WASHINGTON — The White House stepped in Monday with a veto threat against a House GOP plan to advance a round of 2014 spending bills that would ease sequester-imposed cuts on the Pentagon while forcing even deeper cuts on non-defense programs.

Those cuts would come in areas like education, energy and water development and foreign aid.

In a statement, the White House budget office said the cuts called for in the GOP plan would force thousands of poor children off of Head Start, harm special education, cut federal law enforcement and dent medical research grants to thousands of scientists. It called on the Democratic Senate and GOP House to reach a broader agreement on the budget before advancing spending bills.

The veto promise comes as the House is set this week to consider the first of 12 spending bills for the budget year beginning Oct. 1. The first measure totals $73 billion and awards a 3.5 percent increase for veterans programs while cutting construction costs at military bases. The House is also slated to debate and pass a $39 billion measure this week boosting the Homeland Security Department's budget by almost $1 billion compared with current levels.

Democrats and the White House don't have a problem with the substance of the first two bills. Rather they oppose the overall level of funding set by Republicans for the day-to-day operations of federal agencies.

The statement promised a veto of every spending bill until Washington reaches a bargain on "an overall budget framework that supports our recovery and enables sufficient investments in education, infrastructure, innovation and national security for our economy to compete in the future."

At issue is the almost $1 trillion portion of the $3.6 trillion federal budget that must be approved by Congress each year. This so-called discretionary spending has been cut sharply with the imposition in March of across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration. The Pentagon is absorbing cuts of 7 percent this year and domestic discretionary programs are bearing a 5 percent cut from last year's levels.

Hopes are fading for a budget bargain that would replace the cuts, which leaves lawmakers stuck with even bigger cuts for the upcoming year. Appropriated funding for the ongoing budget year totals $984 billion; the House measures total $967 billion, an almost 2 percent cut below already austere current spending.

Under a 2011 budget deal, the panel was supposed to receive almost $1.06 trillion for the 12 appropriations bills; the House panel is instead stuck with $967 billion under the across-the-board cuts imposed because Congress and President Barack Obama were unable to follow up the 2011 deal with further deficit cuts. The Democratic figures are $91 billion higher, a 9 percent increase from current levels.

Obama and Senate Democrats support advancing the annual spending bills at the higher levels called for under the hard-fought 2011 bargain, replacing the cuts with a mixture of tax increases and spending cuts elsewhere in the budget. But conservatives controlling the House insist that the spending bills be written at the post-sequestration cap of $967 billion.

The GOP plan opposed by Obama restores cuts to the military while making cuts to domestic programs favored by Democrats even deeper. The deepest cuts – almost 20 percent – would come from a huge domestic spending bill that funds aid to local school districts, health research and enforcement of labor laws. Cuts to housing, foreign aid, transportation and community development grants would be severe, though a popular program that provides food aid to pregnant women and their babies is likely to emerge intact.

Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., appears to be embarking on a strategy to advance a handful of the annual spending bills by funding them at levels closer to Obama's budget than the tea party budget that passed the House in March. GOP conservatives have balked at such moves in the past, saying they're a trick aimed at boosting spending, but some Democrats were willing to give Rogers the benefit of the doubt by voting for the veterans and homeland security measures during Appropriations Committee consideration last month.

Neither the House nor the Senate are likely to have much luck in advancing the measures very far unless a broader deal is made. In part, the veto threat appears aimed at pushing Republicans into negotiations. But with the budget deficit coming down by itself and with tea party Republicans increasingly comfortable with the across-the-board cuts, it's not clear the strategy will work.

In fact, some lawmakers are predicting that the most likely outcome is for Congress in September to pass a catchall spending measure leaving the cuts in place and keeping the government running on autopilot slightly below current levels.

Related on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Abortion Ban With No Rape Exception

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/gop-platform-spoiler-alert-no-exception-rape-incest-abortion-plank" target="_hplink">oppose</a> abortion in all cases with no exceptions for rape or incest. <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120821/us-gop-convention-platform/" target="_hplink">opposes</a> abortion but supports exceptions for rape and incest. <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama <a href="http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?old=true&can_id=BS030017&npatform_id=69#0" target="_hplink">supports</a> the Democratic Party platform, which states that abortions should be legally available in accordance with Roe v. Wade.

  • Expanding Individual Right To Self-Defense

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/gop-platform-spoiler-alert-no-exception-rape-incest-abortion-plank" target="_hplink">support</a> federal legislation that would expand the "fundamental right to self-defense." <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/issues/gun-rights" target="_hplink">does not believe</a> the country "needs additional laws that restrict the Second Amendment." <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/22/barack-obama-gun-control_n_1693650.html" target="_hplink">believes</a> the federal government should work to prevent gun violence under "existing law."

  • Undocumented Immigrants Don't Count

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/gop-platform-spoiler-alert-no-exception-rape-incest-abortion-plank" target="_hplink">supports</a> "changing the way that the decennial census is conducted, so that citizens are distinguished from lawfully present aliens and illegal aliens." This GOP plank assures that undocumented workers are not counted when tallying the national population. <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/issues/immigration" target="_hplink">wants</a> to increase legal immigration to the United States as a way of strengthening the domestic economy. <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/15/obama-immigration-order-deportation-dream-act_n_1599658.html" target="_hplink">supports</a> the creation of a "pathway to citizenship" for the millions of undocumented immigrants in the United States.

  • No Taxes Increases Unless War, National Emergencies

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/gop-platform-spoiler-alert-no-exception-rape-incest-abortion-plank" target="_hplink">support</a> a constitutional amendment calling for a super-majority -- 60 votes in the Senate -- for any tax increase, unless in cases of war or national tragedy. <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/issues/tax" target="_hplink">wants</a> to cut the marginal tax rate by 20 percent to "stimulate entrepreneurship, job creation, and investment." <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/08/02/obama-quotes_n_916304.html?just_reloaded=1" target="_hplink">repeatedly called for</a> a "balanced approach" -- a mixture of spending cuts and tax increases -- in dealing with the nation's fiscal crises.

  • Marriage Only Between Man, Woman

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/gop-platform-spoiler-alert-no-exception-rape-incest-abortion-plank" target="_hplink">support</a> the traditional definition of marriage as the "union of one man and one woman." <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/issues/values" target="_hplink">wants</a> to "preserve traditional marriage - the joining together of one man and one woman." <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/obama-gay-marriage_n_1503245.html" target="_hplink">supports</a> same-sex marriage.

  • Gold Standard Commission

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-24/reviving-gold-standard-studied-in-republican-platform.html" target="_hplink">support</a> the creation of a commission to explore whether the United States should return to the gold standard. <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-24/reviving-gold-standard-studied-in-republican-platform.html" target="_hplink">has expressed</a> skepticism that Congress would not meddle with the gold standard were it to be implemented. <strong>Obama's position</strong>: Obama has not specifically commented on the gold standard.

  • Medicare Voucher System

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79953.html" target="_hplink">support</a> a voucher-like system that provides future seniors with a fixed amount of money to spend on health insurance. <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79622.html" target="_hplink">has said</a> he's "very supportive of the Ryan budget plan," which proposes turning Medicare into the voucher-like system advocated for in this year's Republican platform draft. <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Obama wants to <a href="http://medicarenewsgroup.com/news/medicare-faqs/individual-faq?faqId=e7642be4-317f-490e-8dd0-43455d3a674a" target="_hplink">mostly keep</a> Medicare the way it is. He believes Medicare could be reformed by making tweaks to its current pay system and reducing fraud and waste within the program.

  • No Women In Combat

    <strong>What the 2012 Republican platform draft says:</strong> Republicans <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/21/new-republican-platform-excludes-women-from-the-front-lines/" target="_hplink">support</a> "women's exemption from direct ground combat units and infantry battalions." <strong>Romney's position:</strong> Romney <a href="http://www.aclulibertywatch.org/candidates/mitt-romney" target="_hplink">has said</a> he believes women have the "capacity to serve in our military in positions of significance and responsibility." <strong>Obama's position:</strong> Under the Obama administration, the Pentagon <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/09/nation/la-na-pentagon-women-20120209" target="_hplink">has loosened</a> limits on women in combat.