Patrick Waldo, a New York-based street artist, claims that international retail chain Zara copied his iconic art in a new $16.90 T-shirt.

Waldo made a name for himself by augmenting faces on New York City subway ads with the swirly word "moustache" until he was caught and arrested in 2011. Waldo has shied away from the graffiti-ing since, but when he spied a Zara T-shirt featuring a similarly-mustachioed skull, he recognized his trademark work right away.

"I came up with the idea [for my graffiti] in March 2010," Waldo tells The Huffington Post. "I was at a subway station in Times Square and I saw an ad on the platform that from far away looked like it had a moustache drawn on it. As I got closer, I realized some graffiti writer had just tagged his name on the actor's face. I figured if there was gonna be any text on someone's upper lip, it should just say 'moustache.'

"I went home and practiced on magazine ads, came back a few nights later with a Sharpie, and started drawing 'moustaches' on every ad I saw. I didn't stop until the NYPD arrested me in June 2011."

Waldo is confident that there's no way this can all be attributed to creative coincidence.

"There's no doubt in my mind that Zara stole my design," Waldo says. "It's not as if I came up with the idea and then kept it to myself. I put my moustache on thousands of posters all over New York City for well over a year. They got press before I was arrested."

Zara has faced similar allegations before. In 2010, a French blogger claimed the chain stole her photos and turned them into T-shirts. In 2007, another street artist says Zara ripped off his designs.

What's the next step? Waldo has tweeted his outrage at Zara's account, but he wants the chain to go further and compensate him: "I didn't go to jail to have some chain store steal my work."

See one of Waldo's designs and the Zara shirt below. We've reached out to Zara for comment and will update when we've heard back.

UPDATE: The shirt seems to have been pulled from Zara's website.

Waldo's work:

mustache zara

Zara's T-shirt:

mustache zara

zara

Disclosure: Patrick Waldo is a former employee of The Huffington Post.

See more fashion copycats:

Loading Slideshow...

  • Derek Lam vs. Ivanka Trump

    In 2011, designer Derek Lam gave a cease-and-desist letter to Ivanka Trump <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/22/derek-lam-ivanka-trump-shoes_n_1165514.html" target="_hplink">accusing Trump of plagiarizing a design from his footwear line</a>, the $780 Ayami sandal. Lam's attorneys gave Trump seven days to pull the shoe from her line. (Courtesy photos)

  • Gucci vs. Guess

    In May 2012, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/21/gucci-lawsuit-gucci-wins-_n_1534491.html#s824190&title=Gucci" target="_hplink">the showdown between Gucci and Guess over the interlocking 'G' logo</a> reached an end in Gucci's favor. Gucci was awarded $4.66 million dollars, a reflection of the profit Guess made from the unauthorized trademark. (Courtesy photos)

  • Pamela Love vs. Chanel

    This year Chanel featured cuffs in their A/W 2012 collection that looked almost exactly like crystal cuffs by Pamela Love from her fall 2011 collection. In a very classy move, Chanel decided to not produce the cuffs, telling Fashionista: "Out of respect for the concerns raised and for the artistic process generally the House has decided not to offer these bracelets for sale as part of the A/W 2012 collection." (Getty/Courtesy photos)

  • Alexander McQueen vs. Snooki

    In March 2012, MTV Style pointed out that one bag in the reality TV star's new collection of handbags was a McQueen knock-off. NOT classy Snooki... (Courtesy photos)

  • Christian Louboutin vs. YSL

    In 2011, the designer of the famous sexy, red-soled shoe Christian Louboutin <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/11/louboutin-red-soles-lawsuit_n_924110.html" target="_hplink">requested a U.S. judge to stop the sale of red-soled shoes designed by Yves Saint Laurent</a>. The judge denied the request saying, "Awarding one participant in the designer shoe market a monopoly on the color red would impermissibly hinder competition among other participants." (Courtesy photos)

  • Solange Azagury-Partridge vs. Target

    Target is set to release it's Kirna Zabete designer collaboration collection in September, but there was an accessory in Zabete's collection that looked similar to British designer Solange Azagury-Partridge's lip rings. Although there was no court case involving copyright claims, it is true that these two accessories look very similar to one another. (Courtesy photos)

  • Proenza Schouler vs. Target

    In 2011, Target sold the 'Mossimo Messenger' bag in their stores which Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/25/proenza-schouler-ps1-target_n_840717.html" target="_hplink">Proenza Schouler argued looked too similar to their PS1 bag</a> ($1,600 vs Target's $34.99). The designers were disappointed with Target, having previously partnered with the retailer, to which a spokesperson for Target responded: "It always has been and continues to be the policy of Target to respect the intellectual property rights of others." (Courtesy photos)

  • Madonna vs. Christian Louboutin

    Madonna is lucky to not have a court case slapped on her claiming that one of the shoes in her new 'Truth or Dare' collection is a knock-off of Louboutin's studded stunners. (Courtesy photos)

  • RJ Williams vs. Madonna

    This year, Madonna began her domination of the fashion world (ok, kind of) releasing the first product of her 'Truth or Dare' collection, the 'M' perfume. Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/08/madonna-truth-or-dare-logo_n_1500539.html" target="_hplink">an Australian artist claimed that the singer plagiarized his signature 'M'</a> and sent her a letter, requesting the singer to stop using the symbol. (Getty photo)

  • Shoe Showdown as Louboutin Takes YSL to Court

    Related Video

Want more? Be sure to check out HuffPost Style on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr and Pinterest.