iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Joshua Hersh
GET UPDATES FROM Joshua:

Afghan Army General: Corruption Sometimes Makes It Impossible To Do Our Job

Posted: Updated: 05/18/2012 1:00 pm

Afghanistan Army Corruption
An Afghan Army soldier patrols Afghanistan's Logar Province. Major General Afzal Aman has said government corruption could make some operations impossible.

KABUL, Afghanistan -- Close ties between Afghan Taliban or criminal elements and officials highly placed in the government threaten to prevent the Afghan National Army from fulfilling its security responsibilities when it fully takes over control of the country, a top Afghan general told The Huffington Post.

Major General Afzal Aman, the chief of staff for operations at the Ministry of Defense, said in an interview on Thursday that Afghan security forces are sometimes forced to halt missions when the target turns out to have influential contacts in the Afghan government.

"A person who we know is guilty, if he has a relationship with somebody with high rank or authority in the government, or if he is close to a very rich person, there are some restrictions on what we can do," Gen. Aman said.

"Maybe you know about the influence of these dangerous people in the villages," he added. "In some cases we are finding that with some people we face, although we know they are lying, we know they are guilty, but we can't do anything about it."

Gen. Aman did not offer any specific examples, but he added that American and other Western forces "don't have these limitations."

Corruption -- within the government in general and the military specifically -- has long been identified as a major impediment to the security of the Afghan state.

A 2010 report by the Pentagon's Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that corruption within the ranks of the Afghan military was "a key factor undermining developmental progress and morale at the unit level" -- something that coalition military officials readily acknowledge.

The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) "considers corruption a considerable threat, and counter corruption is one of our campaign lines of effort," said Australian Brigadier Roger Noble, the deputy chief of staff for operations at ISAF in Kabul.

Noble said that ISAF has worked with the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to improve its countercorruption monitoring and prevention and added that a new internal countercorruption task force at the Ministry of Defense had already "detected and punished offenders."

"We see the ANSF increasingly holding leaders to account, and the expectations of many Afghan soldiers and officers are high -- as they should be," Noble said. "If the force is professionalized, systematic, confident and values-driven, it will continue to gain ground in the fight against corruption. It is not an easy battle with Afghanistan's recent history and trials always close by in the rear view mirror."

But most of the attention on corruption within the Afghan military has focused on more mundane illegal acts: bribery, pilfering of supplies and pay fraud.

By contrast, Gen. Aman's remarks hinted at a potentially far more enduring obstacle that widespread influence peddling and corruption might pose to basic military operations.

It's also rare to hear these concerns expressed so bluntly by a high-ranking member of the Afghan military itself.

Gen. Aman's warning comes at a time when Afghan forces are increasingly finding themselves taking responsibility for military operations across the country.

Earlier this week, American forces handed over security responsibilities of a third tranche of territory to the Afghan government, putting the Afghan military in nominal control of at least one district in every province.

The Afghan Army has also been plagued by an apparent rise in so-called green-on-blue killings, in which a uniformed Afghan soldier kills a coalition service member. So far this year, 22 coalition service members have been killed by people in Afghan military uniforms, compared with 35 in all of 2011, according to The New York Times.

For the time being, most operations conducted by the Afghan military still include some participation and monitoring by Western advisers and mentors, and ISAF has so far only certified a small number of Afghan units as fit to operate fully independently.

In his interview with HuffPost, Gen. Aman expressed confidence that the problem of influence peddlers could be overcome with time.

"It's not particularly frustrating for me," he said. "We're going to solve it, bit by bit."

FOLLOW WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan -- Close ties between Afghan Taliban or criminal elements and officials highly placed in the government threaten to prevent the Afghan National Army from fulfilling its security res...
KABUL, Afghanistan -- Close ties between Afghan Taliban or criminal elements and officials highly placed in the government threaten to prevent the Afghan National Army from fulfilling its security res...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 915
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
06:09 PM on 05/20/2012
NATO sets the precedent for an international police force.........exactly what the world needs to fight terrorism......and it could be extended to include SEATO...........even if it does smack of world Federation. Watch out John Connor, the threat to human liberty could come from anywhere, especially if the Federation is 'Of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations' and their market-based (human exclusionary) reality :-)
05:48 PM on 05/20/2012
Afghanistan? Corruption? Failed objectives? Who woulda thunk? The problem for those who are overtired of the war, and the futility is that 'terrorism' has let the genie out of the bottle and little insignificant groups with self centered interests, like Al Qaeda, the Somolian pirates, and the T-Party can hold even the greatest of nations hostage.

You can't fence it in (or out), you've got to deal with it on it's own turf, behead it, and eradicate it! :-)
ElCojonuo
I believe in WISDOM
08:43 AM on 05/20/2012
The headline sounds just like Méjico.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:08 PM on 05/19/2012
I bet that they are not more corrupt that our Chicago, Illinois government..................
06:01 PM on 05/20/2012
Democracy, and especially our capitalist based democracy are really just an 'organized' form of corruption. The rules are set just loose enough to satisfy the seemingly 'normal' human need for 'hanky-panky' (aka corruption) without allowing for complete chaos. In order to maintain order, we generally just 'flash some lights' and give out a few speeding tickets to the unlucky few who are randomly selected to serve as examples and remind the majority that they are taking a risk if they violate the rules too fragrantly.

This is also why we need to worry about wealth disparity.........because the wealthy have most likely 'skated' through some 'lucky' windows of opportunity that just weren't available to others. Time & place, rule enforcement, lack of police (regulatory) presence, and dozens of other variables all contribute to these "lucky breaks" that make one person with .0001% difference in genetics worth millions more than his or her genetic twin :-) Like all good things, a thin layer of disparity goes a long way towards 'soothing the masses' and building a civil society.

Of course, once the Republicans, and their conservative brethren around the world have fully replaced human labor with robots, this will no longer be a problem..............and a very few very wealthy people will be able to control the world without concern for the rabble masses. There is something scary about that thought :-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 PM on 05/20/2012
I agree with you........people should not have moe than 1 kid and none if they are dumb....but, it works the other way.......Intelligent people have 1 or 2 kids and the really dumb with bad genes have tons of them....................
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:07 PM on 05/19/2012
I thought that they were talking about Chicago..................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builder101
VOTE!
02:57 PM on 05/19/2012
Leave this year. Spend the money on Education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ayesha Khan
01:21 PM on 05/19/2012
The best solution to all this big drama is that the US and NATO should openly open fire on Afghan government and capture the whole country, that's it--- If a General of Afghan Military can state that they are unable to stop those corrupt people who are at the back of this violence every now and then and they cannot do anything---then to hell with such generals and the entire army. They deserve it cause they themselves are corrupt to the core. I don't understand what kind of people they are calling other nations to fight terrorism and corruption when they cannot eliminate the same from their own self's Every single person who is corrupt has a person tag on him, and the US and NATO have paid their price and they are bought--And it is not Pakistan who is supporting the NATO to bring the supplies into Afghan territory via their routes it is the high corrupt, and notorious Pakistani officials among which on the top list is President Zardari, and on account of such corrupt ones the repute of Pakistan on global level has been disgraced--
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
11:22 AM on 05/19/2012
The thing that puzzles me is when was it that the U.S. Gov't decided they could end a 2500 year tradition of slaughtering one another? These Afghans need to be left alone to do what they have always done. Fight each other. That country has no role so important to the world that it must be civilized. I'm not certain that it can be civilized.
photo
catcancook
Going Forward 2013-2016
10:54 AM on 05/19/2012
"the problem of influence peddlers could be overcome with time."

TIME and MONEY...is not on our side in the US. Afghanistan is a Money Pit!

Problems in Afghanistan go all the way back to 1979. It's highly doubtful it will become a stable country without corruption or ongoing problems anytime in the next decade or longer.
11:22 AM on 05/19/2012
Yes. The Soviet Union finally gave up. Why does the U.S. appear so ignorant of the history of Afghanistan?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Farmer
Common Sense Yankee
10:42 AM on 05/19/2012
This not "news" to those of us veterans, [me, Vietnam,66-67}, who "know" the Karzai government is corrupt and just "plays" at pretending to be loyal allies. As soon as the US and Allied Forces withdraw from Afghanistan, the whole place will erupt in a civil war. The Taliban and Al Qaeda will re-establish themselves quickly, as they both continue to recruit "as we speak". Pakistan will be able to be more open in their support of the corrupt Afghani government AND the Taliban. Karzai and Zardari are two of the most duplicitous "allies" the US has. The clandestine industry of Opium growth and production will continue to be Afghanistan's biggest "money maker".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zlohcuc
"Serving millions from atop the Allegheny"
10:40 AM on 05/19/2012
Begging the question on the minds of millions of Americans...why don't we leave the Afghans, Taliban, AQ,Pakistani enablers to work this out amongst themselves.We can join the Chinese in exploiting the county's resources after the factions knock each other off and the coast is clear.There is no reason other than providing corporate cover and safeguarding the poppy trade for a US presence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HADAFAKAYA
Imagine all the people living life in peace.
10:39 AM on 05/19/2012
You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blondssspice
10:37 AM on 05/19/2012
Afghanistan may have just as many civilian contractors and subcontractors, as Iraq had... they will have to be removed or evacuated as well if USA Military decided to leave.

In the IRAQ War, Halliburton was awarded a $$$ 7 Billion contract for services in the conflict. Halliburton was the only company allowed to bid on this contract under the George Bush administration 2001-2009.

USA Vice President Dick Cheney was the former CEO of Haliburton from 1995-2000 and he was receiving a "deferred compensation package" from Haliburton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
11:23 AM on 05/19/2012
Gee, that was so useful to solving our Afghan problem Blonds.. Thanx so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blondssspice
11:53 AM on 05/19/2012
LOL ...   but really, its all about money.  I dont believe for one moment we are there to self sacrifice for the afghan people
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giveadamn
Don't let them school you or even try to fool you.
10:37 AM on 05/19/2012
Like the Taliban saying about foreigners goes, "They have the watches, we have the time!"
When you see the dam cracking, you don't stand there with your finger in it, you make a timely exit! Afghan Army pay is not much, and since bartering is a way of life there, it make perfect sense that they would do what is in their nature. It reminds me of the story of the scorpion who asked the frog for a ride across the river, but the frog said you'll bite, the scorpion swore he wouldn't, so he relented. Halfway across, the scorpion bit the frog and as they were sinking, the frog said: "But why?", "You'll die too!, the scorpion replied: I can't help it, it's in my nature!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHARLESTHETENTH
10:33 AM on 05/19/2012
The very sad part to all of this is that it has been going on since the US arrived and well known by our government and yet through all of this American soldiers were put in harms way. This administration continues to carry out the failed policy of the Bush era, continues to commit our soldiers and seemingly waiting for the opportune time to withdraw. There is no opportune time and there never was...a big mistake was made going there in the first place. This administration is balancing our soldiers against the backdrop of a failed Afghanistan when in fact Afghanistan has been a failure from the very beginning. Whether its a pull out now or in 2014 makes no difference as far as the fate of Afghanistan but makes a big difference on the number of soldiers we will lose in the interim. Common sense never did prevail in our foolish attempt to convert a country that cannot be converted. All we did was further corrupt a country and made it easier for anarchy and return of the enemy we have fought and died for. How can this administration justify for even another day our commitment in Afghanistan in light of all that has and continues to take place within the Afghan government and its Military.