iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Nuclear Crisis: Yukiya Amano, UN Nuclear Chief, In Iran On Crucial Visit

By NASSER KARIMI and BRIAN MURPHY 05/21/12 05:38 PM ET AP

TEHRAN, Iran — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency pushed Monday for a breakthrough pact with Iran to resume inspections into suspected secret atomic weapons work and possibly set in motion further dealmaking when envoys from Tehran and world powers gather later this week in Baghdad.

The mission by International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano – his first to Iran since taking the post in 2009 – raised speculation about greater flexibility by Iranian officials as they struggle to balance the blows from Western sanctions and their insistence never to abandon the country's nuclear program.

But any Iranian cooperation – including possibly opening up a military site to U.N. inspectors – will carry reciprocal demands that the West may consider reaching too far, too soon.

Tehran has already signaled its goal before Wednesday's talks: Pressing the U.S. and Europe to roll back sanctions that have hit critical oil exports and blacklisted the country from international banking networks. The West's opening gambit, meanwhile, may aim at one of Iran's most prized advances – its ability to make nuclear fuel.

A main concern is Iran's production of uranium enriched to 20 percent, which is far higher than needed for regular energy-producing reactors but used in medical research. The U.S. and allies fear the higher-enriched uranium could be quickly boosted to warhead-grade material.

Iran denies it seeks nuclear arms and says its reactors are only for power and medical applications.

U.S. officials have said Washington will not backpedal from its stance that Iran must fully halt uranium enrichment. But speculation is increasing that the priorities have shifted to block the 20 percent enrichment and perhaps allow – at least for the moment – Iran to maintain lower-level nuclear fuel production.

Iranian officials could package such a scenario as a victory for their domestic audience. In Israel, it would likely be greeted with dismay and widen rifts between the Obama administration and Israeli officials who keep open the threat of military action against Iran's nuclear sites.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned against concessions, saying world powers should make "clear and unequivocal demands" that Iran stop all of its nuclear enrichment activity.

"Iran wants to destroy Israel and it is developing nuclear weapons to fulfill that goal," Netanyahu said at a conference for civil servants in Jerusalem. "Against this malicious intention, leading world powers need to display determination and not weakness. They should not make any concessions to Iran."

Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, said his country hopes for a new beginning when the negotiations begin on Wednesday.

"We had an agreement in Istanbul. That is the basis for the beginning of a new cooperation. We hope that the talks in Baghdad will be a kind of dialogue that will give shape to such cooperation," Jalili said after arriving in Baghdad late Monday.

In Warsaw, Iran's ambassador to Poland, Samad Ali Lakizadeh, said Monday that he believes the Baghdad talks offer a "very good chance and opportunity to solve many problems, provided that our rights are respected" – a reference to U.N. nuclear treaties that permit signatory nations, such as Iran, to enrich uranium.

Optimism for the Baghdad round was further boosted by the U.N. nuclear chief's visit to Iran – just days after talks with Iranian envoys in Vienna that were described as making progress.

Amano is focused on getting Iran agreement to allow IAEA probes of various high-profile Iranian sites, including the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran, where the agency believes Iran in 2003 ran explosive tests needed to set off a nuclear charge. The suspected blasts took place inside a pressure chamber.

Iran has never said whether the chamber existed, but describes Parchin as a conventional military site. Iran, however, has blocked IAEA inspection requests for more than four years.

A deal on Parchin could give Iran some leverage going into the Baghdad talks with a six-nation bloc comprising both friends and foes: the permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany.

"Nothing is certain in life, in diplomacy," Amano told reporters before departing from Vienna. "But there has been good progress.

"I really think this is the right time to reach agreement," he added.

Amano's talks included Jalili as well as Iran's foreign minister and other officials including the head of Iran's nuclear agency, Fereidoun Abbasi.

Amano said his meetings were held amid a "good atmosphere," but neither side mentioned Parchin in remarks to the press after Monday's meeting, keeping their statements general.

Iranian lawmaker Heshmatollah Falahtpisheh told The Associated Press earlier Monday that Tehran will likely accept more inspections of Parchin "if it feels there is good will within the (IAEA)."

But Falahtpisheh, a member of the influential parliamentary committee of national security and foreign policy, warned that this new openness will likely come with expectations that the West would in return ease international sanctions on Iran.

"In opening up to more inspections, Iran aims at lowering the crisis over its nuclear case," said Falahtpisheh. "But if the sanctions continue, Iran would stop this."

A political analyst in Tehran, Hamid Reza Shokouhi, said Iran is carefully watching to see if the West shows more "flexibility and pays attention to Iranian demands" during Amano's trip.

"Then Iran will show flexibility, too," Shokouhi said.

But some Iranian media was critical of Amano and the IAEA, which could indicate some displeasure with Monday's talks.

The semiofficial Fars news agency, which is close to Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard, said that Amano should "avoid playing for others ground" – a reference to claims by hard-liners that the IAEA is a tool of the West and its allies.

In a sign of ebbing market worries, oil prices have steadily fallen since Iran and world powers resumed talks in April in Istanbul. Fears of supply disruptions because of military conflict or Iranian shipping blockades helped drive prices above $106 a barrel earlier this year. Oil rose to slightly above $92 per barrel Monday in New York.

"May is shaping up to be a key month for international efforts to achieve a diplomatic breakthrough on the Iranian nuclear program," Barclays said in a report.

___

Murphy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writers George Jahn in Vienna, Ali Akbar Dareini in Baghdad, Ian Deitch in Jerusalem and Monika Scislowska in Warsaw contributed to this report.

FOLLOW WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency pushed Monday for a breakthrough pact with Iran to resume inspections into suspected secret atomic weapons work and possibly set in motion furt...
TEHRAN, Iran — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency pushed Monday for a breakthrough pact with Iran to resume inspections into suspected secret atomic weapons work and possibly set in motion furt...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 93
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelson rivera
Disabled US Veteran hopes we can work together
06:56 PM on 05/22/2012
It appears Iran Want the Sanctions Lifted. So now the Game of Chess will start with the UN Inspectors.
12:03 AM on 05/22/2012
Lets go Iran! Lets get them bombs built quick before Uncle Samstein attacks!
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
11:38 PM on 05/21/2012
Huh. Guess stories of economic meltdown in the US and Europe have been greatly exaggerated.

(I am wagering on the principle that rational, non-idiotic leaders don't wage wars on an empty treasury)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
09:11 PM on 05/21/2012
Iran has developed a nuclear capability, in which if they wanted to, they can create nuclear weapons in a very short manner of time. Iran is not stupid, they are patient. They are waiting out the sanctions period that is hurting there economy. But once the sanctions are lifted, they will have the option to develop nuclear weapons as there disposal.

The IAEA, UN, Israel and other intelligence agencies besides the U.S, know they have the capabilities and means to do it. An abundance of evidence has been compiled over the years that Iran has the capabilities of doing it and the expressive means when they threatened genocide against Israel. In addition, Iran is the prime sponsor of terrorism through out the world and Israel. In conjunction of violating the NPT and UNSC resolutions, the international community does not want to take any chances on Iran.

But its impossible to know for sure when they would start the nuclear weapons program. Obama seems to be in a hurry to seal a deal, primarily to stop an Israeli strike and not the Iranian threat. But Israel will decide on its own if it needs to strike for its national security. And chances are, they will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
07:05 PM on 05/21/2012
Some optimistic news for change as far as US and Iran peace talks are concern, yes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
04:04 PM on 05/21/2012
Yukiya Amano going to Iran is a good step in the right direction, any thing help to put off another war in the region
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
02:37 PM on 05/21/2012
"Parchin is especially significant since the IAEA believes Iran in 2003 ran explosive tests needed to set off a nuclear charge. The suspected blasts took place inside a pressure chamber. Iran has never said whether the chamber existed."

More on the Mossad-AP disinformation campaign about a explosive chamber:
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2012/05/ap-presents-sketchup-of-nanodiamond-chamber-as-nuclear-issue.html
05:22 PM on 05/21/2012
Hopefully Iran gives a bag of nano-diamonds to Mr. Amano so he can use them for making the non-stick coating for frying pans. Cancer causing Teflon is being phased out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelson rivera
Disabled US Veteran hopes we can work together
07:11 PM on 05/22/2012
Of cause the Chamber Never Existed. Iran is a Peace loving Nation. What Iran does behind Closed Doors Is their Business.It's called on a Need to know Basis. Iran works Hard for National Security like other Countries do. Iran might feel the need for a few Nuclear Firecrackers like Israel Has for National Security.
12:39 PM on 05/21/2012
Why doesn't Israel represent itself at the conference in Bagdad on Wednesday. Israel claims to have concerns about a nuclear Iran. Israel has bombed Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors supposedly. Israel threatens to bomb Iranian reactors as well. Why is there not some peace talks of some sort between Iran and Israel. At least let them discuss their nuclear concerns about each other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelson rivera
Disabled US Veteran hopes we can work together
07:23 PM on 05/22/2012
That sounds like a good Idea. I would like to see Benjamin Netanyabu in a meeting with Ahmadinejad on TV. I bet they have a lot to talk about.
12:18 PM on 05/21/2012
We do not stand a chance. These people are nuts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:03 AM on 05/21/2012
Israel even recently said it would be okay if Iran enriched to 3%.

Guess that unified government made some concessions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
02:57 PM on 05/21/2012
The Iranian want to enrich uranium 5%-10% and that still below 20% they have been at.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:18 AM on 05/21/2012
It would be nice of the UN actually stood up for the ideals that it was founded on.
When will the UN confront Iran on its announced genocidal goals?

Top Commander Reiterates Iran's Commitment to Full Annihilation of Israel
2012-05-20
TEHRAN (FNA)- Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Hassan Firouzabadi said threats and pressures cannot deter Iran from its revolutionary causes and ideals, and stressed that the Iranian nation will remain committed to the full annihilation of the Zionist regime of Israel to the end.

Addressing a defense gathering here in Tehran on Sunday, General Firouzabadi said "The Iranian nation is standing for its cause that is the full annihilation of Israel."
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9102112759
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:56 AM on 05/21/2012
Nice try tallen, but even the Israeli government is coming to realize that promoting the meme of a genocidal Iran is making them look foolish.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
11:36 AM on 05/21/2012
>>promoting the meme of a genocidal Iran

The one promoting that is the Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Hassan Firouzabadi ...not Israel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
01:59 PM on 05/21/2012
Of course, by the 'creative' interpretation of what constitutes genocidal intentions, the US and Israel have repeatedly expressed their genocidal intentions about Persians, and most of the world expressed genocidal intentions towards Africaaners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:05 AM on 05/21/2012
That would have a lot more impact if Israel didn't constantly call for the end of Khomeini's regime...

It's the equivalent of "I know you are, but what am I?"
12:33 PM on 05/21/2012
Don't start that.  Iran is fully equal in the blame game of who's going to wipe who off the map.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
09:56 AM on 05/21/2012
It is rather interesting that it was only after the new head of the IAEA was elected with the US lobbying extensively on his behalf that the 'evidence' which had been seen as 'too suspect to be given any weight' became 'credible'. It should also be noted that Parchin (an important site in the development of the weapons (conventional) that Iran would be using to defend itself from a US attack, direct or sponsored) has been the target of allegations that it was a 'nuclear weapons development site' before, and Iran did let the IAEA inspect it (in the hopes of seeing the US start taking a rational evidence based approach, rather than the paranoic allegation based approach) which proved those allegations to be false (no change in the US approach, though, they ignored the report and continued to act as if the allegations were credible)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:08 AM on 05/21/2012
No one wants Iran to become a regional power. Saudi influence included. It's about politics, it's not about any real threat.

Of course, the US is the one who would pay for and fight all of these wars, so what's not stopping them from calling for war?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
02:06 PM on 05/21/2012
Oh, the House of Saud is scared to death about democratic Iran becoming even more of a regional power than it is (something to do with their population maybe getting the idea that democracy is a better form of government) and the US is worried about Iran becoming more of a power (something to do with other nations getting the idea that defying the US is possible without massive repercussions for the population of that nation) and Israel is absolutely obsessed with the idea of preventing Iran from becoming a power in the region (something to do with them not willing to Chamberlaine to Israel's expansionist practices) but that hardly constitutes 'everyone'
photo
hiker326
Welcome to the island of Misfit Toys.
12:32 PM on 05/21/2012
I thought Parchin was NOT inspected just yet... although they last inspectors in January and February wanted to... its taken a few months but now they are "saying" they will let them in.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
01:53 PM on 05/21/2012
Well, the way it goes is there is an allegation, then an investigation proves it false, then, surprise, there is a new allegation from the same sources, using the same sort of 'information', that is treated as compelling. This is the second time around for Parchin, and the umpteenth time for a lot of the other stuff, and every time the stories are the same, with the idea that maybe this time the burden of proof should be on those who have been making false accusations treated as a ridiculous notion.
09:37 AM on 05/21/2012
Iran is ruled by unelected, illegitimate, religious Twelver fanatics who think that god wants them to do these things that they do. You cannot reason with that mentality. Even if they appear to be willing to compromise they're lying. Like now with their nukes. It's Koranically condoned lying, called "takia". Eventually it''ll probably come to a fight to the death with these guys.

DISCLAIMER: I speak only of the illegitimate bums who hijacked this nation by the force of arms in 1979 and not about the Iranian people who, I am sure, are regular, salt-of-the-earth types, victims as well, of the tyrants that run the nation.

(I don't want to hear retorts about the shah who was equally repressive in his own way. Two wrongs, even in Iran, still don't make a right.BTW, who'd take the Twelvers over the shah?)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:24 AM on 05/21/2012
And I bet you also don't want to hear what the Iranian people, the regular, salt-of-the-earth types, have to say, because it directly contradicts your view about the Iranian government. PS, remember, it was exactly the sort of people you claim are willing to lie about their rejection of nuclear weapons as an option who refused to use the WMDs the Shah had stockpiled (and they had the ability to create more) even while WMDs were raining down on them and they were fighting a war they were expected to lose, with the consequence of losing being (according to you in a different context) a genocide of the Iranian people.
10:56 AM on 05/21/2012
You're off topic. Please point out how I am mistaken. This is about nuclear inspections. The Supreme Leader (haha, a title that makes even teh North Korean's laugh) is elected?  The Koran does not condone "takia"?  The religious fanatics who have hijacked Iran are not Koranically motivated?  Iran's leader have not stated on many occasions that they would like to see Israel, a fellow UN member, eradicated?

http://www.iran-press-service.com/articles_2001/dec_2001/rafsanjani_nuke_threats_141201.htm

Where am I wrong?
12:35 PM on 05/21/2012
You're not Iranian and haven't got a clue what the people want.
10:29 AM on 05/21/2012
yea and people that run Israel aren't religous at all LOL.
10:46 AM on 05/21/2012
Listen dopey, this piece isn't about Israel, it's about Iran and the nuclear inspections to take place there. Save your anti-Israel material for an appropriate time and place.
12:36 PM on 05/21/2012
No, I don't think they are either.  NO extremist faction is truly religious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
09:21 AM on 05/21/2012
Sanctions don’t work. They only help dictators stay in power longer. Sanctions have not deposed leaders in Iraq, Iran, North Korea nor Cuba. Sanctions made Saddam billions in black market oil sales.
maybe IAEA inspectors should look inside Israel? No wait, they are not allowed. No nukes?

Meanwhile back in the US: This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice against Iran and begins military preparations for it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-dennis-kucinich/ndaa-authorizes-war-again_b_1524474.html
09:45 AM on 05/21/2012
Every article says sanctions are hurting Iran, and it is the sanctions that are forcing Iran to the negotiating table.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:32 AM on 05/21/2012
And yet the 'hurting' seems to be limited to slowing their growth, either a little or more than a little, not stopping or reversing it. Their oil revenues keep going up, their non-oil exports keep going up, their industrial base keeps expanding, the number of countries willing to defy the US keeps increasing, and the only place where the effect of the sanctions seems to be increasing (the value of the Iranian currency in markets the US dollar dominates) look like the exact opposite of the 'growth' that was wiped out during the 'global' economic meltdown (that is, it is not based on anything real)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
11:43 AM on 05/21/2012
> Every article says sanctions are hurting Iran?

No. Not every article. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday said that Western sanctions on Iran's nuclear program were ineffective and must be hardened. lol.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4176186,00.html
photo
blutopie
no longer 'chosen'
08:53 AM on 05/21/2012
In the most stunnnig realpolitik strategic debacle of the 21st century - Israel and her Israeli Lobby here in the US are NOT going to be able to successfully pull off hoaxing the US into a war against Iran, like Israelis and Neocons did with Iraq

How will King Netanyahu climb down out of this tree he has treed himself in? - very, very awkwardly

Israeli hasbara teams are still in full court press to try to salvage the hoax over the US they have been engaged in for the last 10 yrs but thankfully, all their voluminous cut and pastes that make up their end of desperately trying to enable Israel's hoax on the US will come to naught

Israel and her Israel Lobby are NOT going to get their war against Iran do divert from the dismantling of Israeli Apartheid - and this is a strategic debacle for Eretz Israel that cannot be underestimated.
09:47 AM on 05/21/2012
How come Europe has the same opinion as Israel Svengalli and Hoaxed America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:34 AM on 05/21/2012
The need to stay on the good side of the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:19 AM on 05/21/2012
They don't. Spain and France saw their incumbents lose because of their interventionist foreign policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:16 AM on 05/21/2012
They are not really all that interested in an actual hot war with Iran (would either result in them winning and suffering the embarassment of another 'we were lieing to you and we did it deliberately knowing it would kill many' moment, or losing which would vault Iran from a regional power to a global power of note) but rather in keeping an 'on the verge of hot war' cold war going. The problem for them is that despite their best efforts, Iran continues to progress in science and industry, and running right over the 'red lines' that were dreamed up to create that 'on the verge' atmosphere, and the repeated failures of such to trigger them going hot or for the supposed nuclear weapons to appear is making the whole drama seem more and more like a farce. The people of the ME are beginning to see the American military as a paper tiger (as evidenced by the Arab Spring) countries, corporations, and investors are increasingly seeing it as more advantageous to quietly do business with Iran than to obey American dictates, and some are even seeing advantage in loudly and openly defying those dictates.