A Pennsylvania restaurant owner must offer her church-goer discount to diners of all denominations, even atheists, according to a recent ruling from state officials.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, a Madison, Wisc.-based atheist group, filed a complaint earlier this year against Prudhomme's Lost Cajun Kitchen demanding that owner Sharon Prudhomme stop offering a Sunday discount to church-goers who brought in a flyer or bulletin from their congregation.

“I call it a bunch of hoo-ha over nothing,” Prudhomme told The Huffington Post. She refused to remove the promotion or satisfy requests from officials to change the deal's use of “church” to “faith-oriented group.”

Prudhomme, whose uncle through marriage is the well-known New Orleans chef Paul Prudhomme, said she never intended to exclude anyone. Had a customer showed up carrying a non-Christian bulletin, they would have received the same 10 percent discount, regardless of the state's order, she claimed.

State officials finalized a settlement in late September that allowed Prudhomme's promotion to continue as long as the restaurant honors publications from "any group oriented around the subject of religious faith," including atheist groups.

Meanwhile, Prudhomme said her battle caused an uptick in sales and incited an outpouring of support from First Amendment lawyers, including Randall Wenger of the Independence Law Center, who represented her free of charge.

With Wenger's help, Prudhomme has stood by her refusal to amend the language in the offer, which remains unchanged on the restaurant's website. “To me, a mosque is a church; a [Jewish] temple is a church,” she said. “I consider the word to just mean a place where someone goes to honor their religion.”

But to most Muslims and Jews, church means a place where Christians worship, said Shannon Powers, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, which issued the settlement order.

"What some folks aren't recognizing is that the term church excludes some religions," Powers told HuffPost. "If Prudhomme continues to use that term in her promotion, and it's determined by the commission's lawyers that, in so doing, she's breaching the terms of the settlement, we could seek enforcement in court."

(h/t Consumerist)

This article has been updated to include comment from Shannon Powers, spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Child Labor Prohibitions Will Ruin Us

    "The new child labor law making the willful employment of children under the age of fourteen years a misdemeanor.. will be fought both in and out of the courts by the glass manufacturers..who claim the glass industry will be ruined by the measure." To Fight Child Labor Law: New Jersey's Statute Will Be Opposed Bitterly by Glass Manufacturers, August 10, 1903

  • Without Slavery We'd Have No Cotton

    "The first and most obvious effect, would be to put an end to the cultivation of our great Southern staple... Imagine an extensive rice or cotton plantation cultivated by free laborers, who might perhaps strike for an increase of wages, at a season when the neglect of a few days would insure the destruction of the whole crop. Even if it were possible to procure laborers at all, what planter would venture to carry on his operations under such circumstances?" <a href="http://www1.assumption.edu/users/lknoles/douglassproslaveryargs.html">"Slavery in the Light of Social Ethics"</a> by Chancelor Harper

  • 8 Hour Work Days Doom The Railroads

    "The railroads have estimated that it would cost them $50,000,000 a year to give the members of the four brotherhoods the eight-hour day, and they are by no means assured that other workers, such as telegraphers and switchmen will not try to come in under its benefits, thus increasing the cost still further." <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F10F14FD3E5412738FDDAF0994D9415B868DF1D3">Railroads United In General Attack On the 8-Hour Act</a>, The New York Times, November 16, 1916

  • Social Security Will Kill American Prosperity

    "One employer tells me this law will increase his costs between 10 and 15 percent. If this is added to selling prices, what will it do to sales, and hence employment? If it is taken out of the labor fund, what will it do to the purchasing power of all who work for a living, and hence to national prosperity?" <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F60B1FF63555147B93C5A8178AD95F418385F9">Social Security: Effect of Tax on Payrolls Viewed With Alarm</a>, by R.P. Ellis, The New York Times, November 17, 1935

  • Ban On Cigarette Ads Is Silly!

    "The Tobacco Advisory Committee, representing the manufacturers, called the ban unjustified and said it would not solve the question of smoking and health. A spokesman said that all cigarette advertising was brand advertising and that there was little or not evidence that this had increased the consumption of individual smokers." <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F30A1FF935541B7B93C6A9178ED85F4D8685F9">The Cigarette Companies Would Rather Fight Than Switch</a> by Elizabeth B. Drew, The New York Times, May 4, 1969

  • Cigarette Taxes Will Kill Small Business Owners

    "Re-enactment of the city's 1-cent-a-package tax on cigarettes will defeat its own purpose by driving thousands of small retailers out of business, the finance committee of the City Council was told yesterday at a public hearing." <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F20E17FE3E54107A93C4A8178DD85F4D8385F9">City Urged To Drop Its Cigarette Tax</a>, The New York Times, June 16, 1939

  • Minimum Wage Laws Will Hurt Old People

    "The first ill effect of raising the minimum wage to the standard of the average wage would be to cause the weak, slow, and the aged--and especially unskilled young women and girls--to fall by the wayside. These classes of workers are always a drain upon the employer, for the overhead charges of a factory are just as great whether the places be occupied by good, quick workers or poor, slow ones, therefore a smaller output of the latter causes a loss by raising the percentage of these overhead charges. An advance in wages... adds to this loss and forces the employer to discharge the sub-average, giving preference to strong workers who already earn the minimum." <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F20811F83B5813738DDDAF0A94DB405B838DF1D3">The Minimum Wage: Should Worthy Laborers Be Sacrificed to Establish It?</a> by Marcus M. Marks, The New York Times, March 25, 1913

  • Seatbelts Laws Shouldn't Be Legislated

    "The auto industry's Big Three told congress today that the public should be educated to use auto safety seat belts and not forced into it by legislation." <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F60D17FF3E55137A93C5A91783D85F438585F9">Car Makers Oppose Law On Seat Belts</a>, The New York Times, August 8, 1957