iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Eduardo Saverin Might Not Be Allowed Back In The U.S., According To Citizenship Law

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: Updated: 05/17/2012 12:06 am

Eduardo Saverin

Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin might not be allowed to return to the United States.

Billionaire Saverin, who ditched his U.S. citizenship ahead of Facebook's mega IPO, is said to own a 4 or 5 percent stake in the social network. Bloomberg reported last week that he is moving to Singapore, possibly to slash taxes he might owe the U.S. government.

According to a U.S. immigration law highlighted by Talking Points Memo (TPM), Saverin might face difficulty re-entering the country due to the timing of his expatriation. From Sec. 212. [8 U.S.C. 1182] of the law, per TPM:

Former citizens who renounced citizenship to avoid taxation.-Any alien who is a former citizen of the United States who officially renounces United States citizenship and who is determined by the Attorney General to have renounced United States citizenship for the purpose of avoiding taxation by the United States is excludable

Facebook is seeking to raise as much as $18 billion in it what is expected to be the largest Internet IPO ever. Based on a regulatory filing the social network submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, the stock's planned price range is currently between $34 and $38 dollars per share; the company may be valued as high as $104 billion as a result. Bloomberg reports that Saverin likely saved himself $67 million in federal income taxes on his shares; the Times pegs his savings at $100 million or more.

A separate TPM post links to a document that one would have to file with the U.S. State Department's Bureau Of Consulate Affairs in order to relinquish citizenship. An item in that document also mentions possible exclusion of a person who has renounced citizenship in order to dodge taxes:

My renunciation/relinquishment may not exempt me from United States income taxation. With regard to United States taxation consequences, I understand that I must contact the United States Internal Revenue Service. Further, I understand that if my renunciation of United States citizenship is determined by the United States Attorney General to be motivated by tax avoidance purposes, I will be found excludable from the United States under Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.

A spokesman for Saverin has emailed multiple media outlets to say that Saverin, who was born in Brazil, did not become a resident of Singapore to avoid taxes in the U.S. "Eduardo recently found it to be more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time," the spokesman wrote. "He still has very strong ties to Brazil and is extremely passionate about not only his homeland, but also the U.S."

Saverin told the New York Times in an interview, “I’m not a tax expert [...] We complied with all the known laws. There was an exit tax.”

An exit tax is applied to an expatriate's capital assets, including unsold stock. Forbes estimates that, even though Saverin settled up with the government before the imminent spike in the value of Facebook's shares, he probably paid nearly $500 million to leave the country.

While still a Harvard student, Saverin served as the first CFO of Facebook. He held that position from 2004 until Mark Zuckerberg and other execs muscled him out in 2006 and diluted his 34 percent stake in the company. Saverin established his current stake in the social network as a result of a settlement with Facebook in 2009. Exact terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

Also on HuffPost:

For a look at 6 people Mark Zuckerberg burned on his way to the top, check out the slideshow (below).
Loading Slideshow...
  • The Winklevoss Twins

    The infamous Winklevoss twins have been giving Mark Zuckerberg grief ever since Facebook's launch back in 2004. The pair and a business partner (more on him later) commissioned Mark Zuckerberg to program a social networking site they had founded called ConnectU, but they later alleged in a lawsuit that Zuckerberg ripped off their idea and launched Thefacebook (later, Facebook) instead. After settling with the company for $65 million in cash and stock, the twins claimed that Facebook misled them about the value of the company's stock. They appealed the settlement <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/16/winklevoss-twins-appeal-denied-circuit-court_n_862758.html" target="_hplink">all the way up to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court</a> -- just one appeal shy of the Supreme Court -- before <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/22/winklevoss-twins-facebook-lawsuit_n_882618.html" target="_hplink">throwing in the towel in June 2011</a>.

  • Divya Narendra

    Divya Narendra partnered with the Winklevoss twins on their ConnectU project during their time at Harvard. Narendra fought Zuckerberg in court alongside the twins and <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/21/connectu-co-founder-launches-professional-investment-community-sumzero/" target="_hplink">founded his own investor community, called SumZero,</a> before claiming his share of the $65 million settlement with the social network. A plotline in the film "The Social Network," which dramatized Facebook's founding, portrayed the Harvard students' working relationship and subsequent fallout with Zuckerberg.

  • Eduardo Saverin

    Here's another name you probably recognize from "The Social Network." The film portrayed Zuck's deteriorating friendship with Facebook co-founder and fellow Harvard student Eduardo Saverin, culminating in a blatant betrayal on the part of Zuckerberg that ended his working relationship with Saverin. <a href="a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-booted-his-co-founder-out-of-the-company-2012-5?page=1" target="_hplink"" target="_hplink">A new piece by Business Insider indicates</a> that Saverin may not have been as much of a victim. As noted by BI, Zuckerberg planned to cut Saverin out of the company because he had failed to secure funding or set up a business model and had used the social network to run free ads for Joboozle, a side-project Saverin had developed. (<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-booted-his-co-founder-out-of-the-company-2012-5?page=1" target="_hplink">Business Insider also published emails and instant messages</a>, purportedly written by Zuckerberg, that shed light on the methods Zuck used to oust Saverin and dilute his shares in the company.) After a 2009 settlement with Facebook, Saverin retains an <a href="http://www.forbes.com/profile/eduardo-saverin/" target="_hplink">estimated five percent stake in the company</a>. (His original stake was higher than 30 percent.) He recently <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/11/eduardo-saverin-us-citizenship_n_1510099.html" target="_hplink">renounced his U.S. citizenship</a>, presumably to avoid the capital gains taxes on the profit he stands to make off Facebook's imminent IPO.

  • Sean Parker

    Napster creator Sean Parker, who also served as Facebook's first president, played a huge role in the development of the social network. <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mark-zuckerberg-2012-5/index3.html" target="_hplink">According to Henry Blodget's recent profile of Mark Zuckerberg</a>, Parker was also instrumental in securing Zuck's power over the company. However, <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mark-zuckerberg-2012-5/index3.html" target="_hplink">as Blodget explains</a>, despite Parker's contributions, Zuck and the company cut him loose a year after his arrival due to his "<a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mark-zuckerberg-2012-5/index3.html" target="_hplink">party-boy ways</a>."

  • Owen Van Natta

    Zuckerberg also had a hand in the departure of Owen Van Natta, Facebook's former chief operating officer and the <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20080219/owen-van-natta-to-leave-facebook/" target="_hplink">mind behind big deals</a> like Microsoft's $240 million investment in the social network. "His greatest strength was deal-making, not management," <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mark-zuckerberg-2012-5/index3.html " target="_hplink">writes Henry Blodget</a>. "In early 2008, in the wake of the disastrous launch of an advertising product called Beacon, Facebook's senior team determined that the company needed a different kind of executive running the business." <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20080219/owen-van-natta-to-leave-facebook/" target="_hplink">AllThingsD's Kara Swisher notes that</a> Van Natta had long been gunning for a CEO spot, which he was unlikely to find a Facebook. "He has said to me many times that he had been hesitant to come to Facebook then, as he had been looking for a CEO job at the time," wrote Swisher when Van Natta left Facebook.

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin might not be allowed to return to the United States. Billionaire Saverin, who ditched his U.S. citizenship ahead of Facebook's mega IPO, is said to own a 4 or 5 ...
Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin might not be allowed to return to the United States. Billionaire Saverin, who ditched his U.S. citizenship ahead of Facebook's mega IPO, is said to own a 4 or 5 ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 677
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
01:14 PM on 05/23/2012
Forget keeping him out -- just make him pay. There ought to be a law -- renounce your citizenship, pay an exit fee, applicable to any naturalized citizen. This guy comes to the U.S. supposedly because he was in danger in his native country, benefits from American generosity and the sacrifice of our early settlers and immigrants -- and now he goes to Singapore, a democracy with draconian rules (because to keep that many people per sq mi civilized, you have to have draconian rules). Good riddance. But his business is an American business, and it should pay American taxes.
07:42 PM on 05/23/2012
Didn't he move to Miami with his extremely wealthy parents?
photo
future primitive
Voice in the Wilderness
09:13 AM on 05/19/2012
He got poked. And now he's superpoked.
06:32 PM on 05/18/2012
facebook sucks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jmaximus Spartacus
04:47 AM on 05/18/2012
I say good riddance. Mark Zuckerberg didn't leave.
04:13 AM on 05/18/2012
What's really getting inane about this debate is the insinuation that all American dual citizens living abroad who give up their citizenship are doing it to avoid paying taxes. The vast majority of dual citizens living abroad are not billionaires, and don't earn enough to have to pay taxes in the U.S., even if they do have to file returns (an utterly unique obligation in the industrial world). But an ill-thought out law known as FATCA is making normal life for ex-pats pretty impossible. Imagine not being able to open a bank account? That's an ever-increasing reality for holders of a US Passport, even if they've never been to the US. FATCA is an attempt to turn every financial institution in the world (including pension funds,insurance, etc.) into an arm of the IRS, as they will be required to report all transactions to the IRS, at their own expense. The result is an unwillingness to do any business with Americans, and the sad fact that holding a passport abroad brings plenty of disadvantages, and no advantages. That's the reason for the record number of people giving up their US passports, and the problem is only going to get worse. I don't know any Americans abroad who are NOT considering giving up their citizenship, all because of this poor legislation passed by a misguided Democratic Congress in 2010. Yet I've seen no discussion of this insane law here or anywhere else in the US press.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnegie
I am.
07:41 PM on 05/17/2012
Okay am I mis reading something here? It says he saved 67 million in taxes by leaving. Then at the end it sasy he paid around 500 million to leave presumably by exit tax.

So.....which is it? He saved money in taxes or he paid money in taxes?
03:28 PM on 05/17/2012
There is only a solution to this: boycott Facebook!!!
02:28 PM on 05/17/2012
Face down, ask up, that's the way I like to Book!
02:10 PM on 05/17/2012
Keep him out and take facebook with! In a paralleled corruptible capacity, the entity "facebook" has contributed to much decay of the sanctity of home, and such perpetuates damage control machine unlike no other, not by the means of goodness, but for tax benefits and positive publicity. Some are aware of the implications of such, and have avoided "IT" all together. Increase your market cap and pass the slippery slope business to joe public with zero remorse. Don't lead a prostitute's life, since pimps do not pay taxes either. Farewell you opportunistic twit! Shedding negative sentiment timed interestingly so nears the IPO stems from industrial manipulation of our people. I pray for these addicts for profit in futility, whom are ignorantly lead by ignorance no true WORTH. Keep contributing to the mapping imprint of one's self, since the data predicts it (you lab rat). Move on GM! Question the model others! Prepare for the craziness!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wuud52
12:50 PM on 05/17/2012
I doubt he is a Republican, but this is the way many of them think. Use America's laws, infrastructure, free society, freedom of speech, entrepreneurial culture and openness to create a booming business, then hide all of the money that the culture allowed you to make over seas. Would he still be a multi millionaire if he paid his taxes? Of course he would. Would his money help pay for the roads, bridges, fire fighters, police and army that helped to keep him safe while he was here? Of course it would.

Go try to start a Facebook from scratch in Russia, China or North Korea...
02:24 PM on 05/17/2012
Yes! If only many others shared your views, preservation of wealth would fall to the wayside for preservation of country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnegie
I am.
07:47 PM on 05/17/2012
You can have both. Consider the post and consider the concept that a tax is a pay at-the-end for services rendered.

If you have found an environment that halped create, and sustain your Wealth tax is like rent, the landlord has every right to collect monies due for you're using the space.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JimMcDermottJr
rules are for the obedience of fools, and the guid
12:35 PM on 05/17/2012
Eduardo Saverin thanks for helping in the creation of FaceBook- a $100B company. You've helped create thousands of jobs and your company's IPO will generate billions for the US and for California's treasury. Good luck in Singapore and thanks.
12:24 PM on 05/17/2012
The only thing FaceBook has to offer is selling us other people's ads. Why does this seem to be something I don't want?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wuud52
12:45 PM on 05/17/2012
Hmmm, 900 million people might disagree with you.

Facebook does those things you say, but only because it also let's people communicate with friends and loved ones. There are lots of companies that just sell ads and privacy, and they do not have a following.
01:06 PM on 05/17/2012
You can communicate with friends and loved ones without the invasiveness of social networking.
12:13 PM on 05/17/2012
"In late 2003, Harvard sophomore Mark Zuckerberg asked a Harvard student named Eduardo Saverin, a junior, to deposit $15,000 in a bank account that would be accessible to both of them. The money, Mark promised, would go toward the servers needed to host a site that Mark wanted to develop. The site would be called TheFacebook.com. Eduardo agreed."

Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-05-15/tech/31706573_1_ceo-mark-zuckerberg-billionaire-facebook-eduardo-saverin#ixzz1v8zjlqc9
03:15 PM on 05/17/2012
Saverin gave his money to an American to help him create a company, then the American screwed him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnegie
I am.
07:51 PM on 05/17/2012
He got a pretty good return for his investment. Funny thing inventors ALWAYS get screwed.

Then again MZ didn't really invent this either.

What WAS his genius? Intrigue and theft?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
republic84
Equality is a right, not a luxury
12:13 PM on 05/17/2012
Hmm... I bet hes a republican isnt he.....
01:35 PM on 05/17/2012
Why? He is visibly not interested about US politics.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DudeDad
12:12 PM on 05/17/2012
It's called the Reed Amendment and it's never been enforced. It will not likely be enforced. Added at the last minute, no floor debate, nothing. No guidance on how to apply it.