iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Is NOM Acting Right?

Posted:

By Sofia Resnick

WASHINGTON -- "NOM is not a partisan organization or a stalking horse for either party," wrote National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown in March. "We are a movement of people of every race, creed, color -- and party -- willing to stand up for marriage."

NOM has long insisted that its battle against same-sex marriage transcends partisanship. "We're committed to achieving a majority for marriage, not any particular partisan majority," said Brown in announcing NOM's recent endorsement of an anti-marriage equality Democrat in New York.

Which is what makes NOM's close relationship with a right-wing fundraising and activism organization called ActRight so striking.

ActRight, which is also run by Brown and shares office space with NOM, has often been presented as the conservative answer to the successful progressive fundraising site ActBlue. Its website allows users to sign petitions, fund conservative organizations, and donate to politicians.

The site makes clear that when it comes to candidates, its focus is electing conservative Republicans. "All federal Republican candidates appear on ActRight," reads the "about us" page. "But from there you actually decide! Anyone who has become a member of ActRight by donating at least $5.00 to any federal candidate can vote RINO's off of the site by hitting the RINO button."

ActRight doesn't automatically list Democrats, but it doesn't ban them either. "Given that some third party candidates or even Democrats could be conservative (hey, it does happen!) we also allow you to vote candidates on." Still, as of May 15, none of the federal candidates listed on ActRight were Democrats.

Fighting same-sex marriage together

As a clearinghouse for conservative and Republican causes, ActRight makes it seem like the right's top priority is fighting against same-sex marriage.

Half of ActRight's "top causes" -- the groups the site has raised the most amount of money for – are campaigns pushing anti-gay marriage ballot measures in Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Washington state. NOM has been deeply involved with each of those campaigns. Most of the remaining top causes are groups affiliated with CatholicVote.org (a project of Fidelis, a socially conservative Catholic group), which also wants to prevent same-sex couples from marrying.

This placement does not appear to be coincidental.

As Good As You blogger Jeremy Hooper recently reported, the state anti-marriage equality campaigns backed by NOM have set up their websites so that online donations are processed through ActRight.

Hooper, who has written extensively about NOM's ties to ActRight, reported last year that contributions made through Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.)'s presidential campaign site website were being process through ActRight. McCotter continues to be the highest-earning candidate on ActRight.com.

In addition to allowing users to donate to candidates and causes, ActRight allows users to create and contribute to "actions," which mainly consist of petitions and letters to political leaders related to a particular cause. ActRight's "top action" for this month is "Dump Starbucks for Supporting Same Sex Marriage," an electronic petition informing the CEO and board of directors of Starbucks that signatories are "deeply offended by your corporate position to support same-sex marriage and your decision to oppose the reasonable moral views of half your US customers and the vast majority of your international consumers." The signers pledge not to patronize Starbucks until it stops "attacking the natural institution of marriage." NOM started the Dump Starbucks boycott initiative back in March.

Last week -- after President Obama declared his support for gay marriage and North Carolina voted to ban it -- NOM announced a new initiative called Stand for Marriage America, which allows marriage equality foes to contribute simultaneously to ballot campaigns in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington: "For every dollar you donate, 25 cents will go to each of the four state campaigns where marriage is on the ballot – or you can re-allocate your gift to particular states!"

NOM's Stand for Marriage America campaign is being conducted using ActRight. In a blog post on NOM's site, Brown repeatedly directs supporters to ActRight's site in order to fund the effort.

A close relationship

NOM's relationship with ActRight goes beyond simply sharing its president and cooperating in fundraising activities.

Just last month, ActRight's legal arm, ActRight Legal Services, took over as NOM's counsel in two different federal cases. They replaced Citizens United attorney James Bopp Jr. and his colleagues at the Bopp Law Firm, which for years has been representing NOM in its efforts to skirt campaign-disclosure laws. (At least four of the attorneys who joined ActRight Legal Services earlier this year are former Bopp attorneys.)

NOM has avoided directly promoting ActRight or declaring a formal relationship between the two organizations, though the address listed for ActRight and its various entities is the same as that listed for the National Organization for Marriage. (ActRight Fund -- the group's 527 arm -- lists rent paid to NOM on its IRS filings.)

The American Independent recently visited the K Street address listed by both NOM and ActRight, where we requested copies of ActRight's 2010 tax filings for its 501(c)3 (ActRight Educational Trust Fund) and 501(c)4 (ActRight Action). We could not be helped because, we were told, the relevant ActRight staff member had the day off. That ActRight staffer is Paul Bothwell, who at one point worked at NOM. Bothwell later told TAI in an email that for 2010, ActRight was "not required to file as we had too little activity." Bothwell would not confirm whether he was still working for NOM, but he responded to our inquiry using an actright.com email address instead of the nationformarriage.orgemail address at which we had originally contacted him.

Louis Marinelli, a former NOM employee who is now a marriage equality activist, released several of NOM's internal memos and emails earlier this year. Among the documents Marinelli posted were minutes from a meeting in which he and other NOM staffers discussed ActRight's technology at length.

Campaign-finance records for ActRight's political action committee (ActRight) and its 527 organization (ActRight Fund) show that recent big donations have come from past NOM donors.

The ActRight Fund's 2011 year-end report of contributions and expenditures showed that the bulk of its nearly $200,000 in itemized contributions came from one source, Sean Fieler of Equinox Partners LLP. Fieler -- who gave the group $195,000 -- is chairman of the American Principles Project, whose founder is Robert George, chairman emeritus of NOM. Excluding a bank payment refund, the rest -- four installments of $700 -- came from ActRight's PAC.

The ActRight Fund's 2012 first quarter report shows that it received $500,445 in itemized contributions. Nearly all of that came from one person: Terrence Caster, who helped bankroll the NOM-backed Proposition 8 in 2008.

According to version of NOM's 2008 tax return that was released by the Human Rights Campaign via a reported whistleblower, in 2008 Fieler gave $100,000 to NOM and Caster gave NOM $172,500.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By Sofia Resnick WASHINGTON -- "NOM is not a partisan organization or a stalking horse for either party," wrote National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown in March. "We are a move...
By Sofia Resnick WASHINGTON -- "NOM is not a partisan organization or a stalking horse for either party," wrote National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown in March. "We are a move...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:59 AM on 05/18/2012
“NOM’s underhanded attempts to divide will not succeed if black Americans remember their own history of discrimination,” said Julian Bond, chairman emeritus of the NAACP. “Pitting bigotry’s victims against other victims is reprehensible; the defenders of justice must stand together. It confirmed a suspicion that some evil hand was behind this.”

“African-American men and women of faith are not a political football to be tossed around in a cynical game of resentment and division, said minister Leslie Watson Malachi, director of People For the American Way Foundation’s African-American Ministers Leadership Council. “We, like all Americans, struggle thoughtfully with issues of faith, family and politics. Anti-equality activists such as NOM consistently attempt to use a deeply cynical ‘wedge’ strategy to divide African Americans and the gay community, playing up what are now old and tired clichés.”

“NOM’s wedge strategy memos detail its campaign to funnel money to a handful of African-American clergy in order to attack gay couples and, appallingly, discredit the strong and clear voice of those African-American civil rights champions, such as John Lewis, Julian Bond, and Coretta Scott King, who have stood up for the freedom to marry and the equal civil rights of all people, including gay people of color,” said Freedom To Marry President Evan Wolfson in response to the document release.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
itsgoingtobeabumpyride
09:34 AM on 05/18/2012
If you have never visited the NOM blog, try it for a good laugh. These people make Sarah Palin look like Einstein.
07:42 AM on 05/18/2012
Such a "Christ-Like" organization.

Seeking to divide and influence the Black & Latino communities to win elections and initiatives.

Seeking to cloak the powers and donors behind a wall of anonymity.

No conscience other than "whatever works".

The right of the people to not have the political process subverted by these Super-PAC's and organizations far outweighs the argument for anonymity.

The only way to short-circuit this so-far successful strategy is to educate the targeted electorate A.S.A.P.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Bursac
You're not the bossa nova me.
04:14 AM on 05/18/2012
The way NOM and its backers have skirted the letter of the law on many fundraising and disclosure matters you'd think all the males involved are transvestites.

Which could be true, actually.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
racmd
Just riding the wave of life
07:58 PM on 05/17/2012
The NOM is no more than the KKK without robes and hoods. They are vindictive, hateful and crude. They call us names and we just shrug. We tell the LGBT youth it gets better. I say that is a crock. It does not get better..look around you. What gets better is your ability to rationalize the hatred...to turn the other cheek or to hide in your home...in your job...or your small group of friends.
We must take control of this...we have no organizers..and few leaders who will lead this fight. Oh, we have a handful of people who taunt the pwers to be...but when was the last successful LGBT march...that we were not marching in our "full colors"...showing who we can be...in a social structure? We need to be as militant as this group...non-violent but as vile and as hateful.
Help the LGBT youth...give to programs that help kids...and stop giving to churches, religious groups, the GOP, the TP and other hateful groups. Do something with that extra drink, dinner or party money. Or the tithing for one week a month for a year...and give a thank you note to the church...for donating to a worthy cause. Call out these hateful people..loudly and clearly...
we are 20,000,000+ strong and we are NOT going away and we will NOT be silenced by ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
racmd
Just riding the wave of life
07:51 PM on 05/17/2012
This just grinds me...we, the L & G, are over 20,000,000+ strong...then you add our support groups...and you have well over 75,000,000 people....why is it we cannot get organized enough to make these groups cry in their sleep? I will tell you why.. We have people in our midst who would NOT have us have rights. They have identified with the aggressor and they vote in the same vein.
We need to become militant...not violent...but militant all the same.
We are 20,000,000+ strong and we are NOT going away...and we will NOT be silenced by ignorance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:12 PM on 05/17/2012
What are YOU going to do about it aside from a comment on an article venting?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
07:43 PM on 05/17/2012
NOM IS ALL ABOUT THE CATHOLIC AND MORMON MACHINES

BEING DEATHLY AFRAID OF HAVING TO CHANGE

PERIOD
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robroberts2009
No more info for YOU people.
07:26 PM on 05/17/2012
It is so strange to me that there is an anti-gay hate industry funded by a couple donors, and the Catholic and Mormon churches. They back up all their claims with religious animis, and outdated,, discredited claims by quak "researchers" many of who have been shunned and barred from their profession. For these people it seems to be some sort of sadistic political game; for the millions of people whose loves are affected it is destroying our quality of life, our equality and our chance to ever fully participate in the American Dream. Is this what religion has come down to, funders and promoters of inequality and hate? Jesus would be ashamed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Heuser
Independent Buckeye For Life
03:47 PM on 05/17/2012
I've posted this a few times already. I guess I'm hoping to in essence knock some sense into some people. The fact is Christianity did not invent marriage but, these people want to make it solely a Christian institution. The only thing Christianity can take credit for is the word marriage. The act of marriage was in fact around thousands of years before Christianity. It was called Handfasting at that time. It's actually a pagan tradition that was "adopted" by the Christians just like several other traditions such as the "yule log" and "Halloween" Now, I am married. However; I was married in a civil ceremony in my parents backyard by the mayor of a nearby city. When speaking with a Christian pastor at the wedding of a family member we got on to the subject of my marriage. He asked me "What church were you married at?" I told him. His response to that was "Then you are not married in the eyes of god." I was offended that he would nullify my marriage in such a way and so I said "I am married in the eyes of the law and that is good enough for me." So, since churches are protected by the 1st amendment they can refuse to marry a gay couple without repercussions. Which to me makes this whole argument about gay marriage a load of nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
racmd
Just riding the wave of life
07:49 PM on 05/17/2012
You are so correct!!!
I have gone so far as to suggest that the "marriage equality" laws MUST contain statements forbidding religious groups and their representatives from marrying same sex couples. This will tip over a few wagons...Each person, can apply to the state, to be allowed to perform "same-sex" marriages based on their ethics and attitudes in an interview and questionaire. Otherwise..they are banned from being involved. They want a separation of church and state I will separate it..totally in this instance.
BTW...you might have offered to the "pastor" that his license to marry was granted by the state...not by his god.
F and F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Heuser
Independent Buckeye For Life
09:28 PM on 05/17/2012
Awesome! Where were you eight years ago!!!! LOL!
photo
LintLass
"When you can balance a tackhammer on your head...
01:15 PM on 05/18/2012
Why should those of we clergy and religions that happily celebrate and perform LGBT weddings be banned from the practice of *our* faiths? Just cause some others want this? Doesn't make much sense there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
08:10 PM on 05/17/2012
Fanned and faved. I have said this a number of time, but the Christianists just go on claiming things that were originally Pagan. I was civilly married and then we were handfasted at a Pagan fest the following summer. The nice thing, though is that even if we hadn't been able to have a Handfasting we would still be considered married. No condemnation like that Christianist minister who decided you weren't married.

This whole thing is nonsense: churches cannot be forced to marry anyone they don't want to. The problem is they don't want anyone else to be able to legally marry GLBT people...because Christianists disapprove. I say, "Fine disapprove all you want in your churches but keep your bigoted beliefs out of our laws!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Heuser
Independent Buckeye For Life
09:29 PM on 05/17/2012
I just created a petition on Change.org pertaining to that sort of thing. Now, I know what I am proposing is not exactly possible but, hey if it gets enough signatures it will definitely send a message to the Congress. LOL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnolialover
03:32 PM on 05/17/2012
Ah yes, another "marriage" organization that is actually against, well, marriage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ta2t2o
If I agreed with you, then we'd both be wrong.
03:16 PM on 05/17/2012
"We are a movement of people of every race, creed, color -- and party -- willing to stand up for marriage."

As a gay man - I would like to believe that this movement of theirs is truthfully about protecting marriage. However, if this was the case, you would think their primary focus would be on making divorces more difficult and in changing the age of consent laws to make sure people were a bit more mature when they wed. However, what they're calling a defense of marriage is actually nothing more than seeking to deny this right to gay people - plain and simple.

They're doing nothing to actually protect marriage by doing this - they're just limiting who can participate in it. If they actually wanted to protect marriage - they would push for legislation that would allow you to have only one single marriage as long as both of the original parties are still living. It would also deny the marriage of US Citizens and Immigrants (i.e. Mail Order Brides) or at least make the vetting of these marriages more stringent so as to make sure they're not skirting immigration laws. Doesn't sound like they're actually doing anything that's pro-marriage, just anti-marriage for gay people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karma2U
Blessed are the Peacemakers
03:05 PM on 05/17/2012
The right wing Gold Over People party hates everyone! They worship only money.

Register and vote Obama, a working congress and progressive governors 2012!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
08:12 PM on 05/17/2012
Registered and good to go to vote for Obama, more Democrats in Congress from Colorado!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
03:05 PM on 05/17/2012
Not partisan? Ha! Their clearly not progressive. In fact conservative is not even adequate - more like regressive. You can't get any further to the right.
02:55 PM on 05/17/2012
Eliminate the government giving any money to religious organizations and take away their tax exemption if they want to play in politics and push their superstitions on everyone else!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almchrl13
02:13 PM on 05/17/2012
Rush and Newty love marriage so much they have cumulatively done in 7 times.