By: Peter B. de Selding, Space News
Published: 10/08/2012 02:22 PM EDT on SPACE.com

NAPLES, Italy — The European Space Agency (ESA) faces the uncomfortable choice of either actively removing its dead Envisat satellite from low Earth orbit or risk being held liable if Envisat damages another satellite, a member of the International Institute of Space Law (IISL) said.

Because it elected to continue operating Envisat until it had too little fuel to be powered to a lower orbit, as international guidelines prescribe, ESA could be held liable for negligence, or even gross negligence, if Envisat or pieces of it damage an active satellite in the 100-plus years Envisat will remain in orbit, according to the IISL analysis.

In a presentation in Naples, Italy, to the 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Martha Mejia-Kaiser, an IISL member from the Autonomous National University of Mexico, said Envisat is a “ticking bomb” that poses an unusually large danger to a heavily populated corridor in polar orbit at 780 kilometers in altitude.

Launched in 2002, Envisat has a 26-meter cross section, weighs some 8,000 kilograms and, importantly, was not passivated before it suddenly went silent in April. [Photos: Envisat Satellite & Earth Views]

Propellant remnants, still-charged batteries, residual gases and other stored energy only add to the danger posed by the satellite.

Mejia-Kaiser said it would have taken just 60 kilograms of fuel to lower Envisat’s orbit by 30 kilometers, to 750 kilometers. From this orbit, natural forces likely would have forced the satellite into the atmosphere within 25 years — as international guidelines urge operators of low-orbiting satellites to do.

Instead, ESA continued operating Envisat as an active and highly valued environmental-monitoring satellite until its unexpected shutdown.

“Why did ESA prioritize the operating of Envisat until the last drop of fuel rather than the stability of this precious area in outer space, and the welfare of this valuable orbit?” Mejia-Kaiser said in her presentation. She added that while Envisat was launched before orbital-disposal guidelines were published, the decision to continue operating it was made well after ESA signed a code of conduct that adopts these guidelines.

“ESA’s choice of futures is reduced to the expensive options: to actively remove Envisat or to become liable and pay compensation in case of future collisions,” she said.

ESA and other space agencies are studying future debris-removal technologies that today are viewed as overly risky and expensive. Space law experts disagree over whether the agency could be sued for negligence, an action that would be without precedent.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

GALLERY: SPACE FAILS
Loading Slideshow...
  • Liberty Bell 7 Sinks

    After the second manned space mission in 1961, the Liberty Bell 7 capsule was afloat in the Atlantic ocean, awaiting recovery. Astronaut Gus Grissom reported that he heard a dull thud as the hatch blew open--the module began filling with water, and Grissom had to struggle to escape before it sank. Did Grissom "screw the pooch," as Tom Wolfe famously wrote in <i>The Right Stuff</i>? Or was there a mechanical malfunction? The world may never know.

  • Phobos-Grunt Disintegrates

    Phobos-Grunt was a 2011 Russian mission to return a sample of soil from Mars' moon Phobos. It would have been the first such sample ever returned to earth. Because of a malfunction in the craft's propulsion system, however, Phobos-Grunt never made it out of low-earth orbit. It remained there, crippled, until early 2012, when its orbit decayed and it disintegrated in the atmosphere off the coast of Chile.

  • Mars Climate Orbiter Burns Up

    This 1998 orbiter mission was supposed to study Mars' climate history and determine if the planet ever held life-sustaining water. But the $125 million craft never made it to Mars, burning up in the atmosphere on the day it was supposed to enter orbit. What caused the costly incident? One team of engineers had performed their calculations in metric units, while another used English units.

  • Soyuz 5 Lands Hard

    After participating in the first in-flight transfer of cosmonauts from one spacecraft to another, pilot Boris Volynov (pictured), led Soyuz 5 back toward Earth. When the service module failed to detach, the craft plummeted toward earth upside-down, subjecting Volynov to extreme heat. The craft subsequently crashed hundreds of miles off course in the Ural mountains, breaking several of Volynov's teeth in the impact and leaving him to awaiting rescue in -38 degree (F) temperatures. He walked "a few kilometers" to a village and took shelter until help arrived. (<a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/01/dayintech_0116">Source</a>)

  • Hubble Telescope Can't See

    Although NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has produced incredible images of space for more than 20 years, it was nearly a failure of galactic proportions. After its launch in 1990, Hubble produced only blurry, grainy pictures due to a faulty mirror. Luckily, it was fixed three years later, and went on to capture some of the most incredible space images ever seen.

  • Kwangmyŏngsŏng Program Flounders

    North Korea has attempted to launch its Kwangmyŏngsŏng satellites four times, and met with four failures. North Korean Umha-2 rockets, pictured, were used on the second and third launches but could not bring their satellite payloads into orbit. Fortunately, all the missions were unmanned.

  • H-IIA Rocket Self-Destructs

    H-IIA is the launch system of the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). Its sixth launch was supposed to deliver a spy satellite into orbit, but a rocket booster failed to detach properly from the H-IIA, making the rocket too heavy to enter orbit. Ground control sent a destruct command to the rocket shortly after.

  • Glory Sputters Out

    Climate science was dealt a blow in March 2011, when NASA's Glory satellite--which was supposed to study humans' effect on the Earth's atmosphere--failed to launch. The Taurus XL rocket carrying the observation satellite crashed into the Pacific after liftoff when Glory's protective casing didn't open.

  • Cluster Breaks Up

    Cluster, a group of spacecraft launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in 1995, were lost when launch vehicle Ariane 5 failed to reach orbit. The launch vehicle, on its maiden voyage, self-destructed after a software error caused it to veer off-course. What was the problem? A glitch similar to the issue that doomsayers said would bring disaster at 11:59:59, December 31, 1999. This time, however, the threat was real.

  • Apollo 13 'Fails Successfully'

    NASA's most famous black eye came on April 14, 1970, when an oxygen tank on Apollo 13's service module exploded and the crew narrowly managed to abort the mission safely. The damaged service module that began the drama is pictured here, courtesy of <a href="http://www.alanbeangallery.com/">Alan Bean</a>, Apollo astronaut and "first artist on another world."

  • Naro-1 Sputters

    Naro-1 was a carrier rocket created for South Korea's Korean Aerospace Research Institute. Both attempts to launch Naro-1 ended in failure, with one disintegrating in the atmosphere and another exploding before making it to space.