Huffpost Politics

FISA Court Interpretation Of 'Relevant' Allowed Broad Surveillance: Report

Posted: Updated:
Print

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has broadened the definition of the word "relevant" to justify the National Security Agency's mass telephone and internet surveillance, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

Reports on the court's rulings, which remain classified, seem to confirm the concerns of senators who are seeking to declassify the court's decisions. These senators allege that the FISC has interpreted the Patriot Act in unprecedented ways that Congress did not intend.

FISC rulings have broadened the meaning of the word "relevant," moving further away from Supreme Court precedent that declared evidence could only be considered if there was a "reasonable possibility" that it could produce information related to an investigation.

Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) have introduced a bill that would require the Attorney General to declassify FISC opinions, with some exceptions for national security. A similar measure has been introduced in the House. However, a related amendment just garnered the votes of 37 senators in December 2012, and Edward Snowden, the NSA whistle-blower who revealed the continued existence of the NSA programs, has earned bipartisan scorn.

The FISA court, created by Congress in 1978, was designed to be a check against government surveillance in the wake of the Nixon administration. However, in practice, the court rarely has denied surveillance requests.

A Supreme Court petition by the Electronic Privacy Information Center hinges on the definition of "relevant." The group, seeking to block the gathering of telephone records "metadata," asks how all of the NSA's information gathering meets the standard of being "relevant."

Related on HuffPost:

Close
Politicians React To NSA Collecting Phone Records
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

FISA Court's 'Relevant' Redefinition Challenged -- Daily Intelligencer

FISA Court Redefined 'Relevant' - The Daily Beast

FISA Court's Redefinition of 'Relevant' Gets Supreme Court Challenge

Privacy Group to Ask Supreme Court to Stop N.S.A.'s Phone Spying ...

In Secret, Court Vastly Broadens Powers of N.S.A. - NYTimes.com

FISA Court's Redefinition of 'Relevant' Gets Supreme Court ...

Why The NSA And President Bush Got The FISA Court To ... - Techdirt

Fisa Court stories at Techdirt.

2 : 39 AM FISA Court's Redefinition of ' Relevant ' Gets Supreme Court Challenge

In Secret, Court Vastly Broadens Powers of NSA

Secret rulings from America's shadow Supreme Court legalizes spying in one ...

We need a better way to pick FISA court judges

Five unanswered questions about the NSA's surveillance programs

What's really at stake in the National Security Agency data sweeps

Patriot Act Could Protect Us and Privacy

Congress restarts: Cyber-espionage, FCC at hand in the House; Senate ...

MI Congressman wants secret court surveillance opinions made public