iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SpaceX Delays Rocket Launch To ISS Due To Technical Problems (VIDEO)

By MARCIA DUNN 05/19/12 06:56 PM ET AP

Spacex
This framegrab from NASA-TV shows the Falcon 9 SpaceX rocket on the launch pad at complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Cape Canaveral, Fla., seconds after the launch was aborted due to technical problems early Saturday May 19, 2012. The launch is now rescheduled is rescheduled for Tuesday morning May 22, 2012 at 3:44 a.m. EDT (AP Photo/NASA)

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A new private supply ship for the International Space Station remained stuck on the ground Saturday after rocket engine trouble led to a last-second abort of the historic flight.

All nine engines for the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket roared to life Saturday morning. But with a mere half-second remaining before liftoff, the onboard computers automatically shut everything down. So instead of blasting off on a delivery mission to the space station, the rocket stayed on its launch pad amid a plume of engine exhaust.

Even NASA's most seasoned launch commentator was taken off-guard.

"Three, two, one, zero and liftoff," announced commentator George Diller, his voice trailing as the rocket failed to budge. "We've had a cutoff. Liftoff did not occur."

SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell said that high combustion chamber pressure in engine No. 5 was to blame. During an inspection later in the day, engineers discovered a faulty valve and worked into the evening to replace it.

Tuesday is the earliest that SpaceX can try again to send its cargo-laden Dragon capsule to the space station. The California-based company – formally known as Space Exploration Technologies Corp. – is targeting every few days for a launch attempt to save fuel in case of rendezvous problems at the space station. Wednesday also could be a launch option.

This was the first launch attempt by the several private U.S. companies hoping to take over the job of delivering cargo and eventually astronauts to the space station for NASA. Only governments have accomplished that to date: the United States, Russia, Europe and Japan.

NASA is looking to the private sector, in this post-shuttle era, to get American astronauts launching again from U.S. soil. SpaceX officials said that could happen in as few as three years, possibly four. Several other companies are in the running.

An estimated 1,000 SpaceX and NASA guests poured into the launching area in the wee hours of Saturday, hoping to see firsthand the start of this new commercial era. They left disappointed. The abort was especially disheartening given the perfect weather and the absence of any earlier countdown problems.

Shotwell was asked by a reporter whether she considered Saturday's abort a failure.

"This is not a failure," she said. "We aborted with purpose. It would be a failure if we were to have lifted off with an engine trending in this direction."

She added: "The software did what it was supposed to do" with the engine shutdown.

Everyone around town, at least, is rooting for a successful flight.

"Go SpaceX," read the sign outside Cape Canaveral City Hall. Until NASA's space shuttles retired last summer, the sign had urged on the launches of Discovery, Endeavour and, finally, Atlantis. Those ships are now relegated to museums.

Late last month, SpaceX conducted a test firing of the nine first-stage rocket engines at the pad. Each engine – including No. 5 – was "rock solid," Shotwell said.

The first flight of the Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral, in June 2010, encountered similar last-second engine trouble, but there was enough time to fix the problem and fly the same day. SpaceX has just a single second each day to launch this time around because of the space station rendezvous.

Six months after the initial Falcon 9 flight, SpaceX launched another rocket with a Dragon capsule that reached orbit. It was the first time a private company put a spacecraft into orbit and then recovered it. The newest Dragon also is meant to splash down into the Pacific, returning space station experiments and equipment.

For Saturday's launch attempt, SpaceX's billionaire founder, Elon Musk, was in the SpaceX Mission Control in Hawthorne, Calif. He helped create PayPal and founded SpaceX 10 years ago. He also runs Tesla Motors, his electric car company.

___

Online:

SpaceX: http://www.spacex.com

NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/offices/c3po/home/

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

Filed by Jacqueline Howard  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 232
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Allie
Starving Philosopher
09:56 PM on 05/20/2012
This is seriously cool stuff. I am so happy the problem was minor, and that all the safety systems worked flawlessly. I hope to see many more launches in the future.
Good luck to all involved.
Where do I apply for work with you guys?
08:11 PM on 05/21/2012
http://www.spacex.com/careers.php

They are hiring at a pretty good clip, but they're only hiring the best minds of the next generation or the most experienced hands of the past generation. SpaceX hires straight out of the best engineering schools or from the highest echelons of the space industry. Very little in between. They did take the time to write a brief personalized email when they turned me down.
06:30 PM on 05/22/2012
Their loss...Perhaps another company's gain (Ditto for me when I applied to them).
04:47 PM on 05/20/2012
Its like we are starting all over. For those of us who remember the early days we not good. We grew thru NASA and the Air Force. In the 60's when I served in the AF we were throwing nearly as much into orbit as NASA and our tracking stations knew where their stuff (NASA) was than they did.
Space X has had how many launches? How many for NASA? How many for the AF. Private companies can not afford many catastropic launch failures and survive. They will get it right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnash26170
03:38 PM on 05/20/2012
Man, I sure would want to be an astronaut on a space craft that was developed to make a profit.
03:49 PM on 05/20/2012
Profit was made on every US manned rocket/ship. Else they wouldnt have been built.
03:58 PM on 05/20/2012
I think your definition of "profit" needs a lot more work, erhuh...
06:17 PM on 05/20/2012
Furthermore, previous NASA vehicles were procured under cost-plus contracts, so the contractor made the same guaranteed profit margin even if the project ran over budget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Allie
Starving Philosopher
09:23 PM on 05/20/2012
Not only did the contractors profit financially, humanity profits intellectually, and the spin off products have been a boon for mankind. Not to mention our situational awareness. I.E. Weather forecasting, global surveillance, our place in the universe, etc...
N.A.S.A. is the best investment America could possibly make.
I only hope commercializing space travel will continue. Our government has failed us by spending our money in all the wrong places, and not spending enough in the right places.
Learning sometimes requires going over budget. After all we are trying new things. The unknown is expensive and unpredictable. What could be more important than seeing something new and unexpected?
If we fail to search for truth and our place in the cosmos, we fail our children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nixlix
03:28 PM on 05/20/2012
They need to stop subcontracting to and getting parts from North Korea!!!
03:19 PM on 05/20/2012
Hurry they are running out of 2 ply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
light brigade
legalize truth
02:57 PM on 05/20/2012
43 years ago, a time when mokeys were the only ones to fly a rocket, nasa put together a plastic ship with a volkswagen engine and made it land on the moon.
and now with all the "advances" in space technology they can't fire up a rocket???????????
yeah, we landed on the moon all right and my pet pig Wilbur piloted it.
03:42 PM on 05/20/2012
Shuttle was routinely delayed. Launch scrubs have been around since the beginning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRETT3066
LADY LIBERTY IS WEEPING
03:51 PM on 05/20/2012
agreed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Allie
Starving Philosopher
09:31 PM on 05/20/2012
Are you trying to imply we did not go to the moon?
If you are, you should change your micro bio to ignoring truth.
I personally was on hand in Cocoa Beach to watch several Apollo launches.
They were not fake launches. I still remember the ground shaking sensation like it was yesterday.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:34 PM on 05/20/2012
Want to know what the technical problem actually is? It is NOT NASA. If NASA was doing this 'launch', it would have gone off without a glitch
03:44 PM on 05/20/2012
The shuttle launches were routinely scrubbed and delayed. You must not have been paying attention. Sometimes for weeks or a month.

This is only a delay until Tuesday. For now.
Autora
No micro-bio for me, thanks
02:30 PM on 05/20/2012
I think that what SpaceX is doing is very cool, and I certainly don't hold it against them that something wasn't quite right and the system shut itself down. NASA's record is hardly perfect either-- this is very delicate and tricky technology.

I am reminded of a customer of mine, years ago, out at National Airport in DC. I knew her well, but for over a year I did not know what she did, until the launch of the Mars Explorer vehicles.


She came in one day when my co-workers and I were eagerly discussing it: Oh, said the lady-- do you like my babies? Turned out, she was an ex lawyer turned lobbyist for space exploration, and it was her work that got the funding for the Mars program. We just gaped at her, laugh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capers2
wavasson
02:16 PM on 05/20/2012
"The best laid plans of mice and men often go astray." Bill Clinton.
01:28 PM on 05/20/2012
Maybe there really was an astronaut on board and he had to go to the bathroom.

Stan.
04:44 PM on 05/20/2012
He'd be in real trouble when he needed to breath. No life support on there yet.
11:59 PM on 05/20/2012
Maybe there was no bathroom either.

Stan.
01:01 PM on 05/20/2012
At least it didn't blow up like Vanguard 1. Go SpaceX!
12:36 PM on 05/20/2012
turned from science to making profit for someone great job USA.
03:54 PM on 05/20/2012
Boeing and many other companies made a profit building shuttle. Nothing new. The cost structure is different, not the idea of profit.

And theyve already launched Falcon 9 successfully twice. We know it works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Allie
Starving Philosopher
09:45 PM on 05/20/2012
How about our wars for profit? That's your tax dollars at work.
Science has always profited man, why stop now when we are just beginning to learn about it. Thomas Edison was not afraid of profiting from science. You make it sound like a problem if a profit is made. Profit is good so long as it is not made by gouging the clients.
Win win is a possible scenario.
12:26 PM on 05/20/2012
And the good news is Privatization. The best and the brightest will continue to flock to companies that have vision and lofty goals. Let's hope that SpaceX will move forward and prove to the world that the US is still a place where the impossible becomes the possible.
Autora
No micro-bio for me, thanks
02:32 PM on 05/20/2012
I sure hope so, because it's very cool stuff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnash26170
03:41 PM on 05/20/2012
Again, too bad profit is the motive. I would not wish to fly when the subs were the lowest bidders. Like the saying goes, what do you call someone who graduated last in their class in medical school? Doctor.
03:57 PM on 05/20/2012
Profit was involved in shuttle as well. Bids went out and companies that make the best bid (lowest price and most attractive) usually win.

What did cost plus get you? 40 years of orbit. NASA cannot afford to both explore and provide a taxi to orbit.
04:38 PM on 05/20/2012
Only an idiot would think that for profit flights are not built by lowest bid sub contractors. How many flights did NASA fly that were built to 10% tolerance by the lowest bidder?
12:02 PM on 05/20/2012
These guys have to get this thing to work. No matter who takes the White House next year, I see none of our leaders helping space exploration out any time soon which means these guys are practically the US's only hope to stay in space.
01:30 PM on 05/20/2012
Can they send a president up there? Thanks.

Stan.
04:06 PM on 05/20/2012
Stan... I'd much rather see a Boner in space...