iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shell's Chukchi Sea Drilling Halted For Safety Reasons

Shell Chukchi Sea Drilling

DAN JOLING   09/10/12 07:48 PM ET  AP

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Royal Dutch Shell on Monday was moving its drill ship off a prospect in the Chukchi Sea, a day after drilling began 70 miles off the Alaska coast because sea ice was moving toward the vessel.

Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith tells The Associated Press that drilling was stopped for safety reasons.

"As a precautionary measure and in accordance with our approved Chukchi Sea Ice Management Plan, Shell has made the decision to temporarily move off the Burger-A well to avoid potentially encroaching sea ice," he said by email. "Once the ice moves on, the Noble Discoverer will re-connect to anchors and continue drilling."

Shell officials on Sunday were monitoring ice measuring 30 miles long and 12 miles wide about 105 miles away from the drill ship, Smith said by phone.

"We're using satellite images, we're using radar images, we're also using onsite reconnaissance to watch this ice so there are no surprises," Smith said.

The ice varies in thickness, he said, but at its thickest is 25 meters, or about 82 feet. It was moving at 0.5 knots, or less than 1 mph.

The decision to halt drilling was made Sunday. At noon Monday, the drill ship was detaching from the last of eight massive anchors. Smith said he did not know how far away the ice was at that time.

The anchors will stay in place.

"Part of working in ice is having the ability to temporarily relocate," Smith said. "You never want to stop operations when your crews and your equipment are working smoothly but this is what it means to work safely in the Arctic."

Drilling may be delayed by two days or more, he said. The ice, he said, is dynamic. After it passes, changing winds could blow it back.

"We need as much margin once it moves by as we demand before we start drilling," he said.

Drilling had begun at 4:30 a.m. Sunday. Royal Dutch Shell PLC was given permission last month to begin preliminary work on an exploratory well. The company's oil spill response barge has not been certified but the company was authorized to drill pilot holes that do not descend into oil reservoirs.

Shell has spent upward of $4.5 billion for Arctic Ocean drilling but had been thwarted from drilling by environmental lawsuits, regulatory requirements and short open-water drilling seasons.

Shell Alaska vice president Pete Slaiby on Sunday called the beginning of drilling historic. He said it was the first time a drill bit had touched the sea floor in the U.S. Chukchi Sea in more than two decades.

Drilling is bitterly opposed by environmental groups that say oil companies have not demonstrated they can clean up a spill in ice-choked water. They say a spill of the magnitude of the Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico would be catastrophic in a region hammered by climate warming and home to endangered or threatened marine mammals such as bowhead whales, polar bear and walrus.

___

Online:

http://www.shell.us/alaska

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Niger Delta ExxonMobil Spill, Nigeria - May 2010

    In Nigeria's Akwa Ibom State, an ExxonMobil pipeline ruptured on May 1 and spilled over a million gallons of oil, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/30/oil-spills-nigeria-niger-delta-shell" target="_hplink">reported the <em>Guardian</em></a>. The leak continued for seven days before it was stopped. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omoyele-sowore/the-oil-spill-no-ones-tal_b_649220.html" target="_hplink">HuffPost blogger Omoyele Sowore explained</a> in July 2010 that an oil spill from ExxonMobil operations was nothing new to the country. He wrote that an "environmental catastrophe [had] been going on since December 2009." He described the toll on Nigeria: "There's oil on the surface of the ocean, wildlife coated in crude, fishermen losing their businesses."

  • Trans-Alaska Pipeline Spill - May 2010

    In May 2010, several thousand barrels of oil spilled from the Trans-Alaska pipeline "during a scheduled pipeline shutdown at a pump station near Fort Greely," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/26/alaska-oil-spill-trans-al_n_589974.html" target="_hplink">explained AP</a>. No injuries were reported and officials said the spill was likely "limited to the gravel on top of the containment area's line."

  • Red Butte Creek Spill, Utah - June 2010

    In June 2010, a Chevron pipeline ruptured and spilled oil into a creek near Salt Lake City, Utah. It was first estimated that over 400 to 500 barrels spilled into the creek, which leads into the Great Salt Lake, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/12/utah-oil-spill-500-gallon_n_610232.html#s99698" target="_hplink">reported AP</a>. Around 150 birds were "identified for rehabilitation." The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/14/utah-oil-spill-officials-_n_611014.html" target="_hplink">oil did not reach the Great Salt Lake</a>, however. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/14/chevron-cited-for-oil-spi_n_646340.html" target="_hplink">Chevron was later cited for the spill</a>, which released an estimated 33,000 gallons in total. In March 2012, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120324/us-oil-spill-utah/" target="_hplink">a group of 66 residents of a Salt Lake City neighborhood sued Chevron</a> for damage caused by the Red Butte Creek spill and a smaller spill in December 2011.

  • Kalamazoo River Spill, Michigan - July 2010

    In late July 2010, an Enbridge pipeline in southwestern Michigan sprung a leak and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/27/michigan-oil-spill-among_n_661196.html" target="_hplink">spilled over 800,000 gallons of oil into a creek</a> which flows into the Kalamazoo River. By August, a regional EPA administrator said that significant progress had been made at the site, but "the agency cautioned that it will take months to complete the cleanup," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/02/michigan-oil-spill-epa-of_n_667556.html" target="_hplink">reported AP</a>. By the end of September, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/27/michigan-oil-pipeline-res_n_741233.html" target="_hplink">the pipeline -- which travels from Ontario to Indiana -- was back in operation</a>. The EPA later <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20111116/us-michigan-river-oil-spill/" target="_hplink">reported that about 1.1 million gallons of oil were recovered</a>, but pipeline operator Enbridge said that it would stick with previous estimates that only about 843,000 gallons were spilled.

  • Xingag Harbor Spill, Dailan, China - July 2010

    In July 2010, China experienced what was reported as the "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/21/china-oil-spill-grows-off_n_653852.html#s120708" target="_hplink">country's largest reported oil spill</a>" after a pipeline rupture near the northeastern port city of Dailan. Several days after the spill, cleanup efforts were underway over a 165 square mile (430 square kilometer) area of the Yellow Sea. The Chinese government reported that about 1,500 tons or 461,790 gallons of oil had spilled, but <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/30/china-oil-spill-far-bigge_n_665038.html#s120708" target="_hplink">experts contended that the spill could have been "dozens of times larger,"</a> reported AP.

  • Peace River Spill, Alberta, Canada - April 2011

    In late April 2011, a pipeline in northwestern Alberta began leaking, and created the worst spill in the province in 36 years, <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Rainbow+pipeline+leak+largest+years/4720888/story.html" target="_hplink">reported the <em>Calgary Herald</em></a>. About 28,000 barrels of oil were reportedly spilled from the Rainbow pipeline, which is operated by Plains Midstream Canada. The <em>Globe and Mail</em> revealed that the pipeline operators "<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/oil-on-rainbow-line-halted-8-hours-after-problem-detected/article2013335/" target="_hplink">detected a potential problem nearly eight hours before halting the flow of crude</a>." A nearby school in a First Nation community was closed after residents reported "nausea, burning eyes and other symptoms," and several animals were found dead. In late July, Plains Midstream <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/07/28/alberta-pipeline-owner-as_n_912796.html" target="_hplink">requested to re-open the pipeline</a> and begin to ship oil to Edmonton again.

  • Bohai Bay Spill, China - June 2011

    In June 2011, an oil <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/01/china-offshore-oil-spills-bohai-bay_n_888473.html" target="_hplink">spill occurred about 25 miles off the coast of China's Shandong province</a> in Bohai Bay. A second spill followed in July. In late August, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/26/new-seeps-in-china-spill_n_937809.html" target="_hplink">it was reported</a> that ConocoPhillips had discovered more oil seeps in Bohai Bay, although only "1 to 2 liters (a quarter to a half-gallon) of oil and drilling mud were being released each day." The company reported that the 2011 spills released 700 barrels of oil and 2,500 barrels of drilling mud into the bay and that most of it was recovered. In September, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/05/china-oil-spill-conocophillips_n_949745.html" target="_hplink">China's State Oceanic Administration claimed that oil was still seeping</a> underwater. In early 2012, Texas-based ConocoPhillips <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120124/as-china-oil-spill/" target="_hplink">reached a settlement deal with the Chinese government</a> for $160 million.

  • Yellowstone River Spill, Montana - July 2011

    In July 2011, a pipeline beneath Montana's Yellowstone River ruptured and sent an oil plume 25 miles downstream, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/02/yellowstone-oil-spill-pro_n_889363.html" target="_hplink">reported AP</a>. Despite reassurances from ExxonMobil that the pipeline was safe, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/yellowstone-river-oil-spill-exxon-mobil_n_891246.html" target="_hplink">the July spill released what was originally estimated to be 42,000 gallons of oil</a>. With other 1,000 workers assisting the cleanup, ExxonMobil <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/04/yellowstone-river-cleanup-costs_n_1077106.html" target="_hplink">estimated that it would cost $135 million to clean the river</a>. In January 2012, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/19/exxon-yellowstone-oil-spill_n_1216830.html" target="_hplink">it was reported</a> that ExxonMobil had increased its estimate of the spill size by 500 barrels. AP later <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/yellowstone-river-spill-response-plan_n_1408328.html" target="_hplink">reported the estimated spill size as 63,000 gallons</a>. <em><strong>CORRECTION:</strong> A previous version of this slide stated the estimated spill size as 63,000 barrels instead of gallons.</em>

  • North Sea Spill, United Kingdom - Aug. 2011

    In August 2011, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/15/north-sea-spill-uk-oil-spill_n_927078.html" target="_hplink">an oil rig off the eastern coast of Scotland began leaking</a> oil into the North Sea. Royal Dutch Shell, which operates the Gannet Alpha oil rig, initially reported that 54,600 gallons of oil were spilled. A second leak soon occurred, turning the spill into the worst in the North Sea in a decade, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/16/north-sea-oil-spill-shell_n_927941.html" target="_hplink">reported AP</a>. Several days later, Shell announced that it had "closed a valve from which oil was spilling into the North Sea," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/19/shell-says-it-has-closed-_n_931379.html" target="_hplink">according to AP</a>. The spill released about 1,300 barrels of oil, which spread out over a 2.5 square mile (6.7 square kilometer) area.

  • Campos Basin Spill, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Nov. 2011

    In mid-November 2011, Brazilian authorities began investigating an offshore spill near Rio de Janeiro, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/17/chevron-oil-spill-brazil_n_1100062.html" target="_hplink">reported AP</a>. Chevron initially reported that between 400 and 650 barrels of oil had spilled into the Atlantic, while a nonprofit environmental group using satellite imagery estimated that the spill rate was at least 3,738 barrels per day. Chevron soon claimed full responsibility for the spill. The brazilian division's COO said, Chevron "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/20/brazil-oil-spill-chevron-_n_1104070.html" target="_hplink">takes full responsibility for this incident</a>," and that "any oil on the surface of the ocean is unacceptable to Chevron," reported AP. In December, Brazilian prosecutors announced that they were <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/14/brazil-oil-spill-chevron-payment_n_1149554.html"target="_hplink">seeking $10.6 billion in damages</a> from Chevron for the spill that leaked nearly 3,000 barrels of oil. In March 2012, a Brazilian federal judge <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/18/brazil-oil-spill-chevron_n_1355923.html" target="_hplink">allowed prosecutors to file criminal charges against Chevron and Transocean</a> and 17 executives from both companies were barred from leaving Brazil.

  • Rena Spill, New Zealand - Oct. 2011

    In October 2011, a Liberian-flagged cargo ship ran aground on a reef in Northern New Zealand and began leaking oil. With oil washing up on shore, a government minister deemed it <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/11/new-zealand-oil-spill_n_1004643.html" target="_hplink">the country's largest maritime environmental disaster</a> a week later. Although over 2,000 sea birds were killed by the spill that spilled about 400 tons of fuel oil, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/22/new-zealand-oil-spill-penguins_n_1107289.html" target="_hplink">343 little blue penguins were rescued and cleaned of oil</a>. <em>[<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/22/new-zealand-oil-spill-penguins-released_n_1151788.html" target="_hplink">Watch video of the penguins' release into the wild here.</a>]</em> In January, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/10/new-zealand-oil-spill-ship_n_1196568.html" target="_hplink">half of the stricken Rena began sinking</a> into the sea after breaking apart and spilling over 100 cargo containers.

  • Nigeria Oil Spill - Dec. 2011

    The spill, which took place near the coast of Nigeria, was reported as "likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/22/shell-oil-spill-nigeria_n_1164891.html" target="_hplink">according to AP</a>. After two days, the spill had affected 115 miles (185 kilometers) of Nigerian coastline. Several days after the December 20 spill, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/26/shell-nigeria-oil-spill_n_1170198.html" target="_hplink">Shell reported that the leak -- which occurred about 75 miles offshore -- had been contained before it reached the Nigerian coast</a>. The spill, which covered 350 square miles of ocean at its peak, was reported as having released less than "40,000 barrels -- or 1.68 million gallons" of oil.

  • Also On The Huffington Post...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ANCHORAGE, Alaska &mdash; Royal Dutch Shell on Monday was moving its drill ship off a prospect in the Chukchi Sea, a day after drilling began 70 miles off the Alaska coast because sea ice was moving t...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska &mdash; Royal Dutch Shell on Monday was moving its drill ship off a prospect in the Chukchi Sea, a day after drilling began 70 miles off the Alaska coast because sea ice was moving t...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 251
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
06:56 PM on 09/16/2012
What a foolish article - Shell is being ostracized for doing the right thing? Aren't they supposed to do the right thing? I'm starting to think that Lib's WANT something bad to happen - it makes for good press...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suddenfun
Subvert the dominant paradigm
01:27 PM on 09/12/2012
We are powerless to stop the rapacious negligence of these companies from destroying the planet. We must get the money out of politics to have any hope of ever doing right by the common man and this planet. The spills since the gulf disaster are as much proof as anyone should need that this industry cannot be trusted to protect the environment. The greed and aggression of the powerful are destroying the commons that are the property of us all. They should have no right impose the actually cost of their destruction on the rest of us.
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
12:25 AM on 09/12/2012
"When we destroy something created by Man, we call it Vandalism.
But when we destroy something created by Nature, we call it Progress". -Ed Begley Jr.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 09/19/2012
Save Mars! (we'll mine it later)
06:30 PM on 09/11/2012
What ice? Isn't it supposed to be melted?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:02 PM on 09/11/2012
hey watch out pointing that out, I had my head almost taken off by a few on HP for pointing that out.
these greenies are like Egyptian muslim's when it comes to saying something negative about their religion. Tread carefully
06:02 PM on 09/11/2012
If you oppose drilling keep pressure up. I believe the only reason shell stopped drilling on day 2 was because of the public relations nightmare it would have caused if anythings happens.

Again, i think we should invest the oil subsidies in clean energy technology, create american jobs and create an advantage for american companies. Big oil has run this country for long enough in my opinion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 PM on 09/11/2012
but don't protest the Russian drilling programs. We know they have such high safety standards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas Dunlap
04:52 PM on 09/12/2012
LHTexan - Itake it that you haven't seen this story: http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/story/2012-08-24/greenpeace-russian-oil-rig-arctic/57266760/1
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
06:59 PM on 09/16/2012
Um, of course they stopped drilling on day 2 because of the publlic relations nightmare if something did happen. Obviously, as the article states,k the ice is slow moving and several days away, plus it may not even hit the area they are in. So, they have a choice: Look at the science, do the math and decide if drilling can continue, or play it safe, pull off, even if the chances are slim that the pack ice will strike, and wait until it has passed. Would you rather they took a risk?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
05:38 PM on 09/11/2012
Drilling anywhere around moving ice is a recipe for disaster. I can't imagine the long term residents of Alaska are in favor of Shell drilling in their backyard.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
07:01 PM on 09/16/2012
Um, who do you think does most of the drilling? The largest industry in Alaska is drilling - what did you think, EVERYONE works at the Captain Cook bringing tourists drinks before they get on the tour bus?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Beth Amend Crafts
04:08 PM on 09/11/2012
Perhaps Mother Nature is voicing her opinion on Arctic drilling!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niweldit6
04:19 PM on 09/11/2012
Mother Nature has no opinion. She does this regularly each year.
04:24 PM on 09/11/2012
Wonderful that she could do it to Big Oil though!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
02:24 PM on 09/11/2012
What gets me is the way the spokesperson blithely says they'll come back "after the ice moves on" and continue with what they are doing. Having worked out of Barrow, I know the magnitude of ice that "moves on" - or sticks around. As the Chukchi is only navigable maybe 4 months/year, I'm thinking Shell is going to be doing a whole lot of moving its ship around....
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
12:27 AM on 09/12/2012
perhaps then i shall indulge in a bit of hope for a change.

they have no business being there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
03:16 PM on 09/12/2012
Totally agree.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
07:02 PM on 09/16/2012
They planned for it. They knew that they had a short season. These are exploration wells - if they find anything, it will be 10 years before they can come up with an infill plan.
01:11 PM on 09/11/2012
When there's an accident in offshore drilling there's always a chain of mistakes that lead to it. But, in the end, whether it's a large accident like the BP one in the gulf or a small one like most, depends on the blowout preventer working. Amazingly, the BP disaster in 2010 was caused by exactly the same problem as the blowout in the 1979 Ixtoc spill, Bay of Campeche, Mexico. A piece of drill pipe was left in the shaft and the shear ram that is supposed to crush the well shut does not have enough force to crush the drill pipe as well as the well shaft.

How can we not learn from these mistakes?

Additionally, all the same containment tactics were employed in Campeche as in the BP disaster, and all failed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Grimley
03:09 PM on 09/11/2012
Live and learn.... oil companies are worse at this than non-corporate person.
01:09 PM on 09/11/2012
Did you hear about the journalists who got jailed reporting on the oil damage in the Gulf?

It's not headline news, apparently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Grimley
03:09 PM on 09/11/2012
National security was at stake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EC001
03:53 PM on 09/11/2012
I hope your response was sarcasm; otherwise
god help us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:04 PM on 09/11/2012
you heard wrong.
01:09 PM on 09/11/2012
So everybody knows that an Oil company will eventually explain why the oil gusher in the Arctic was reasonable and couldn't happen again. And they will explain how nobody could have predicted that not being able to deal with it in the Gulf, means that in the Arctic circle -- it's just that much harder. They can't even make a profit off of using prison labor because the tax credit is less than the cost for moving them up there. So we all know they'll just make sure the media is paid so they don't film the black ice.
01:08 PM on 09/11/2012
This is definitely an "Emperor has no clothes moment."

The question isn't; "Can humankind drill in the arctic without damage or make citizens prosperous and healthy without ravaging other people to do it" -- the question is; "Can a corporation, which is going to constantly cut corners and bribe regulators to look the other way, manage to not destroy the arctic if it doesn't cost one more dollar than bribing judges to look the other way when it does."

We know from all the experts that Nuclear power is cost effective and safe; but we know from reality that all those nifty technologies can't supersede profit margins and that whatever can be skirted will be skirted. Fukishima became a disaster and the full extent isn't known because the nuclear plasma melted down to the bedrock to become a future generations problem. But I'm also sure that everyone was told how awesome the protections were when they were pitching that project. No corporation invests their own money in Nuclear power -- it's just that darn safe and cost effective, right?

So we KNOW that nothing bad will happen, but everyone knows that it will, and so the media and the experts pretend not to know, what everyone actually knows, you know?
01:03 PM on 09/11/2012
I've really nothing to say. I just wanted to release some grief with others for the ignorance and indifference shown by some humans that will be paid for by other brothers and sisters, like fishermen, shoredwellers, fish, whales, bears, and a whole host of our common family. I know Obama approved this. I don't know why. I don't believe the reasons he gave, which were the old tired, usual ones. Sea ice today; maybe an earthquake tomorrow. One can dream even if one cannot physically do something about it.
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
12:29 AM on 09/12/2012
i hear ya.
f/f
photo
TCPITS
One big global union of all the workers
12:46 PM on 09/11/2012
"The reason I'm in this race is to help people," Romney said. "I'm not in this race to slow the rise of the oceans or to heal the planet. I'm in this race to help the American people."
photo
TCPITS
One big global union of all the workers
07:28 PM on 09/11/2012
Thanks. I'll share :-) Fan #2
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
12:29 AM on 09/12/2012
perfect!
01:46 PM on 09/11/2012
until he can figure out a way to profit from it.
12:36 PM on 09/11/2012
Just remember what that Deepwater Horizon survivor stated on CNN about BP,
"You could call time out for safety,they wouldn't fire you for it but they would find another way to fire you for it"
-Daniel Baron Deepwater Horizon survivor
He stated this in front of 4 other survivors and they all agreed with his statement.
How true it is, i know i'm an unemployed Whistleblower for steping forward and doing the right thing.
Gregg
PROUD NAVY DAD