From The Colorado Independent's Tessa Cheek.

ON WEDNESDAY, Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s office signed off on ballot language for the state’s first-ever lawmaker recall election, where Democratic state Senate President John Morse will effectively face Republican City Council Member Bernie Herpin.

The Morse campaign doesn’t like the ballot language and believes the Republican secretary of state may have worked to tilt the scales in the race, stripping out language Morse submitted to be included.

But the Herpin campaign argues the Secretary didn’t go far enough. In a release the campaign charges that, in the language Morse submitted to the secretary, he “violated state law” by making false assertions about Herpin and about Basic Freedom Defense Fund — the group organized to promote recall of Morse mainly in response to his support for gun-control legislation last spring.

The recall campaigns, launched months ago, have been characterized by regularly erupting similar back-and-forths and there may be many more to come over the four weeks leading to Election Day on September 10.

In in its release Thursday, A Whole Lot of People For John Morse detailed its accusations against Gessler’s office:

The factual information that the SOS office refused to include on the ballot included:

Bernie Herpin opposed criminal background checks, a position so extreme it would allow felons and domestic abusers to buy guns.

When Bernie Herpin was on our City Council, he took part in a $25,000 special interest junket paid for from our utility bills – and then he tried to hide it from voters. Voting NO on the recall is also a NO to this kind of lavish special interest spending and elected official cover-up.”

Gessler’s office dismissed the complaint as after-the-fact politics.

“On the advice of the attorney general, we removed that language because it violates state law,” wrote Secretary of State Spokesman Rich Coolidge to The Colorado Independent. “Surprisingly, A Whole lot of People never contested that removal to us, so it’s unfortunate to see these attacks aired in a press release.”

Coolidge cited the law governing recall ballot language:

The officer sought to be recalled may submit to the designated election official a statement of three hundred words or fewer justifying the officer’s course of conduct. The officer shall not include any profane or false statements in the statement of justification.

“That statute doesn’t really fit,” responded Morse campaign manager Christy Le Lait, who explained that the campaign has the information to back up their statements about Herpin.

“Gessler basically decided what we could put in our statement,” said Le Lait, “It’s unfair, to say the least, to give voters the wrong information when they read the ballot.”

Le Lait adds that the language the Secretary included on the ballot written by the recall supporters falsely accuses Morse of limiting testimony during Senate committee testimony on the gun laws. She said that opponents and supporters of the gun bills received equal time to testify and that it was the same amount of time allotted for testimony during similarly high-profile debates.

The Morse assertions struck from the ballot concern Herpin’s participation last year in a spendy water tour of the state at the expense of the city’s strapped utility’s rate-payers.

Herpin’s campaign sent out a responding release stating, “The water conference John Morse references actually cost $192.26 for Bernie Herpin to participate in.” They further assert that the trip came as “… part of his official duties as a city council member to provide desperately needed water to the people of Colorado Springs.”

According to the Colorado Springs Gazette, Herpin received flack for his participation in the junket from Springs Treasurer Bob Balink at the time. This time, in the campaign’s recent release, Balink came to Herpin’s defense crediting him with overseeing the Southern Delivery System which brings water to Colorado Springs, on time and under budget.

Le Lait said the irony of Gessler deleting information about a Republican office holder’s alleged ethics lapse won’t be lost on state politics news watchers. From the release:

“The irony of making Sen. Morse delete the reference to Bernie Herpin’s taxpayer-funded junket is that Gessler’s the one person in all of state government who’s been determined to have violated state ethics laws by taking his own taxpayer-funded junket,” Le Lait said. “This is manipulation, plain and simple. The voters are being denied information that can help them make a decision.”

Gessler spent roughly $1,000 of public money on a trip to a Republican lawyers meeting and the Republican National Convention in Florida last year. The state’s Independent Ethics Commission found the spending violated ethics rules. Gessler battled the charges intensely, hiring three private-sector attorneys who charged roughly $122,000 to defend him, costs also paid by taxpayers.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • 1981: The Attempted Assassination Of President Ronald Reagan

    on March 30, 1981, President Reagan and three others were shot and wounded in an assassination attempt by John Hinckley, Jr. outside the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. Reagan's press secretary, Jim Brady, was shot in the head.

  • 1993: The Brady Handgun Violence Act

    The Brady Handgun Violence Act of 1993, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, mandated that federally licensed dealers complete comprehensive background checks on individuals before selling them a gun. The legislation was named for James Brady, who was shot during an attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan in 1981.

  • 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act

    The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1994, instituted a ban on 19 kinds of assault weapons, including Uzis and AK-47s. The crime bill also banned the possession of magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. (An exemption was made for weapons and magazines manufactured prior to the ban.)

  • 2004: Law Banning Magazines Holding More Than Ten Rounds Of Ammunition Expires

    In 2004, ten years after it first became law, Congress allowed a provision banning possession of magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition to expire through a sunset provision. Brady Campaign President Paul Helmke told HuffPost that the expiration of this provision meant that Rep. Gabby Giffords's alleged shooter was able to fire off 20-plus shots without reloading (under the former law he would have had only ten).

  • 2007: The U.S. Court of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Rules In Favor Of Dick Heller

    In 2007 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled to allow Dick Heller, a licensed District police officer, to keep a handgun in his home in Washington, D.C. Following that ruling, the defendants petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

  • 2008: The NICS Improvement Amendments Act

    Following the deadly shooting at Virginia Tech University, Congress passed legislation to require states provide data on mentally unsound individuals to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, with the aim of halting gun purchases by the mentally ill, and others prohibited from possessing firearms. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush in January of 2008.

  • 2008: Supreme Court Strikes Down D.C. Handgun Ban As Unconstitutional

    In June of 2008, the United States Supreme Court upheld the verdict of a lower court ruling the D.C. handgun ban unconstitutional in the landmark case <em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>.

  • Gabrielle Giffords And Trayvon Martin Shootings

    Gun control advocates had high hopes that reform efforts would have increased momentum in the wake of two tragic events that rocked the nation. In January of 2011, Jared Loughner opened fire at an event held by Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), killing six and injuring 13, including the congresswoman. Resulting attempts to push gun control legislation <a href="" target="_hplink">proved fruitless</a>, with neither proposal even succeeding in gaining a single GOP co-sponsor. More than a year after that shooting, Florida teenager Trayvon Martin was <a href="" target="_hplink">gunned down</a> by George Zimmerman in an event that some believed would bring increased scrutiny on the nation's Stand Your Ground laws. While there has been increasing discussion over the nature of those statutes, lawmakers were <a href="" target="_hplink">quick to concede</a> that they had little faith the event would effectively spur gun control legislation, thanks largely to the National Rifle Association's vast lobbying power. Read more <a href="" target="_hplink">here</a>:

  • Colorado Movie Theater Shooting

    In July of 2012, a heavily armed gunman <a href="" target="_hplink">opened fire on theatergoers</a> attending a midnight premiere of the final film of the latest Batman trilogy, killing 12 and wounding scores more. The suspect, James Eagan Holmes, allegedly carried out the act with a number of handguns, as well as an AR-15 assault rifle with a 100-round drum magazine. Some lawmakers used the incident, which took place in a state with some of the laxest gun control laws, to bring forth legislation designed to place increased regulations on access to such weapons, but many observers, citing previous experience, were <a href="" target="_hplink">hesitant to say</a> that they would be able to overcome the power of the National Rifle Association and Washington gun lobby.

  • Sikh Temple Shooting

    On August 5, 2012, white supremacist Wade Michael Page opened fire on a Sikhs gathered at a temple in Oak Creek, Wis., killing six and wounding four more before turning the gun on himself.