iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Morgan Stanley Shareholder Meeting Interrupted By The 99% Spring Protest Group

Reuters  |  Posted: Updated: 05/16/2012 12:36 am


* Gorman faces tough questions from protesters

* Shareholders approve pay and director proposals

* Chants drown out vote tally

By Lauren Tara LaCapra

PURCHASE, N.Y., May 15 (Reuters) - Anti-Wall Street protesters upstaged Morgan Stanley's annual meeting on Tuesday, lobbing tough questions at Chairman and Chief Executive James Gorman and shouting negative comments over a bank official who was attempting to read a tally of shareholder votes.

The 53-year-old CEO kept his cool through the meeting, but took protesters to task after one accused him and the board of directors of "immoral" and "unethical" practices. Among protesters' complaints were the bank's high pay packages, job cuts and financial reform lobbying efforts.

"I take umbrage at the suggestion that our board did anything unethical and I can't just let that sit out there," said Gorman.

He went on to say that although some of Morgan Stanley's business practices, including mortgage servicing, had been poor in the past, "I don't regard those as immoral or unethical."

After engaging in debate with some members of the protester group, which identified itself as "The 99% Spring" and was similar in tone to the "Occupy Wall Street" movement, Gorman instructed Corporate Secretary Martin Cohen to announce the preliminary shareholder vote tally.

But protesters quickly drowned out Cohen by yelling negative comments about Morgan Stanley and Wall Street.

"We will not be quiet until we create a system that prevents the 1 percent from ripping off the 99 percent," they chanted in a call-and-response fashion.

Once the protesters had finished their chant, Cohen announced that 93.6 percent of shareholders voted for the election of directors, 94.8 percent of investors approved proposed compensation for top executives and 81.4 percent approved a plan to add clawback provisions to bonuses stemming back to 2007.

There followed a second, lengthier question-and-answer session between Gorman and shareholders - who were mostly protesters - that pushed the meeting to over an hour.

After the meeting, which was staffed with security guards and police, Gorman shook hands with a few more supportive shareholders and fielded more questions from reporters.

Gorman said that Morgan Stanley does not have positions similar to the derivatives trades that have caused at least $2 billion in losses for competitor JPMorgan Chase & Co. Morgan Stanley's corporate treasury desk, which manages the company's excess liquidity, is "conservative," he said.

Gorman also said he does not believe JPMorgan's trading losses, which caused negative reactions from rating agencies for that bank, will affect Moody's Corp's assessment of Morgan Stanley's rating.

"I don't think JPMorgan has anything to do with how Morgan Stanley is rated," said Gorman.

Moody's is in the process of assessing downgrades for several large banks, and has said it might lower Morgan Stanley's three notches, from "A2" to "Baa2," which is just two notches above junk. Moody's has an open dialogue with Morgan Stanley as it gears up for the release of its assessment in June, Gorman said.

Gorman, who opened the annual meeting by saying he hoped it would be "respectful and orderly," had been prepared for the protesters. All considered, he said, "I thought it was pretty smooth."

A shareholder who shook hands with Gorman said he was upset that the event was dominated by protesters' political statements rather than more traditional shareholder concerns. "I want the stock to go back to where it was - that's all I want," he said.

Morgan Stanley shares were up 0.3 percent at $14.35 in afternoon trading on Tuesday. Its shares closed at $14.30 on Monday, less than half the company's stated book value of $31.42 as of March 31.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

* Gorman faces tough questions from protesters * Shareholders approve pay and director proposals * Chants drown out vote tally By Lauren Tara LaCapra ...
* Gorman faces tough questions from protesters * Shareholders approve pay and director proposals * Chants drown out vote tally By Lauren Tara LaCapra ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:21 PM on 05/16/2012
OWS protesters really need to fall back to the good old days to get their movement going forward again; urinating on themselves, defecating on police cars, taking drugs, spreading STD's, destroying property and so on. OWS protesters have to regain their momentum. My suggestions may help.
photo
cimmereo
manu ad ferram
03:50 AM on 05/16/2012
Glad to see OWS making itself heard to the soulless banking industry. Do more! (BTW, Mr Gorman simply isn't credible.)
05:48 PM on 05/15/2012
Call Congresswoman debra wasserman, I am being tortured by US Gov now and since 1996. I tried to sue but was denied. US torts branch - dept of army - 03-351-T064, filed in 2003, said I sued wrong agency and not within 2 years of finding electronic implant in my gums. Also When tried to change my name and ask for original birth cert. from Dallas General hospital was told I had a death certificate number also. The gov is using advanced torture techniques on me, every year its a different form of torture.

Call John Durham, Federal Prosecutor, CT - 203 821 3700, so far he only represents muslims being tortured at Gitmo, maybe he should represent an American being tortured by US Government.

Call National Security attorney Law Office of Mark S. Zaid.

If you dont believe see on you tube Dr. Colin Ross with has 3 institues in 3 states. Ca, Arizona and Texas. On video he says US Government is torturing Americans.

Kevin Tarr, Fort Lauderdale Florida
05:13 PM on 05/15/2012
Thank you OWS.
05:24 PM on 05/15/2012
Your welcome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:37 PM on 05/15/2012
LOL LOL!! Boy you OWS guys sure know how put together large crowds don`t you.
04:02 PM on 05/15/2012
"94.8 percent of investors approved proposed compensation for top executives" Let me clarify... Lots of rich people got together and decided it was a good idea to give a couple more rich people even more money. I think that's really what this quote should say.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
04:16 PM on 05/15/2012
That how it is. You own so many voting shares and you vote. Why do you have a problem with that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woody7
Always a Dem, but..............
04:21 PM on 05/15/2012
works for me.
PROGRESSISGOOD
Without Economic Justice, There Is No Justice!
03:36 PM on 05/15/2012
According to the Banksters and Stock Pushers, any act that creates profit for the company is by definition MORAL.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
04:17 PM on 05/15/2012
OK.
photo
cimmereo
manu ad ferram
03:54 AM on 05/16/2012
Paying the CEO minimum wage would boost company profits. Therefore, his compensation package is immoral.