The Orleans Parish School Board, which controls the curriculum and policies for six schools in New Orleans, voted Tuesday to ban the teaching of creationism as science and a "revisionist" history course touted in Texas.
Although none of these six New Orleans schools currently teaches creationism or "intelligent design," outgoing Orleans Parish School Board President Thomas Robichaux is making sure they never will, The Times-Picayune first reported in November.
The newly approved policy bans teachers from including "any aspect of religious faith" in science courses and from using history textbooks adjusted to include Christianity.
The first part regarding textbooks reads: “No history textbook shall be approved which has been adjusted in accordance with the State of Texas revisionist guidelines nor shall any science textbook be approved which presents creationism or intelligent design as science or scientific theories."
The second part delves specifically into teaching: “No teacher of any discipline of science shall teach any aspect of religious faith as science or in a science class. No teacher of any discipline of science shall teach creationism or intelligent design in classes designated as science classes.”
The Texas State Board of Education in 2010 adopted a statewide social studies and history curriculum that amended or watered down the teaching of the civil rights movement, religious freedoms, America's relationship with the United Nations and hundreds of other topics. Its approved social studies curriculum included religious and right-wing viewpoints, the New York Times previously reported. Social studies and economic textbooks were altered to include "the superiority of American capitalism, questioning the Founding Fathers’ commitment to a purely secular government and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light."
A report out last year by Keith Erekson, an assistant professor of history at the University of Texas at El Paso, says that Texas K-12 standards in history are inadequate, ineffective and "fail to meet the state's college readiness standards." The report notes that the Fordham Institute gave Texas's history standards a "D" grade, calling them a "politicized distortion of history" that is "both unwieldy and troubling" while "offering misrepresentations at every turn."
"When this was done in Texas, all this talk was what massive influence would do in other states," Robichaux told Gambit's Best of New Orleans blog. "We want to make sure kids are taught history that has been properly vetted by academics and prepared for their consumption.... I have no problem teaching [religion] in a religion or philosophy class, but the science class is not the appropriate place for it."
Robichaux is a liberal Democrat and the school board's first openly gay president, according to The Times-Picayune. His policy was reportedly influenced by a concern that, in the future, the school board could be pressured to adopt a curriculum with religious connotations.
Also on HuffPost:
According to the “Educating Our Children” section of <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/98440774/2012-Platform-Final">Texas Republican Party 2012 Platform</a>, “corporal punishment is effective.” Furthermore, the document recommends teachers be given "more authority" to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/27/texas-republican-party-2012-platform-education_n_1632097.html">deal with disciplinary problems</a>.
The proposal’s most radical position, however, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/vo26x/texas_gop_we_oppose_the_teaching_of_higher_order/">opposes the teaching of "higher order thinking skills"</a> -- a curriculum which strives to encourage critical thinking -- arguing that it <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/27/texas-republican-party-2012-platform-education_n_1632097.html">might challenge "student's fixed beliefs"</a> and undermine "parental authority."
One school participating in Louisiana's voucher program notes that its students "will be <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/louisiana-voucher-program_n_1724259.html">expected to defend creationism through evidence presented by the Bible</a> versus traditional scientific theory."
According to <em>Mother Jones</em>, <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/photos-evangelical-curricula-louisiana-tax-dollars">many of the Christian schools</a> rely on <a href="http://www.abeka.com/">A Beka Book</a> curriculum or <a href="http://www.bjupress.com/page/Home">Bob Jones University Press</a> textbooks to teach their students “the <a href="http://www.abeka.com/OurFoundation.aspx">accumulated wisdom of the past from a biblical worldview</a>.” Here are some <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/08/crazy-facts-students-will_n_1758003.html">examples</a>:
"Bible-believing Christians cannot accept any evolutionary interpretation. <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/photos-evangelical-curricula-louisiana-tax-dollars">Dinosaurs and humans were definitely on the earth at the same time</a> and may have even lived side by side within the past few thousand years." — <em>Life Science</em>, 3rd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 2007
Gay people "have no more claims to <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/photos-evangelical-curricula-louisiana-tax-dollars">special rights than child molesters or rapists</a>." — <em>Teacher's Resource Guide to Current Events for Christian Schools, 1998-1999</em>, Bob Jones University Press, 1998
In April, Tennessee lawmakers added language to the state’s abstinence-only sex education curriculum that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/08/tennessee-sex-education-b_n_1411100.html">warns against “gateway sexual activity.”</a> Although Senate Bill 3310 does not specify what constitutes "gateway sexual activity,” many have interpreted the phrase to dissuade anything that has potential to lead to sex -- including kissing, hand-holding and cuddling. The bill is a response to recent controversies over sex-ed lessons in some Tennessee school districts that mentioned alternatives to sexual intercourse. "'Abstinence' means from all of these activities, and we want to promote that," said Republican state Sen. Jack Johnson, the bill's sponsor. "What we do <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/08/tennessee-sex-education-b_n_1411100.html">want to communicate to the kids is that the best choice is abstinence</a>."
In March, the Utah state Senate passed a bill that would <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/utah-passes-bill-allowing_n_1326777.html">permit schools to eliminate sex education</a>, prohibit instruction on how to use contraception and bar discussion of homosexuality in class. Many senators spoke out in support of the bill, claiming sex education is meant for the home, not school. Utah Gov. Gary Herbert eventually <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/17/utah-governor-vetoes-bill_n_1355053.html">vetoed the controversial bill</a>. Spurred on by the impassioned Utah sex education debate, Republican state Sen. Stuart Reid is now sponsoring a bill that would <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/22/utah-senator-stuart-reid-_n_1989793.html?utm_hp_ref=education">require the state school board to develop a sex education program for parents</a>, so that they might feel better equipped to teach their children about sex in the privacy of their own homes.
A 2011 Mississippi law <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/mississippi-sex-education_n_1719882.html">required some sort of sex education in all school systems beginning this academic year</a>. Local districts had the option of deciding whether to adopt an abstinence-only or an abstinence-plus policy for sex education. Abstinence-plus teaches safe-sex practices, contraception and causes and effects of sexually transmitted diseases in addition to abstinence. More than <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/10/13/4910033/sex-education-in-mississippi-classrooms.html">80 of the state's 151 districts opted for abstinence-only curriculums</a>, while three chose to adopt split policies, teaching abstinence-only to younger students and abstinence-plus to older grades. Students must receive parental permission to take the courses and boys and girls take the classes separately.
In April, Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed legislation requiring the state Board of Education to design a high school elective course for public and charter school students titled "The Bible and its influence on Western Culture," which would include <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/19/arizona-bible-course-bill_n_1437484.html">lessons on the history, literature and influence of the Old and New testaments on laws, government and culture</a>, among other aspects of society.
A measure passed in recent years required Virginia’s Board of Education to design course materials in line with the <a href="http://www.doe.virginia.gov/boe/guidance/safety/school_gun_safety_elementary.pdf">National Rifle Association's Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program guidelines</a> to teach elementary students about gun safety. The curriculum includes <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/virginia-school-districts_n_976126.html">lessons ranging from distinguishing those who use guns professionally to recognizing and catching firearms on school property</a>. Individual districts had the option of deciding whether to adopt the curriculum.
In July 2011, Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill making <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/california-gay-textbooks-_n_891464.html">California the first state to require public schools to teach lessons on historical and current contributions of gays and lesbians</a>. According to <em>USA Today</em>, the new law mandates the California Board of Education and local school districts <a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-07-14-california-teaching-gay-history-schools_n.htm">adopt textbooks and other teaching materials that include the contributions of sexual minorities as soon as the 2013-14 school year</a>. The legislation does not specify a grade level for instruction to begin, and leaves implementation up to local school boards.
Around the same time that California’s landmark bill was signed, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/18/new-york-city-teaching-ga_n_901876.html">summer school teachers in New York City began teaching about same-sex marriage</a> in civics classes. According to the <em>New York Post</em>, city education officials are looking to follow in California's footsteps and formally include it into city schools' curriculum, though a <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/gay_nups_become_class_act_xcxuOGG9Vsz1y0C98mUm5J#ixzz1SSJoMfkQ">timeline is yet to be determined</a>.
In July 2011, Indiana school officials announced that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/07/indiana-schools-no-longer_n_892377.html">students would no longer be required to learn cursive writing</a>, effective Fall 2011.
Hawaii / North Carolina
Following Indiana, Hawaii <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/01/hawaii-no-longer-requires_n_915402.html">dropped cursive writing from its mandatory school curriculum</a>. Going into the 2011-12 school year, the state adopted the national Common Core State Standards, a set of education standards that omits cursive but includes keyboard proficiency. Now, principals decide whether their schools teach cursive. Pitt County Schools in North Carolina recently followed suit, no longer requiring its students to learn cursive writing. According to Assistant Superintendent Cheryl Olmstead, a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/05/pitt-county-schools-in-no_n_2079608.html">team of educators is working to figure out where to fit cursive writing into the curriculum so that students will have a recognizable signature</a>. She says the district hopes to have a plan in place next year.