iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Penn State Receives Accreditation Warning

KATHY MATHESON   08/14/12 04:20 PM ET  AP

Penn State

PHILADELPHIA — An accreditation warning issued to Penn State is serious and necessary given the issues raised by a recent child sex-abuse scandal, but the school is unlikely to lose the all-important designation, experts said Tuesday.

They also expect the university to comply quickly with demands to show that its governance, finances and integrity meet standards set by its accreditation agency, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

"This is an entirely appropriate and anticipated action by Middle States given the strategic importance of voluntary peer review," said American Council on Education president Molly Corbett Broad. "It's really the basis on which public accountability is achieved in American higher education."

The Philadelphia-based Middle States Commission issued the warning last week based on the school's handling of molestation allegations against Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant football coach convicted in June of sexually abusing 10 boys.

Concerns include whether Penn State trustees provide sufficient oversight of the administration, the strength of the university's ethical standards and the school's compliance with government policies, such as those requiring campus crime reports, said Middle States spokesman Richard Pokrass.

The commission also wants the school to address its financial status in light of a $60 million penalty imposed by the NCAA and any lawsuits from Sandusky's victims.

Penn State must submit a report to the agency by Sept. 30. A small team of accreditors would then visit the school in State College.

"The university has been very cooperative," Pokrass said Tuesday. "The leadership of the university is aware of what the concerns are and have been taking very positive steps."

Penn State is now one of about 15 schools in the Mid-Atlantic region with a warning.

Most institutions work their way off warning status within a year to 18 months, Pokrass said. Those that don't are put on probation.

Schools lose accreditation after two years of noncompliance, starting with the warning. Students cannot use federal funds – including Pell grants and government loans – to attend unaccredited schools.

Penn State stressed that it remains accredited and that academic programs are not being questioned.

"This action has nothing to do with the quality of education our students receive," Blannie Bowen, vice provost for academic affairs, said in a statement.

Judith Eaton, president of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, said Tuesday that Penn State has the reputation, strength and resources to rebound from this setback. It's "highly unlikely" the school will end up on probation, let alone lose its accreditation, she said.

Still, accreditation warnings are important tools because governments typically don't take action against colleges and universities, Broad said. Accreditation agencies provide accountability through standards enforcement and peer evaluation of academic programs, university leadership, financial stability and institutional honor.

"This is serious both for our own sense of integrity and well-being within higher education," Broad said.

The school that most recently lost its accreditation from Middle States was Baltimore International College, a culinary school in Maryland.

Pokrass said it lost its accreditation about nine months ago because of finances, a lack of assessment of student learning and issues regarding student services. It is now owned and operated by Stratford University, an accredited for-profit institution based in Virginia.

Middle States accredits more than 525 colleges and universities in five states plus the District of Columbia, two U.S. territories and several international locations.

___

Follow Kathy Matheson at http://www.twitter.com/kmatheson

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

PHILADELPHIA — An accreditation warning issued to Penn State is serious and necessary given the issues raised by a recent child sex-abuse scandal, but the school is unlikely to lose the all-impo...
PHILADELPHIA — An accreditation warning issued to Penn State is serious and necessary given the issues raised by a recent child sex-abuse scandal, but the school is unlikely to lose the all-impo...
Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:37 PM on 08/17/2012
While I don't think they will (or should) lose accreditation, this is EXACTLY the kind of group where any penalties/warnings/fines should have been doled out. It made no absolutely zero sense for the ncaa to be involved in the matter, as was obvious from the fact they couldn't even point to any ncaa violations (other the nebulous catch-all institutional control). This was not a football issue. It was a simple case of the highest university officials not doing what they should have done, with the knowledge they had on the matter. The way to remedy that is through the college system...NOT through the ncaa. So it should have been nothing from the ncaa, and fines/etc from the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
01:07 PM on 08/16/2012
How come the University of Pennsylvania never got a an accreditation warning for doing almost the exact same thing, hypocrites
12:08 AM on 08/16/2012
If you think Penn State should lose their accreditation then you're an idiot and your parents were brother and sister
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hbrinn
10:15 AM on 08/16/2012
Please explain your preposterous statement.
08:59 AM on 08/15/2012
I hope they lose their accreditation and closes up shop. There is no excuse for what occurred there. They do not deserve to be in business any longer.
03:20 PM on 08/15/2012
Excuse me? I am an incoming freshmen at Penn State UP this fall, and am thoroughly mortified that you would say something like that. I have worked so hard to appear in a good light to colleges, and was thrilled when I was accepted into one of the best programs in the country for my major that just happened to be at Penn State. Now, some committee that doesn't even know who I am is threatening to completely decimate my future and all I've worked for. You know where I was in 1998 when this began.... Kindergarten! I had no clue who Jerry Sandusky was or what the word "molest" even meant. Now, here I am, the Valedictorian of my class, praying that Penn State can rebound from this. Yes, what that handful of people did was horrendous, but I feel like they're punishing the wrong people here! It's individuals like you who are so caught up in their "soapbox moment" that they don't take the time to think about the 80,000 kids whose careers will be jeopardized, futures will be altered, and lives will be affected if this goes through. Those kids are Penn State, I am Penn State, not those officials, not Jo Pa's statue. Think of that the next time you want to spout off about shutting the doors.
05:08 PM on 08/15/2012
If you were the Valedictorian of your class, I don't understand why you are going to PSU.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vonric
09:43 AM on 08/16/2012
Look at the specifics of the commentary from the accreditation association before you get all bent out of shape.

1. The commentary speaks of a "warning", which is nothing more (or less) than a shot across the bow of Penn State. It is lighter than sanctioning, or probation... Few schools, if any, go directly to having their accreditation pulled; there are visitations, reviews, compliance criteria and probation. Penn State is a long, long long way from that.
2. The commentary speaks of the need for Penn State to define their leadership and reporting policies so that the kind of behavior that was clearly routine during the Sandusky era cannot be repeated. Simple request, and one with impeccible logic. Do you want to repeat those years? Does anyone?
3. The process of responding to this "warning" is something that Penn State should take seriously, very seriously, but is hardly that difficult to write, produce or define.

and, I will push back. You may be Penn State in your mind and in the minds of many, bu tthe realty of it is it is the leadership, or lack of leadership, that charts the course of the University. That leadership was profoundly lacking and a pedophile ran rampant.

A thoughtful and responsible reply, directly, without mincing words, is all that is required. IF that is too much for the senior leadership at Penn State, then they have no business in trying to chart the course of a university.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:37 PM on 08/14/2012
Wait 'til the Chery Act sanctions hit, plus at least 2 more criminal trails and countless civil suits.
Meanwhile, over at StateCollege.com they just ban people from posting who don't kowtow to Joepa's memory and PSU's complete innocence. LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
10:25 PM on 08/14/2012
Bottom line, this is a lot of politics on the part of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. They are not going to lose accreditation but it does cast a shadow over the school and the students that clearly had nothing to do with the problem yet may be punished as collateral damage.

Football program will have a very bad year since other schools are raiding them and you cannot blame a football player for taking a scholarship at another school that will enhance their chance of a NFL career. Doing things that punish the current students is not going to resolve any of the issues and failures of leadership of the people at the top, including the board of directors..
08:16 PM on 08/14/2012
Completely asinine, That would be like bull dozing a neighborhood because a murder lived there.
Political posturing at it's finest.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hbrinn
08:34 PM on 08/14/2012
That's a bad analogy. It would be like breaking up a neighborhood with a gang of serial killers.
08:36 PM on 08/14/2012
except it's not. what did the students/professors/employers do to cover up the scandal? you are talking out your behind here, champ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
10:26 PM on 08/14/2012
Good analogy!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
10:50 AM on 08/14/2012
School avoids a "death sentence" to the football program and now faces a "death sentence" to the entire university!  It won't happen though unless further investigation really draws up some serious coverups by even more administrators.  Even then, I can't help but feel bad for the students.  Time to transfer if you can, I wouldn't want Pennsylvania State University on my diploma, accreditation or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
10:31 PM on 08/14/2012
Bottom line, its going to be a stain for a few years! If the University reacts quickly, cleans house and continues to stress the clear separation of its football and its academic program, it can regain its good academic standing a lot quicker than it will its football program...
mira chancleta
C'mon, there's NO "La Tino" race
10:16 AM on 08/14/2012
What happened at PennState will(and should)live in the history of higher education forever!

Children were raped for YEARS and these acts were covered-up by immoral and corrupt officials from the locker-room to the wood-paneled board rooms. Of this there is no doubt and all "officials" who knew and denied these HORRIFIC acts should go to prison for years!!!

But, to take away PSU's academic accreditation is INSANE!!!

The only thing that this stupid act will accomplish is to diminish and defame the primary function of an institution of learning---the opportunity for minds to expand and explore every conceivable corner of the intellect.

Students of today&tomorrow should NOT be punished for the egregious acts of pedophilia-defending, designer-suit wearing criminals that SHOULD see the inside of prison cells.

Leave the academics alone!!!

NOBODY is served by destroying an otherwise distinguished university.

PSU will NEVER recover its name,but at the very least faculty/students should be allowed to pursue their passions without having to apologize for the filth that occurred in the locker rooms and fancy offices of people who betrayed the public trust on so MANY levels, not the least of which was to defend the defenseless!

Destroy the football program, which the NCAA"just happened"to not do, but support the academic mission!

Nationally,we are hurting really bad in our academic achievement.
Let's not reduce opportunities to further promote our society.

To not do this is to admit that PSUonly existed for pedophilia and pom-poms.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vonric
10:01 AM on 08/16/2012
Did you read the language of the warning?
Do you have the slightest understanding of how accreditation is established or pulled?

the warning is quite specific in requesting a timely response to a a request for documentation of policy pertaining senior leadership's approach towards reporting. Nothing more, nothing less. It in no way impugns the moderately decent academic setting of Penn State. (and no, I am not of the opinion that it is a great university, it is a decent mid-tier state school.....)

This was not even a citation. Were this to go the next step, there would be a complex process of placing the institution on probation. That would lead to another round of definitions of shortfalls and policy definitions for remediation. Only if they failed to produce in the probationary period would there be a serious risk of loosing accreditation.

So, in sum
THE SKY IS NOT FALLING!!!!!
the university needs to respond appropriately to a reqest for policy definition and revision so that the Unviersity will never, never be in the position of harboring a pedophile again.
the sky actually has fallen on the victims of Sandusky, I note.
mira chancleta
C'mon, there's NO "La Tino" race
08:30 AM on 08/17/2012
...aren't you noble
09:40 AM on 08/14/2012
Just more crap dumped on Penn State based on an a report fraught with errors and spin. When the Freeh report is exposed for what it truly is, all of this hoopla, including the NCAA sanctions will be withdrawn.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vonric
10:13 AM on 08/14/2012
nice fantasy world there. Today's news also report the commentary of a witness who notes the reality that Sandusky "swapped" boys with a Penn state donor on a private airplane... the investigations of a pedophile ring and kiddie porn ring are being taken seriously, and are starting to bear results.

if, indeed, Sandusky's foundation was nothing more than a victim factory, Penn State's ancillary involvement will tarnish them for far, far longer than the measly four years of sanctions that they currently face.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hbrinn
08:35 PM on 08/14/2012
So why don't you tell me what actually happened then.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulwl
09:26 AM on 08/14/2012
Much ado about . . .nothing! This is Penn St., not some for-profit-school in downtown Philly! People need to get a grip, stop making unnecessary work and most importantly, let PSU get back to doing a wonderful job of producing graduates for the betterment of the world! Yes they had an unfortunate thing(s) happen, it/they are over, now let's move on!
09:36 AM on 08/14/2012
I'm willing to bet all those boys are not "over it" and cannot "move on" with the tragedy they had to endure. It wasn't just an "unfortunate thing" that happened. It was child molestation with a MASSIVE cover-up from the higher ups. They should rightfully deal with any wrath that is coming their way, and they have no right to complain about anything. They gave up that right, the second they didn't call the police/FBI whoever to inform them that a child was getting abused.... and then continued to let it happen, over, and over, and over again.
08:46 PM on 08/14/2012
As horrible as that was, it has NOTHING to do with the school's academic standards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vonric
10:10 AM on 08/14/2012
yep, and Penn State is a mediocre state-funded school with a varied track record in academics and a decent but not spectacular record in student placement at point of graduation. It is moderately competitive within the array of public state schools in PA.

What is impressive to me is that your hubris matches the hubris of the Penn state announcement... "they don';t say these things unless they know we can REALLY comply" is so full of hot air.....

having been part of accreditation teams on both sides of the fence (working within the institution for specific professional accreditation and working as part of an assessment team) I can guarantee you that the process of determining, maintaining and reviewing accreditation is serious business.

If Penn State takes the same cavalier attitude towards this "throwdown" that the took towards the original allegations of childhood sexual abuse, they can look to a long and dismal future as classrooms empty and decent students flee to accredited institutions that really prefer to not harbor pedophiles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torinir
A good reputation takes a lifetime to build.
09:24 AM on 08/14/2012
If PSU loses accreditation, that's a death sentence for the entire University. Students no longer eligible for public student loans, degrees no longer recognized. No one will attend, if that occurs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wintersoldier7020
The FanGirls Are Pissed
07:39 PM on 08/14/2012
Who wants graduate of Penn State on their resume anyway? Think of those people that just graduated from there...it's reputation is the pedophile school. No thanks.