A little girl has become the face of an embattled iPad app giving those with speech problems the ability to speak.

Maya Nieder, a 4-year-old in New York who has difficulty speaking, utilizes the app Speak for Yourself, to communicate with the world at large. In April, she was profiled by TIME's Keith Wagstaff.

But this app, designed by certified speech-language pathologists, is in the midst of a legal battle and has been discontinued, for now. Apple removed the app from its App Store last week.

"Over 1,000 pageloads today and it's only 10:45. The word is spreading," Maya's mother Dana Nieder tweeted this morning, as she wages her own war on the companies fighting the app with a personal campaign online.

Both sides have also released statements on Facebook (scroll down for those). Dana Nieder says she is fond of the role social media can play as this story develops.

"If something like this happened pre-Facebook or pre-Twitter, we would just be really upset by ourselves. There would be nothing that we could do," she told The Huffington Post. "At least I feel I can do something [by posting to social media and a blog]. I can help the story spread and hopefully make a difference."

Nieder says she's also observed an outpouring of support and has been amazed how fast the story has circulated the Web. She spoke out on her personal blog after Apple removed the app:

It disappeared. It no longer exists.

Gone.

According to this court document, here’s how it happened: PRC/SCS contacted Apple and requested that Speak for Yourself be removed from the iTunes store, claiming that it infringes on their patents. In turn, Apple contacted SfY and requested their response to these claims. The lawyer for SfY responded, explaining to Apple exactly why the infringement claims are unfounded, referring Apple to the current open court case, and pointing out that PRC/SCS had not asked the court for an injunction ordering the app to be removed from the store. For months, nothing happened . . . and then on June 4th Apple notified SfY that the app had been removed, due to the fact that the dispute with PRC/SCS had not been resolved.

The PRC/SCS that she's referring to is Prentke Romich Company and Semantic Compaction Systems, which brought the app down with a claim that over 100 software patents were infringed on, per TIME. The case is still in court, but Apple apparently decided to remove the app now.

Maya still has the app, but her mother notes she won't be able to get updates and it could fail as updates are made to the iPad iOS. For those who don't already have it, they won't be able to get it.

"What if it can be remotely deleted?" her mother also worries.

PCWorld foreshadowed what's happening here with its piece, "How Tech Patent Lawsuits Hurt Real People."

Maya's mother told PCWorld that this is about big companies (PRC and SCS) against Speak for Yourself. If the little guys lose, those like Maya may be forced to get communication devices that can range up to $9,000 -- Speak for Yourself retails for $299.99 -- "too big (both literally and figuratively)," Dana Nieder said.

Speak for Yourself released the following statement in response to Apple's move with a Facebook post Monday evening:

We were saddened and disappointed that PRC and Semantic Compaction filed a lawsuit against us, two speech-language pathologists who have emphatically supported their mission that "everyone deserves a voice."

We came to terms with their decision and actions over these past few months. We have taken all of the necessary and legal steps to defend the lawsuit and protect Speak for Yourself, the app that we created, and that hundreds of people who are unable to talk are using to communicate.

Unfortunately last week, Apple removed our app from the App Store under pressure from Semantic and Prentke Romich. Now our sadness and disappointment have turned to indignation. Speak for Yourself will continue to fight this baseless lawsuit and the obvious, and blatant interference with your fundamental right to a VOICE which is motivated solely by their desire to drive SfY out of existence. That will not happen.

PRC had its own statement in response, posted to Facebook this afternoon:

Last week Prentke Romich Company (PRC) learned that Apple removed a language assistance app from its iTunes® store pending the outcome of a patent infringement lawsuit filed against the company that developed the iPad® app.

PRC and the licensor of the Unity™ system that powers our language devices jointly filed the lawsuit after our patent attorney found numerous instances of infringement on Unity patents in the “Speak for Yourself” app. Apple has a process that allows third parties to provide notice of infringement concerns as part of its terms and conditions. Accordingly, we reached out to Apple on two occasions. We provided Apple with a copy of the lawsuit, expressing our concerns about the “Speak for Yourself” app. We then responded to a later request from Apple asking for an update on the lawsuit. Last week, Apple elected to remove the app.

Maya's mother had said previously that the legal fight was "literally" putting "my daughter’s voice on the line."

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

See how the app works with this video from Speak for Yourself:

The most controversial apps ever:
Loading Slideshow...
  • Smuggle Truck: Operation Immigrant

    Boston-based developer Owlchemy Labs irked immigrant advocate groups with this iPhone game that allows users to drive a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/28/smuggle-truck-operation-immigration-rejected-by-apple_n_854899.html" target="_hplink">truck full of immigrants</a> through the desert. According to the AP, "[Developer Alex] Schwartz said he wanted to bring attention to immigration issues." But Apple banned the app from the App Store.

  • Phantom Alert

    U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer, Frank Lautenberg, Tom Udall and Harry Reid pressured Apple, Google and RIM earlier this spring to remove smartphone apps that notify users of nearby police <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/23/senators-ask-apple-to-ban-dui-checkpoint-alert-apps_n_839300.html" target="_hplink">DUI checkpoints</a>. Apple and RIM have since <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/09/apple-dui-checkpoint-apps-ban_n_874532.html" target="_hplink">complied</a> with the Seantors' demands and cracked on so-called "DUI checkpoint" apps, but Google has yet to take action.

  • Exodus International

    Despite initially passing Apple's standards, the allegedly anti-gay messages promoted by the app "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/23/apple-exodus-international-app_n_839448.html" target="_hplink">Exodus International</a>" outraged thousands of customers. The Exodus International ministry, from which the app takes its name, <a href="http://blog.exodusinternational.org/about/http://blog.exodusinternational.org/about/" target="_hplink">promotes</a> "freedom from homosexuality through the power of Jesus Christ." After more than 150,000 signatures were gathered for an online petition, Apple removed the app from the App Store entirely.

  • Playboy

    Hugh Hefner claimed in January that "Playboy" would soon come <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/21/playboy-ipad-app-blocked-_n_812489.html" target="_hplink">uncensored on the iPad</a>. Apple, however, remains firm on its nudity-free policy within the App Store and forced "Playboy" to resort to a low resolution web app instead.

  • Wikileaks

    The <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/20/apple-removes-wikileaks-app-from-app-store/" target="_hplink">unofficial WikiLeaks application</a> lasted only three days in the App Store before being banned by Apple.

  • 'The Importance Of Being Earnest'

    Apparently Apple's censors worried that Tom Bouden's graphic novel version of Oscar Wilde's <em><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/14/apple-censors-gay-kiss-in_n_611553.html" target="_hplink">The Importance of Being Earnest</a></em>, which portrays illustrations of nude or partially nude men embracing, would be too objectionable for too many users. Apple approved the app, but only with black boxes covering controversial frames. However, the App Store later reversed its decision and passed the app without the censor bars.

  • Big Brother Camera Security

    In 2010, Apple approved the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/apple-bans-big-brother-camera-security-iphone-passcodes_n_877481.html" target="_hplink">Big Brother Camera Security app</a>, which lets users remotely photograph someone who is improperly trying to access their stolen or lost iPhone. In June 2010, however, the app was removed from the App Store following accusations that the developer was "surreptitiously harvesting user passwords."

  • ThirdIntifada

    Apple removed the app called "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/23/apple-removes-anti-israel-thirdintifada-app_n_882857.html" target="_hplink">ThirdIntifada</a>" from the App Store, following complaints made by Israel's information minister, Yuli Edelstein and Jewish human rights group Simon Wiesenthal Center. The app was said to promote violence against Israel, according to claims.

  • Manhattan Declaration

    Apple initially approved so-called "anti-gay" app <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/24/apple-manhattan-declaration-app_n_788075.html" target="_hplink">Manhattan Declaration</a>, but the App Store later removed the program following a wave of complaints--and a petition--from outraged customers. The app asked users to sign a "declaration," which according to the app "speaks in defense of the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty."