WASHINGTON -- Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) announced on Wednesday a lawsuit challenging the Internal Revenue Service's rules for certain tax-exempt nonprofit groups that have become major vehicles for political spending in the last few years.
Van Hollen, a leading advocate for campaign finance reform and the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, is bringing the case with the help of watchdog groups Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center and Public Citizen. Van Hollen v. IRS is being filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
The lawsuit challenges one specific IRS regulation covering tax-exempt nonprofits organized under section 501(c)(4) of the U.S. Tax Code. The tax code requires that these nonprofits be "exclusively" engaged in social welfare activity. But the IRS' 1959 interpretation states that 501(c)(4) nonprofits need only be "primarily" engaged in their stated social welfare activity -- a looser rule that has opened the door to significant political activity by some of these groups. The lawsuit gives as examples in the last election Crossroads GPS, founded by GOP operative Karl Rove, and Priorities USA, a 501(c)(4) affiliated with the pro-Obama super PAC Priorities USA Action.
"The law as it was written by Congress could not be more plain," Van Hollen said at a press briefing on the lawsuit. "It says that 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status is reserved for groups that are exclusively, and that's a quote, exclusively engaged in social welfare activity -- not partially, not a little bit, exclusively."
"The IRS for some 54 years has had a regulation that contradicts the plain language of the Internal Revenue Service code," added Scott Nelson of Public Citizen, who is the lead lawyer on the suit.
The lack of clear IRS guidelines setting limits on these nonprofits' political activity -- beyond the warning that it cannot be their "primary" activity -- has been interpreted by many 501(c)(4)s to mean that they can spend as much as 49 percent of their budget and time on politics. Confusion over the limits lies at the center of the recent IRS "targeting" controversy, in which IRS agents were asked to be on the lookout for groups registering with certain names like "tea party" and "progressive" that might be more political than allowed under the vague regulations.
"The root of the problem is that the IRS is currently in the business of trying to determine whether the primary purpose of an organization seeking 501(c)(4) status is social welfare or whether their primary purpose is political," Van Hollen said.
Mega-donors like 501(c)(4) nonprofits because not only are they tax-exempt, but they are not required to disclose the sources of their funding. Since the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010 lifted some campaign finance restrictions, the amount of political activity by these nonprofits has exploded. According to a previous Huffington Post review, nondisclosing nonprofits spent in excess of $400 million on direct campaign and campaign-related issue advertising in the 2012 election.
"It's time for the District Court to order the IRS to close this 'dark money' loophole," Campaign Legal Center attorney Paul S. Ryan said.
Democracy 21 and the Campaign Legal Center had previously petitioned the IRS to review this and related regulations following the surge in campaign spending by 501(c)(4) nonprofits and 501(c)(6) trade associations.
"The IRS never acted on our petition," Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer said.
In 2012, Van Hollen challenged a Federal Election Commission regulation that gutted one disclosure requirement for politically active nonprofits enacted in the 2002 McCain-Feingold law. After the U.S. District Court sided with the congressman, an appeals court overturned that victory and sent the case back to the FEC to state whether it intended to answer issues raised by the court rulings. The FEC, hamstrung by ideological division, refused to revise the rule or address the issues.
Van Hollen earlier announced his intention to file this lawsuit against the IRS at a June conference on money and politics held by the Brennan Center for Justice.
Also on HuffPost:
Democratic Governors Association: $3.6 Million
The Democratic Governors Association gave $3.6 million to its own super PAC, DGA Action, in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. The group spends large sums on advertising and ground support for Democratic gubernatorial candidates across the country. Democrats are hoping to take back the Virginia governorship in 2013 and, going forward, are aiming to win many of the gubernatorial seats they lost in the 2010 tea party wave. <em>Pictured: DGA Chairman Gov. Peter Shumlin (D-Vt.)</em>
Michael Bloomberg: $2.25 Million
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has already pumped $2.15 million into Independence USA PAC, his own personal super PAC, and gave $100,000 to Americans for Responsible Solutions, the pro-gun control super PAC founded by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Independence USA PAC spent the entirety of Bloomberg's money on a special Democratic primary in Illinois' 2nd Congressional District. The group entered the race to oppose both former Rep. Deborah Halvorsen and state Sen. Toi Hutchinson because of their opposition to gun control legislation. The super PAC ultimately backed the eventual winner, Robin Kelly.
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners: $1.9 Million
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners gave $1.9 million to Working for Working Americans, a pro-labor super PAC. The 130-year-old union is funded by dues contributions made by its half-million members.
AFL-CIO: $1.8 Million
The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions with more than 11 million members, gave $1.8 million to its Workers' Voice super PAC during the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. <em>Pictured: AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka</em>
Thomas Steyer: $1.75 Million
Thomas Steyer, head of the San Francisco-based hedge fund Farallon Capital, gave $1.75 million to a super PAC he founded to help elect more lawmakers who support action on climate change. CE Action Committee (formerly NextGen Committee) spent $1 million of that money to support the election of Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in a special election. Steyer told Bloomberg Businessweek that he wants to push climate change into election conversations in 2014 and beyond. "If you look at the 2012 campaign, climate change was like incest -- something you couldn't talk about in polite company," he said. Steyer was not a super PAC donor in the 2012 election.
John Jordan: $1.7 Million
California vintner Thomas John Jordan gave $1.7 million to Americans for Progressive Action, a super PAC that supported Republican candidate Gabriel Gomez in the Massachusetts special Senate election in 2013. Gomez lost the race to Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). Jordan told The Wall Street Journal, "I just couldn't sit by and watch and leave [Gomez] alone while the establishment Republican groups decided to sit on their hands and just leave him on the beach. I just couldn't do that." <em>Pictured: Former Massachusetts Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez</em>
AFSCME: $1.5 Million
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees has given $1,546,250 to super PACs in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. The group contributed $1 million to the AFL-CIO's Workers' Voice super PAC, $350,000 to Senate Majority PAC, $150,000 to House Majority PAC, $100,000 to American Bridge 21st Century, $25,000 to Women Vote!, $16,250 to Patriot Majority PAC and $5,000 to Battleground Texas. <em>Pictured: AFSCME Secretary-General Lee Saunders</em>
Bob Perry: $1.1 Million
Before his death in April 2013, GOP mega-donor Bob Perry gave $1.1 million to super PACs, including $1 million to Senate Conservatives Action, a group aligned with former senator and current Heritage Foundation president Jim DeMint, and $100,000 to Kentuckians for Strong Leadership, a pro-Mitch McConnell super PAC. Perry was one of the biggest donors to Republican independent groups over the last decade. He was a major funder of the 2004 Swift Boat Veterans for Truth effort and was the third biggest donor to super PACs in the 2012 election, giving $23.45 million.
Jonathan Soros: $1 Million
Jonathan Soros, investor and son of the billionaire investor and Democratic donor George Soros, gave $1,005,000 to the super PAC he helped found, Friends of Democracy. The group works to enact campaign finance reform at the state and federal levels, in part by electing or defeating candidates based on their positions on campaign finance reform. Friends of Democracy spent most of its money in the first six months of 2013 to help fund a massive effort to enact reform legislation in New York state. Despite support from the majority of citizens and nearly every Democratic leader in the state, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the legislation died in the state Senate.
Harold Simmons: $1 Million
Texas industrialist Harold Simmons, through his company Contran Corporation, gave $1 million to American Crossroads, the Republican super PAC co-founded by Karl Rove. Simmons, a longtime GOP contributor, was the second biggest super PAC donor in the 2012 election cycle.
Cooperative of American Physicians: $844,510
The Cooperative of American Physicians, a membership organization for California doctors to purchase medical liability insurance, gave $844,510 to its own super PAC. The latter group supports candidates who back liability insurance reform, specifically the institution of caps on lawsuit damages, and other legislation to make it more difficult to sue doctors. In the 2012 election, the super PAC backed both Republican and Democratic candidates.
Massachusetts Teachers Association: $700,000
The Massachusetts Teachers Association gave $700,000 to Senate Majority PAC in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. The organization's contributions helped to fund independent expenditures to support the successful Senate special election campaign of Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). <em>Pictured: Massachusetts Teachers Association members rally in support of unionized teachers in Wisconsin.</em>
National Education Association: $671,250
The National Education Association gave $671,250 to super PACs in the first six months of 2013. The union contributed $300,000 to its own super PAC, NEA Advocacy Fund; $150,000 to DGA Action; $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC; $100,000 to American Bridge 21st Century; $16,250 to Patriot Majority PAC; and $5,000 to House Majority PAC.
Richard Uihlein: $630,000
Richard Uihlein, the CEO of U-Line Corporation, gave $630,000 to conservative super PACs in the first half of 2013. He contributed $280,000 to Liberty Principles PAC, $250,000 to Club for Growth Action and $100,000 to Senate Conservatives Action.
Steve Mostyn: $600,000
Texas trial lawyer and Democratic donor Steve Mostyn, through his Mostyn Law Firm, gave $600,000 to super PACs in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. Mostyn, who emerged as a major national donor in the 2012 election, gave $250,000 to Americans for Responsible Solutions, $250,000 to Battleground Texas and $100,000 to House Majority PAC.
American Bridge 21st Century/Foundation: $592,627
The Democratic super PAC American Bridge 21st Century and its nonprofit arm, American Bridge 21st Century Foundation, combined to give $592,627 to super PACs in 2013. The majority of this money -- $557,479 -- was in form of staff payments by the nonprofit to the super PAC. The super PAC also gave $35,000 to Senate Majority PAC and $148 to the Jewish Council for Education and Research.
Unite Here: $500,000
Unite Here, a diverse labor union representing workers in the airport, food service, gaming, hotel, textile and laundry industries, has contributed $500,000 to the AFL-CIO's Workers' Voices PAC in 2013. <em>Pictured: Unite Here hotel strike in West Hollywood, Calif., in 2005</em>
Marc Benioff: $500,000
Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff gave $500,000 to Americans for Responsible Solutions, the pro-gun control super PAC founded by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and her husband, former NASA astronaut Mark Kelly. Benioff was a major fundraiser in Silicon Valley for President Barack Obama's reelection campaign. This is his first super PAC contribution.
George Marcus: $500,000
California real estate investor George Marcus gave $500,000 to super PACs in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. He contributed $250,000 to House Majority PAC and $250,000 to Senate Majority PAC. Marcus chipped in more than $500,000 to super PACs in the 2012 election.
Sean Parker: $500,000
Facebook billionaire and Napster co-founder Sean Parker gave $500,000 to super PACs in the first six months of the 2014 election cycle. He contributed $250,000 to Americans for Responsible Solutions and $250,000 to Friends of Democracy. These are Parker's first super PAC contributions and could indicate the entrance of a new Democratic-leaning billionaire into the political arena.