering (IPO) for his Foresight Energy and producers like Peabody and Alliance Coal are ramping up operations or opening new mines.

Peabody, the largest U.S. coal producer, opened another new mine, Wild Boar, in Indiana last year and is expanding its Gateway mine in southern Illinois, in a region where Peabody traces its roots back to its first mine in 1895. The Bear Run mine alone employs 460 miners and produces 6 million tons of coal a year.

Production in the Illinois Basin, which covers parts of Illinois, Indiana and western Kentucky, shrank by more than one-third i n the last two decades on environmental concerns over the high-sulphur content of its coal.

The game changer was the advance of anti-pollution scrubber technology that allows burning high-sulphur coal with fewer pollutant emissions, analyst Burns said.

Also, stricter emissions regulations requiring scrubbers mean power plants can no longer get by burning lower-sulphur Appalachian coal.

Scrubbers using limestone or lime can remove as much as 97 percent of sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions at a coal-fired electricity plant. Most utilities have now installed scrubbers following the 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule that required further reduction in SO2 emissions in the eastern United States.

Burns noted that the Illinois Basin was the region most affected by the Clean Air Act and subsequent amendments that set federal controls on air pollution.

The resurgence of the Illinois Basin contrasts with the central and northern Appalachian region of West Virginia, Virginia, eastern Kentucky and Pennsylvania, where many of its mines are played out or increasingly difficult and expensive to work.

"Now most plants have installed scrubbers and there are very favorable conditions for mining there," said analyst Lucas Pipes, of Brean Murray Carret & Co. "There are still virgin seams that have never been mined and costs are extremely low."

Illinois Basin coal is cheaper to mine because the coal seams are closer to the surface, and the region is well-positioned to ship coal to Gulf ports for growing U.S. exports, Svec said.

"The Illinois Basin has good growth potential from a variety of perspectives," said Peabody spokesman Vic Svec. "It is a backfill against the continuing decline of central Appalachia."


LOWER COSTS, EASIER TO MINE

The Illinois Basin, one of America's four major coal basins besides northern Appalachia, central Appalachia and the Powder River Basin of Wyoming, has been mined since the 1800s.

In the 1970s, it was producing about 140 million tons per year, according to U.S. Energy Department data. But it fell below 100 million tons per year after 1990, following implementation of Clean Air Act amendments.

In 2011, Illinois Basin output rose to about 116 million tons.

By contrast, Appalachia's total production has fallen from a high of 488 million tons in 1990 to about 336 million last year.

Overall, the U.S. coal industry is in a slump, with prices for thermal coal, used for power generation, plummeting as demand from utilities has fallen off.

Coal producers, mostly operating in Appalachia, have suffered as power plants increase the use of natural gas, which is at historically low prices, and switch off many older coal-fired power plants.

The relatively mild U.S. winter has also led utilities to burn less coal, forcing producers to shut mines to manage supply.

The lower prices, combined with the higher costs of mining in increasingly more difficult Appalachian coal seams, are squeezing margins and forcing producers to scramble to find lower-cost alternatives.

"They have discovered that Illinois Basin coal is a suitable replacement of high-cost Appalachian coal," said John Hanou, whose Hanou Energy Consulting LLC just carried out a survey on the region's prospects for the next 10 years.

Adding to the attraction of Illinois Basin coal is that costs are about 40 percent to 50 percent lower than in Appalachia because the coal seams are close to the surface.

Mark Levin, an analyst with BB&T Capital Markets, said some companies operating there had mining costs of $20-$30 per ton, compared with as much as $70 per ton in Appalachia.

In its IPO filing, Foresight said its average costs last year were $19.85 per ton.

Hanou predicts Illinois Basin production could rise to 136 million tons in 2012, with the addition of two Foresight mines.

Daniel Scott, an analyst with Dahlman Rose & Co, believes production can increase by 50 percent in the next few years.

Peabody produced 28.1 million tons in the Illinois Basin last year and expects to boost mining as it forecasts U.S. coal exports will increase by more than 75 percent to 250 million tons in the next five years.

Alliance Coal, a subsidiary of Alliance Resource Partners LP , was the No. 2 producer in the Basin last year with 27.7 million tons.

Cline's Foresight mined 10.4 million tons last year but with two mines -- Sugar Camp and Hillsboro -- opening this year, it could rise to 25 million by 2013, Hanou said.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

* Illinois Basin coal production on rise * Region has lower costs, easier mining than Appalachia * Mining companies see growth potential By Steve James ...
* Illinois Basin coal production on rise * Region has lower costs, easier mining than Appalachia * Mining companies see growth potential By Steve James ...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:31 AM on 05/13/2012
I’m not sure how it could be classified as a comeback. Obama and his EPA have tilted the playing field to favor coal mining in the Illinois and Powder River Basin, by imposing new regulations upon the Appalachia coal fields and not others.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
03:30 PM on 05/13/2012
What regulations affect Appalachia coal fields and not others?
04:44 PM on 05/13/2012
Prior to the Obama administration taking office coal companies were required to have their mining permits be approved by the State they are located in and by the Army Corps of Engineers (404, NPDES etc.). Obama has directed the EPA to review each and every mining permit, so back in 2009 the EPA held up around 100 mining permits that were in the process of being reviewed, many of these permits have still not been approved.

At first, when the EPA took over reviewing the permits they would request that more info was needed, but they wouldn’t clarify what information they were looking for this went on for over a year. Now the EPA is forcing coal companies to adhere to far more stringent water quality standards, that other coal regions are not. Also the EPA is not renewing NPDES permits in a timely manner, these permits once approved are good for five years, then they must be renewed again, some companies have been granted 3 or 4 3 month extensions. The problem with the NPDES extensions is that no other revisions can be approved without an approved NPDES permit.

The EPA for the first time in history revoked an approved mining permit, this permit had been ten years in the making including an EIS (environment impact statement).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
11:26 AM on 05/13/2012
It's the system stupid. Chasing coal production is like Bill Murray chasing the groundhog. As long as America organizes itself around the idea that maximizing profits in uncontrolled markets is the best most efficient system, we will continue to sacrifice our health and our children for today's cold had cash. Unless we add the true cost of production to these goods, they will always be cheaper. There is no cost of production, only extraction. Health costs are not added in because they are somebody else's burden. Costs to the environment are born by those in the future. If one added the real cost to fossil fuel production, no one could afford them. We don't because we are worried about out economy, I say add it and level the playing field.

I believe that unless we end free-trade and impose a pollution cost on our economy we will never get in front of the cost curve. Some decry the inflationary impact of this action but it is a one-time event and we can adjust salaries to reflect the higher costs. Until we fully load the true cost into production, we will continue this false reality that coal, oil, and fracking are cheaper. It's time to take control of our destiny, go to Americans Elect and support a real alternative, not another corporate stooge. http://www.americanselect.org/profile-candidate/365878/topic-answer
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:13 AM on 05/13/2012
Arctic Sea Ice is about to disappear claim top scientists.

Link to Illinois coal obvious.

http://tinyurl.com/7ft4ub6
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
03:32 PM on 05/13/2012
Let's see . . . burning coal makes carbon dioxide . . . carbon dioxide traps heat . . . more heat melts ice . . .

You're right. It is pretty obvious isn't it?
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:07 PM on 05/13/2012
Orkney spams every story on Huffpost with this Heartland/Watts rot. Flaggable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Norman
03:23 PM on 05/12/2012
Good for the people of Illinois, good for the poor of Illinois, good paying jobs lower energy bills.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
11:16 AM on 05/12/2012
Oh Lord no. Not more filthy coal mining.
02:27 PM on 05/11/2012
Right wing radio talkers and fuax noise seem to be running a 24/7 infomercial for big oil and coal.

They have convinced a lot of people to vote against their own best interests and for the interests of the top 1%.
06:46 PM on 05/11/2012
Whatever it takes, without electricity I won't be able to access the internet to read and post on HuffPo.
09:23 AM on 05/13/2012
I live and work in Appalachia and have many friends and family members that either work directly or indirectly for the coal industry. They have very good paying jobs, yet none of them are part of the one percent that you speak of.

The fact is that the majority of the coal companies are publicly traded.
02:26 PM on 05/11/2012
It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy sources.

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.
06:48 PM on 05/11/2012
Wind 25% power factor. Solar 30% power factor. Biofuel 2%. What else do you have in your bag of tricks? Better go back to your drawing board.
01:11 PM on 05/30/2012
when. they were not there for the tva great time of need. the fed gov (tva) think so highly on them that the tva is spending 20 billion for 2 nuke plant for 2200 mw
02:03 PM on 05/11/2012
http://youtu.be/EEK0Z2FOPao

A song about the dangers of burning fuel for energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
12:37 PM on 05/11/2012
Why is it we can't envision those same fields planted with hemp? A renewable energy source that would allow us to leave the coal in the ground and give us something, a lot nicer, to look at. Maybe it's because the farmers would be the ones to benefit from it and not the big coal executives...
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
02:10 PM on 05/11/2012
It's a lack of vision. These same people are the last adopters of everything because they want things the way they remember and not what is the best way.

Hemp does need to be legalized.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
02:40 PM on 05/11/2012
We are working on that. Join the fight!
01:12 PM on 05/30/2012
hemp can also fuel cars