Huffpost Business
Mark Gongloff Headshot

Nasty Election Could Wreck The Economy, BofA Economist Warns

Posted: Updated:
A contentious election in 2012 could hurt the economy in 2013, an economist warns.
A contentious election in 2012 could hurt the economy in 2013, an economist warns.

Like most Americans, you're probably thoroughly enjoying the nasty 2012 presidential election. We just can't get enough of the rape gaffes and the birth-certificate jokes, am I right?

But did you know that what you might consider frivolous electo-tainment could actually cause the entire U.S. economy to crash?

That is the warning in a new note by Bank of America economist Ethan Harris. He cautions that the ugly back-and-forth of this campaign could hurt the chances of Congress getting anything done about the "fiscal cliff," the $600 billion to $700 billion in tax increases and spending cuts set to take effect at the end of the year.

The Congressional Budget Office warned earlier this week that the cliff could cause a fairly deep recession in 2013, and Harris wrote in his note Friday that the election could make that nightmare scenario a reality:

Unfortunately, in our view, the “energize the base” campaign from both sides increases the risk of a poor outcome for the fiscal cliff. Recall that avoiding the cliff -- that is, $500 bn in tax increases and $200 bn in spending cuts -- requires that both parties do a 180-degree turn. They must quickly forget the campaign, turn their guns into plowshares and negotiate a compromise with the “enemy.”

Harris worries about two possible scenarios unfolding if the parties can't come to an agreement. In the first, both Democrats and Republicans use the cliff as leverage to get what they want, ending in a Tarantino-style standoff that leaves everybody dead: The Democrats let tax cuts expire so they can revoke the Bush tax cuts for the upper class. The Republicans let the spending cuts tax take effect so they can cut spending for everything except defense.

"The question then becomes how long does it take for one side to 'blink' and how much damage does it do to the economy and markets," Harris writes.

In the second scenario, if a new president and Congress are elected in November, then the new government might just let the tax increases and spending cuts happen and avoid cutting a deal with the old government, thinking it will get what it wants anyway after the inauguration in January. The trouble with this approach is that the new minority government in January could still make problems for the new majority, with filibusters and such. Again, the economy will burn while Congress fiddles.

Mitt Romney's selection of Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) also presents a problem for solving the fiscal cliff, Harris writes:

As a leading House conservative, Ryan has been pushing for immediate, front-loaded, action to reduce the deficit. Since arguably winning the debt ceiling battle last summer, House conservatives have been presenting budgets that include even bigger cuts than agreed to under the debt ceiling agreement and they have warned that they will use the next debt ceiling -- which likely hits in December -- as a negotiating lever. In our view, this group will block attempts to delay spending cuts for more than a couple months.

Below are 7 presidential speeches on the economy that failed:

Presidential Economy Speech Fails
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Also on The Huffington Post

Economic Predictions That Were Blatantly Wrong (Or Have Blatantly Yet To Come True)
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Jobs data boosts Obama's chances

Despite furor, economy likely to trump women's rights in election

Fed will likely attempt to boost economy ahead of election

Political implications of grim CBO report

Public confidence in France's Hollande slips

Political Perceptions: An Uptick in Economic Optimism

Four Ways Ohio Republicans Are Already Stealing the 2012 Elections

Obama, Romney pursue divergent ad strategies

 
  Obama Romney
Obama Romney
332 206
Obama leading
Obama won
Romney leading
Romney won
Popular Vote
33 out of 100 seats are up for election. 51 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Holdover
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats* Republicans
Current Senate 53 47
Seats gained or lost +2 -2
New Total 55 45
* Includes two independent senators expected to caucus with the Democrats: Angus King (Maine) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.).
All 435 seats are up for election. 218 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats Republicans
Seats won 201 234
Click for Full Results