iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New York Gas Drillers In Marcellus Shale Region Wrangle Over Limitations

AP  |  By Posted: 05/12/2012 2:18 pm Updated: 05/13/2012 8:18 am

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — With all the restrictions in proposed state regulations and local bans, gas companies say about half of their lease holdings in the lucrative Marcellus Shale region in New York state will be off-limits or inaccessible to drilling if the state gives the green light to developers this year.

A coalition of environmental groups is pushing for a complete ban on shale gas drilling, but the industry and landowners hoping to lease to drillers are working to lift some of the restrictions and halt the movement toward local bans.

"Industry estimates that when you look at the cumulative effect of prohibitions and setbacks, 40 to 60 percent of their leasehold is effectively undevelopable," said Tom West, an Albany lawyer representing gas companies.

The Marcellus is a gas-rich shale deposit thousands of feet underground in parts of Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. It's estimated to contain 84 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas, enough to supply the nation's gas-burning electrical plants for 11 years.

The formation produced just over 1 trillion cubic feet of gas in Pennsylvania last year, providing $3.5 billion in gross revenues for drillers and more than $400 million in landowner royalties, according to an analysis by The Associated Press.

Industry insiders and environmental groups say it's impossible to quantify how much gas would be off-limits to production under the various bans and restrictions in New York because the amount of gas that can economically be extracted won't be known until wells are drilled.

Drilling hasn't been allowed since 2008, when the state began an environmental review of high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which frees gas from shale by injecting a well with millions of gallons of water mixed with chemicals and sand. After drillers poured into Pennsylvania in 2008, environmental problems including methane-contaminated private water wells, salt in rivers from wastewater dumping and spill-polluted streams prompted regulatory reforms in that state and touched off a vocal opposition movement in New York.

The Marcellus Shale comprises 20,569 square miles beneath 23 counties across the southern half of New York, with the most gas likely to come from areas where the shale is thickest and deepest underground. That's in the counties along the Pennsylvania border, with the prime area considered to be in Broome and Tioga counties and parts of Chenango and Chemung counties.

About 25 municipalities have enacted bans on gas drilling, and about 75 others have enacted moratoriums. Dozens of other communities are considering them. That amounts to 1,015 square miles of the Marcellus region under local bans, 2,171 square miles under moratorium and more than 2,400 square miles under consideration for a ban or moratorium, said Karen Edelstein, a geographic information systems consultant in Ithaca who closely follows the oil and gas industry and serves as a consultant for environmental groups.

The majority of those communities are outside the region most likely to see development. Only one, the city of Binghamton, is in one of the prime counties, Broome.

The Joint Landowners Coalition of New York, which represents about 70,000 landowners seeking to lease land for gas drilling, is working to counter the push for municipal bans. The group has drafted a resolution supporting gas drilling, and several town boards have adopted it. Members of the coalition also have lobbied in towns considering bans and have had some success blocking them.

"We maintain that these local bans are illegal under New York law and that they will be overturned in court," said Karen Moreau, executive director of the New York State Petroleum Council.

Two of the bans, in Middlefield and Dryden, were upheld by local judges but are under appeal.

Another concern is restrictions proposed in state permitting guidelines and environmental regulations that are undergoing final review and may be enacted later this year.

DEC is proposing to make the watersheds of New York City and Syracuse off-limits to drilling, which amounts to about 1,700 square miles. More land is made off-limits by protected buffers and setbacks within state parks, forests and wildlife management areas and rules protecting water supplies.

When three drilling companies tried to plot out where to locate drilling pads on their leased lands in New York, they found in many cases the state's limits made the task impossible, West said in an interview with the AP.

The Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York argues in comments submitted to DEC that some of the setbacks should be reduced or removed because they're arbitrary rather than based on scientific data or case studies. In other cases, it argues that DEC should grant waivers or exceptions when operators demonstrate that adequate protections exist. That's standard practice in Pennsylvania, West said.

Environmental groups argue that the setbacks proposed by DEC may not be sufficient to protect water supplies.

"For industry to be now seeking loopholes and workarounds for the state's proposed setbacks suggests that they still don't understand the strong level of public concern," said Eric Goldstein of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

If the state's setbacks prevent a gas company from locating a drilling pad within a single, 640-acre drilling unit, that would deprive those landowners of $30 million in royalties over the life of the well, West reasoned, based on what some Pennsylvania wells are producing.

Moreau said fragmenting the landscape with restrictions will increase the environmental footprint of gas development because companies may be forced to put in more well pads and associated pipelines and access roads to get at the gas, rather than locating one well in a geologically ideal area.

"We want a high environmental bar in New York," West said. "But when you have so many restrictions that it makes it impossible to drill, it's gone too far."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — With all the restrictions in proposed state regulations and local bans, gas companies say about half of their lease holdings in the lucrative Marcellus Shale region in New York s...
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — With all the restrictions in proposed state regulations and local bans, gas companies say about half of their lease holdings in the lucrative Marcellus Shale region in New York s...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boreas154
Registered Indy... I vote common sense.
03:08 PM on 05/14/2012
For any proponents of fracking, some food for thought:

1. What's in it? http://www.exxonmobilperspectives.com/2011/08/25/fracking-fluid-disclosure-why-its-important/

2. Where does it go when finished? http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2011/09/25/fracking-wastewater-floods-ohio.html

3. What looms on the horizon? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centralia,_Pennsylvania
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
12:37 PM on 05/14/2012
If the extraction profiteers had any sort of responsible track record or general credibility they would have an easier time working with others.
10:37 AM on 05/14/2012
One can be an, "all of the above" energy person and be against the obvious & hideous effects from fracking.
Mike Block
Mikeology (mycology)- the study of Fun Guy (fungi)
10:24 AM on 05/14/2012
trucker1000: "The amount of gas in the water is nothing your big sounding numbers are only becase the standard is set to low . No way it would be flamable time to move out of moms basemant and see the real world"

I never mentioned a single number in any of my posts. I've had my own apartment for over 20 years and I was looking to move my family to upstate NY. It was through firsthand research that I arrived at my conclusions.

BTW, see those little, squiggly lines under some of the words in your post? That means you misspelled something. Try reading books instead of burning them. Someone needs to up their prozac prescription.

Plus, I've said it before. My gas bill is the lowest utility bill I pay. I'd be happy to pay more if it means my water is clean. Try to find gas somewhere outside of heavily populated areas (and their watersheds), then charge more for it. It would generate more jobs!

Don't call me a grammar Nazi again until you learn to spell grammar, Nazi. : )

Excelsior (for the uninitiated, that's the motto of NY state. It means "ever upward").
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:12 AM on 05/14/2012
loopholes ? the real loophole is the halliburton loophole that chainy and bush put in their 2005 energy bill.....explicity exempts fracking from the safe drinking water act and clean air act....just unbleiveable....and because of this you have to know that fracking is a big polluter of our water and our air....
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
10:59 PM on 05/13/2012
Ground water is highly overrated. Real Americans wean their 5 year olds on Kentucky bourbon.
08:46 AM on 05/14/2012
For many New Yorkers, ground water is over rated. We have Lake Ontario and Erie which supplies our water. Here in Western NY, we also have a ~200 mile irrigation ditch already in place ie: the Erie Canal.

No droughts for me, we have plenty of water....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Storyhill
10:54 PM on 05/13/2012
Sounds like Walker trying to rapenthe environment in Wisconsi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
09:18 PM on 05/13/2012
And drill, ye tarriers, drill.

Last week a premature blast went off
and a mile in the air went big Jim Goff.
Then when payday came around, Jim Goff a dollar short was found.
When he asked the reason why, "You were docked for the time you were up in the sky."

And drill ye tarriers drill.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
08:44 PM on 05/13/2012
Everyone should have the right to poison the ground water.....right? The gas companies and those that own the mineral rights think they do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
09:24 PM on 05/13/2012
The gas and oil companies believe that even poor families should be able to enjoy oatmeal flambé.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridan56
Irony: it's what's for dinner.
07:46 PM on 05/13/2012
this is where the most reckless ants push for the ultimate collapse of their very own harmonious mound. This is about a push for human developemental implosion.
It is UGLY too . I have seen it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GHY1
06:46 PM on 05/13/2012
Nice to see towns banning energy companies from destroying the water. Water is more important than gas. I hope this spreads and more towns restrict oil gas and shale development to save water. I wonder if towns in the mid-west can do the same to stop the line from Canada to the Gulf.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:00 PM on 05/13/2012
Here in the Pacific North West we are trying to stop numerous coal export terminals on our coast with all the coal trains harming our environment for private profit. The fossil fuel fascist talk jobs and magic pollution prevention technology. Poor counties only see the increased tax revenue. Fossil Fuel fascists are everywhere and have to be stopped everywhere.
03:37 AM on 05/14/2012
And countries with no environmental standards only see cheap energy and chemicals. Tar sands oil is too dirty for America or Canada; hey, ship it to China. DDT is banned in USA; Ship it to Africa, they know a job creator when they see one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janetshusb
05:54 PM on 05/13/2012
What would be wrong with asking the drilling companies to come up with a process that doesn't pollute. It may take a while to develop such a process but the gas has been there for millions of years. It's not going any where.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
byronic
05:25 PM on 05/13/2012
11 years of gas, 110 generations of destruction of the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:01 PM on 05/13/2012
Penny wise and pound foolish. Private profit and public risk.
02:35 AM on 05/14/2012
Well they will will have had their money and be dead by the time that it becomes a real problem...
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
05:20 PM on 05/13/2012
I hope the poisoned water is only in red areas since that's what the people want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:03 PM on 05/13/2012
I keep watching Texas and when they will run out of water. Fracking in the middle of a major drought means America will have a shining example of the harm from fracking.
03:39 AM on 05/14/2012
It amazes me how they can find millions of gallons of water to cram underground, but not enough to water the cattle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Egalitare
02:56 PM on 05/13/2012
What's a few undisclosed, trade-secret formulation chemicals among "friends?"