Huffpost Religion

Atheist Pledge Of Allegiance Case Goes To Massachusetts' Supreme Court

Posted: Updated:

(RNS) Massachusetts’ highest court on Wednesday (Sept. 4) will consider whether the daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance is a violation of students’ rights.

Since the addition of the phrase “under God” in 1954, the pledge has been challenged repeatedly as a violation of the separation of church and state. In 2004, one case reached the Supreme Court, but ultimately failed, as have all previous challenges.

But the current case before the state’s Supreme Judicial Court, Doe v. Acton-Boxborough Regional School District, is different because lawyers for the plaintiffs, an anonymous atheist couple, won’t be arguing about federal law but rather that the compulsory recitation of the pledge violates the state’s equal rights laws. They argue that the daily recitation of the pledge is a violation of their guarantee of equal protection under those laws.

This change of tack in pledge challenges is modeled on a successful precedent laid down in the same court on gay marriage. In 2003, Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court ruled 4-3 in favor of a same-sex couple seeking the right to marry under the state’s equal rights laws. Their win led to similar successful challenges in other state courts — something that could happen here if judges rule for the plaintiffs.

“You would then see a rash of state court lawsuits challenging the pledge all over the country,” said Eric Rassbach, deputy general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is arguing for the defendants. “A win for us would completely avoid that unnecessary harm. And it would affirm that it is not discriminatory to have the words ‘under God’ in the pledge.”

“There is disagreement, but there is not discrimination,” Rassbach continued. “That is what is at the heart of this — disagreement about what the government should do.”

The plaintiffs are represented by the American Humanist Association, a national advocacy group for humanists and other secularists. David Niose, the plaintiffs’ attorney and president of the AHA, could not be reached for comment.

The defendants won the first round in June 2012 when a lower court judge ruled that daily recitation of the pledge did not violate the Massachusetts Constitution, the school district’s anti-discrimination policy or state law. The upcoming oral arguments address an appeal of that decision.

Also on The Huffington Post

Top 10 Most and Least Religious States
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Mass. Supreme Court to hear challenge to Pledge of Allegiance ...

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Will Soon Decide the ...

Massachusetts Supreme Court Will Hear Case to Stop Reciting the ...

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court To Hear Case Against ...

Mass. Supreme Court Sets Oral Arguments for 'Under God' Lawsuit

Mass. Supreme Court to Hear Suit Against 'Under God' in Pledge

Mass. Supreme Court to hear case against'under God' in Pledge of ...

Superior Court judge affirms use of Pledge of Allegiance 'under God ...

Massachusetts court rejects challenge to 'Under God' in Pledge of ...

The Pledge of Allegiance Cases (2000-current) -

Mass. Supreme Court to hear challenge to Pledge of Allegiance

Mass. Supreme Court Sets Oral Arguments for 'Under God' Lawsuit