Are you a fan of your neighborhood? The answer could say a lot about your health, according to a new report.

Gallup researchers found that people who like their community, or who think that their community is improving, report better physical health than people who don't like their community or think that their community is deteriorating in terms of livability.

"These findings provide support for the ecological model of health, which suggests that one's living conditions, community safety, community development, and civic engagement, among other factors, affect community members' health outcomes," the researchers wrote in the report. "The relationship between community-level perspectives and physical health may have significant implications for urban planning and community improvement efforts, particularly in light of the increase in cardiovascular disease and obesity over the past decade."

The findings are based on telephone surveys of 353,492 people ages 18 and older throughout the United States, who were surveyed between Jan. 2 and Dec. 29 last year.

Overall, people who said that they were satisfied with their area of residence scored a 78 on the physical health index, compared with 69.1 by people who said they were dissatisfied with their area of residence. And people who said that their area of residence was getting better scored a 79.5 overall on the index, compared with people who said their area of residence was getting worse, who scored a 70.9 overall.

On a more granular level, fewer people who said they were satisfied with their cities reported specific health-related issues than those who said they are dissatisfied -- even when taking into account influential factors like income, education and ethnicity, researchers found.

Among some of the findings:

- Twenty-two percent of satisfied people reported having physical pain the day before, compared with 34 percent of dissatisfied people.

- Twenty percent of satisfied people said they had health problems, compared with 29 percent of dissatisfied people.

- Seventy-three percent of satisfied people said that they are well-rested, compared with 57 percent of dissatisfied people.

- Eighty-seven percent of satisfied people said that they had enough energy the day before, compared with 76 percent of dissatisfied people.

- Twenty-six percent of satisfied people reported high cholesterol, compared with 25 percent of dissatisfied people.

- Twenty-six percent of satisfied people were obese, compared with 29 percent of dissatisfied people.

And researchers found a link between physical health and feeling safe to exercise or feeling safe being alone at night in the area where you live.

Recently, a study in the journal Diabetes Care showed a link between the walkability of a neighborhood and a person's risk of developing diabetes.

The researchers from St. Michael's Hospital and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences found that people who live in not-so-walkable neighborhoods have about a 50 percent increased risk of diabetes compared with people who live in walkable neighborhoods.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Best State To Live In #10: Maryland

    This state scored an average rank of 18.5 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Best State To Live In #9: South Dakota

    This state scored an average rank of 18.1 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Best State To Live In #8: Hawaii

    This state scored an average rank of 17.5 in the 13 future livability metrics. Hawaii was the best performing state in the standard of living metric, where residents reported the standard of living as improving.

  • Best State To Live In #7: Iowa

    This state scored an average rank of 17.5 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Best State To Live In #6: Virginia

    This state scored an average rank of 16.8 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Best State To Live In #5: North Dakota

    This state scored an average rank of 14.5 in the 13 future livability metrics. North Dakota performed best among the metrics dealing with employment, including the job creation index (where employees reported more hiring than firing) and rates of full-time employment.

  • Best State To Live In #4: Nebraska

    This state scored an average rank of 13.7 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Best State To Live In #3: Colorado

    This state scored an average rank of 12.8 in the 13 future livability metrics. Colorado performed best in the obesity metric, with the lowest predicted future obesity rates.

  • Best State To Live In #2: Minnesota

    This state scored an average rank of 10.5 in the 13 future livability metrics. Minnesota performed best in the economic confidence index (where residents are optimistic about where their state's economy is headed) and had the greatest accessibility to safe places to exercise.

  • Best State To Live In #1: Utah

    This state scored an average rank of 7.5 in the 13 future livability metrics. Utah stole the show with the best performance in low smoking habits, accessibility to clean water and supervisor relationships, where employees reported being treated well by their superiors at work.

  • Worst State To Live In #10: Delaware

    This state scored an average rank of 32.5 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #9: Ohio

    This state scored an average rank of 32.7 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #8: Louisiana

    This state scored an average rank of 33.3 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #7: Alabama

    This state scored an average rank of 33.5 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #6: Florida

    This state scored an average rank of 33.9 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #5: Arkansas

    This state scored an average rank of 33.9 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Libe In #4: Nevada

    This state scored an average rank of 34.5 in the 13 future livability metrics. Nevada performed most poorly in the city optimism metric, in which residents reported seeing their city as becoming a worse place to live in the future.

  • Worst State To Live In #3: Kentucky

    This state scored an average rank of 36.7 in the 13 future livability metrics.

  • Worst State To Live In #2: Mississippi

    This state scored an average rank of 37.8 in the 13 future livability metrics. Mississipi scored lowest among several employment metrics (supervisor relationship and full-time employment), as well as the dentist visit metric, which is connected to poor oral health.

  • Worst State To Live In #1: West Virginia

    This state scored an average rank of 43.4 in the 13 future livability metrics. West Virginia scored lowest in several categories, including the daily learning, smoking, obesity and easy access to a safe place to exercise metrics.

  • Related Video