iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pakistan Drone Strike: U.S. Mission Kills 8 Militants, Officials Say

By REBECCA SANTANA   06/03/12 11:40 PM ET  AP

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A drone strike in Pakistan's tribal areas killed eight suspected militants early Monday, Pakistani officials said, as the U.S. pushes ahead with the controversial drone program despite Pakistani demands to stop.

The strike was the seventh in less than two weeks and highlights the importance that Washington places on the drone program as a way to combat al-Qaida and Taliban fighters who use Pakistan as a base for attacks against American and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

In the most recent attack, three Pakistani intelligence officials say four missiles were fired at a suspected militant hideout in a village near the town of Mir Ali in North Waziristan early Monday morning.

North Waziristan is one of the tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan that has become a hub of militant activity.

The attack followed closely on the heels of another drone strike Sunday that killed 10 suspected militants. Two Pakistani intelligence officials say in that attack, four missiles were fired at targets in the village of Mana Raghzai in South Waziristan near the border with Afghanistan.

At the time of the attack, suspected militants were gathered to offer condolences to the brother of a militant commander killed during another drone strike Saturday.

The brother was one of those who died in the Sunday morning strike.

All the Pakistani officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The American drone campaign, which has accelerated under President Barack Obama, has become a source of deep frustration and tension between the U.S. and Pakistan.

Secretly, many Pakistani military commanders are believed to support the drone campaign. But among the Pakistani public, where the U.S. is viewed with mistrust, the drone strikes are considered an affront to the nation's sovereignty.

The Pakistani government and parliament have repeatedly asked the U.S. to stop the strikes.

The ongoing attacks are also complicating efforts for the U.S. and Pakistan to come to an agreement over reopening the supply routes to NATO and American forces in Afghanistan. American airstrikes inadvertently killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November, prompting Islamabad to block U.S. and NATO supply lines running through its territory.

Pakistan has demanded an apology over the raid and an end to drone strikes as a precursor to reopening the supply lines. But the U.S. has shown no intention of ending the attacks.

Also Sunday, gunmen killed four Shiite minority Muslims, a police officer and a bystander in a busy market of southwestern Pakistani city of Quetta, said police officer Abdul Wahid. He said police were investigating who could be behind the attack, but that it had a sectarian motive.

In the 1980s and 1990s, Pakistan became the scene of a proxy war between mostly Shiite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia, with both sides funneling money to sectarian groups that regularly targeted each other.

The level of sectarian violence has declined somewhat since then, but attacks continue. In recent years, Sunni attacks on Shiites have been far more common.

__

Associated Press writer Ishtiaq Mahsud in Dera Ismail Khan, Abdul Sattar in Quetta, and Rasool Dawar in Peshawar contributed to this report.

Related on HuffPost:

DRONES:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Boeing Phantom Ray

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: Boeing's stealth Phantom Ray took to the skies for the <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/05/bds_phantom_ray_first_flight_05_04_11.html" target="_hplink">first time in April 2011</a>. According to Boeing, the <a href="http://www.boeing.com/advertising/bma/unmanned/unmanned_05.html" target="_hplink">Phantom Ray can perform missions</a> such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, suppression of enemy air defenses, and electronic attack. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown. This is a "demonstrator" so there will likely be a future variation of the Ray.

  • General Atomics Predator Avenger

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems <a href="http://www.ga-asi.com/products/aircraft/predator_c.php" target="_hplink">Predator Avenger C</a> is a beast. According to the two-page brochure, the PAC is a "Next-Generation Multi-mission ISR and Strike Aircraft" and successor for the Predator B that can be stacked with a multitude of weaponry. <strong>Deployment</strong>: There is one <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?topicName=unmanned&id=news/awst/2011/12/19/AW_12_19_2011_p25-406500.xml&headline=USAF Plans Larger, More Capable Predator&channel=&from=topicalreports" target="_hplink">demonstration craft currently in Afghanistan</a>.

  • SOCOM Mini Drone Of Doom

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: Yo dawg, I heard you like drones so I <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/socom-warhead-drones/" target="_hplink">put a drone in your drone</a>. One small deadly warhead-equipped mini-drone stuffed into another, to be launched from the main drone and remotely aimed at a target. <strong> Potential Deployment</strong>: This <a href="http://defensenewsstand.com/NewsStand-General/The-INSIDER-Free-Article/socom-could-have-warhead-equipped-micro-uav-by-spring-2012/menu-id-720.html" target="_hplink">warhead-equiped micro-UAV</a> could be flown by SOCOM in the skies by spring 2012.

  • Suicide Switchblade

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (USA) <strong>Description</strong>: <a href="http://www.avinc.com/uas/adc/switchblade/" target="_hplink">AeroVironment's Switchblade</a> is meant to be a portable, rapid deployment, beyond line-of-sight, "loitering munition" that is a "magic bullet." A bit of advice, AeroVironment: Don't describe a remote-controlled bomb as a "loitering munition" that you call "Switchblade," as it conjures up images of 1950's-style greasers loitering on street corners, flipping open switchblades idly as they wait for their favorite gals. Luckily, greasers won't be in charge of flying Switchblades. They're to be controlled by infantry and <a href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=7982421&&s=TOP" target="_hplink">according to the AeroVironment</a>, "Flying quietly at high speed the Switchblade delivers its onboard explosive payload with precision while minimizing collateral damage." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Undisclosed.

  • Nano Hummingbird

    <strong>Type</strong>: Surveillance (USA, DARPA Funded) <strong>Description</strong>: AeroVironment is at it again. In partnership with DARPA, they've actually managed to build a human mechanically engineered version of one of nature's most amazing flying machines: the hummingbird. The <a href="http://www.avinc.com/media_gallery/" target="_hplink">Nano Hummingbird</a> is a perfect bid for James Bond-esque style spy shenanigans. Once these hit the field, we'll never look at hummingbirds the same way. "Stop looking at me! That bird is following me!" <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Within five years.

  • Army A160 Hummingbird Drone

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Army) <strong>Description</strong>: Though the military's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/30/us-army-hummingbird-a160-helicopter-drone_n_1176763.html?ref=technology" target="_hplink">A160 Hummingbird drone</a> doesn't resemble an actual hummingbird so much as AeroVironment's take, it is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/nprs_domestic_drone_commercial/" target="_hplink">raising just as many alarms</a> because of its potential to be deployed on the U.S. home front. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: May or June 2012, Afghanistan

  • Firescout

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Navy) <strong>Description</strong>: Northrop Grumman <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/mq8bfirescout_navy/index.html" target="_hplink">describes the Firescout</a> as a "Transformational Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle system provides unprecedented situation awareness and precision targeting support for U.S. Armed Forces of the future. The MQ-8B Fire Scout has the ability to autonomously take off and land on any aviation-capable warship and at prepared and unprepared landing zones in proximity to the soldier in contact." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: <a href="http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=237497" target="_hplink">March 2013</a>

  • Euro Hawk

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (German Ministry of Defense, purchased from Northrop Grumman) <strong>Description</strong>: NG touts its <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/euro_hawk/index.html" target="_hplink">Euro Hawk</a>, built for German Ministry of Defense, as having a "wingspan larger than a commercial airliner, endurance of more than 30 hours and a maximum altitude of more than 60,000 feet, EURO HAWK is an interoperable, modular and cost-effective replacement to the aging fleet of manned Breguet Atlantic aircraft, which have been in service since 1972 and will be retired in 2010." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: 2015, 2016 (<a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/euro_hawk/assets/SIGINT_NewsRelease_101211.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>)

  • X-47B

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Navy) <strong>Description</strong>: A carrier-based combat drone, <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/nucasx47b/index.html" target="_hplink">Northrop Grumman's futuristic X-47B</a> flew in its cruise configuration <a href="http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=239278" target="_hplink">for the first time</a> on November 22, 2011. It can land with precision on the deck of a moving aircraft carrier, and features twin weapons payload bays that hold up to 4,500 lbs. (<a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/nucasx47b/assets/X-47B_Navy_UCAS_FactSheet.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>). <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/navy-killer-drone-refuel/" target="_hplink">2018</a>

  • Taranis

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (British) <strong>Description</strong>: BAE System's Taranis (<a href="http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_taranis_fact_sheet.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>) is aiming to "Push the boundaries by providing advancements in low observability capability and autonomous mission systems operations demonstrating the feasibility and utility of UAVs." Such a statement starts to push the idea of fully autonomous flight from science fiction into science fact, though we're still a long way off from having an actual real debate on fully autonomous drones fighting our battles and flying our skies. Potential Deployment: TBD, test flights have been delayed to 2012.

  • Boeing Phantom Eye

    <strong>Type</strong>: Communications <strong>Description</strong>: Boeing's hydrogen-powered <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2010/07/bds_feat_phantom_eye_07_12_10.html" target="_hplink">Phantom Eye</a> is a High Altitude Long Duration Craft designed to fly at <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/11/bds_phantom_eye_11_16_11.html" target="_hplink">65,000 feet for up to four days</a>. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown

  • DARPA Vulture

    <strong>Type</strong>: Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) <strong>Description</strong>: <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/TTO/Programs/Vulture.aspx" target="_hplink">DARPA's description</a> says the "Vulture technology enables a re-taskable, persistent pseudo-satellite capability, in an aircraft package." Basically, DARPA is attempting to develop a super long duration craft capable of five year continuous flight. Think about that - the Vulture is intended to fly for up to five years continuously. If it were to launch this year it would be in the air for two Olympics. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown

  • AVIATR: Drone To Fly Saturn's Moon

    <strong>Type</strong>: Government Funded Space Exploration <strong>Description</strong>: While the proposal probably won't go through for this mission, this is an aerial drone we can really get behind. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/aviatr-probe-proposed-mission-titan_n_1184028.html" target="_hplink">AVIATR</a> would be a long distance drone that would fly the skies of Saturn's moon Titan. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Beyond 2020

  • Japan Defense Ministry Ball Drone

    <strong>Type</strong>: Surveillance (Japan) <strong>Description</strong>: Techcrunch <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/25/video-japans-defense-ministry-develops-awesome-ball-shaped-drone/" target="_hplink">tells us</a> that the drone can "stand still in mid-air, fly vertically and horizontally through narrow spaces at up to 60km/h, and (which is very cool) keep on moving when it hits the ground or a wall. Thanks to three gyro sensors in its body, the machine can keep also flying even if it's hit by an obstacle." And all for only $1,400. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Undisclosed



FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A drone strike in Pakistan's tribal areas killed eight suspected militants early Monday, Pakistani officials said, as the U.S. pushes ahead with the controversial drone program ...
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A drone strike in Pakistan's tribal areas killed eight suspected militants early Monday, Pakistani officials said, as the U.S. pushes ahead with the controversial drone program ...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 529
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
11:56 AM on 08/21/2012
Why wasn't this comment posted?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
09:48 AM on 08/01/2012
Supposing Iran decided that certain Israeli's were war mongers who were seeking the destruction of their country and had proof ,along with the know how to launch a drone ,how would the US react ? Supposing Iran also had proof that US citizens were intent on launching an attack ,as they had said openly to the media once they were in office, would Iran be entitled to defend themselves by this method? Sometimes it's worth thinking ,what would happen if the boot is on the other foot
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geral Sosbee
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
05:52 AM on 08/01/2012
Allowing the president of the United States to act as judge, jury and executioner for suspected terrorists, including U.S. citizens, on the basis of secret evidence is impossible to reconcile with the Constitution’s guarantee that a life will not be taken without due process of law.

Under the law, the government must obtain a court order if it seeks to target a U.S. citizen for electronic surveillance, yet there is no comparable judicial review of a decision to kill a citizen. No court is even able to review the general policies for such assassinations. . . .

But if the United States is going to continue down the troubling road of state-sponsored assassination, Congress should, at the very least, require that a court play some role, as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court does with the electronic surveillance of suspected foreign terrorists. Even minimal judicial oversight might make the president and his advisors think twice about whether an American citizen poses such an “imminent” danger that he must be executed without a trial. Glenn Greenwald
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vanderbil Covington
It is better to be wise than just knowledgeable
09:26 AM on 06/07/2012
The only downside to the present administration's use of drones could extend to horror of abuses under a Romney administration. If Conservatives gain the White House, considering their contempt of the poor, middle class, elderly, union activist and other "dissidents",-- can we be assured such deterrents wont be used against them. Is this really a stretch? Once enough corporate money and power become the political influence over democracy, logic and truth, the masses WILL suffer under iron fist of fascisim of the dominate oligarchy. People, -- start thinking for yourselves and the world your children will inherit. Let Scott Walker's victory in Wisconson remind you of how money can buy the better judgement with constant barrages of propaganda benefiting only corporations and the rich -- at the expense of YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE! Why else would the Koch brothers, Adelson and others want Romney to win in November? It's damn sure it's NOT to benefit YOU
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vanderbil Covington
It is better to be wise than just knowledgeable
08:38 AM on 06/07/2012
I think the war of terrorist has taken a very wise turn with the Obama administration's approach. Rather than carpet bombing sovereign nations, in which thousands of innocents are killed just to hopefully target one or two insurgents, drones are far more effective. President Obama has directed Leon Panetta to use them instead of putting our troops in danger. Donald Rumsfeld claimed the President "is weak" because he used Bush era intel gleaned from torturing insurgents in order to have dispatched recent al-Quaida members. This is not true entirely because terrorist are constantly changing tactics and connections to avoid detection. Any intel secured 5 or more years ago are too old to apply today. More responsibility by diligent monitoring by the FBI, NSA and other recent assets, along with wise use of lethal deterrence, are making the country safer than any results and methods employed by Bush
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
09:16 AM on 06/05/2012
Computers so powerful that they monitor all comunications ..... Computers that learn ..... Drones that kill but controled by radio signal with no pilot onboard ... missiles controled by computers ... , billions of computers hooked to the web ..... Good Morning Skynet .... To achieve something you first must concieve of it .... between Orwells 1984 and the Terminator movies .... with so much of that fiction a fact in todays world ......it isn't looking good for the human race....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
09:49 AM on 08/01/2012
Yep,even the on/off switch would be disabled
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:09 AM on 06/05/2012
Suspects eliminated. Now they don't have to explain themselves.
Coming soon to your neighbourhood. And why not?
Keep your noses clean, kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themasterpuppeteer
You can't handle the truth!
12:49 AM on 06/05/2012
Notice how the article states "SUSPECTED militants" according to Obama's policy, anyone within distance of a drone is considered a militant, so, the stats on civilians are fudged up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IfIonlyknew
Go ahead....Say something funny.
12:51 PM on 06/05/2012
And George didn't count the enemy or the civilian casualties to avoid any problems.
12:57 PM on 06/05/2012
That's EVERY president's policy, dummy. How many "insurgents" were really insurgents under Bush's administration? Don't be ignorant.
12:16 AM on 06/05/2012
A disgusting move by America, Just like abandoning China to Japan in 1937 after contributing so much to WWI (A war that they were in no way involved in) America continues to kill innocent people, the label ''Suspected militant'' is just a name that saves the U.S. from international backlash, America is quick to forget WHO saved the lives of those worthless Americans getting gunned down in Somalia, Pakistan should've left them all to the Somali, so that they could have been beheading and dragged through the streets, they deserve nothing more.
12:58 PM on 06/05/2012
You must not be an American. Lol
10:42 PM on 06/04/2012
As long as Pakistan is protecting and hiding the Mumbai massacre terr0rists, they need to b0mbed
10:25 PM on 06/04/2012
Bet the drone factory never needs to be bailed out.
photo
hangr54
Republicans are not an option
08:07 PM on 06/04/2012
Well, thats a start
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
05:57 PM on 06/04/2012
They're killing people at random to keep the "Terrorist" con going. This is amazing criminal behavior.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:00 PM on 06/04/2012
And Obama's file at the International Criminal Court gets thicker and thicker.
04:43 PM on 06/04/2012
Cut off all aid to Pakistan. Blow the heck out of the militants hiding in Pakistan ad anywhere else. Pakistan has been shielding these militants since the beginning of our efforts in Afganistan and are responsible for many of our casualties.
05:22 PM on 06/04/2012
who was supplying and shielding these militants before our current misadventure in Afghanistan?

Look in the mirror...

so using YOUR logic how do we cut aid off for ourselves and how do we "blow the heck" out of ourselves?
05:49 PM on 06/04/2012
Pakistan was hiding and shielding them before Afghan war twerp.
Afghanistan Mujihadeen had over 400,000 fighters in it. We aided the Muj not Al Qaeda, they weren't created by Abdullah Azzam until 1988, Taliban rose to power in 1996 with backing of Pakistan ISI
06:41 PM on 06/04/2012
What?