Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg wed his long-time girlfriend Priscilla Chan on Saturday in a surprise ceremony even their guests didn’t see coming. However, the happy couple's nuptials have been somewhat overshadowed by one question: Did they get prenuptial agreement?
Zuckerberg was worth $17.5 billion as of March 2012, according to Forbes. That figure could now be closer to $19 billion thanks to his move to take Facebook public on May 19, says Forbes personal finance writer Deborah L. Jacobs.
So what does this all mean for their marriage? California law makes premarital property separate property, so Chan wouldn't automatically be entitled to 50 percent of the Facebook empire in the event of divorce. However, if the company increased in value post-marriage, any gains would be considered community property -- a term that refers to everything a couple acquires during the course of the marriage -- and she could be entitled to 50 percent of the profits. Unless other terms are stipulated in a prenuptial agreement, that is.
Zuckerberg and Chan actually may already have experience with relationship contracts. According to the 2008 book "Once You're Lucky, Twice You're Good" by Sarah Lacy, Chan allegedly made Zuckerberg sign a "relationship contract" four years ago, prior to moving in with him in Palo Alto, Calif. where Facebook is headquartered (she was moving from Cambridge, Mass.). Among the rules Chan supposedly laid out: “One date per week, a minimum of a hundred minutes of alone time, not in his apartment and definitely not at Facebook.” (Neither Chan nor Zuckerberg have confirmed the validity of Lacy's claim.)
When it comes to an actual (legally binding) prenup, chances are the couple has one, says celebrity divorce attorney Raoul Felder. “You can bet your last dollar -- actually you can bet his last dollar -- that he has a prenup,” Felder says. “If he doesn’t, he ought to go to a psychiatrist and not a lawyer."
Some have wondered if the timing of his wedding is suspicious, that somehow Zuckerberg “conveniently” got married right after taking Facebook public to avoid making his company community property. But Felder doesn’t think the timing of Zuckerberg and Chan's marriage was a calculated monetary move. “My guess is that he was just too busy [to get married before],” Felder says. “Taking a company public is a big undertaking.” In fact, according to the Associated Press, Zuckerberg and Chan’s wedding was planned for months, well before the IPO’s date was set.
And while Zuckerberg has kept much of his relationship with Chan private, that hasn't stopped people from speculating over -- and directing their unsolicited advice at -- the couple.
Prenup veteran Donald Trump weighed in on the situation -- quite presciently, actually, as his comments came four days before the couple wed:
"So he's gonna be worth like $18, $19 billion, you're telling me he's got a girlfriend ... does he get a prenuptial agreement?" Trump said. "They get married, and then for some reason over the next couple of years they get divorced and then she sues him for $10 billion and she hits the jackpot ... In New York, she would get a big chunk of what he has."
On this point, Felder agrees. If Zuckerberg and Chan did indeed skip the prenup, he says that the split "might be the mother of all divorces."
Zuckerberg may or may not have protected his online empire with a prenup, but if he didn't, he wouldn't be the first billionaire to forgo it. Click through the slideshow below to read about five billionaires who tied the knot without prenups.
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steven-spielberg-oprah-winfrey-drop-166128" target="_hplink">Billionaire filmmaker Steven Spielberg</a> and his first wife Amy Irving allegedly had a prenup -- but <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22149413/#.T7qAnp9Ytdo" target="_hplink">it was on a napkin</a>. When they split in 1989, a judge decided the prenup was invalid and <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/top-10-pricey-divorce-settlements-in-hollywood-2012-5#100-million-steven-spielberg-and-amy-irving-9" target="_hplink">awarded Irving $100 million</a>.
He might not have been a billionaire when he <a href="http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20186762,00.html" target="_hplink">split from Heather Mills</a> in 2008, but Paul McCartney certainly wasn't broke either. The pop icon -- who was declared <a href="http://music.yahoo.com/paul-mccartney/news/artist-name...rst-billionaire--12038355" target="_hplink">pop music's first billionaire</a> in 2012 -- and his former wife didn't have a prenup, so <a href="http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20186762,00.html" target="_hplink">Mills was awarded</a> $48.6 million in divorce court.
Richard Mellon Scaife, an ultra-conservative newspaper publisher, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/21/AR2007102101643_pf.html" target="_hplink">failed to protect</a> his estimated $1.3 billion fortune with a prenup when he married his second wife, Margaret Scaife, in 2007. The final amount of the divorce settlement has yet to be reported.
Sumner Redstone, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/10/billionaires-2009-richest-people_Sumner-Redstone_KJHY.html" target="_hplink">majority owner and chairman of National Amusements</a> (parent company to CBS, Viacom and MTV), <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34316968/The_World_s_Most_Expensive_Divorce_Settlements?slide=4" target="_hplink">split from his wife</a> Phyllis after 52 years of marriage in 1999. With no prenup, Phyllis received $100 million in the settlement.
After 17 years of marriage, Michael and Juanita Jordan divorced in 2006. Though the couple signed a <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/Divorce-will-cost-Michael-Jordan-168-million?urn=nba-53560" target="_hplink">post-nuptial agreement</a> one year after their marriage, awarding Juanita one-half of <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/32798277/Michael_Jordan_First_Athlete_To_1_Billion" target="_hplink">Michael's fortune</a> in the event of a divorce, she ended up with one-third when they split -- a total of $168 million.