iOS app Android app More

LEGO Gender Gap: Sociological Images Blog Maps Toy Company's Gender Marketing Through History

Posted: Updated: 05/18/2012 2:41 pm

Lego Gender Gap

Lamenting the prevalence of toystore gender stereotypes, a wise little girl named Riley once said: "Some girls like superheroes, some girls like princesses; some boys like superheroes, some boys like princesses. So then why [do] all the girls have to buy pink stuff and the boys have to buy the different color stuff?"

Riley wouldn’t be surprised to hear that many children of both genders enjoy using regular old LEGOs. But the company's recent track record of gender pigeonholing suggests that some of its own marketers might.

"A company that has focused its marketing efforts almost solely on boys for the last five years is now trying to break into the female market," HuffPost reported last year when LEGO announced it would launch a new line of toys, "LEGO Friends," targeted specifically at girls.

At the time of the announcement, Margaret Hartmann of Jezebel bemoaned the unimaginative characters and color schemes of the Friends sets, writing: "A tremendous amount of thought went into developing Lego Friends -- which is part of the reason it's so disappointing." She was certainly not the only person to express her frustration. (In January, Susana Polo wrote at The Mary Sue: “This is gender stereotyping. .... If it was any other kind of stereotyping, would the excuse 'well, it sells units' be used?”)

Now, in a series on the blog Sociological Images, David Pickett is trying to "provide some historical perspective for the valid concerns raised in [the] heated [LEGO Friends] debate" by outlining the company's gender marketing strategies over the years since the early 1930s.

The first two entries in his series explore how and why the company's tactics developed over the course of the 20th century. He focuses specifically on the more recent gender breakdown of LEGO minifigures (aka "minifigs"), an array of characters that lock into LEGO bricks and scenes. Two more installments due over the next few weeks will bring readers up to the present day. Throughout, Pickett addresses thorny questions such as, "Why is it that the products for girls are always on the low-skill side of the spectrum and the high-skill side always reserved for boys?"

The following images and charts are taken from Part II of his series, and illustrate the gender split in LEGO minifigures through the years. Click over to Sociological Images to read his full analysis.

(H/T BoingBoing)

Loading Slideshow...
  • 1960s

    <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a>

  • 1971 - 1974 -- Homemaker

    <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a>

  • 1978 - The Minifigure

    <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a>

  • Early 1980s

    <br>Ads that recently resurfaced as "proof" that LEGO marketers weren't gender-biased in the '80s.</br> <br><a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a></br>

  • 1979 - 1980 -- Scala Jewellery

    <br>Other marketing from the '80s tells a different story.</br> <br><a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a></br>

  • Early 1980s -- Technic

    <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/08/part-i-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">via Sociological Images</a>

  • 1989 - 2010 -- Pirates

    via <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/15/part-ii-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">Sociological Images</a>

  • 1994 - 2008 -- Belville

    via <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/15/part-ii-historical-perspective-on-the-lego-gender-gap/" target="_hplink">Sociological Images</a>

  • Masculine/feminine split across all themes for five key years between 1989 and 1999

    Red = female minifigs; Blue = male minifigs; Grey = "neutral" minifigs

  • Masculine/feminine split for the "girls'" lines Paradisa, Belville, and Scala Dolls "across all years they existed"

    Red = female minifigs; Blue = male minifigs; Grey = "neutral" minifigs

  • Masculine/feminine minifigure ratio over time

FOLLOW PARENTS

Filed by Emma Mustich  |