Despite some momentum toward gun control legislation in the wake of the tragic shooting in Newtown, Conn., earlier this month, stricter laws are far from a sure thing. One reason: people like Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Ga.), who argued in June that the federal government shouldn't enact new gun control laws -- it should get rid of all of the existing ones instead.

"When we start down that road again with folks who think that they know best, you never know where it's going to end. The law of unintended consequences is on steroids in Washington, D.C.," Woodall said at a candidate forum on June 25, sent to HuffPost by a Democratic activist in Georgia. "We can begin to protect the Second Amendment by doing away with all federal control of gun laws."

After 20 first graders and six adults were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, some politicians quickly called for gun control and began work on legislation to ban the future sale of some assault weapons.

Even some staunch defenders of broad gun rights, such as Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), who has an A rating from the National Rifle Association, said they believe something must be done to limit assault weapons.

Woodall, though, is part of a class of lawmakers who may be tough to convince that putting more restrictions on gun ownership is the right answer. The freshman congressman made news in 2011 when he scolded a constituent for asking about government aid and then said he accepts his government-provided health care "because it's free." Woodall has a C rating from the National Rifle Association on voting in support of gun rights. He voted against a bill to require states to respect out-of-state concealed weapons permits, but only because he said the Second Amendment already confers that right and the bill was unnecessary.

His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment as to whether his thinking on gun control had shifted after the Sandy Hook shooting.

In June, though, he was clear that he opposed even existing federal gun regulations, saying the way to protect the Second Amendment was "doing away with those federal gun laws that are already on the books."

"I don't know when the feds got into the criminalization business, but criminalization happens at the state level, not the federal level," he said at the candidate forum. "Outside of a few national security issues like treason that the Constitution lays out, we don't need federal crimes and we don't need federal prisons. We need state crimes and state prisons."

Watch Woodall's comments from June 25:

Source: Project Vote Smart, Graphic by: Chris Spurlock

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)

    "I wish to God she had had an m-4 in her office, locked up so when she heard gunfire, she pulls it out ... and takes him out and takes his head off before he can kill those precious kids," Gohmert said of slain principal Dawn Hochsprung on <a href=""><em>Fox News Sunday</em></a>. He argued that shooters often choose schools because they know people will be unarmed.

  • Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R)

    "If people were armed, not just a police officer, but other school officials that were trained and chose to have a weapon, certainly there would be an opportunity to stop an individual trying to get into the school," he <a href="">told WTOP's "Ask the Governor" show</a> Tuesday, warning that Washington may respond to such a policy with a "knee-jerk reaction."

  • Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam (R) & State Sen. Frank Niceley (R)

    Gov. Haslam says he will consider a Tennessee plan to secretly arm and train some teachers, <a href="">TPM reports</a>. The legislation will be introduced by State Sen. Frank Niceley (R) next month. "Say some madman comes in. The first person he would probably try to take out was the resource officer. But if he doesn’t know which teacher has training, then he wouldn’t know which one had [a gun]," Niceley told TPM. "These guys are obviously cowards anyway and if someone starts shooting back, they’re going to take cover, maybe go ahead and commit suicide like most of them have."

  • Oklahoma State Rep. Mark McCullough (R) & State Sen. Ralph Shortey (R)

    State Rep. Mark McCullough (R) <a href="">told the Tulsa World</a> he plans to file legislation that would bring guns into schools, calling their absence "irresponsible." “It is incredibly irresponsible to leave our schools undefended – to allow mad men to kill dozens of innocents when we have a very simple solution available to us to prevent it," he said. "I’ve been considering this proposal for a long time. In light of the savagery on display in Connecticut, I believe it’s an idea whose time has come." Sen. Ralph Shortey (R) told the Tulsa World that teachers should carry concealed weapons at school events. "Allowing teachers and administrators with concealed-carry permits the ability to have weapons at school events would provide both a measure of security for students and a deterrent against attackers," he said.

  • Florida State Rep. Dennis Baxley (R)

    Baxley, who once sponsored Florida's controversial Stand Your Ground law, <a href="">told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune </a>that keeping guns out of schools makes them a target for attacks. “We need to be more realistic at looking at this policy," he said. "In our zealousness to protect people from harm we’ve created all these gun-free zones and what we’ve inadvertently done is we’ve made them a target. A helpless target is exactly what a deranged person is looking for where they cannot be stopped.”

  • Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R)

    At a Tea Party event Monday night, <a href="">Perry praised a Texas school system that allows some staff to carry concealed weapons to work</a> and encouraged local school districts to make their own policies.

  • Minnesota State Rep. Tony Cornish (R)

    Cornish <a href="">plans to introduce legislation that would allow teachers to arm themselves</a>, according to the AP.

  • Oregon State Rep. Dennis Richardson (R)

    In an email <a href="">obtained by Gawker</a> and excerpted below, Richardson tells three superintendents that he could have saved lives had he been armed and in Sandy Hook on Friday: <blockquote>If I had been a teacher or the principal at the Sandy Hook Elementary School and if the school district did not preclude me from having access to a firearm, either by concealed carry or locked in my desk, most of the murdered children would still be alive, and the gunman would still be dead, and not by suicide. ... [O]ur children's safety depends on having a number of well-trained school employees on every campus who are prepared to defend our children and save their lives?</blockquote>

  • Former Education Secretary Bill Bennett

    "And I'm not so sure -- and I'm sure I'll get mail for this -- I'm not so sure I wouldn't want one person in a school armed, ready for this kind of thing," Bennett, who served as education secretary under Ronald Reagan, <a href="">told <em>Meet the Press</em> Sunday</a>. "The principal lunged at this guy. The school psychologist lunged at the guy. It has to be someone who's trained, responsible. But, my god, if you can prevent this kind of thing, I think you ought to."