Water-Powered Cars, Safe Cigarettes and More Inventions You'll Never See (PHOTOS)
EDITOR'S NOTE: Our friends at TruTV have shared with us these amazing inventions that we'll likely never be able to use.
We think these 18 innovative creations are some of the most suppressed of all time. Find out why:
Â
More from truTV.com
Find Out Why Google Won’t Show You These 24 Places
What Caused These 15 Porn Star Deaths?
Discover Why We Think the Government is Researching Time Travel
Filed by Simon McCormack
|
Report Corrections
- Comments
- 244
- Pending Comments
- 0
- View FAQ
View All
Favorites
05:08 PM on 09/18/2012
What a great list of Urban Myths! None true yet we all want to believe. Battery technology that is ancient, and toxic but still being attempted. I have a 110 year chart on battery chemical reactions and is still current in science. Toxic CFL bulbs with more problems than they solve. 100 MPG cars. I built a dune buggy in 1973 with just a roll bar. After removing the body it weighed less than 800 lbs. It originally got 39 MPG on the 40 HP engine. It got over 80 MPG with the weight gone and a 5 gallon tank. Weight reduction is the only significant MPG improve in vehicles since 1940. What about Ponce de Leon's fountain youth. Keep on believing, it keeps P.T.Barnum from rolling in his grave.
06:49 PM on 09/18/2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_LupoIt's more like 78 mpg. The point you are missing is the absence of the Lupo in the U.S. market.
07:22 PM on 09/18/2012
The absence of the Lupo, the $6K Indian Car and the super cheap Korean car is not the auto industry. It is our wonderful over-regulated government oversite on EPA/Safety/nutcake regulations, etc. Look at the Smart Car at $20,000 a pop. That was to pay for all the safety requirements etc. It should sell for $12K max. That added weight etc. and makes this vehicle less efficient also. I tried to build my own car in Caliphony and you cannot do it without regulations and inspections costing it hundreds of thousands to make, with registration at $5,000.00 plus a year. Why would Caliphony want a car that would reduce their sales tax revenue and their high priced registration fees. I pay $194.00 a year registration on a 1997 pickup truck. Get it?
11:54 AM on 09/19/2012
Your link doesn't mention that that 78 mpg was achieved on the Euro test not the EPA test. The Euro test always produces numbers FAR higher than our own EPA. The Jetta Diesel 2.0 liter 140 hp version is on sale in both Europe and the US and is made at the same factory in Mexico. It's rated at 42 mpg hwy in the US and 57.4 on the Euro cycle.The EPA revamped the way they did their tests a few years ago because of all the complaints about how no one could ever meet the posted numbers. They got it about right.
07:23 PM on 09/18/2012
a lot of that is true...They just finished proving THC suppresses cancer cells.
A bunch of kids built a car for a collage project that got like almost 200 MPG (though it only weighed like 500 bls lol)
hemp makes the best paper and bio fuel source... it grows fast and don't deplete the nutrients in the soil no where near as much as other crops like corn.
They did have electric and hybrid cars way before they were released, and the same with light bulbs. There mass production was stalled intentionally. And better technologies are still being stalled.
And we do have hot fusion, it's just right now the way we do it the energy we get out of it compared to the energy we put in.... it's just not worth it. The Tokamak and other torus reactors work, they just don't make much net energy and until they find a way to reduce the amount of energy it takes to run one... or find a better way to harness the energy it creates, there is no point in building them.
12:07 PM on 09/19/2012
Part of the problem is all of the regulations that an actual car manufacturer has to meet. Your 500 lb car would never pass either the crash tests or emission tests = illegal to sell to the general public. And those standards are constantly evolving.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
11:05 AM on 09/18/2012
The 1st electric car in the 1990's ? more like the 1890's who writes this drivel?
11:08 AM on 09/18/2012
lolol........real men don't drive 'electric cars'.
12:19 AM on 09/18/2012
this H2O powered car sounds almost like a miraculous GREAT invention....too BAD that it will be ruled a "no-go" by the oil companies since it "interferes" with "them" making extra-money.......Chin-marin....
09:38 PM on 09/17/2012
Silly humans. You are naive if you think the powers that be will let someone stop them from making hundreds of billions a year. Silly silly humans.
07:48 PM on 09/17/2012
SO the government basically BULLIES anyone not on their PAYROLL...
03:45 AM on 09/18/2012
Always! Just ask Gibson Guitars and Gallup.But, we need more of it, from what I seem to hear on the HP. Gov'ts just not big enough, controlling enough, regulating enough, Yet.
12:24 PM on 09/17/2012
I have heard rumors about a 100 mpg carburator since the Seventies. And that GM bought the patents and shelved it. So,no, not suprised. As far as the pot being used externally, heck, we have used it for centuries. My best freinds mom was a brujah back in NM. She put some mixed in a poultice on an infected cut on my arm, it was gone in 24 hours. Its not owned by Big Pharm and it is not addictive, unlike Big Pharm's products, so Big Pharm will do anything to keep it criminalized. And I do mean anything.
03:21 PM on 09/17/2012
As a materials scientist who has worked in this are for 30 years, I can tell you that there never was a 100mpg carburetor, unless it was on a modest motorcyle. The laws of physics can't be cheated. There's only so much energy in a gallon of gasoline, and the only way to get a vehicle to go significantly farther on it is to reduce the weight of the vehicle. Fuel injectors help, manual transmission helps, aerodynamics help, hybrid helps, but none of those things make a large difference. And of course as weight goes down, so does safety, comfort, power, and carrying capacity until you basically have a motorcycle with a sheet metal or plastic box around it.
People go on about how many mpg their Prius gets, but for overall driving (city and highway) mpg a hybrid is comparable to a compact conventional car like a Sentra with a small (1.5 L) engine. For less than 5mpg more than a conventional subcompact both the buyer and the environment pay a substantial price.
05:41 PM on 09/17/2012
The Lupo is a REAL CAR. I've seen one, and it's not the dinky little motorcycle with tin sides that you might describe.Or, let me guess here, you never actually read the article?
It happens that the energy you get from a fuel used in an internal combustion engine has a non linear relationship to compression ratio where the energy derived goes toward an exponential, nearly vertical line as compression ratio is increased. This is why diesel engines are so effective - with the right design you can get a LOT of energy out of them.
Normal, every day vehicles get 50 mpg out of fuel in Europe all the time. It's only here in the USA where there's a "that's impossible!" viewpoint.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
12:17 PM on 09/17/2012
I don't view them all as conspiracy "theories." I remember the EV-1. They said there was no "consumer interst" even though thousands of people were willing to pay up to 10 times the purported list price for one. But it was nothing doing for some strange reason...but it wasn't lack of consumer interest.
01:07 PM on 09/17/2012
Actually if you watch the movie(Who killed the electric car), people offered to continuing leasing the EV1s at the same price which was heavily subsidized by GM. Nissan has sold 4,228 Leafs so far this year. That is a terribly low sales rate and one at which Nissan is losing money. EVs are niche products with today's battery technology. It is simply too expensive or too limiting for the vast majority of buyers. Solve the battery problem and people will line up to buy EVs.
03:27 PM on 09/17/2012
Exactly right, and the battery problem will never be solved, at least not using the metal / electrolyte model. There hasn't been a big breakthrough in battery technology since Nazi Germany developed the sintered plate nickel cadmium battery.
12:05 PM on 09/17/2012
Auto-making, pharmaceudicals, and electricity supply are al billion dollar industries. The major companies involved would and could never allow these type of products in to the marketplace. As a matter of fact, it would hurt our ecnomy if they did become available. Too many jobs and financial infrastructure depend on these industries as they are.
Too bad for us consumers.
12:38 PM on 09/18/2012
The flip side is NOT making available these types of products will deplete every last natural resource on the planet and kill numerous species and ecosystems along the way (this is already happening). We can't exist on this planet without those things - so what's the point?New jobs researching, creating, building, and maintaining these technologies would replace those lost allowing the old, inefficient, dirty, and dangerous technologies to die out.
Perhaps you've simply lost faith in human innovation and evolution - especially in the face of the fear-mongering, controlling PTB? Couldn't really blame you if you have.
11:57 AM on 09/17/2012
No, but with the Volkswagen XL-1 in in hot climate testing currently and having all ready passed cold climate testing earlier, we will see the first limited production models in the states in the next couple of years. How many MPGs? Somewhere between 200 MPG and 236 MPG if it continues on track. A Diesel hybrid, who would have thought......
01:10 PM on 09/17/2012
Not exactly a mainstream product though is it. It also remains to be seen if it can pass today's safety standards.There's a reason you don't see a lot of diesel hybrids on the road. Hybrids add several thousand dollars to the cost of a car and diesels also add several thousand dollars to the price. Combine that and you end up with a vehicle that costs roughly $10,000 more than a comparable ICE vehicle.
05:16 PM on 09/17/2012
No more "un-mainstream" than any other hybrid. Just powered by a diesel engine instead of a gasoline. Yes, it does add extra cost. However, Volkswagen has pretty well perfected small diesel tech when it comes to road vehicles. The other benefit is that diesel engines are more robust, better at fuel efficiency and generate more torque. Currently in America, you see NO diesel hybrids on the road...that is the point to the development of this car.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
05:45 PM on 09/17/2012
News to you: Diesel engines _are_ ICE - Internal Combustion Engine. Just because the combustion is initiated through autoignition doesn't mean it's not combusted.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
02:45 PM on 09/17/2012
Diesel hybrids... State of the art technology...Oh wait, dont trains have diesel hybrid technology? YES!
03:37 PM on 09/17/2012
Trains are ideally suited for hybrid technology because they require a tremendous amount of torque to get their heavy loads moving from a standstill. Electric motors have the same torque at low speed as at high, whereas gasoline engines don't have their best torque at higher RPMs and thus require a transmission to keep the engine in the best rpm zone for torque across the entire speed range of the vehicle.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
09:10 AM on 09/17/2012
Human innovation suppressed through crony capitalism and its all relegated to a weird news section sponsored by True TV? That's sad. Apple anyone?
08:33 AM on 09/17/2012
It makes perfect sense that THC has the same benefit as it has detriment: it kills brain tumors while it kills living brain cells.
06:48 PM on 09/17/2012
Ah, but it does kill brain cells and even more so than ethel alcohol beverages do. I'm thinking that you are a lay person who has more of a personal rather than scientific interest in what you say. Unless you hold Ph.D. and/or M.D. degree you're not qualified to even comment with any degree of credibility regarding the above. If you were qualified you wouldn't be commenting on this message board.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
07:33 AM on 09/17/2012
I wasn't expecting a conspiracy theorist's countdown list.
07:19 AM on 09/17/2012
yes the greatness of capitalism,isn't a marvel,buy what makes you lose money and bury it.so much for innovation of the 'free' market.this is WHY we patents need to be 2 years,period.we kill innovation off with this kind of crap.
03:39 PM on 09/17/2012
If you reduce patents to two years, no one will spend the large sums of money required to invent new things. Alternately, if possible, they'll go back to trade secret practices and the result will be the same.
07:18 AM on 09/17/2012
My take on fuel economy is to have cars that can auto-charge. A socket in a garage and on parking lot which charges the car parked on it. It should also have a fuel tank as back up. This should be offered as after-sale service and companies or offices that are conscious of global warming.Eventually cars might charge wireless.
Push the folds of science!
09:20 AM on 09/17/2012
"Conscious of global warming"? LOL Perhaps you fail to realize 50% of our energy stations produce electricity by burning coal. An industry Obama has said he is going to bankrupt. Then Obama pushes the electric car. HAHA In addition, the US grid would NEVER be able to handle the load. Of course ANYTHING is possible....but at what cost?
11:04 AM on 09/17/2012
The US grid would be fine. 95% of all charging of electric vehicles will be at home overnight during the least busy time of day when the grid is barely taxed. Obama might be bankrupting coal but being in the industry, I assure you, these coal plants are slowly converting to natural gas. On top of it, an electric motor is nearly 90% efficient compared to the 20% efficiency of internal combustion engines which means it requires far less energy in (read: electricity from coal plants) to push the same energy out as a vehicle using gas.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
11:33 AM on 09/17/2012
I understand both argument and urge diversification. Let me also agree with you that the world has a KNOWN energy reserve that can sustain it for 400 years so we wont run out of oil in our lifetime.I was thinking about the price. Would it be nice to live in a day when you don't have to stop at a gas station and your gas bill is 50% less? When we don't argue about rising oil prices? Its possible. Even electric production can be diversified and more sources explored.
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
















First Posted: 08/29/2012 11:57 am Updated: 09/16/2012 9:58 am