The international definition of a second of time could be heading for a change, thanks to researchers who have demonstrated that an advanced type of ‘atomic clock’ has the degree of precision and stability needed to provide a new standard.

Jérôme Lodewyck of the Paris Observatory and his colleagues have shown that two so-called optical lattice clocks (OLCs) can remain as perfectly in step as experimental precision can establish1. They say that this test of consistency is essential if OLCs are to be used to redefine the second, which is currently defined according to a different type of atomic clock.

Christopher Oates, a specialist in atomic-clock time standards at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado, says that this is “very beautiful and careful work, which gives grounds for confidence in the optical lattice clock and in optical clocks generally”.

Since 1967, the second has been defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 oscillations of the microwave radiation absorbed or emitted when a caesium atom jumps between two particular energy states.

The most accurate way to measure this frequency at present is in an atomic fountain, in which a laser beam propels atoms in gasous caesium upwards. Emission from the atoms is probed as they pass twice through a microwave beam – once on the way up, and once as they fall back down under gravity.

Caesium atomic-fountain clocks are used to set national time standards at NIST, at the Paris Observatory and elsewhere.

The caesium fountain clock has an accuracy of about three parts in 10 quadrillion (3 × 10−16). This means that it will keep time to within one second over 100 million years. But some newer atomic clocks can do even better. Monitoring emission from individual ionized atoms trapped by an electromagnetic field can supply an accuracy of about 10−17.

Better timing

The clocks studied by Lodewyck and his colleagues are newer still: they were first demonstrated less than a decade ago2. Although they cannot yet beat the accuracy of trapped-ion clocks, they have been shown to be comparable to caesium fountain clocks, and some researchers are convinced that they will ultimately be the best of the lot.

There are two reasons for this. First, like trapped-ion clocks, they measure the frequency of visible light, with a frequency tens of thousands of times higher than that of microwaves. Second, they measure the average emission frequency from several thousand trapped atoms rather than just one, and so the measurement statistics are better. The atoms are trapped in an optical lattice, rather like an electromagnetic egg box for holding atoms.

If OLCs are to succeed, however, researchers must show that one such clock ticks at exactly the same rate as another prepared in an identical way. This is what Lodewyck and colleagues have shown. They prepared optical lattices that each held about 10,000 atoms of the isotope strontium-87, and have shown that the two clocks stay in synchrony to within a precision of at least 1.5 × 10−16, which is as accurately as the experiment could measure.

The team has also shown that their strontium OLCs can keep pace with all three of the caesium clocks at the Paris Observatory, to an accuracy dictated only by the fundamental limit on the caesium clocks themselves.

Better atomic clocks would be a boon to basic science. For example, physicists could use such clocks to investigate whether some of nature’s fundamental constants change over time, as some theories predict.

This story originally appeared in Nature News.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmidt_Sting_Pain_Index" target="_hplink">Schmidt Sting Pain Index</a> measures the pain of stings from various bees, wasps and ants on a 1.0-4.0 spectrum. An ordinary Sweat bee scores a 1.0 on the scale, and the South American Bullet ant scores a 4.0+. The commentary is particularly specific, and its colorful descriptions were the inspiration for this slideshow: a Yellow Jacket sting, rating a 2.0 on the scale, is said to be "Hot and smoky, almost irreverent. Imagine W. C. Fields extinguishing a cigar on your tongue." Image: a Bullet Ant. Creative Commons.

  • The Riddle Scale measures a person's degree of homophobia. Its values range from Revulsion at one end, through Pity, Tolerance, Acceptance, Support, Admiration, Appreciation and finally Nurturance. Image: Getty Images

  • The Bristol Stool Scale measures the consistency of human poop, with sometimes uncomfortably vivid descriptions; the scale ranges from from type 1 ("Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass)") to type 7 ("Watery, no solid pieces. Entirely liquid"). Researchers initially believed that the hardness of feces indicated how long it took to pass through the colon, and therefore could aid in diagnosis of certain bowel conditions, but this hypothesis has since been challenged. The Bristol Stool Scale may be the most well-known among the scales in this slideshow; there's even a company that <a href="http://www.zazzle.com/bristol_stool_chart_tshirt-235895582634416904" target="_hplink">puts it on T-shirts</a>. Image: Creative Commons

  • <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904716604576542460736605364.html" target="_hplink">The Waffle House Index</a>, an informal measurement of storm damage, looks at the menu of restaurants in the Waffle House chain in an affected area and estimates the degree of disaster response that might be required. This stems from the reputation of Waffle House restaurants to stay open in harsh conditions, though sometimes with a less extensive menu than usual. As FEMA administrater Craig Fugate once said, "If you get there and the Waffle House is closed? That's really bad. That's where you go to work." Image: Getty

  • This is the Norwood Scale for Male Pattern Baldness, a visual representation of the stages of this type of men's hair loss (women typically show a different pattern, <a href="http://www.americanhairloss.org/women_hair_loss/degree_of_hair_loss.asp" target="_hplink">shown here</a>). Although it would be obvious to a "Stage 6" man, the rest of us might be surprised to learn that the "pattern" is quite well understood, and typical cases progress through the predictable series of stages in the diagram. Not all men who experience hair loss fall along this spectrum, but <a href="http://www.niams.nih.gov/Health_Info/Alopecia_Areata/default.asp" target="_hplink">other forms of baldness</a> show less well-defined progressions. Norwood Scale for Male Pattern Baldness Courtesy of The American Hair Loss Association

  • This is the Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale, also known as the Kinsey Scale after Alfred Kinsey, the groundbreaking sex researcher who helped developed it. Values range from 0 (exclusively heterosexual) to 6 (exclusively homosexual), with various shades of gray in between. These values aren't based on perceived orientation; they refer to a proportion of the genders of an individual's past sexual partners. As a result, contemporary sex researchers use tools like the Kinsey Scale in conjunction with more complicated metrics for gender identity.

  • The Enhanced Fujita Scale (EF Scale) measures the intensity of tornados, and wouldn't be unusual except for the extremely specific calculations involved. Destruction is measured in Degrees of Damage (DoD), and each type of building that gets destroyed by a tornado carries its own DoD. <a href="http://www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale/ef-ttu.pdf" target="_hplink">The paper that introduced the EF Scale</a> proposed different DoDs for the "K-Mart, Wal-Mart" category than it did for "Doctor's Office, Branch Banks" and "Hospital, Government or University Building." This scale can give better estimates of real damage than other scales, because it can account for the fact that a larger tornado isn't necessarily more destructive; a smaller tornado that knocks down enough telephone poles, for example, can rank higher than a huge tornado that destroys a couple of junior high schools and nothing else. Image: Creative Commons.

  • The Kardashev Scale measures how advanced a civilization is, based on the amount of energy it controls. According to the scale, a Type I civilization would command about 10 to the 16 power Watts, achievable on Earth if we could capture all the solar energy that reflects back off our planet. Other types get more extreme, requiring an amount of energy equivalent to harnessing all of the sun's output just to reach Type II. The entire scale is, of course hypothetical; humanity hasn't even made it to Type I. Our energy production <a href="http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2009_downloads/statistical_review_of_world_energy_full_report_2009.xls#'Primary" target="_hplink">was estimated</a> at 15 terawatts per year in 2008, which would rank a 0.72 on the scale. Image: a hypothetical <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere" target="_hplink">Dyson Sphere</a>, one tool that a civilization might use to reach Type II. Creative Commons.

  • <a href="http://www.scottrobertsweb.com/scoville-scale.php" target="_hplink">The Scoville Scale</a> measures the hotness of chili peppers and <a href="http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/casually-pepper-spray-everything-cop" target="_hplink">other substances</a> that contain capsaicin, a chemical that produces a burning sensation in living tissue it touches. Bell peppers hardly produce any heat, so they score nearly 0 on the scale, and pure capsaicin scores around 16 million. The hottest known chili peppers hover around 1 million points, and law-enforcement grade pepper spray rates between 500,000 to 2 million. Image: Bhut Jolokia peppers, among the hottest in the world. Getty

  • The <a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1968-03998-001" target="_hplink">Social Readjustment Rating Scale</a>, also known as the Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale, is a list of various stressful life events, each assigned a score out of 100 to describe how profound an effect it has on someone who experiences it. The original list ranges from "Death of a spouse" at 100 to "Minor violation of the law" at 11. A higher score tends to indicate a greater health risk, and a person who has recently experienced 300 or more points on the Stress Scale is considered to be "at risk of illness." Only the abstract of the paper is available for free online, but the list is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holmes_and_Rahe_stress_scale" target="_hplink">reproduced on Wikipedia</a>. What do you score? Image: Getty