iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arthur Delaney
GET UPDATES FROM Arthur:

Extended Benefits Cuts Taking Effect

Posted: Updated: 05/14/2012 2:30 pm

Unemployment Benefits
In this April 24 photo, job seekers wait in line during a job fair, in Portland, Ore.

WASHINGTON -- The long-term jobless will be eligible for fewer months of benefits as congressional cuts take effect this month.

By June, the federal Extended Benefits Program will be phased out in most of the states that used it, according to an analysis by the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group. The program, fully funded by the federal government since 2009, gives the long-term jobless their final 13 or 20 weeks of benefits, depending how the unemployment rate is in a given state.

"The final 13 to 20 weeks of jobless insurance that workers in high-unemployment states have been relying on is now being stripped away as a casualty of the legislation Congress passed in February reauthorizing the federal unemployment programs," NELP director Christine Owens said in a statement. "These cuts are coming faster than the economy is improving, which means more workers will have to survive without any jobless assistance and families will have less money to put back into the economy."

HuffPost readers: Losing your benefits? Tell us about it -- email arthur@huffingtonpost.com. Please include your phone number if you're willing to do an interview.

Extended Benefits kick in for workers who use up 53 weeks of aid under another federal program called Emergency Unemployment Compensation, in effect since 2008 for people who exhaust the standard 26 weeks of benefits provided by states since the 1950s. The three sources of benefits combined to give the unemployed in hard-hit states 99 weeks of benefits.

Even though the government is offering less help to the long-term unemployed, their population is almost as big as ever. In April, 1.8 million people had been out of work for 99 weeks -- barely changed from 1.9 million the previous year.

Over the weekend, eight states lost eligibility for Extended Benefits because the states' unemployment rates had not risen from a corresponding three-month period in the previous three years. More than 200,000 workers will be cut off, according to NELP. In 2010, Congress changed the the formula for triggering eligibility for Extended Benefits to allow states to keep the assistance through 2011. In February, lawmakers declined to change the formula again.

"The Extended Benefits program is being phased out because state unemployment rates have stopped climbing, but unemployment is still exceedingly high in many places. Job openings are not taking the place of these cuts," Owens said.

Congress also said states could drug test some unemployment claimants and allowed states to create programs that could allow businesses to test out workers without having to pay them.

By the end of the month, Extended Benefits will have been phased out in 27 states. The remaining nine states where workers can receive Extended Benefits will lose eligibility in the fall. According to NELP, the share of jobless workers receiving benefits will drop from two-in-three in 2010 to less than one-in-two later this year.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The long-term jobless will be eligible for fewer months of benefits as congressional cuts take effect this month. By June, the federal Extended Benefits Program will be phased out in...
WASHINGTON -- The long-term jobless will be eligible for fewer months of benefits as congressional cuts take effect this month. By June, the federal Extended Benefits Program will be phased out in...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,166
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
07:21 PM on 04/10/2013
Yeah, I just got a notice about this at 4:03 PM today. I have been out of work for over a year and a half and have already exhausted my 401k and Pension Plan. I have been cutting expenses as much as I thought I could, but no way I can survive without my unemployment. I cut expenses so that I could make ends meet with the reduced income, and now I suddenly find out that the cuts I have made will not be enough. This is an outrage!
photo
sylkol
You can't buy soap on aid if you don't have kids.
03:01 AM on 05/28/2012
Why oh why will NO ONE talk about: you can't buy soap on aid if you don't have kids or are not over 65? My unemployment is cut 5 months. I cannot buy soap, laundry detergent, dish soap, paper towels, tissues, tampons, shampoo, toothpaste, sponges, or a lightbulb. No one cares and all these people who have been on aid for years and years - they can't all have kids - how are they buying SOAP?????????????
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
05:44 AM on 05/16/2012
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the heartless politicians who wielded their votes to cut extended benefits to people who have been among the hardest hit during the recession they created.

My extended benefits dried up and vanished last week. But I suppose I shouldn't complain. After exhausting my savings during my period of unemployment in order to supplement it and take care of my family..... I still have some money in my retirement account. I'll begin draining that when the next mortgage payment comes due on June first.

It would have been nice to keep that money for retirement, and withdraw it without penalty, but that's not going to happen.

So thanks again, you'll be seeing my extra tax penalties for early withdrawal next April.

You'll be seeing my vote in November.
12:35 PM on 05/16/2012
This program of collecting 2 years free money to do nothing has be going on what seems like forever...it needs end. You should have worked off the books like a lot of others did and still collected huh?
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
08:40 PM on 05/16/2012
I'd have worked off the books if anyone would have let me. Can't you read? Here's the problem, Six, I'm 55 years old. NOBODY wants to hire me at my age. It hasn't been fun applying and interviewing only to be rejected time and time again. It hasn't been fun draining my life savings and now my retirement account. Don't you suppose that I'd have taken any job I could get to avoid that? I'm ruined, I'm too young to retire and too old to get a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:25 PM on 05/18/2012
I was very happy that they were able to come to an agreement at all. With the tone in Congress these days, I was not at all sure that the Repubs would give in on any kind of extension. As my husband has been affected by this cut off, I will say that we were thrilled to have the extra four months from December to now. My legislators voted for this last compromise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CatkinsV1301
05:11 PM on 05/15/2012
If I lose my home, I am moving in with the Obama's....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:23 PM on 05/18/2012
Why in the world would you blame the Obamas? This is a Repub issue; as they are the ones who have been holding the unemployed hostage for the past two years. Look it up and don't allow yourself to be duped.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
08:44 AM on 05/19/2012
That is the problem with a democracy in which the average voter is not motivated enough to find out the facts. How can such an ignorant electorate make good choices?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CatkinsV1301
04:57 PM on 05/21/2012
Because MiddleMolly it's a nice house with servants....
03:59 PM on 05/15/2012
Republicans have attacked the unemployed, minorities, unions, gays, postal workers, the elderly, auto workers, teachers, Medicare and Social Security.

The only ones they have not attacked are big coal and oil, billionaires and the top 1%.

It is time to vote all Republicans out of office.
05:41 PM on 05/21/2012
I agree with that . Vote all Republican out of office.
11:43 AM on 05/15/2012
Why doesn't the government make people work for their welfare??? They could paint/restore/clean, do gardening, anything and be paid their welfare.......or the government could make a temporary cut to small businesses taxes allowing them to expand and create more jobs!!! There are many options which do not require destroying peoples lives by cutting them off, splitting families up and making it feel like another depression era! BUT all they do is spend money on who's the better candidate instead of repairing what needs doing right now....
01:34 PM on 05/15/2012
First unemployment insurance is not WELFARE! Secondly, the fund was established to insure people would not starve. Thirdly, unemployment taxes are paid by the employer for the benefit of employees that choose to terminate of lay off. These people have worked for those benefits. Austerity measures are nothing more than a means to depopulate, first by riots and violence and then Fema camps and euthanasia...Good by grandma!
03:51 AM on 05/16/2012
If I offended you I am sorry, I know first hand what happens to people who have their benefits cut despite this being the first time in their life they haven't worked!!! All he wants is a job but instead he's now homeless. I call that outrageous, unfair and inhumane. And if you think differently, I feel sorry for you, I hope you never have to go through it but the way things are going you probably will. And Good by has an E on the end :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
08:47 AM on 05/19/2012
Only the state's 26 weeks of unemployment comes from the funds to which workers and employers (mostly employers) have contributed. The additional 53 weeks come from the federal government and they are part of the deficit. And it's good-bye.
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
05:50 AM on 05/16/2012
It's not my 'welfare' they've cut off, it's my unemployment insurance. I'd have much preferred working, believe me. I'd have been happy to paint/restore/clean or do gardening for the meager amount of money I received after being unemployed for the first time in my 55 years.

Hell, I'd have let them drug test me to keep my benefits, although I find the practice despicable.

I'd have preferred any option over what's happened. My savings are gone. My retirement account is dwindling... and adding insult to injury, I have to pay tax penalties for early withdrawal.
12:41 PM on 05/16/2012
I bet you wouild let them test you to keep the handout...but thats not an option
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
08:48 AM on 05/19/2012
The unemployment insurance you funded ends after 26 weeks. The rest is federal deficit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KWiedemer
Denver Unemployment Examiner
10:01 AM on 05/15/2012
"In April, 1.8 million people had been out of work for 99 weeks -- barely changed from 1.9 million the previous year. " Wrong. The HuffPost wants to ignore the GAO findings on how many people have exhausted benefits, claiming, I guess, that just becuase a person didn't receive the full 99 weeks of benefits, they didn't 'exhaust' their benefits. What? huh?

The GAO now estimates that 5.5 million have exhausted all available unemployment insurance (UI; previously a maximum of 99 weeks) and that most who exhaust all UI do not qualify for additional assistance such as TANF because they don't have children under the age of 18 (something that yours truly has been saying for a very long time). This finding is a badly need and much sought after update and an increase from the 2 million 'exhaustees' that has been reported for well over a year now.

btw - I've seen the GAO numbers (ie 5.5 million exhaustees) reporte elsewhere.

http://www.examiner.com/article/gao-report-an-estimated-5-5-million-have-exhausted-all-ui-benefits
12:44 PM on 05/16/2012
Going from 1 handout program to another is the goal of many...but they will be REJECTED --- ooooh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KWiedemer
Denver Unemployment Examiner
02:53 PM on 05/16/2012
Six Mill, why don't you give me job? Happy to send you my resume.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronp121
09:04 AM on 05/15/2012
Got it now. When the jobs were abundant and unemployment was down to a acceptable level those that were working were looking forward to a depression so they could stay at home and wait for their houses to be taken away and to watch their families go hungry and to collect the monies they were taxed for unemployment coverage in case they were laid off. Now that the benefits have been taken away by a republican congress they can just jump out and get that other job. Simple logic. Huh Pubs?
12:45 PM on 05/16/2012
thats your problem right there...waiting you don't wait - you start hustlin'. its your family and you're responsible for them...don't wait for someone else to take care of them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronp121
01:47 PM on 05/16/2012
Did that, put two daughters through collage, paid my way, retired now. But I sure wouldn't want to attempt that achievement now.Those jobs of the past are gone so you in the working force better get use to it. Start fighting for what is right for your fellow man not your local corporation they aren't there for your better interest.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lqw
Justmyopinion
08:58 AM on 05/15/2012
Yet, Obama is focused on gay marriage. Priorities, priorities.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janna03
09:38 AM on 05/15/2012
Obama is focused on re-election and solidifying his base. This is why our Presidents should have one 5 or 6 year term, and that's it. If our President can't get anything done in 5 or 6 years, he can't get anything done. Stricter term limits for all politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Micheal Anderson
When the Rebels become the Tyrants
07:35 AM on 05/15/2012
All we have to do is stop paying for unemployment and people will simply stop being unemployed.

That's their 'logic.'
11:49 AM on 05/15/2012
I know, it stupid huh, they show the numbers of unemployed as lower than they actually are, maybe they should count the poor people who are recieving NO benefit's at all or the families that have been split up because they lost their homes and there are no places for them to stay together........the true figure would shock the world!!!
06:44 AM on 05/15/2012
This will get the unemployement percentage to acceptable levels. It will hurt the people who are really trying to find a job. The people who are placing the system or will not take a job because they want more money then the jobs offer will be forced to get a job or go on welfare. For both sides of the isle there are people gaming the system and there are people who just cannot find a job. Not to worry the bail out will keep unemployement low. Green energy jobs will fix it. More regulation will create more jobs. More government spending and control is the answer to all problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Micheal Anderson
When the Rebels become the Tyrants
07:38 AM on 05/15/2012
Yeah, not like giving rich people tax cuts so they can invest in mutual funds that are investing in China, not like those jobs that get created. And clearly, as the Zimmerman Martin shooting showed, the real answer is more guns as Martin clearly should have been armed and stood his ground. And deregulation always creates more high paying jobs with comprehensive health care and retirement benefits. And industry always regulates itself, never breaks the law, and never pollutes or treats workers poorly.
03:10 AM on 05/15/2012
Government of corrupt people, by corrupt people, for corrupt people. Just what "the Founding Fathers" had in mind, and what Lincoln spoke of. What a great system!
01:42 AM on 05/15/2012
Articles like this bring out all the tired old epithets and self-righteous opinions - viz, that the unemployed don't really want to work, and that nothing short of destitution and hunger will drive them off the couch and back to work.

And as ever, it's easy to see why people hold true to this point of view.

It prevents them from having to face up to reality - to the existence of a real problem, faced by thoroughly decent people who are, in fact, not at all the "deadbeats" they imagine.

Indeed, creating alternate realities in order to avoid dealing with them, seems to be the right wing modus operandi. It's so much *easier* to believe that people deserve what they get.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
04:30 AM on 05/15/2012
I think you have hit on the big difference between Repubs and Dems: For the most part, Dems realize that people have hard luck and hard times, and that "success" is perspiration, inspiration... and lots of luck and lots of "gifts". Likewise, if people are struggling, it is not a sign that they are somehow inferior.. it is a sign that bad things happen to good people.

Repubs...Naw, Success is the result of "working hard", "planning ahead", "good choices", and some kind of basic "superiority". In the Repub world, people are never born rich, never born smart, never born talented, never get sick, and never depend on the government for anything...Everything good that happens to a Repub has happened through his/her own doing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janna03
08:41 AM on 05/15/2012
Interesting comment! There is an element of truth in the Republican litany, that's what makes it appeal to people. Working hard, planning ahead and trying to make smart choices does tend to help people be more successful but as you point out life happens. Not every problem or outcome of a decision can be anticipated. What's happening to people right now is due to a major shift in our economy; resulting from moving away from manufacturing to a service based economy which has been happening over several decades, massive deregulation in the financial sector, and the over spending that results when you attempt to fund multiple "wars" for decades. What I see is an attempt to almost trivialize our economic problems by saying, if you are having problems in this economy then you're just not trying, you're lazy. Some people may be gaming the system but many are not and are genuinely struggling. It's our politicians who don't want to take responsibility, and take the easy way out by trying to place all the blame on the unemployed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juicybrisket
true emancipation is a fantasy...
01:12 AM on 05/15/2012
its typical for the rightwingies on this thread to bash obama and offer no solutions to the unemployment problem.
photo
Alux
Pull the Wool Over Your Own Eyes!
03:53 AM on 05/15/2012
Nobody has to bash Obama. He does an outstanding job all by his own lonesome!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
04:30 AM on 05/15/2012
Too much Faux news for you.
12:58 PM on 05/16/2012
Its not our job to figure things out for you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maureen Mower
Humanist, realist, open-minded, logical
12:55 AM on 05/15/2012
It might have been nice to list, somewhere in that article, WHICH states are losing benefits next. Have you Huff Po writers forgotten the basics of journalism, as in the "who, what, when, and WHERE"?