How 3D Printing Will Change Our World

2012-02-16-archdailyreal.jpg  
Posted: 07/11/2012 6:37 pm

By Vanessa Quirk
click here for the original article on ArchDaily

The MakerBot Replicator, a personal 3D Printer. Photo via MakerBot.

When the kids at NOTLabs first got their hands on a MakerBot Replicator, the ingenious 3D printer that can make just about anything you want, they quickly got down to business – making LEGO and Kinex connectors, that is. As inconsequential as their decision may seem, it got us thinking: today, building blocks, but tomorrow? Buildings themselves.

The future isn’t as far as you may think. In the next two articles, I’ll introduce you to three visionaries who are already applying 3D printing technology to revolutionary effect: an engineer hoping to improve the human condition, a robotics expert with the goal of completing the Sagrada Familia (or at least putting a structure on the moon), and an architect at MIT using nature-inspired materials to turn the design world on its head.

If these three examples are anything to go by, 3D Printing will revolutionize the world as we know it. But it begs the question: at what price?Ā Will it offer architects the freedom to design without the pesky limitations of built reality? Or, like the scribes made redundant by Gutenberg’s printing press, will 3D printing make the architect go extinct?

How (and Why) to Print A House

ā€œIf you look around, everything else we use is made automatically, like the pen you’re holding, the shoes, the cars. The reason we don’t have [automated homebuilding] is simply that we haven’t had the large-scale technology.ā€ [1]

Behrokh Khoshnevis, director of the Center for Rapid Automated Fabrication Technologies (CRAFT) at the University of Souther California, has made it his mission to perfect that technology, what he calls ā€œContour Crafting.ā€

Here’s how, essentially, it works: Imagine a giant printer, printing, say, a line. Now imagine that instead of ink, the printer’s cartridge holds concrete. Imagine that printer printing the line again, just a millimeter above the previous one, adding a layer, and then going back to do it again and again – until your 2D line has become a 3D structure: a wall.

The implications for the building industry are enormous. These 3D printers can build a square foot of wall in less than 20 seconds, and, according to Khoshnevis and his USC colleagues, will be able to erect a 2,000 square foot, two story house in 24 hours. Eventually, Contour Crafting could even produce strings of houses, each with a different design, each including all the conduits forĀ  electrical, plumbing and air-conditioning, at one time.

Furthermore, by taking out the need for extensive labor, (Khoshnevis imagines a scenario where workers play a supporting role: the architect’s digital blueprint is plugged into the printer, activating it to build without much human direction), printing could cost about a fifth of what traditional construction methods cost.

A girl walks in a slum in Pakistan. The creator of Contour Crafting,Ā Behrokh Khoshnevis, hopes to use his technology to eradicate slums. Photo via Flicker CC User balazsgardi.

A Dignified SolutionĀ 

Because of its time/money-saving capacity, Khoshnevis envisions a lofty application for his technology: bettering the human condition.

Imagine if this technology were applied in developing countries, especially where lumber is scarce. Slums could be eradicated. Instead of living in tents or cardboard boxes when natural disaster strikes, victims could be provided what Khoshnevis describes as ā€œdignified housingā€ – and fast.

With poor communities particularly vulnerable to destructive natural disasters, and about one billion people already living in slums (and that number expected to double as over the next twenty years), 3D printed homes could be a dignified solution to an increasingly desperate global situation.

But beyond its world-changing potential, what does 3D printing offer the architect?

Nothing short of freedom from reality.

The Man Who Prints Houses Trailer from Marc Webb on Vimeo.

The Alchemy of Stone

Enrico Dini is a robotics expert, a ā€œstone alchemist,ā€ and a dreamer. He has spent more than a decade working on his D-Shape, a 3D printer, driven by CAD software, that has produced the tallest printed sculpture in existence and the closest thing to a printed house: a small dwelling known as a ā€œtrullo.ā€

Rather than using concrete, Dini’s invention uses sand and an inorganic binder as its raw materials – when mixed together, they form stone. This capability has famously called Foster+Partners’ attention, who have been in conversation with Dini about the feasibility of using to build on the moon (using moon dust, no less).

But D-shape doesn’t just make ordinary stone slabs. It makes curvy, organic, complex works of art.

Radiolaria, a sculpture designed by Andrea Morgante and printed using Enrico Dini’s D-Shape 3D Printer. Photo Ā© Enrico Dini.

Building Your Digital Dreams

To prove his machine’s potential, Dini paired up with architect Andrea Morgante, of Shiro Studio. As Morgante explained to Blueprint Magazine, he developed a model that would have been extremely difficult and cost prohibitive with traditional construction techniques or methods. The result was Radiolaria: an impressive, Gaudi-esque sculpture.

Morgante’s sculpture reveals one of 3D printing’s most powerful advantages: it can create concave and convex designs (which ordinarily involve time consuming, expensive processes, such as manual casting and intricate scaffolding) just as quickly as straight lines and angles.

Sean Bailey, architect and artist at Paper Architecture, put it this way to Txchnologist: ā€œā€˜Whereas traditional fabrication techniques require additional resources as complexity increases, 3D printers are not bound to this logic.’ With a 3D printer, it takes the same amount of time and money to turn a glob of concrete into a cube as it does to turn it into an octopus.ā€

Much like BIM has empowered architects like Frank Gehry to incorporate more organic, curvy forms into their designs (forms that were previously considered impossible), 3D printers could similarly open up a world of possibilities for architecture, making what was once avant-garde attainable, maybe even mainstream.

As Morgante so eloquently articulated, these printers: ā€œcan build your digital dreams.ā€

To be Continued…

3D printing could not only offer relief to millions of urban dwellers, but empower the architect by liberating him/her from the traditional restrictions of reality (and I haven’t even showed you how far it can go). Next week, I’ll introduce you to a third visionary, perhaps the most radical yet.

I’ll also return to the potential downside of 3D Printing: as the technology advances and becomes more accessible, allowing ordinary citizens to easily scan designs and build them on their own, what will happen to the concept of intellectual property? Will architects be able to adapted to this changed world? Or will they cease to be relevant at all…

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

By Vanessa Quirk click here for the original article on ArchDaily ...
By Vanessa Quirk click here for the original article on ArchDaily ...
By Vanessa Quirk click here for the original article on ArchDaily ...
By Vanessa Quirk click here for the original article on ArchDaily ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:56 AM on 07/26/2012
It is hard to say. Ideally, yes, it would give architects virtually unlimited creativity. But if I have to judge this base on the building industry now, architects will become extinct. The only thing a 3D printer would print would be cookie-cutter buildings and houses.
08:08 AM on 07/26/2012
And now we see how existing Trademark and Copyright law will make a convoluted mess of the whole business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wtf is this
It depends.
01:31 AM on 07/26/2012
I got a crown a couple of years ago. My dentist was putting the dimensions in his computer. I jokingly commented that it would be really cool if he could just print it out. His response? Just wait. 15 minutes later he was placing the crown in my mouth. Amazing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aerobat
Truth through humor ... and sarcasm
01:00 PM on 07/25/2012
I recently heard an Airbus Executive say they plan to print the majority of an aircraft in the near future. They are already printing metal parts:
http://gizmodo.com/5841449/why-yes-maam-this-airbus-a380-was-printed-on-demand-by-a-computer

I think the unsung heroes in much of this are the scientists developing the materials that can be fed out of what are basically "Pastry Nozzles". I have played with early versions of printed parts and while they were true to form for mock-ups, they were not very strong. So we used them to make molds or sand castings.

Materials scientists are progressing at an incredible rate and now, as in theAirbus example, we are seeing durable metal parts with geometries that would be difficult to machine or cast reliably.

Of course the big threat is when the 3D printers start printing themselves. At that point, why bother with those pesky humans at all. At least now we're designing and building the printers ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norwegiano
Gay Lefty - admitted and proud.
12:05 PM on 07/25/2012
While still in it's infancy, there is a spark of major innovation with these proto-type printers that has major potential to bring the whole human race out of the Industrial Age and into the Information Age.

I cannot wait to see where this takes us. Imagine needing a vase for some flowers, and you just go to the printer and make one in 15 seconds. Imagine losing an important ID, like a license.
Imagine biological 3D printing. Need a kidney? Print one up. Need a new car door? Print one up.
Need a new toy for the bedroom? Select-a-size print options abound!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:12 AM on 07/25/2012
Yup they always claimed this could be done but the reality is we're not there yet.