WASHINGTON -- In an embarrassment for Democrats, the House on Thursday reprimanded Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) -- and slapped her with a $10,000 fine -- for ethics violations relating to inappropriate use of her official staff for campaign and personal needs.

The House quietly adopted the resolution by voice vote, making Richardson the ninth lawmaker in history to be formally reprimanded by Congress. She agreed to all seven charges brought against her, ranging from improper use of House resources to "attempting to intimidate" official staff into doing campaign work to obstructing the committee's investigation.

In Richardson's official response, per materials released by the House Ethics Committee, she states that she "did not intend that her staff feel compelled or coerced to work on her campaign" and that she didn't "ever intend to obstruct the Committee's investigation in any way."

The committee's report included some harsh criticisms of Richardson's work ethic. During the floor debate on the resolution, House Ethics Committee Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) read aloud comments made by one of Richardson's former staffers, a disabled veteran, who had told the committee that she "would rather be at war in Afghanistan than work under people who are morally corrupt."

"I am simply haunted" by that statement, Bonner said. "While some might prefer a harsher sentence, perhaps even a few might think a reprimand is too severe, I urge my colleagues to support the unanimous recommendation of the only evenly divided committee in this House of Representatives."

Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), who chairs the subcommittee that oversaw the committee's investigation, said he did "not relish" speaking on the House floor about the matter.

"This is, indeed, a solemn moment," Dent said.

Some rose in defense of Richardson. Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said he knows that she "regrets the violations and hopes that the reprimand by the House will allow both her and the House to move on to address the great issues facing the nation."

In an unexpected move, Richardson herself rose to give remarks and, during an awkward few minutes, said the committee report unfairly characterized her.

"First, I want to assure my colleagues that, contrary to the inflammatory suggestions in the full committee report, I do take these findings very seriously," she said. "Second, I set forth in my statement of views ... several significant concerns about the manner in which the committee conducted this investigation."

Richardson went on to accuse committee members of "prejudgment and improper influence of witnesses," which "clearly influenced subsequent staff testimony."

She sparred briefly with Bonner over how much time she had left to keep talking. When he said everything Richardson was saying was already in the committee report, she fired back, "I was told that I would be allowed additional time to complete my presentation." She got another five minutes in before Bonner gave his closing remarks, which weren't kind to Richardson.

"There is an unspoken duty to hold ourselves up to a higher standard," Bonner said. "Unfortunately, as Rep. Richardson has admitted, she did not live up to this higher standard. She did a disservice to her staff, to her colleagues and while it is ultimately up to her constituents in California to be the final judge of her actions, I think it's safe to say she did a disservice to the hardworking taxpayers from all corners of this country who expect and deserve more from their elected leaders."

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Nuts Bring Buckets of Same

    Just in case anyone forgot that the House Judiciary Committee ACORN hearing was a House Judiciary Committee hearing about ACORN, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/02/acorn-hearing-a-barrel-of_n_376882.html">Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) helpfully brought a bucket of acorns</a> to the House Judiciary Committee. Also that day, colleague Lamar Smith praising the "turnout so early in the day" at 2:30pm, and Louie Gohmert offering up the malaprop: “From one acorn, many nuts can grow.” Like, say, Peter King.

  • Hello Kitty, Hello Revolving Debt

    Credit cards. Were it not for them, we would have to save up money in order to buy things. But do some credit cards take it too far, marketing to the youths? Byron Dorgan thought so when he saw the Hello Kitty Platinum VISA. "Does it seem to you like they’re targeting that 10-year-old, the 14-year-old." Ha! He should see the <a href="http://www.shopinprivate.com/hello-kitty-pink-guilty.html">Hello Kitty vibrator</a>.

  • "I'll See Your Baby, And Raise You Two Tweens"

    Last time out, we made mention of Representative John Shadegg's (R-Ariz.) attempt to wield a baby in order to make a point about how terrible health care reform was. We neglected to mention that Representative Pete Stark (D-Calif.) took it a step further, and attempted to bring two young children to make his own points about health care (5:25 in video), at which point the House was officially barred from trafficking in human props any further.

  • John Thune's Stackin' Dollars

    How much is too much stimulus? When it allows representatives to make junior high math analogies based on topography and astronomy, maybe. Here, Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) makes some stupid pictures of dollar stacks that extend into the sky, to the celestial firmament itself. “If you took 100 dollar bills, Mr. President," Thune said, "and stacked them on top of each other you would have a stack that goes 689 miles high.” He added, "In other words, if you took the 100 dollar bills and not stacked them on top of each other, but wrapped them side-by-side all around the earth… If you could believe this, it’d go around the earth almost 39 times." So, we cannot stimulate the economy, because of science! (1:15 in clip)

  • Gettin' High On Your Own Supply (Of A Substance That Does Not Get You High)

    Representative Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) wasn't having any of that whole "regulating tobacco" stuff. Why? Because it's "not the nicotine that kills, it's the smoke!" So, he argued, why don't we regulate lettuce, to keep people from smoking lettuce? Wouldn't that prevent a "pandemic" of cancers? This would have been a good point, were it not for the non-existence of either a massive industry geared toward curing lettuce and rolling it into cigarettes, or a target market of consumers who were even remotely interested in smoking lettuce. BUT YEAH OTHER THAT ALL THAT STUFF (and the fact that nicotine is addictive) STEVE BUYER IS A GENIUS.

  • And Now, A Poem From Ted Poe

    From Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas): <i>It came on two pages, It has withstood the ages. / The word "shall,'' is only 10 times mentioned, But enough to get one's attention. / No taxes did this law raise, To this day it continues to create much praise; / Two great religions does it claim, The "Law of the Ten Commandments'' is its name. / A current writing, 1,990 pages long, Has a socialist philosophy that is all wrong; / Difficult for the people to understand, And troubling what big government doth demand. / Over 3,445 "shalls'' it does loudly shout, New massive taxes does it proudly tout; / Written in secret by the bureaucrats, For exclusive use of the taxacrats. / The Congressional bill called "Health Care Reform," Is illusionary, the authors are still ill-informed; / Government ought not take over America's health biz. / And that's just the way it is."</i> And so, America, this is why you should have to die of easily treated medical conditions.

  • And Now, An Even Dumber Poem, From Roland Burris

    From the junior senator from Illinois: <i>"It was the night before Christmas, and all through the Senate / The right held up our health care bill, no matter what was in it / The people had voted a mandated reform / But Republicans blew off the gathering storm / We'll clog up the Senate, they cried with a grin / And in the midterm elections, we'll get voted in / They knew regular folks needed help right this second / But fundraisers, lobbyists and politics beckoned / So try as they might, Democrats could not win / Because the majority was simply too thin / Then across every state there rose such a clatter / The whole senate rushed out to see what was the matter / All sprang up from their desk and ran from the floor / Straight through the cloakroom and right out the door."</i> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/22/burris-backs-reform-with_n_400456.html">There's more</a>, but you will probably want to shoot yourself in the face after you read it.

  • Chuck Grassley Goes All Aggro On The Speaker Box

    For some reason, in the course of discussing fuel efficiency standards, Senator Chuck Grassley decided he should drive his point home by shouting out Ashton Kutcher and his movie, "Dude, Where's My Car." Prior to this, Grassley went on an <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Speech_by_GOP_Senator_references_stoner_0924.html">extended monologue</a> about Pink Floyd's <i>Dark Side of the Moon</i> album and the shards of a broken prism and the "multishades" of light. Just straight up tripping balls, in the well of the Senate. Anyway, as you now know, this TOTALLY fixed fuel efficiency standards!

  • Sam Brownback Will Save Your Inanimate Genetic Material

    Who's looking out for your precious bodily fluids? Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, that's who. And he's enlisted the help of a young girl, named Hannah, who has the power of talking to human embryos! "<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/18/brownback-embryo/">Are you going to kill me?</a>" the embryos asked Hannah, who immediately scrawled a picture of this conversation on a giant piece of posterboard, so that Sam Brownback could stop people from killing the stem cells. And then Sam Brownback went on to support a bunch of wars in the Middle East!

  • The Most Important Prop Of All

    James Inhofe (R-Batshit) hates him some gay marriage, and the gays in general. And to make his point, he carries around with him The Most Important Prop in America: a picture of his family. "As you see here, and I think this is maybe the most important prop we’ll have during the entire debate, my wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I’m really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we’ve never had a divorce or any kind of homosexual relationship." Ha! THAT HE KNOWS OF!