Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) is being criticized by a potential 2014 opponent for a new $1.4 million ad campaign touting the state's economic development success to residents.

Cuyahoga County Executive Ed Fitzgerald (D) sent a letter to Kasich on Tuesday questioning a series of commercials and print advertisements that Jobs Ohio, the state's economic development agency, has debuted. The ads tout how job creation has changed communities across the state. The ads, described as Thrive in Ohio, ask residents to send in their job success stories to a website operated by Jobs Ohio. The stories will be used to help recruit business to Ohio.

“In the past year alone, Ohio businesses have created more jobs than any other state in the country," one of the commercials says.

The ad campaign includes at least four commercials, along with a series of print advertisements. The Columbus Dispatch said the print ads have run in newspapers in Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Indiana, along with the Wall Street Journal. Online ads are planned for several national business news websites.

Fitzgerald questioned the timing of the ads, which coincide with the second half of Kasich's first term.

"I write to express my concern, and the concern of many in Northeast Ohio and across the state, about your recent use of $1.4 million dollars in state funds to place television and print ads that strongly seem meant to bolster your personal job approval numbers," Fitzgerald wrote in the letter, which was released by the Ohio Democratic Party. "These ads are an improper waste of state funds and seem intended to boost your gubernatorial re-election effort rather than actually help with economic development here in-state."

Fitzgerald noted that Jobs Ohio, the public-private partnership agency that Kasich created to manage the state's economic development efforts, is exempt from public disclosure of spending. Jobs Ohio was created by Kasich in 2011 as a way to shift economic development policy from the state-funded Department of Development to the new agency, which is funded by the state and private companies. Kasich renamed the Department of Development the state Development Services Agency, with a new mission to help existing businesses.

Fitzgerald also praised the role President Barack Obama played in the state's economy, including the auto bailout, which Obama and Ohio Democrats emphasized in the 2012 campaign.

"Like most Ohioans, I’m deeply thankful that President Obama and Ohio’s partners have helped foster an economic recovery for our state that began in February 2010 and continues to this day," Fitzgerald wrote.

Fitzgerald, 44, has been mentioned as a potential Kasich opponent in the 2014 governor's race, along with former Gov. Ted Strickland (D), who Kasich unseated in 2010. Fitzgerald, a former Lakewood mayor and FBI agent, was elected as the first ever county executive in Ohio's largest county in 2010.

Kasich's spokesman Rob Nichols told HuffPost that the role of Jobs Ohio is to promote the state and the promotion policies are similar to those used by the Department of Development under past governors. He also said that the same promotion policies would continue under Kasich's successors.

Nichols released a response from Kristi Tanner, the chief operating officer of Jobs Ohio, who described the advertising campaign as similar to what she worked on at the evelopment department under Strickland and his Republicans predecessors, Robert Taft and George Voinovich. She said the plan is not unique to Ohio.

"In fact, other states are spending significantly more to promote their state as a good location for business," Tanner said. "It is essential to job creation, and Ohioans should be proud of what's going on in the state and for the fact that it's being recognized and promoted."

Tanner also explained that while the state has run ads outside of Ohio, there is a need to run them within the state to spur economic growth.

“There were many ads that ran inside of Ohio with the similar message about why it’s great to live and work in Ohio. You have to speak to your home audience. Our existing businesses, both large and small, create 80% of the new job growth. If those businesses, including their influencers and their families don’t feel good about Ohio’s economy then they’ll be less inclined to re-invest in the state," she said. "And just as was done in the Strickland administration, (and the Taft & Voinovich administrations) the campaign serves as a vehicle to collect those positive stories to be used to attract companies that have no past experience working in the state of Ohio.”

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • The Deficit Has Grown Mostly Because Of The Recession

    The deficit has ballooned not because of specific spending measures, but <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?s[1][id]=FYFSD" target="_hplink">because of the recession</a>. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals" target="_hplink">The deficit more than doubled</a> between 2008 and 2009, as the economy was in free fall, since laid-off workers paid less in taxes and needed more benefits. The deficit then shrank in 2010 and 2011.

  • The Stimulus Cost Much Less Than Bush's Wars, Tax Cuts

    Republicans frequently have blamed <a href="http://projects.nytimes.com/44th_president/stimulus" target="_hplink">the $787 billion stimulus</a> for the national debt, but, when all government spending is taken into account, the stimulus frankly wasn't that big. In contrast, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/29/cost-of-war-iraq-afghanistan_n_887084.html" target="_hplink">the U.S. will have spent nearly $4 trillion</a> on wars in the Middle East by the time those conflicts end, according to a recent report by Brown University. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/revisiting-the-cost-of-the-bush-tax-cuts/2011/05/09/AFxTFtbG_blog.html" target="_hplink">The Bush tax cuts have cost nearly $1.3 trillion</a> over 10 years.

  • The Deficit Grew Under George W. Bush

    When George W. Bush took office, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals" target="_hplink">the federal government was running a surplus</a> of $86 billion. When he left, that had turned into a $642 billion deficit.

  • The Deficit Is Shrinking

    <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals" target="_hplink">Last year's federal budget deficit</a> was 12 percent lower than in 2009, according to the Office of Management and Budget.<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals" target="_hplink">The deficit is projected to shrink</a> even more over the next several years.

  • Investors Are Paying Us To Borrow Money

    <a href="http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=realyield" target="_hplink">The interest rate on 10-year Treasury bonds</a> is <em>negative</em>, according to the Treasury Department. Investors are even paying us for 30-year Treasury bonds, when adjusted for inflation.

  • Investors Are Not Running Away

    <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/niall-ferguson-has-been-wrong-on-economics-2012-8" target="_hplink">Conservative commentators</a> have been warning for years that investors will run away from Treasury bonds because of the national debt. So far it's not happening. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/30/treasury-yield-record-low_n_1555975.html" target="_hplink">Interest rates on Treasury bonds</a> continue to hover at historic lows.

  • Health Care Reform Reduces The Deficit

    <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/04/republican-platform-2012-factual-mistakes_n_1840795.html#slide=1461142" target="_hplink">Republicans have blasted the Affordable Care Act</a> as "budget-busting." But <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/04/republican-platform-2012-factual-mistakes_n_1840795.html#slide=1461142" target="_hplink">health care reform actually reduces the deficit</a>, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

  • The U.S. Is Borrowing Less From China

    <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/30/fear-of-china-syndrome/" target="_hplink">The U.S. government is borrowing much less from foreign countries</a> than before the recession, according to government data cited by Paul Krugman. That is because the U.S. private sector is financing our bigger deficits.

  • We Spend A Lot On Defense

    <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1258" target="_hplink">Defense spending constituted 20 percent</a> of federal spending last year, or $718 billion, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. This adds up to <a href="https://twitter.com/AJInsight/statuses/241269134996959234" target="_hplink">41 percent of the world's defense spending</a>, according to Bloomberg TV anchor Adam Johnson. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/19/mitt-romney-military-budget_n_1687601.html" target="_hplink">Mitt Romney has vowed</a> to not cut defense spending if elected president.

  • We Spend A Lot On Health Care

    <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1258" target="_hplink">Health insurance, including Medicare and Medicaid, constituted 21 percent</a> of federal spending last year. In contrast, education constituted 2 percent of federal spending. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/19/2956609/middle-aged-blues-over-paul-ryans.html" target="_hplink">Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have promised not to change Medicare</a> for Americans age 55 and older.

  • Republicans May Want Large Deficits For Now

    <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/corporate-taxes-deficits-and-labor-vs-capital-during-reagans-first-term-2012-7" target="_hplink">The federal budget deficit ballooned</a> under Ronald Reagan, and that may be just the way Republicans like it. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/06/tax-cuts-republicans-starve-the-beast-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html" target="_hplink">Some Republican thinkers</a> have proposed <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/opinion/22krugman.html" target="_hplink">"starving the beast"</a>: that is, cutting taxes in order to use larger deficits to justify spending cuts later. Since Republicans ultimately want lower taxes and a smaller government, what better way is there to cut spending than to make it look urgent and necessary?